Any act which is committed by a juvenile that would also be considered a crime if it were committed by an adult is called a "Delinquent-Act."
The "Juvenile-Delinquency" is defined as a pattern of illegal behavior by individuals who are not yet considered adults, usually under the age of 18 in the United States.
In most cases, juvenile delinquents are subject to a separate legal system that focuses on rehabilitation rather than punishment, although in some cases, more serious offenses may result in juvenile offenders being tried as adults in the criminal justice system.
The goal of the juvenile justice system is to help young-offenders learn from their mistakes, take responsibility for their actions, and develop the skills and knowledge they need to make positive changes in their lives.
Learn more about Juveniles here
https://brainly.com/question/30921060
#SPJ4
When we talk about the juvenile justice system, we often make it sound like there is one uniform system, but the truth is that there are __ separate systems.
When we discuss the juvenile justice system, we frequently give the impression that there is a single, consistent system, yet there are really 50 different systems.
About a century ago, the United States created a separate juvenile justice system with the intention of keeping young offenders out of the hands of the criminal justice system and promoting rehabilitation tailored to the needs of each individual juvenile.
The goal of juvenile justice in the United States is to assist children who come into contact with law enforcement and are accused of breaching the law. It is made up of state and municipal court-based systems. Law enforcement, prosecutors, courts, and corrections—the main pillars of the juvenile justice system—are all highlighted.
Learn more about juvenile Visit: brainly.com/question/25821714
#SPJ4
Bella owns a farm in Colorado. Doyle drives his sport utility vehicle Doyle drives his sport utility vehicle off a highway and onto Bella's land. Doyle commits trespass if he
a. does not have Bella's permission to drive on the property
b. drives onto the property for recreational purposes
c. harms the property in a material way
d. harms the property in any way
Doyle commits trespass if he does not have Bella's permission to drive on the property.
Doyle drove his SUV onto Bella's property without her consent, which constitutes a trespass, which is an intentional tort that occurs when someone enters or remains on another person's property without that person's consent or legal right to do so. Trespassing is the practice of entering or lingering on another person's property without that person's consent or legal authorization.
It is regarded as a crime, which denotes that the conduct was done with the purpose of doing so, even if no harm or damage was meant to result. Whether Doyle entered or remained on Bella's property for recreational purposes or damaged it in any way is irrelevant to whether or not Doyle committed trespass. All that matters is that he did not have Bella's permission.
To learn more about trespass, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/15363613
#SPJ4
grievance procedures in a union contract are preferable to other methods of resolving workplace disputes because
Grievance procedures in a union contract are preferable to other methods of resolving workplace disputes because they provide a structured and organized process for addressing concerns.
This method allows for the following advantages:
1. Fairness: Grievance procedures ensure that every employee's concerns are treated with equal importance and assessed on a consistent basis. This helps to create a fair and impartial environment in the workplace.
2. Clear communication: By having a well-defined procedure in place, employees are aware of the steps they need to take to raise their concerns, and employers know how to handle such issues.
3. Timeliness: Grievance procedures often have a specific timeframe for resolving disputes, which encourages timely resolutions and helps prevent disputes from escalating.
4. Impartiality: Grievance procedures often involve an impartial third party, such as a union representative or mediator, who can help ensure that both sides of the dispute are heard and considered fairly.
5. Confidentiality: The process of handling grievances is usually confidential, which protects employees from potential retaliation and allows them to raise concerns without fear.
6. Legal protection: Grievance procedures outlined in a union contract help protect both the employees and the employer by adhering to applicable labor laws, reducing the risk of legal action.
7. Resolution focus: By following a well-established process, grievance procedures encourage problem-solving and resolution, rather than focusing on blame or punishment.
In summary, grievance procedures in a union contract are preferable to other methods of resolving workplace disputes due to their fairness, clear communication, timeliness, impartiality, confidentiality, legal protection, and resolution-focused approach.
