Effective policing appears to depend mainly on

Making decisions according to the law of criminal procedure as outlined in the Constitution, judicial opinions, laws and other written sources is called "Formal decision making". So, option A is the correct answer.

Formal decision making is a structured and rule-bound process of making decisions according to established legal requirements and procedures. In criminal justice, formal decision making ensures that the rights of defendants are protected, and that law enforcement officials and courts operate within the bounds of the law.

This involves following a set of predetermined steps to ensure that criminal defendants receive fair treatment and are not subject to arbitrary or discriminatory actions. In contrast, informal decision making may be based on personal biases, preferences, or informal rules, which can lead to inconsistent or unfair treatment of defendants.

Discretionary decision making allows for the exercise of judgment within the framework of established rules and procedures, but still requires adherence to legal requirements and safeguards.

Learn more about Constitution :

https://brainly.com/question/29775576

#SPJ4

Under the Negligent Operator Treatment System (NOTS), you will lose your license if you earn 4 points within a 12-month period.

The Negligent Operator Treatment System (NOTS) is a program implemented by the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to identify and monitor drivers who have exhibited negligent driving behavior. Under NOTS, if a driver earns four or more points within a 12-month period, they will be considered a negligent operator and may face license suspension or revocation. Additionally, if a driver earns six or more points within a 24-month period, they may also face license suspension or revocation.



To avoid accumulating points under NOTS, it is important to practice safe driving habits and obey traffic laws at all times.

To know more about Department of Motor Vehicles, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30328368

#SPJ11

The Clean Water Act (CWA) is a federal law that requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate the discharge of pollutants into waterways.

The CWA was originally passed by Congress in 1972, to  restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters. Under the CWA, the EPA is responsible for establishing water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters and for regulating discharges of pollutants from point sources, such as factories and wastewater treatment plants. The EPA also works with states and tribes to develop and implement programs to protect and restore water quality.

The Clean Water Act has been amended several times since its original passage, with the most recent amendments occurring in 1987. These amendments added new provisions to address non-point source pollution, toxic pollutants, and wetlands protection, among other issues.

In summary, the Clean Water Act is the law that requires the EPA to regulate the discharge of pollutants into waterways,  to protect and restore the quality of the nation's waters.

Know more about CWA here:

https://brainly.com/question/12682291

#SPJ11  

In Ed's suit against First National Bank, the discovery phase would include all of the following except option A- Ed's complaint.

During the discovery phase of a litigation, each party can acquire evidence and information from the other party or parties. The goal of discovery is for the parties to obtain evidence and information in order to prepare for trial and avoid surprises during the trial.

Depositions, written interrogatories, petitions for admission, and requests for production of papers or other tangible evidence are common techniques of gathering information during the discovery phase.

As a result, Ed's deposition, demands for admissions from First National, and responses to Ed's written interrogatories would all be part of the discovery phase.

learn more about litigation here:

https://brainly.com/question/15284945

#SPJ4

  White-collar crimes are less likely than other crimes to be given lenient plea bargains. Option A

This is because white-collar crimes typically involve financial or economic offenses committed by individuals in positions of power or trust, such as corporate executives, bankers, and government officials. These crimes often involve complex legal and financial issues, making them difficult to prosecute and negotiate plea bargains for.

Additionally, white-collar crimes tend to have a lower public perception of harm than other crimes, such as drug-related or vandalism offenses. As a result, prosecutors may be less inclined to offer lenient plea bargains to individuals charged with white-collar crimes in order to deter future similar offenses and maintain public confidence in the justice system.
In contrast, drug-related crimes and vandalism offenses are often seen as more direct and violent offenses that pose a greater risk to public safety. As such, prosecutors may be more willing to offer lenient plea bargains in exchange for information or cooperation in order to expedite the legal process and reduce the overall impact of these crimes on society.

Immigration offenses, while still serious, are often subject to their own unique legal frameworks and may not be subject to plea bargaining in the same way as other crimes. Overall, the nature of the crime and its impact on society will play a significant role in determining the likelihood of a lenient plea bargain being offered. Therefore option A is correct.

