Good drivers deal with unsafe and irresponsible drivers by practicing defensive driving techniques, maintaining a safe following distance, scanning the road for potential hazards, communicating their intentions, staying patient and calm, and reporting dangerous behavior when necessary.
Good drivers deal with drivers who cannot or will not perform in a safe and responsible manner by practicing defensive driving techniques. Defensive driving involves anticipating potential hazards and being prepared to react appropriately to minimize risk.
One important technique is maintaining a safe following distance, which allows good drivers more time to respond to the actions of unpredictable drivers. This can be achieved by following the 3-second rule, where they pick a stationary object ahead and ensure that there's a 3-second gap between their vehicle and the one in front.
Another aspect of defensive driving is regularly scanning the road and surroundings to identify potential dangers, such as aggressive or distracted drivers. By being aware of their environment, good drivers can adjust their actions to avoid hazardous situations.
Good drivers also communicate their intentions clearly by using turn signals, brake lights, and other indicators. This helps other drivers understand their plans and allows them to respond accordingly.
Additionally, good drivers remain patient and avoid engaging in road rage, which can escalate an already dangerous situation. Instead, they stay calm and focused, concentrating on their own safe driving habits.
In cases where a driver's actions pose a serious risk to others, good drivers may choose to report the dangerous behavior to law enforcement. This can help prevent potential accidents and promote safer roads for everyone. This approach helps ensure the safety of both themselves and others on the road.
For More Such Questions on drivers
https://brainly.com/question/30244978
#SPJ11
Any act committed by a juvenile that would also be considered a crime if it were committed by an adult is called what...
Any act which is committed by a juvenile that would also be considered a crime if it were committed by an adult is called a "Delinquent-Act."
The "Juvenile-Delinquency" is defined as a pattern of illegal behavior by individuals who are not yet considered adults, usually under the age of 18 in the United States.
In most cases, juvenile delinquents are subject to a separate legal system that focuses on rehabilitation rather than punishment, although in some cases, more serious offenses may result in juvenile offenders being tried as adults in the criminal justice system.
The goal of the juvenile justice system is to help young-offenders learn from their mistakes, take responsibility for their actions, and develop the skills and knowledge they need to make positive changes in their lives.
Learn more about Juveniles here
https://brainly.com/question/30921060
#SPJ4
Possible dangers that responsible citizens could encounter when using social media to discourage dumping
Question 2
1 pts
Attitudes toward marijuana use are quickly changing in the US, with 90% of
Americans support marijuana use either medically or recreationally. You live in a
very conservative area, and you suspect that the residents of the city you live in do
not support medical or recreational use of marijuana at that level. To test your
assumption, you conduct a survey of 553 residents and find that 84% of residents
support marijuana use either medically or recreationally. Test the alternative
hypothesis that residents of your town have lower levels of support for marijuana
than the US population. Use alpha level of 0.01.
What is your test statistic?
If Attitudes toward marijuana use are quickly changing in the US, with 90% of Americans support marijuana use either medically or recreationally. the test statistic is -4.70.
How to find the test statistic?To test the hypothesis that the residents of the city have lower levels of support for marijuana than the US population, we can use a one-sample proportion test.
First, we need to define our null and alternative hypotheses:
Null hypothesis (H0): The proportion of residents in the city who support marijuana use is the same as or higher than the proportion of Americans who support marijuana use (p ≥ 0.9).
Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The proportion of residents in the city who support marijuana use is lower than the proportion of Americans who support marijuana use (p < 0.9).
We can use the following formula to calculate the test statistic:
z = (p - P) / sqrt[P(1-P)/n]
where p is the proportion of residents in the city who support marijuana use, P is the proportion of Americans who support marijuana use (0.9), and n is the sample size (553).
Plugging in the values, we get:
z = (0.84 - 0.9) / sqrt[0.9(1-0.9)/553] = -4.70
Therefore, the test statistic is -4.70.