To know more about Grievance procedures refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30049203#
#SPJ11
Grievance procedures in a union contract are preferable to other methods of resolving workplace disputes because they provide a clear and structured process for addressing employee complaints.
With content-loaded grievance procedures, employees have a specific set of steps to follow and can feel confident that their concerns will be heard and addressed fairly. Additionally, union contracts often include provisions for impartial third-party arbitration, which can help ensure that disputes are resolved objectively and without bias. Overall, having grievance procedures in a union contract can help promote a more positive and productive work environment, as employees know that their voices are being heard and their rights are being protected.
Know more about Grievance procedures here:
https://brainly.com/question/30049203
#SPJ11
What are the formal and informal powers of the presidency?
The formal powers of the presidency are outlined in the United States Constitution and include the power to veto legislation, serve as commander-in-chief of the military, appoint judges and executive officials, negotiate treaties, and grant pardons.
Informal powers, on the other hand, are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution but are derived from the president's status as the leader of the executive branch and head of state.
These powers include the ability to shape the national agenda through speeches and public appearances, build relationships with foreign leaders, and exert influence over members of Congress and the media.
The extent of these powers can vary depending on the president's leadership style and the political climate of the time.
For more such questions on legislation, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ11
When government has a broad enough sanction by the people in order to stay in power without resorting to tyranny, the government is said to be _______.A. DemocraticB. ReconstitutedC. LegitimateD. Virtuous
When the "government" has broad enough sanction by people in order to stay in power without resorting to tyranny, then government is said to be Legitimate, the correct option is (c).
The Legitimacy is an important concept in political science which refers to belief that a government has right to rule or govern.
In other words, a legitimate government is one that is recognized as having authority to make decisions and enforce laws. This recognition is generally based on the acceptance of government's authority by people it governs.
There are several factors that contribute to a government's legitimacy.
One important factor is the government's adherence to the "rule-of-law", which means that the government follows established laws and procedures in its decision-making and enforcement activities.
Therefore, Option(c) is correct.
Learn more about Government here
https://brainly.com/question/17330779
#SPJ4
john bought a dishwasher from local appliance store. what type of law governs the contract between john and local?
Answer would be that the contract between John and the local appliance store is governed by contract law. Contract law is a legal field that deals with agreements and obligations between parties that are legally binding.
Contract law includes the elements of offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention to create legal relations. When John purchased the dishwasher from the local appliance store, there was an offer made by the store to sell the dishwasher and an acceptance by John to buy it. Consideration refers to the exchange of something of value, such as money, between the parties. The intention to create legal relations means that both parties intended for the agreement to be legally binding.
If there are any disputes or breaches of the contract between John and the local appliance store, contract law would be used to resolve them. This could involve remedies such as damages or specific performance, which requires one party to fulfill their contractual obligations.
To learn more about contract law visit:
brainly.com/question/14316157
#SPJ11
At what stage of the formal CJ process does the defendant enter a plea of guilty or not guilty?A). arraignment B). bail hearingC). preliminary hearingD). criminal trial
Answer:
Arraignment
What best explanation best justifies the inclusion of the separation of powers and checks and balances doctrines in the constitution
The separation of powers and checks and balances theories were incorporated into the constitution because they are crucial to controlling governmental authority and preventing abuse of it.
The division of governmental authority into distinct branches, such as the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, each with their own specific responsibilities and powers, is referred to as the separation of powers.
This helps keep branches from growing too strong and misusing their authority.
Contrarily, a system of checks and balances makes sure that each branch of government has some influence over the others, preventing any one branch from becoming overly powerful.
For such more question on authority
https://brainly.com/question/1742785
#SPJ11
What aspect of the Constitution was brought up as the central issue regarding the health care reform law?
The central issue regarding the health care reform law and the Constitution was the individual mandate. The mandate required individuals to purchase health insurance or face a penalty.