For more such questions on crimes visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31393957

#SPJ11

South Dakota, like other states, may regulate private activities to protect or promote the public order, health, safety, and general welfare under the state's police powers.

State's police power power is derived from the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which reserves to the states all powers not granted to the federal government. The exercise of police powers allows states to regulate a wide range of activities, including business and commercial practices, public health and safety, and environmental protection.

This authority is subject to constitutional limitations, such as the due process clause and the equal protection clause, which prohibit arbitrary or discriminatory actions by the state.

Learn more about South Dakota :

https://brainly.com/question/29107881

#SPJ4

The term you're referring to is "Affirmative Action." It refers to policies and programs that aim to increase the representation and opportunities of historically disadvantaged groups in education, employment, and other areas. These policies may include measures such as targeted recruitment, quotas, or preferential treatment in hiring or admissions processes. The goal of affirmative action is to promote diversity and address past discrimination by providing equal opportunities to all individuals, regardless of their race, gender, or other characteristics.

The term "affirmative action" often refers to this kind of initiative, rule, or programme.

This type of effort, policy, or program is commonly known as affirmative action. Affirmative action aims to address past discrimination and underrepresentation of minority groups and women in the workplace by actively seeking out and hiring qualified individuals from these groups. Some argue that affirmative action is necessary to promote diversity and equality in the workplace, while others argue that it unfairly discriminates against non-minority groups. Regardless of one's stance, affirmative action remains a controversial and ongoing topic in discussions surrounding employment and minority groups.

Learn more about affirmative action here

https://brainly.com/question/1163395

#SPJ11

I can explain that witchcraft is not recognized as a legal defense or practice in many countries. The law usually prohibits harmful practices and beliefs that cause harm to others. It is essential to seek help from law enforcement authorities if someone is threatened or harmed. Burning down someone's property is a criminal offense, and it is crucial to report it to the police.

In this case, the actions of the villagers were unlawful, and they could be held liable for the damages caused to Illunga's property. It is essential to encourage community members to seek help from medical professionals instead of relying on witch doctors or superstitions. They should also be educated about the dangers of mob justice and the importance of following the law.

According to Aquinas' interpretation of the doctrine of natural law, the following is a fundamental intrinsic good: Human life and human reproduction and Human sociability . Option d is Correct.

According to the natural justice system, there are seven "basic goods" that must be provided for: Life, Reproduction, Education, Worship or Seek God, Social Life, Avoid Offence, and Shun Ignorance. Unsurprisingly, there are also differences in basic commodities catalogues. Aquinas cites life, reproduction, social life, knowledge, and moral behaviour among the goods in his account.

According to the ethical philosophy known as "natural law," human beings have inherent values that direct our thinking and behaviour. It asserts that there are universal moral norms that may be observed in all eras and social groups since they serve as the cornerstone of a just society. Option d is Correct.

Learn more about Human life Visit: brainly.com/question/29390879

#SPJ4

The statement "Cultural transmission is the process where people learn the techniques/attitudes of crime from relationships with criminal peers" is True, Cultural transmission is the process where individuals learn the techniques and attitudes of crime from relationships with criminal peers.

This concept is an integral part of the Social Learning Theory, which posits that individuals acquire criminal behavior through social interactions and exposure to criminal models in their environment.

Cultural transmission suggests that criminal behavior is not solely the result of individual traits, but rather influenced by social connections and the cultural norms shared within a group. When individuals associate with criminal peers, they are more likely to be exposed to and adopt the values, beliefs, and behaviors of these deviant groups.

This process of learning takes place through observation, imitation, and reinforcement, where individuals see the actions of their criminal peers and are motivated to engage in similar behaviors, particularly when they perceive rewards or positive outcomes associated with the criminal acts.

Cultural transmission plays a significant role in the acquisition and spread of criminal behavior within social networks. By interacting with criminal peers, individuals can learn the techniques and attitudes necessary for engaging in crime, highlighting the importance of understanding social influences on criminal behavior.

For More Such Questions on Cultural transmission

https://brainly.com/question/18323041

#SPJ11

The act that provided funding for the development of state and local waste management programs is the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

The RCRA was passed by the United States Congress in 1976, and it regulates the disposal of hazardous waste and the management of non-hazardous solid waste. The RCRA provides funding for state and local waste management programs through a variety of mechanisms. One of the main ways it does this is by providing grants to states to help them develop and implement their own waste management programs. These grants can be used for a variety of purposes, including the construction of waste facilities, the development of recycling programs, and the training of waste management professionals.