Learn more about test statistic here:https://brainly.com/question/15110538
#SPJ1
In the United States, real incomes have increased about 2 percent per year. At this growth rate, average income doubles every
Regardless matter whether the original income is $500 or $25,000, if a country's income increases at a rate of 2 percent annually, it will double in 35 years.
What is real income?The income of people or nations that has been adjusted for inflation is referred to as real income. It is determined by dividing nominal income by the current level of prices. When discussing an individual's income, real income is also referred to as real salary. Real income is the amount of money that an individual or entity makes after taking inflation into account. You will make the same amount of money if you earn $50,000 this year as you did last year. The purchasing power you previously had will be impacted if inflation changes. The cost of things increases by 2% if inflation does as well.To learn more about real income, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30560616
The Fourteenth Amendment due process clause is applicable at which stages of the criminal process? A. only at arrest B. only after formal charges C. Only after custodial interrogation begins D. At all the stages of the criminal process
The Fourteenth Amendment due process clause is applicable at all the stages of the criminal process. The correct option is D.
The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause states that no state may "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." The Supreme Court has interpreted this clause to mean that the states must adhere to fair procedures in criminal cases and must respect a number of basic rights of criminal defendants.
All phases of the criminal justice system arrest, arraignment, trial, and sentencing—have these rights in place. The right to be informed of the allegations against you, the right to a fair trial with no bias, the right to counsel, and the right to cross-examine witnesses are some examples of due process rights. The correct option is D.
Learn more about Fourteenth Amendment at:
brainly.com/question/29371683
#SPJ4
In Lawrence v. Texas (2003), the Supreme Court ruled that states cannot lawfully
The Supreme Court found that state laws against homosexual sodomy are unconstitutional because they violate people's right to privacy in Lawrence v. Texas (2003).
What are state laws?The phrase "State law" refers to any and all laws, judgements, rules, regulations, or other state actions that have the force of law in any State. A legislation of the United States that solely applies to the District of Columbia will be regarded as a State law instead of a federal statute. The first ten Constitutional Amendments make up the Bill of Rights. In regard to their government, it outlines Americans' rights. Individual liberties and civil rights are ensured, including freedom of speech, of the press, and of religion. The laws of identity, non-contradiction, and excluded middle are the three laws.To learn more about state laws, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/797582
If you are found guilty of a DUI after proper test(s) you could have your license revoked until you reach twenty-one (21) years of age and you could be fined $2000 (T/F)
The statement "If you are found guilty of a DUI after proper test(s), you could have your license revoked until you reach twenty-one (21) years of age and you could be fined $2000" is false as you can be fined only upto $1000.
The correct answer is false.
If you are over 21 and found guilty of a DUI, the penalties are even more severe. For a first offence, you could face a fine of up to $1,000, up to one year in jail, and a license suspension for six months.
For a second offence, you could face a fine of up to $3,000, up to one year in jail, and license suspension for two years. A third offence carries a fine of up to $5,000, up to one year in jail, and license revocation for three years.
To know more about license, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19477385
#SPJ4
Before formal proceedings begin, the __________ Amendment gives police more flexibility in interrogating suspects.A. SixthB. FifthC. FourteenthD. Eighth
Before formal proceedings begin, the fifth Amendment gives police more flexibility in interrogating suspects.
The correct option is B.
The Fifth Amendment is divided into five rights or safeguards: the right to a jury trial when you are accused of a crime, the safeguard against double jeopardy, the safeguard against self-incrimination, the safeguard for a fair trial, and the safeguard against the government seizing your property without just compensation.
The right to remain silent, the right to be present while a lawyer is questioned, and the right to have a government-appointed lawyer are collectively referred to as Miranda rights.
The two principal rights granted under this are silence—persons are informed that everything they say may be used against them in court—and the right to a counsel, which allows individuals to have legal representation with them at all times.
The correct option is B.