Opponents argued that Congress did not have the authority under the Commerce Clause to require individuals to purchase a product. The case eventually reached the Supreme Court in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. In a 5-4 decision, the Court upheld the individual mandate as a valid exercise of Congress's taxing power. This decision set a precedent for the scope of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause and the limits of the federal government's authority in regulating individual behavior.
For more such questions on insurance , click on:
https://brainly.com/question/28562565
#SPJ11
In the most common form of city government, what functions as the executive branch?
In the most common form of city government, known as the council-manager form of government, the executive branch is composed of a mayor and a city manager.
The mayor is elected by the people and is responsible for representing the interests of the city and its citizens. The mayor is the political head of the city, presiding over city council meetings, representing the city at public events, and serving as a spokesperson for the city.
The city manager is chosen by the city council and is the city's chief executive officer. The city manager is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the city, including overseeing the city budget, managing departments and personnel, and implementing the policies of the city council.
The city manager is also responsible for ensuring that the municipality meets its legal and financial obligations. The city manager and mayor often work together to ensure that the city is functioning efficiently and effectively.
Know more about council-manager here
https://brainly.com/question/26965249#
#SPJ11
At "3 WAY", "4 WAY", and an "ALL WAY" stop sign, the driver reaching the intersection first, goes first, after making a complete stop. (T/F)
The statement "at "3 WAY", "4 WAY", and an "ALL WAY" stop sign, the driver reaching the intersection first, goes first, after making a complete stop" is true because he has the right of way.
The correct answer is true.
At intersections controlled by stop signs, the driver approaching the intersection is required to come to a complete stop at the stop line or before entering the crosswalk or the intersection itself. The purpose of the stop sign is to ensure safety and prevent collisions at intersections.
Drivers need to come to a complete stop at the stop sign and look in all directions before proceeding to ensure safety. This is because other vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians may be crossing the intersection, and it is the driver's responsibility to ensure they are not putting themselves or others in danger.
To know more about right of way, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27740891
#SPJ4
In 2010, what percent of 12th graders reported using drugs in the past year?A). 75B). 90C). 38D). 50
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the annual national survey that tracks drug use among adolescents in the United States found that 38 percent of 12th graders reported using drugs in the past year in 2010.
This figure includes the use of illicit drugs such as marijuana, hallucinogens, inhalants, and non-medical use of prescription drugs. The survey also found that 8.5 percent of high school seniors reported using illicit drugs other than marijuana in the past month.
It is important to note that the overall rate of drug use among high school seniors has decreased significantly since 2010. The National Survey on Drug Use and Health found that the rate of illicit drug use among 12th graders in 2018 was 33.4 percent, down from 38 percent in 2010.
This decline is thought to be due to an increased awareness of the dangers of drug use, more stringent policies and laws, and increased access to drug prevention and treatment resources.
Know more about illicit drugs here
https://brainly.com/question/9743065#
#SPJ11
Elle buys a new textbook for $100 and a used car for $5,000, and signs a one-year lease for an apartment for $1,000 monthly rent to start at the beginning of the next month. The Statute of Fraud covers:
a. the apartment lease, and the textbook and car purchases
b. the apartment lease and the car purchase only
c. the apartment lease only
d. the textbook and car purchase only
The statue of fraud covers the apartment lease only if Elle buys a new textbook for $100 and a used car for $5,000, and signs a one-year lease for an apartment for $1,000 monthly rent to start at the beginning of the next month.
Hence, the correct option is c.
The Statute of Frauds is a law that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing in order to be legally enforceable. In this case, the statute of frauds would apply to the lease agreement for the apartment, but not to the purchase of the textbook or the used car.
The lease agreement for the apartment is a contract that involves the transfer of an interest in real property (the right to use the apartment) for a term of more than one year, and as such, is required to be in writing under the Statute of Frauds. The purchase of the textbook and the used car, on the other hand, do not involve an interest in real property and are not subject to the Statute of Frauds.
Hence, the correct option is c.