In addition to providing funding, the RCRA also establishes a framework for the management of hazardous waste. Under the RCRA, generators of hazardous waste are required to obtain permits and comply with strict regulations regarding the storage, transportation, and disposal of their waste. The act also provides for the cleanup of hazardous waste sites, and it establishes a program for the management of non-hazardous solid waste.

Overall, the RCRA has played a crucial role in promoting the responsible management of waste in the United States. Through its funding and regulatory provisions, it has helped to ensure that waste is managed in a way that protects public health and the environment.

Know more about  hazardous waste here:

https://brainly.com/question/1160703

#SPJ11

Policy analysis is primarily used during option C - Problem analysis, policy alternative development, and policy evaluation stages to identify problems, assess policy alternatives, and evaluate policy outcomes.

Policy analysis is a systematic approach to assessing the impacts of policy decisions. The problem analysis stage is the initial phase of the policy-making process, where policymakers identify the issues that require attention.

During this stage, policy analysts examine the problem, causes, and impacts, using data and evidence to develop an accurate picture of the situation. This information is used to inform the development of policy alternatives.

Policy analysis is a critical component of the policy-making process and is used most heavily during the option C - problem analysis, policy alternative development, and policy evaluation stages.

In the policy alternative development stage, policymakers and policy analysts work together to identify different options for addressing the problem.

Finally, policy evaluation is used to assess the effectiveness of policy implementation. This involves examining the actual outcomes and intended outcomes of policy decisions and determining success or failure of the policy.

While policy analysis is used throughout the policy-making process, it is most heavily relied upon during the problem analysis, policy alternative development, and policy evaluation stages.

By using a systematic approach to policy analysis, policymakers and analysts can develop effective policies that address the underlying problems, promote equitable outcomes, and enhance public welfare.

For more question on "Policy Analysis" :

https://brainly.com/question/29888565

#SPJ11

To prevail in an action for innocent misrepresentation, the plaintiff must prove that the misrepresentation concerned material facts (option b).

This means that the false statement made by the defendant had a significant impact on the plaintiff's decision to enter into the contract.

The plaintiff needs to establish that they relied on the misrepresentation and that it was a crucial factor in inducing them to enter the contract.

It is not necessary for the misrepresentation to be in writing (option a), or for the defendant to have made the false statements with a reckless disregard for the truth (option c).

The focus is on the materiality of the misrepresented facts and the reliance of the plaintiff on those facts.

To know more about innocent misrepresentation refer here: https://brainly.com/question/28347351#

#SPJ11

Principles and standards of conduct that direct company decisions are what is meant by organisational ethics.

To learn more about Organizational ethics, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/13311490

Crime control agents never allow their hunches to serve as their primary source of information. The objective basis requirement might be used to define this notion. Here option C is the correct answer.

The principle that hunches are never sufficient to guide decisions made by agents of crime control can be described as the objective basis requirement.

This principle requires that law enforcement agents have a reasonable and articulable basis for their actions, based on facts and circumstances, rather than mere suspicion or intuition. This requirement is essential to prevent law enforcement agents from engaging in arbitrary or discriminatory actions.

It ensures that agents have a valid reason for their actions and that those actions are based on reliable and relevant information. Without an objective basis requirement, law enforcement agents may engage in profiling, harassment, or other biased practices, which can undermine the public's trust in the criminal justice system.

To learn more about crime control agents

https://brainly.com/question/10607519

#SPJ4

Under the tithing system, option C, "Select one man from each parish as chief peacekeeper," is not a principle of the system.

The tithing system is a historical practice in medieval England, where communities were divided into groups of ten families or households. These groups were responsible for maintaining law and order in their respective areas, and they followed a set of principles to ensure this.

The three principles that the tithing system followed were: A: Agree to follow the law, B: Keep the peace in their areas, D: Bring law violators to justice

These three principles were crucial in maintaining law and order in medieval England. By agreeing to follow the law, each member of the tithing group acknowledged their responsibility towards the community and committed to upholding the law.