To know more about the amendment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30391361
#SPJ4
What was one of the policy ambitions of passing the marriage equality law in Illinois?
The main policy ambition behind passing the marriage equality law in Illinois was to provide equal rights and recognition for same-sex couples.
Prior to the law, same-sex couples were only recognized as domestic partners and lacked the legal protections and benefits that come with marriage. The law aimed to eliminate discrimination based on sexual orientation and allow same-sex couples to have access to the same legal rights and privileges as heterosexual couples, such as the ability to file joint tax returns, inherit property, and make medical decisions for each other. By passing the marriage equality law, Illinois aimed to promote equality and ensure that all citizens are treated fairly under the law.
For more such questions on policy, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29544854
#SPJ11
how do most voters View budget deficits?
Voters View budget deficits as a effect on the economy of the nation and increasing debt.
When expenditure by the government surpasses income from taxes and other sources, a budget deficit results. Although any organization with operating revenues and expenses can experience a budget deficit, the term is most frequently used to refer to government budgets. Budget surplus is another name for public savings.
As budget deficits and government debt can have long-term effects on the economy and future generations, many voters are typically concerned about them. Deficits may be perceived by some voters as evidence of excessive government spending or fiscal irresponsibility, and they may be more inclined to support measures to reduce the deficit, such as spending reductions or tax increases.
Learn more about budget deficits at:
brainly.com/question/29602763
#SPJ4
You should always park your vehicle more than 18 in. from the curb: (T/F)
Answer:
Explanation:
false, 18 in or less
______may give the tenant the right to renew the lease, the right to purchase the leased property, or the right of refusal if the landlord decides to sell the property
A lease agreement may include various provisions that grant rights to the tenant, such as the right to renew the lease, the right to purchase the leased property, or the right of first refusal if the landlord decides to sell the property.
These provisions are negotiated between the landlord and tenant and are often included in the lease agreement to provide the tenant with some security and stability in the use of the property.
The specifics of these provisions can vary widely depending on the terms of the lease agreement and the needs and desires of both parties. A lease is an agreement between a tenant and landlord that grants the renter the right to occupy a rented property for a predetermined amount of time, usually six or twelve months. The lease is a binding agreement between the landlord and the renter.
Learn more about lease agreement Visit: brainly.com/question/30237244
#SPJ4
The Constitution gives each branch of government a different role in policy making in the United States. This sharing of responsibility by our government is known as ______.
In the United States, the Constitution assigns each branch of government a distinct duty in formulating public policy. Separation of powers is the term used to describe how our system distributes responsibility.
What are Separation of powers?The term "separation of powers" refers to the partition of a state's government into "branches," each having their own autonomous powers and responsibilities, to ensure that the authority of one branch does not conflict with that of the other branches. In order to prevent one branch of government from carrying out the primary duties of another, the term "separation of powers" refers to the division of governmental responsibilities into various branches. Checks and balances are intended to prevent the concentration of power. The U.S. Federal Government is divided into the legislative, executive, and judicial branches to ensure a balance of power. Each arm of government has its own authority and duties, including cooperating with other branches, to ensure that the government is effective and that individuals' rights are respected.To learn more about Separation of powers, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/18453855
According to legal experts, the primary generators of the rules to regulate the behavior of police, prosecutors, and others involved in the criminal process rests with the:A. legislatureB. President of the United StatesC. trial courtsD. US Supreme Court
Legal scholars assert that the US Supreme Court is the principal source of laws governing how police, prosecutors, and others participating in the criminal justice system should behave. Here option D is the correct answer.
The Supreme Court's decisions on cases brought before it, particularly those related to the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments to the US Constitution, have set precedents that guide the behavior of law enforcement officials at all levels of government.
The Court's decisions, as well as its interpretations of statutes passed by the legislature, provide important guidance to lower courts and law enforcement agencies, shaping how they interpret and apply the law.