To know more about apartment lease here
https://brainly.com/question/17184728
#SPJ4
Which of the following most strongly contributes to Texas's political culture that minimizes the value of political participation?
a. Strong connections to the traditional South
b. Links to the Puritan culture
c. A pervasive spirit of egalitarianism
d. A moralistic political culture
e. All of these are correct.
The political climate in Texas is characterised by a widespread egalitarianism that downplays the importance of political engagement. Option C is Correct.
It discourages people from engaging in politics. How far in advance of an election must you register in Texas in order to be able to vote? involvement by the federal government. Individualistic and traditional best describes the political culture of Texas. Texas is a low-tax state where big government programmes are disliked.
Business has a significant impact on how the state defines its political culture. The most fundamental and typical form of political engagement is casting a ballot in elections. The individualistic and traditionalistic subcultures predominate in Texas' political culture. The early inhabitants of the state's autonomous culture sought out their own opportunities. Option C is Correct.
Learn more about Texas Visit: brainly.com/question/25723904
#SPJ4
The principle of a necessity dictates that every alternative should be exhausted before an individual resorts to deadly force, and that an individual should be required to _________
a) stand his or her ground
b) withdraw
c) retreat to the wall
d) none of the above
The principle of a necessity dictates that every alternative should be exhausted before an individual resorts to deadly force, and that an individual should be required to withdraw. Option B
The principle of necessity is an essential aspect of self-defense laws, and it dictates that an individual should only use deadly force when it is absolutely necessary to protect themselves from imminent harm. The principle of necessity also states that every alternative should be exhausted before an individual resorts to deadly force.
In this context, the answer to the question is that an individual should be required to withdraw before using deadly force. This means that the person should try to remove themselves from the situation as safely as possible before resorting to the use of deadly force.
Standing their ground or retreating to a wall are not ideal options because they do not necessarily involve trying to remove oneself from the situation. Standing their ground could result in escalating the situation and lead to more violence, while retreating to a wall could leave the person trapped and unable to defend themselves effectively.
Therefore, the principle of necessity requires that an individual should try to withdraw from the situation as safely as possible before using deadly force. This principle is crucial to ensure that the use of deadly force is only used as a last resort and is necessary to protect oneself from harm. Option B is correct.
For more such questions on dictates visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30037726
#SPJ11
the NIMS management characteristic of chain of command and unity of command means that
The NIMS management characteristic of chain of command and unity of command means that from the highest levels of the organization all the way down to the lowest there is a distinct and unbroken line of authority.
Everyone in the organization is aware of their immediate supervisor and who they report to thanks to the chain of command. Each employee in the company only reports to one direct supervisor. according to the concept of unity of command.
This system aids in making quick, effective decisions while ensuring that everyone is working toward the same goals and objectives. For efficient communication, coordination and decision making during emergencies, a clear chain of command and unity of command are essential.
Learn more about unity of command at:
brainly.com/question/30641469
#SPJ1
contracts made by a minor: group of answer choices a. may be enforced by a court. b. may be disaffirmed by the minor. c. are only valid when co-signed by an adult. d. all of the above.
When it comes to contracts made by a minor, the general rule is that they are voidable by the minor. Option B This means that the minor has the option to disaffirm the contract and walk away from it without any legal repercussions.
However, there are some exceptions to this rule. In certain situations, contracts made by a minor may be enforced by a court. For example, if a minor enters into a contract for necessities like food, clothing, or shelter, the court may enforce the contract because it is in the best interest of the minor.
Another exception is when a contract is co-signed by an adult. In this situation, the contract may be considered valid and enforceable, even though a minor is involved. This is because the adult who co-signed the contract is assuming responsibility for the minor's obligations under the contract.
Therefore, the correct answer to the question is d) all of the above. Contracts made by a minor may be enforced by a court in certain situations, may be disaffirmed by the minor, or may be considered valid and enforceable if co-signed by an adult. It is important to understand these rules when dealing with contracts involving minors, as they can have significant legal implications. Option B is correct.