Keeping the peace in their areas was equally important. The tithing groups were responsible for preventing any disturbances, disputes or conflicts within their area. They acted as a support system for each other, ensuring that the community remained peaceful and harmonious.

The third principle, bringing law violators to justice, ensured that anyone who violated the law was held accountable for their actions. This helped deter crime and maintain the rule of law in the community.

However, option C, "Select one man from each parish as chief peacekeeper," is not a principle of the tithing system. The tithing system did not have a chief peacekeeper in each parish.

Instead, each tithing group was responsible for maintaining law and order within their area. They functioned as a self-governing unit and did not require any external authority to oversee their activities.

In conclusion, the tithing system was a vital aspect of medieval English society, and its principles were critical in maintaining law and order. Although the system is no longer in use, its legacy is still visible in modern law enforcement practices.

For more question on "Tithing System" :

https://brainly.com/question/14823008

#SPJ11

The need for prison and jail-security permits searches without probable cause or a warrant of : (d) prisoners, pretrial detainees, employees of the prison, and visitors to the prison.

The need for prison and jail security is to maintain order, safety, and security of inmates, staff, and visitors. To achieve this, correctional facilities have the authority to conduct searches without probable cause or a warrant.

The "Fourth-Amendment" of the US Constitution permits such searches in correctional facilities because the government has a compelling interest in "maintaining-security" and order in prisons and jails.

The, correctional facilities have the legal authority to conduct searches on prisoners, pretrial detainees, employees of the prison, and visitors to the prison.

Therefore, the correct option is (d).

Learn more about Warrant here

https://brainly.com/question/20153030

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

The need for prison and jail security permits searches without probable cause or a warrant of:

(a) prisoners and pretrial detainees

(b) prisoners, pretrial detainees, and visitors to the prison

(c) only prisoners

(d) prisoners, pretrial detainees, employees of the prison, and visitors to the prison.

The maximum penalty for a willful violation depends on the specific law or regulation that has been violated.

Different laws and regulations carry different penalties for willful violations. In some cases, the penalty may be a fine, while in other cases, it may include imprisonment or other legal consequences.

Under US federal law, willful violations of certain environmental regulations can result in fines of up to $50,000 per day of violation, while willful violations of certain occupational safety regulations can result in fines of up to $134,937 per violation.

It's important to consult the relevant law or regulation to determine the specific penalty for a willful violation.

For willful infractions of certain laws and regulations, different punishments apply. The punishment might range from a fine in certain circumstances to incarceration or other legal repercussions in others.

Federal law in the US allows for fines of up to $50,000 per day for willful violations of some environmental rules and up to $134,937 per violation for willful violations of several occupational safety standards.

To find out the precise punishment for a willful infringement, it's essential to examine the pertinent statute or regulation.

For similar questions on violation

https://brainly.com/question/13885689

#SPJ11

The courts have generally supported drug testing of employees, including police officers, based on the principle of maintaining public safety and security.

The argument is that employees in safety-sensitive positions, such as law enforcement officers, have a heightened responsibility to ensure public safety and should be held to a higher standard than other employees. In addition, courts have generally held that the government has a legitimate interest in preventing drug use among its employees, particularly those in safety-sensitive positions, and that drug testing is an effective way to deter drug use and identify those who may be using drugs. However, courts have also recognized that drug testing must be conducted in a manner that respects employees' privacy rights and does not violate their Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure.

Learn more about employees here:

https://brainly.com/question/21847040

#SPJ11

According to the Knapp Commission on police corruption, the most common form of corruption is known as "gratuity," which involves officers accepting small gifts or favors in exchange for performing their duties.

This might include accepting free meals, discounted merchandise, or preferential treatment from businesses or individuals in exchange for providing protection or other forms of assistance.

Other forms of corruption identified by the Knapp Commission included bribery, which involves accepting payments in exchange for performing illegal or unethical actions, and "grass eating," which involves accepting small bribes or kickbacks for performing routine tasks or turning a blind eye to minor violations.