Therefore, the US Supreme Court is considered the primary generator of the rules that regulate the behavior of police, prosecutors, and others involved in the criminal process.
To learn more about Supreme Court
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
effect occurs when negotiators develop a dependence on third party dispute resolution methods. A. Chilling B. Work-to-rule. C. Narcotic D. Hypnotic.
Negotiators become dependent on third-party conflict settlement techniques, which has a work-to-rule impact. Option B is Correct.
In arbitration, the disagreement is decided by a judge who is an impartial third party. The arbitrator hears both sides' arguments and pertinent evidence before making a final ruling. Arbitration. a process for resolving labor-management issues that involves conducting a formal hearing, taking testimony, and having a neutral third party make a judgement that is final and binding.
An approved unbiased and neutral third person with no power of decision-making will mediate a conflict or negotiation. Integrative bargaining, also known as "interest-based bargaining" or "win-win bargaining," is a negotiation technique in which the parties work together to resolve their differences in a way that benefits both of them. Option B is Correct.
Learn more about work rule Visit: brainly.com/question/8886941
#SPJ4
Analyze and evaluate the importance and efforts of the Confederate States in gaining international support during the Civil War.
P2:
The Confederate States' efforts to gain international support were crucial, but ultimately, they were unsuccessful.
Their reliance on cotton exports and diplomatic efforts were insufficient to overcome the Union's naval blockade and the reluctance of European powers to support a fledgling government with uncertain prospects.
During the Civil War, the Confederate States made various attempts to gain international support in their fight against the Union. One of the most significant efforts was their reliance on cotton exports to Britain and France. They hoped that their cotton supply would be so essential to the textile industries in these countries that they would receive support in return. However, the Union's blockade of Southern ports significantly impacted their ability to export cotton, and European countries found other sources to meet their textile needs.
The Confederacy also sent diplomats to Europe to negotiate diplomatic recognition and support. However, these efforts were unsuccessful, primarily due to their inability to prove that they had a viable government with control over their territory.
For More Such Questions on Confederate
https://brainly.com/question/8756278
#SPJ11
Arkansas law requires motorists to ______ for police cars, fire trucks, ambulances and other emergency vehicles using a siren or air horn, and a red or blue flashing light.
Arkansas law requires motorists to yield the right-of-way for police cars, fire trucks, ambulances, and other emergency vehicles using a siren or air horn and a red or blue flashing light. This allows the emergency vehicle to pass quickly and safely.
The correct answer is yield the right-of-way.
This means that when a driver encounters an emergency vehicle with its emergency lights and sirens on, they must immediately pull over to the right side of the road and come to a complete stop. The reason for this law is to ensure that emergency vehicles can get to their destination as quickly as possible and to prevent accidents involving emergency vehicles and other motorists.
Failure to yield to an emergency vehicle is a serious traffic violation and can result in fines, points on a driver's license, and even suspension of the driver's license. In addition to the legal consequences, failure to yield to an emergency vehicle can endanger the lives of emergency responders and other drivers on the road.
To know more about motorists, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24633064
#SPJ4
In 2010, Sara writes Terror at the Track, a novel about racecar driving. Sara does not register the work with the
appropriate government office. Under federal copyright law, Sara's work is protected
a. for ten years.
b. for twenty years.
c. for the life of the author plus seventy years.
d. forever.
Sara writes the racecar-related book Terror at the Track in 2010. Sara fails to file the necessary paperwork with the relevant government agency. Sara's work is safeguarded by federal copyright legislation for the duration of her life plus seventy years. Option C is correct.
Under federal copyright law, Sara's work is protected for the life of the author plus seventy years, regardless of whether she registers it with the appropriate government office or not. Copyright protection is automatic and begins as soon as a work is created in a fixed tangible form, such as writing it down or saving it to a computer file.
The duration of copyright protection has changed over time, but since 1978, works created by an individual are protected for the life of the author plus seventy years.