Fort more such questions on legal repercussions visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28340480
#SPJ11
____refers to the process of the government choosing which specific policy instruments will be used to address a public problem.A. Policy formulationB. Problem analysisC. Parallel situation analysisD. Quantitative data
Policy formulation refers to the process of the government choosing which specific policy instruments will be used to address a public problem.
The correct option is A.
In order to address the issues that have been placed on the policy agenda, effective and acceptable action plans must be developed and this process is called policy formulation.
The creation of a solution to society's issues is the primary goal of the public policy-making process.
These solutions should involve concrete, sustainable, attainable, and time-limited actions in addition to being operational and able to direct numerous players involved in various stages of public policy.
Policy formulation comes before policymaking in conventional public policy models. In order to address an issue and decrease the number of potential solutions required to prepare the final policy decision, this step entails identifying and/or developing a set of policy alternatives.
The correct option is A.
To know more about policy formulation, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28024313
#SPJ4
In order to conduct a consent search of a person, an officer must have: A. probable cause to believe the suspect has seizable items on his/her person.B. a valid warrant C. reasonable suspicion to make a stop D. vouluntary consent to search
Answer:
A is the correct answer here.
Explanation:
True or False: Crime rates appear to be increasing around the world as they decline in the U.S
False. Crime rates in the US have been declining since the early 1990s and the trend is continuing.
This decline is largely attributed to economic growth, increased use of technology for security, and improved policing strategies. Globally, crime rates vary widely depending on the region, however, there does not appear to be a trend of increasing crime rates on a global level.
In some European countries, such as France and the UK, crime rates have seen an increase in recent years. However, in other regions, such as Latin America, crime rates have declined or remained stable.
Therefore, there is no clear evidence to suggest that crime rates across the world are increasing.
Know more about economic growth here
https://brainly.com/question/11679822#
#SPJ11
Why does Hamilton argue that the goverment should have a unified execuitve?
Hamilton saw a unified executive as a crucial component of a strong and effective government, capable of protecting individual liberties and promoting the common good.
Alexander Hamilton, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, argued in favor of a unified executive branch of government in the Federalist Papers, a collection of essays he co-authored with James Madison and John Jay. Hamilton believed that a strong and unified executive was necessary for effective governance and the protection of individual liberties.
Hamilton argued that a divided executive, with power split between multiple individuals or branches, would result in ineffective decision-making, gridlock, and potentially even tyranny. He believed that a single executive, with clear authority and accountability, would be better equipped to make decisions quickly and effectively, especially in times of crisis.
Furthermore, Hamilton believed that a unified executive could more effectively defend individual liberties by preventing the consolidation of power in any one branch or individual. He argued that a system of checks and balances, including a strong executive branch, would safeguard against any potential abuse of power and maintain a balance of power among the different branches of government.
To learn more about Alexander Hamilton
https://brainly.com/question/31006348
#SPJ4
What happens when the house and the senate versions of a bill differ after being passed by the respective bodies...
When the House and Senate versions of a bill differ after being passed by their respective bodies, the bill goes to a conference committee.
The correct answer is bill goes to a conference committee.
The conference committee comprises members from the House and Senate who work together to resolve differences between the two bill versions. The conference committee will typically meet to discuss the differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill and try to agree on a final version. The committee may change the bill or recommend compromises that satisfy the House and Senate.
Once the conference committee has reached an agreement, the bill's final version is sent back to both the House and Senate for a final vote. If both the House and Senate approve the bill's final version, it is then sent to the President for signature. If the President signs the bill, it becomes law.
To know more about Bill, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15266436
#SPJ4
What are the consequences of a driver under the age of 21 who refuse to take a test to determine BAL.What is this law called
If a driver under the age of 21 refuses to take a test to determine their Blood Alcohol Level (BAL), they may face legal consequences under the "Implied Consent Law."