The Knapp Commission was a pioneering effort to investigate and address police corruption in New York City in the early 1970s. The commission was established in response to widespread allegations of corruption within the New York Police Department, and it ultimately led to significant reforms in the department and in law enforcement agencies across the country.

The findings of the Knapp Commission highlighted the need for increased oversight and accountability in law enforcement, as well as the importance of creating a culture of integrity and ethical conduct within police departments. Today, police departments across the United States have implemented a range of measures to prevent and address corruption, including increased training, enhanced background checks, and stronger internal affairs units.

Learn more about pioneering  here:

https://brainly.com/question/22077576

#SPJ11

Yes, this is considered incest, and it is not legal.

Incest is the sexual relations between close relatives, and in most states in the United States, it is illegal. In this scenario, Kid B and Kid C are siblings by adoption, and even though they are not blood-related, they are legally considered siblings. Therefore, if they got married, it would be considered incest, and it is not legally permissible.

Furthermore, even if they got married in a state where first-cousin marriages or other types of incestuous marriages are allowed, their marriage would not be recognized under federal law.

Find out more on incest at https://brainly.com/question/9114375

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

Kid B and Kid C share 0 blood with one another nor with the parents. Kid B shares no blood with parent A and after being disowned, they have no connection either, therefore Kid B isn't even associated with parent A anymore, so you cannot even say they were family. Kid B also doesn't share blood with Kid C, even if Kid C is part of that other family. So legally, this could probably be allowed, however, most likely looked down upon.

Loyalty is one of the most significant fiduciary obligations. Simple in its application, the idea is that corporate decision-makers should act in the company's best interests rather than their own. Avoiding business dealings that could lead to a conflict of interest is the simplest approach to fulfil this obligation.

To learn more about fiduciary duty, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/30198407

Paternalism is a form of beneficence. It refers to the practice of making decisions for someone else based on the belief that the decision is in their best interest.

While paternalism is often well-intentioned, it can also be problematic. It can lead to a lack of autonomy for the person on the receiving end of the decision-making, and can prevent them from making their own choices or having a say in their own lives. It can also lead to resentment or mistrust between the two parties, particularly if the person making the decisions is not fully informed or does not take into account the wishes and values of the other person.
To practice beneficence in a way that respects the autonomy and dignity of the other person, it is important to engage in shared decision-making and to prioritize the person's own wishes and values. This may involve asking questions, listening actively, and providing information and support so that the person can make an informed decision that reflects their own priorities and needs.

For more such questions on beneficence visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12902734

#SPJ11

The Supreme Court balancing approach to stop and frisk requires weighing individual privacy rights and the value of controlling crime.

These are protected under the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, against the value of controlling crime. The Court has established that any stop and frisk must be based on reasonable suspicion and must not be overly intrusive or humiliating. This balancing approach is aimed at ensuring that police officers do not violate individuals' Fourth Amendment rights while still allowing them to perform their duties in controlling crime.

Therefore, A option holds true for the given situation.

To know more about Fourth Amendment, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/7955252

#SPJ11

The level of care expected of a reasonable person under similar circumstances in meeting one's fiduciary duty is called B. Duty of Care.

This principle refers to the obligation of a fiduciary, such as a director or trustee, to act responsibly and make decisions in the best interest of the organization or beneficiaries they serve. Duty of Care requires fiduciaries to exercise reasonable diligence, competence, and skill when managing resources, making decisions, and providing oversight. It ensures that they act in good faith, avoid negligence, and remain informed about relevant issues.

This duty contrasts with A. Duty of Loyalty focuses on putting the organization's interests ahead of personal interests and avoiding conflicts of interest. C. Transparency and D. Fairness are important values in fulfilling fiduciary responsibilities, but they are not specific legal duties. Transparency refers to open and honest communication, while fairness ensures that decisions are made objectively and without bias.

In summary, Duty of Care is the key principle that outlines the level of care expected from  fiduciaries in fulfilling their responsibilities. It emphasizes the need for responsible decision-making and oversight while considering the interests of the organization and its beneficiaries. Therefore the correct option is B

Know more about  Duty of Care here:

https://brainly.com/question/31148084

#SPJ11  

The scenario described within the question is an example of realignment.