This means that Sara's novel, Terror at the Track, will be protected by copyright until seventy years after her death. During this time, no one else can reproduce, distribute, or create derivative works based on Sara's novel without her permission or without qualifying for an exception or limitation under the law.
To learn more about federal copyright law
https://brainly.com/question/30030383
#SPJ4
A brief description of the steps and judgments made by each court that has heard a case is called the:A. courts' judgmentsB. courts' decisionsC. courts' opinionsD. procedural history of the case
The brief description of the steps and judgments made by each court that has heard a case is called the procedural history of the case.
The procedural history of the case typically includes a summary of the relevant facts, the legal issues raised by the parties, the decisions and orders issued by each court, and any appeals or remands to lower courts.
The procedural history provides a chronological overview of the case and the key events that have occurred in its adjudication, and can be a useful tool for understanding the legal reasoning and precedents that have shaped the outcome of the case.
In summary, the procedural history of a case is an important component of legal analysis, providing a roadmap of the court proceedings and judgments that have led to the current state of the case.
Learn more about Judgments :
https://brainly.com/question/13131264
#SPJ4
According to Hamilton, how does human behavior hinder/limit governing?
Answer:
Men often oppose ideas/things if they weren't involved.
Explanation:
if this is from a test, I highly suggest googling this question. a quizlet shows up in the results and it might answer more of your questions.
hope this helps ;)
6. In the United States, most municipal solid waste is disposed of bya. Compostingb. Recyclingc. Incinerationd. Ocean dumpinge. Landfilling
Landfills are responsible for disposing of the majority of municipal solid waste in the United States.
What's wrong with landfills, exactly?Solid garbage is disposed of in modern landfills, which are efficiently managed and well-engineered. To ensure compliance with federal requirements, landfills are situated, created, operated, and watched over. Hazards from landfills include odour, smoke, noise, pests, and tainted water sources. Landfills and locations for the storage of hazardous waste are more likely to be located in minority and low-income regions. The ability to fight the location of these facilities is less powerful in certain places. Despite the fact that present-day landfills are built to contain toxic waste, leaks do occasionally occur. In light of this, landfills continue to pose a threat to both human and environmental health. Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas that is emitted as a result of the decaying garbage and it plays a role in climate change on a worldwide scale.To learn more about Landfills, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29564374
Dirk, an employee of Ergonomic Elevators, Inc., pays Ferbie, an employee of Ergonomics' competitor G-Force Risers Company, for a secret G-Force pricing schedule. This is
a. an effective marketing strategy.
b. commercial bribery.
c. creative legal bookkeeping.
d. money laundering.
This act of Dirk is commercial bribery. Giving a commission or gratuity to an agent or employee of the buyer without the buyer's knowledge or agreement in order to influence them to promote the seller's goods is known as commercial bribery.
The correct option is B.
Commercial bribery is the act of providing something of value, whether directly or indirectly, to an agent, representative, middleman, or employee of another company without that company's knowledge or consent in order to sway that person's decision regarding that company's operations.
Bribing agents and staff to influence sales is long considered as unethical and deceptive. Sixteen States have laws making commercial bribery a criminal offense.
The correct option is B.
To know more about commercial bribery, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14995674
#SPJ4
__________ is the least commonly-used system of county governance in the U.S. today.
The town meeting system is the least commonly-used system of county governance in the U.S. today.
What is the town meeting system ?Under the town meeting system, all eligible voters in a town gather periodically to make decisions on local government matters, including budgeting and policymaking.
This system is primarily used in New England states such as Maine, Vermont, and Massachusetts. However, it is not widely used in other parts of the United States, where county governance typically involves elected officials and administrative structures.
Find out more on the town meeting system at https://brainly.com/question/15888219
#SPJ1
What are some indicators of fire origin and travel?
Please write a full sentence or l will report you.