This means that by accepting a driver's license, the driver has given their implied consent to submit to a chemical test if requested by a law enforcement officer. If a driver under the age of 21 refuses to take a test to determine their blood alcohol level (BAL), they will face consequences such as the immediate suspension of their driver's license for a certain period of time, depending on the state's laws.
In addition, they may also face fines and/or community service. It's important to note that refusing to take a chemical test can also be used as evidence against the driver in court if they are charged with a DUI (driving under the influence) or DWI (driving while intoxicated) offense.
To know more about Blood Alcohol Level (BAL), click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10785159
#SPJ11
You should never leave children and pets unattended in a vehicle? (T/F)
The statement " You should never leave children and pets unattended in a vehicle" is true because It is never safe to leave children and pets unattended in a vehicle, regardless of the weather or other circumstances.
The correct answer is true.
Temperatures inside a vehicle can quickly rise to dangerous levels, even on a mild day, leading to heatstroke, dehydration, and other serious health issues. In addition to the risk of heatstroke, leaving children and pets unattended in a vehicle can also put them at risk of theft, injury from playing with the car's controls, and other dangers.
It is always essential to ensure that children and pets are correctly supervised and never left alone in a vehicle, even for a short period. If you see a child or pet left unattended in a vehicle, you should take action by alerting authorities, such as calling 911 or notifying local law enforcement.
To know more about pets, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27031409
#SPJ4
True or False: the creation of the chicago crime commission in 1919 was the first time the work of the criminal justice system was recognized.
False. The creation of the Chicago Crime Commission in 1919 was not the first time the work of the criminal justice system was recognized.
The creation of the Chicago Crime Commission in 1919 was not the first time the work of the criminal justice system was recognized. While the commission was an important development in addressing organized crime, the criminal justice system had been recognized and functioning long before this event. The Chicago Crime Commission is a business-led, non-partisan civic watchdog group with the mission of educating the public about the dangers posed by organized crime, particularly street gangs, organized crime, and the tools they use: drugs, weapons, public defilement, tax evasion, fraud, and betting, established in 1919. The Chicago Crime Commission is a crucial source of information for the general public, politicians, prosecutors, the judicial system, the police, and politicians. Directing examination and giving examination on wrongdoing issues, working in those organizations related to coordinated crime; and. providing a comprehensive library on organized crime.
learn more about the Chicago crime commission here
https://brainly.com/question/29514717
#SPJ11
CH.7 // The Fourth Amendment:A. applies only to criminal casesB. protects just those in criminal casesC. limits the right to search to the gathering and use of evidence in criminal casesD. includes searches which go beyond the needs of criminal law enforcement
The "4th-Amend-ment" of "US-Constitution" : (d) includes searches which go beyond needs of criminal-law enforcement.
The "4th-Amendment" of "US-Constitution" protect it's indi-viduals from 'un-reasonable-searches" and seizures by government. It applies to all individuals, regardless of whether they are involved in criminal cases or not.
The 4th Amendment sets limits on the power of the government to search and seize individuals, their homes, and their property. It applies to all searches and seizures by the government, not just those related to criminal cases.
This Amendment prohibits the un-reasonable searches and seizures, which includes searches and seizures that go beyond the needs of criminal law enforcement. This means that searches and seizures that are motivated by reasons other than law enforcement, such as harassment or punishment, are prohibited by the Fourth Amendment.
Therefore, the correct option is (d).
Learn more about Amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/28246295
#SPJ4
The given question is incomplete, the complete question is
The Fourth Amendment :
(a) applies only to criminal cases
(b) protects just those in criminal cases
(c) limits the right to search to the gathering and use of evidence in criminal cases
(d) includes searches which go beyond the needs of criminal law enforcement
Superb Toolmakers, Inc contracts to sell its assets to True Hardware Corporation. Before either party has performed, rescission of this contract requires a. a novation. b. an accord and satisfaction. c. a mutual agreement to rescind. d. a settlement agreement.