Realignment is a technique wherein the companies that make up political parties undergo a good sized shift in their beliefs, priorities, and affiliations. This shift can result in the introduction of latest parties, the dissolution of antique parties, and a realignment of the electorate alongside new lines.

For the duration of the presidential election of 1896, the Democratic and Republican parties underwent a sizable realignment. The Republican celebration, which had traditionally been the party of huge enterprise and urban elites, have become the part of the working-class and farmers.

This realignment turned into due to the emergence of a brand new problem, the loose coinage of silver, which attracted assist from farmers and working-elegance people who believed it'd assist alleviate their economic struggles.

Learn more about realignment:-

https://brainly.com/question/9192667

#SPJ1

In many jurisdictions, it is illegal for a person to knowingly smoke tobacco in any motor vehicle in which a child is present. The exact laws and penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction.

Exposure to secondhand smoke can be especially dangerous for children, who are more vulnerable to the health risks associated with tobacco smoke. In a confined space like a car, even small amounts of smoke can have serious health effects.

In addition to the legal implications, it is also important to consider the health and well-being of children and other passengers in the car. Even if smoking is not illegal in a particular situation, it is generally considerate to avoid smoking in a confined space with other people, particularly children or others who may be more vulnerable to smoke.

To know more about jurisdictions, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ4

The US Supreme Court set operating guidelines for the administration of criminal justice, and the states are allowed to follow these guidelines. Here option E is the correct answer.

The US Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the country, and its rulings establish binding precedents that apply to all states. As such, states are not free to lower, ignore, or raise the minimum or maximum operating procedures established by the Court in criminal justice matters.

The US Constitution grants the Supreme Court the power to interpret federal law, including the Constitution itself, and to determine the constitutionality of state and federal actions. When the Court issues a ruling on a criminal justice matter, it establishes a legal precedent that binds all lower courts and state authorities. This means that states must abide by the Court's decisions and incorporate its operating procedures into their criminal justice systems.

For example, in Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court established the requirement that police officers must inform suspects of their constitutional rights (the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney) before questioning them in custody. This ruling applies to all states, and failure to comply with it can result in the exclusion of evidence obtained through unconstitutional means.

To learn more about Supreme Court

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ4

Complete question:

The states are free to ________ operating procedures established by the US Supreme Court that apply to the administration of criminal justice.

A. lower or reduce the

B. ignore the

C. raise the minimum

D. raise the maximum

E. adopt

Serious crimes are known as felonies, whereas lesser criminal offenses are known as misdemeanors. The classification of crimes into felonies and misdemeanors is based on the severity of the crime and the punishment it carries.

Felonies are considered to be the most serious crimes and include offenses such as murder,, arson, and robbery. These crimes are punishable by a minimum of one year in prison and can carry a life sentence or even the death penalty in some cases.
Misdemeanors, on the other hand, are considered less serious and include offenses such as minor theft, disorderly conduct, and traffic violations. These crimes are punishable by a maximum of one year in jail and typically carry a fine or community service as well.
It is important to note that the classification of a crime as a felony or misdemeanor can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the offense. Additionally, some states have a third category of offenses known as infractions, which are considered even less serious than misdemeanors and typically carry only a fine as a penalty.

For more such questions on offenses visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30695527

#SPJ11

The primary ethical issue in United Thermostatic Controls is B. Accelerating the recording of revenue into an earlier period. This issue involves manipulating the financial statements to create a false impression of the company's financial performance. The correct option is B.

The ethical issue arises because United Thermostatic Controls is not accurately reporting its revenue in the correct accounting period, which is against the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). This unethical practice misleads stakeholders, including investors, employees, and regulators, who rely on accurate financial information to make informed decisions about the company.

To address this issue, United Thermostatic Controls should adhere to GAAP and ensure that revenues are recorded in the appropriate accounting period. Management should also establish strong internal controls to detect and prevent any unethical practices, and promote a culture of ethical behavior within the organization.

By doing so, United Thermostatic Controls can restore trust with its stakeholders and ensure that the company's financial statements present a true and fair view of its financial performance.

Therefore, the correct answer is option B. Accelerating the recording of revenue into an earlier period

For More Such Questions on ethical

https://brainly.com/question/21384955

#SPJ11