Some indicators of fire origin and travel include:
Burn patternsHeat damageHow to find fire origin and travel ?The patterns of burn marks and damage on surfaces can indicate the direction and intensity of the fire's travel. For example, if the burn patterns on walls or ceilings are more severe near the floor, it can indicate that the fire started at ground level and traveled upward.
The intensity of the fire can cause certain materials to melt, deform, or discolor. The extent and nature of the heat damage can indicate the fire's origin and how it spread.
Find out more on fire origin at https://brainly.com/question/29774306
#SPJ1
a prosecutor is ready to proceed with a case but decides not to because, upon further investigation, he finds that the police conducted an illegal search. what would be the rationale for this dismissal?
The prosecution's decision to drop the case would be justified by the fact that the evidence gathered during the unauthorised search is not admissible in court.
The rationale for the prosecutor's dismissal of the case would be that the evidence obtained from the illegal search is inadmissible in court. This means that the prosecutor cannot use the illegally obtained evidence to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, as it would be a violation of the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights. Therefore, the prosecutor cannot proceed with the case and must dismiss it. It is important to uphold the law and protect citizens' constitutional rights, even if it means the prosecution cannot proceed with a case.
Learn more about unauthorised here
https://brainly.com/question/30123464
#SPJ11
The rationale for the dismissal of the case by the prosecutor in this scenario is based on the principle of legality and the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.
The illegal search conducted by the police would violate this constitutional protection and render any evidence collected during the search inadmissible in court.
Prosecutors are required to follow ethical guidelines and uphold the law, and allowing evidence obtained through an illegal search to be used in court would be a violation of both. In addition, pursuing a case based on illegally obtained evidence could damage the integrity of the legal system and set a dangerous precedent.
Thus, the prosecutor's decision not to proceed with the case is based on upholding the principles of legality and the Constitution, as well as maintaining the ethical standards of the legal profession. The prosecutor's responsibility is to ensure that justice is served, and this can only be achieved through the use of legal and ethical means.
For more such questions on prosecutor visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29242671
#SPJ11
Which aspect of the Fourth Amendment has made government surveillance programs controversial?
The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The aspect of the Fourth Amendment that has made government surveillance programs controversial is the requirement for probable cause and a warrant issued by a judge.
In other words, the government must have a valid reason and obtain permission from a court before conducting any searches or surveillance on individuals. However, in recent years, government surveillance programs such as the National Security Agency's (NSA) collection of phone records have been criticized for potentially violating the Fourth Amendment. Many argue that the broad and indiscriminate nature of these programs, which collect data on millions of individuals without a warrant or probable cause, constitute an unreasonable search and seizure.
Critics also argue that these programs have a chilling effect on free speech and privacy rights. Individuals may be hesitant to exercise their right to free speech or associate with certain groups if they know the government is collecting data on their activities.
In summary, the controversy surrounding government surveillance programs lies in their potential violation of the Fourth Amendment's requirement for probable cause and a warrant, as well as their impact on free speech and privacy rights.
Know more about Fourth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29619437
#SPJ11
the individuals state of mind or intent to commit a crime is formally referred to as:A). actus reusB). mala in seC). Mens ReaD). stare decisis
Mens Rea is a legal term derived from Latin which translates to “guilty mind”. It is used to describe the state of mind or intent of an individual when committing a crime. It is used to determine if an individual is guilty or innocent of a crime based on the level of intention behind their actions.
Mens Rea is critical when determining if an individual is guilty or innocent of a crime. For example, if an individual is charged with murder and it can be proven that they had the intent to kill the victim, then they can be found guilty of the crime. However, if the individual did not have the intent to kill the victim and only acted out of negligence, then they can be found guilty of a lesser crime such as manslaughter.
Mens Rea is often used in contrast to actus reus, which refers to the physical act of a crime. In order to be found guilty of a crime, both Mens Rea and actus reus need to be present. If either one is missing, then an individual cannot be found guilty of a crime.