If "Superb-Toolmakers Inc." contracts to sell its assets to "True-Hardware Corporation", So before either-party has performed, the "rescission" of this contract requires (c) mutual agreement to rescind.
The "Rescission" is defined as a remedy which allows the parties to a contract to cancel or undo the contract as if it had never been made.
A "mutual-agreement" to rescind is simplest way to rescind a contract, where both parties agree to cancel the contract and return to the way things were before the contract was made.
Whereas, Novation, is a process by which one party to a contract is replaced by a new party.
An accord and satisfaction is a legal agreement to settle a disputed claim, where the parties agree to compromise and settle their differences.
A settlement agreement is an agreement that resolves a dispute between parties, usually by providing compensation or other forms of relief.
Therefore, the correct option is (c).
Learn more about Contract here
https://brainly.com/question/29556649
#SPJ4
Analyze and evaluate the importance and efforts of the Confederate States in gaining international support during the Civil War.
Thesis:
During the Civil War, the Confederate States of America made significant efforts to gain international support in their struggle against the Union. Despite their efforts, the Confederacy ultimately failed to secure sufficient support from foreign nations.
The reasons for this include the Union's effective diplomatic efforts, the Confederacy's lack of resources and legitimacy, and the international community's opposition to slavery. In the end, the Confederacy was left isolated and unable to win the war, resulting in their defeat and the end of the Civil War. The importance of international support for the Confederacy cannot be overstated, as it could have potentially tipped the scales in their favor and altered the course of the war.
However, their efforts were ultimately insufficient, and the Union's victory was ensured. Therefore, while the Confederacy's attempts to gain international support were significant, they were ultimately unsuccessful and did not play a decisive role in the outcome of the war.
For more such questions on secure, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30039274
#SPJ11
In relation to Edie's solicitation of investors in a nonexistent business, she is charged with "mail fraud." This requires, among other things,
a. claiming that an item is "in the mail" when it is not.
b. deceiving postal authorities as to the content of an item of mail.
c. depositing items in the postal system without proper postage.
d. mailing or causing someone else to mail a writing.
If Edie is charged for "mail-fraud", then this requires, among other things : (d) mailing or causing someone else to mail a writing.
In relation to Edie's solicitation of investors in a nonexistent business, if she used the mail to defraud her victims, she could be charged with mail fraud.
The "Mail-Fraud" is a federal crime that involves the use of the mail to carry out a scheme to defraud someone.
To be charged with mail fraud, the prosecution must show that the defendant used the mail to carry out a scheme to defraud someone, and that the defendant acted with intent to defraud. The use of mail must have been a material part of the scheme.
In this case, if Edie used the mail to solicit investments in a nonexistent business, and she did so with the intent to defraud her victims, she could be charged with mail fraud.
Therefore, the correct option is (d).
Learn more about Mail Fraud here
https://brainly.com/question/30654639
#SPJ4
Most cases demand that arrest warrants identify the person to be arrested:A. With absolute certaintyB. In sufficient detail so that it leaves nothing to the discretion of the arresting officerC. With reasonable certaintyD. By name
Most cases demand that arrest warrants identify the person to be arrested with sufficient detail so that it leaves nothing to the discretion of the arresting officer. B
An arrest warrant is a legal document that authorizes law enforcement officers to make an arrest of a specific person or persons who are suspected of committing a crime.
The warrant must provide sufficient information to identify the person to be arrested, including their name, physical description, and any other relevant identifying information.
The warrant must provide enough information to identify the person to be arrested with reasonable certainty, it is not always necessary to identify the person with absolute certainty or by name.
In some cases, a physical description or other identifying information may be sufficient to enable the arresting officer to identify the person to be arrested.
The warrant must provide enough detail to minimize the risk of mistaken identity or other errors in the arrest process.
For similar questions on Identify
https://brainly.com/question/29506010
#SPJ11