Know more about Mens Rea here
https://brainly.com/question/30639117#
#SPJ11
As opposed to elite and group theory, public choice theory focuses ona. individuals.b. large groups.c. voters.d. legislators.
As opposed to elite and group theory, public choice theory focuses on a. individuals.
Public choice theory emphasizes the actions and decisions of individuals in the political process, particularly in regards to their own self-interest and rational behavior. This is in contrast to elite and group theory, which suggest that a small group of elites or interest groups hold significant power and influence in shaping political outcomes. This approach considers individual preferences and behavior as the foundation for understanding decision-making in the political process.
Public choice theory also places emphasis on the role of voters and legislators, but ultimately sees their actions as being driven by individual incentives and preferences.
To know more about Public choice theory, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15205253
#SPJ11
Individuals that claim insanity as a criminal defense may not have the ability to form ___:A). mens reaB). mala in seC). stare decisisD). actus reus
Mens Rea is the legal term for a guilty mind. It is an element of criminal responsibility that requires that a person have a guilty mind or intent when committing a criminal act.
An individual who claims insanity as a criminal defense may not have the ability to form mens rea, as the legal definition of insanity is an inability to distinguish between right and wrong due to a mental disorder. This means that a person who is found to be legally insane is not able to form the intent needed to satisfy mens rea and thus cannot be found criminally liable.
Furthermore, even if the defendant is found to be legally sane, they may still not be able to form mens rea if they can demonstrate that they lacked the ability to understand the consequences of their actions or if they were unable to control their behavior due to a mental disorder. In either case, the defendant may be able to argue that they lacked the capacity to form mens rea, and thus should not be held criminally responsible for their actions.
Know more about Mens Rea here
https://brainly.com/question/30639117#
#SPJ11
1. Mr. Rodrigo alyas Digong was held fragrante delicto for taking cartons of Sardines can goods, accused argued that he should only be convicted of frustrated theft for taking can goods from the supermarket since he was immediately apprehended by the security guard. Is the contention of Digong correct? What crime did he committed? Explain why?
2. Tiborcio fired at Kurdapyo’s room, although in reality, the latter was not present in his room; thus, Tiborcio failed to kill him. If inherent impossibility of accomplishing the crime. What factual crime does committed by Tiborcio? Explain.
3. Patrolman Gunggong dropped a hand grenade inside a house, killing Pikoy instantly and causing Butog, Pokang, Dagul & Mokong to suffer shrapnel wounds on their bodies. What crime committed by Patrolman Gunggong for the grave negligence and mistake he committed?
4. Police Sgt Mahilig had an heated argument to her legal wife Mariel Manibog the accused stabbed his pregnant wife with a knife, causing the instantaneous death of the latter and the fetus inside her womb. What crime committed by Patrolman Sgt Mahilig being a Police Officer?
5. The accused Matte Tigas forcibly took the victim May Hilig from her parents' house and, abduct her bringing her in the Farm about 900 meters away, He forced May to have sexual intercourse with the accused Matte Tigas. If you are the Judge what crime should you imposed to penalize Mr. Matte Tigas?
Digong claimed that he committed frustrated theft when in reality the crime was plain theft.
Why was this considered to be theft?The former happens when an offender executes their acts to commit the offense, but it is not materialized due to reasons outside their control. This was not the case with Digong because he got apprehended as he took the canned goods making his act of stealing already in progress.
In contrast, Tiborcio was penalized for attempted murder since he had a clear intention of shooting Kurdapyo. Inherent Inapplicability denotes circumstances where the intended illegal action could have not succeeded due to the way the actions were performed or other contingencies.
Despite the fact that Kurdapyo wasn't originally present in the room, this does not amount to inherent inapplicability; more like a contingency given particular facts.
Nonetheless, Tiborico's overt actions by firing in the general direction of the room demonstrate a clear intent to murder and only means that the critical component required for successful prosecution, the actual physical presence of the target person, was missing.
Read more about crime here:
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1