Hi i need the rest of these questions for 100 points I WANT E. ANSWER AND D. PLEASE .
Problem 12.4
a. Stop and Frisk = “Pat Down” in outside the clothing police can do a pat down to check for weapons
b. “Reasonable expectation of privacy” Cosented! No reasonable expectation of privacy.
c. This wouldn’t break the 4th amendment because he didn’t commit any crime.
d. ?
e. ?
f. No, The roommate can give police permission to search for common areas
Answers
Answer:
D. no it didn't break the 4th amendment because he willingly gave them permission to search his bag E. yes they did break the 4th amendment because they followed her into her personal living space and search it without her permission or a search warrant. :)
Explanation:
Based on the information provided in the above-given text,
d) In this case, the Fourth Amendment as it relates to search and seizure was not violated. The evidence sized can be used in court.
e) In this case, the Fourth Amendment as it relates to search and seizure was also not violated. The evidence size can and should be used in court.
What is the explanation for the above assertions?In D above, even if there is no search warrant, a search done with the permission of the suspect is often regarded as legitimate.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution demands that searches be reasonable and that searches done with a suspect's voluntary permission are widely regarded as reasonable. The court must, however, evaluate the voluntariness of the consent. If the court determines that the permission was not freely and willingly granted, the search may be deemed illegal, and any evidence gathered during the search may be declared inadmissible in court.
One may argue that the police looked intimidating and that Terry might have granted permission to be searched due to the "intimidating appearance" of the police. The flaw in such an argument is that it is reasonably expected that the Police would wear guns. The overall character of the police is to protect and to serve, hence this argument will fail if presented in court. Therefore the conclusion given in this case stands correct.
In E, there was no consent, but there were reasonable grounds for Pamela to have been searched because she was caught in the act of theft. It is therefore logical to assume that this may not have been the first time she did such a thing. Should all the goods found in her apartment be sized, they would be admissible in court.
Conclusively, in the cases given in E and D above, as far as the Fourth Amendment as it relates to search and seizure is concerned, there were no violations. The evidence sized can and should be used in court without fear of repudiation.
Learn more about Search and Seizures;
https://brainly.com/question/2029952
#SPJ1
Related Questions
i have no idea what im doing
Answers
The sections of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms being challenged are:
Jake Devereux - Section 12 - Treatment or punishment.Tanya Gillis - Section 10 - Arrest or detention.Alex Cortes - Section 2 - Fundamental freedoms. Stephanie Klassen - Section 14 - InterpreterDavid Korman - Section 11 - Proceedings in criminal and penal matters Baltej Singh Dhillon - Section 2 - Fundamental freedoms.Jim Keegstra - Section 2 - Fundamental freedoms.Which rights are violated?Jake Devereux's right to avoid cruel and unusual punishment is violated. Tanya's right is also violated as she should be told why she is arrested.
Alex Cortes has the right to freedom of association and this was violated by Thames Center Council.
Stephanie Klassen has the right to an interpreter if she doesn't understand a language so this is another violation. David Korman has the right to an unbiased trial so the choice of the judge shouldn't matter.
Baltej Singh Dhillon has the right to freedom of religious practice so he shouldn't be fired for wearing what his religion tells him too.
Jim Keegstra's right is not violated because laws and actions against Hate speech can supersede Section 2's fundamental rights.
Question is:
What section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is relevant and is that section being violated?
Find out more on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms at https://brainly.com/question/20329431.
#SPJ1
which of these energy transformations is talking place in the kelp as it carries our photosynthesis?
Answers
Solar energy --- Chemical energy transformations is taking place in the kelp as it carries out photosynthesis.
What is photosynthesis?Photosynthesis is the process through which plant manufactures food for themselves.
They use energy from the sun which is called solar energy with Carbondoxide to form sugar and oxygen. Energy( Adenosine triphosphate ATP) is used during the process of conversion which is chemical energy.
Therefore,
Solar energy --- Chemical energy transformations is taking place in the kelp as it carries out photosynthesis
Learn more on photosynthesis below
https://brainly.com/question/3529377
#SPJ1
Which of these energy transformations is taking place in the kelp as it carries out photosynthesis?
A.Potential energy---- nuclear energy
B. Potential energy--- Kineti energy
C.Solar energy --- Chemical energy
D. Chemical energy --- Solar energy
Why is it important to name an executor in a will?
A) To ensure that beneficiaries get whatever they want from the estate
B) To ensure that someone you trust administers your estate
C) To ensure that beneficiaries do not receive any asset
D) To ensure that the court doesn't declare the will null and void
Answers
The reason why it is very important to name an executor in a will is B) To ensure that someone you trust administers your estate.
Why should an executor to a will be named?
An executor to a will is the person that makes important decisions about the estate of the person who made the will.
They will be in charge of executing the will to ensure that the beneficiaries get the things that are supposed to come to them. It is important to hire someone that is trusted so that the execution will go as the person wanted it to go.
Failure to do this can lead to the executor allowing nefarious activities to occur and for the will to be disregarded.
In conclusion, an executor should be hired because B. To ensure that someone you trust administers your estate.
Find out more on will executors at https://brainly.com/question/27207414
#SPJ1
Answer:
c
Explanation:
maybe
The United States is allowed to conduct random roadside breath-testing.
A. True
B. False
Answers
The United States is allowed to conduct random roadside breath testing is a false statement. Thus option B is correct.
What is breath testing?The breath alcohol test analyzes breath air to determine the level of alcohol consumed. The test involves spitting into a breathalyzer 15 minutes after consuming alcohol. The test is used to determine how much booze is required to reach a hazardous level in the blood.
Three roadside checks for intoxication. Before stopping a car, the police may do so without having reason to believe the driver is intoxicated. In fact, it is permissible for the police to stop vehicles at random & check them for intoxicated drivers.
Operator error is significantly decreased by the device and printer display which guides the user through a testing cycle.Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about breath testing, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/15232346
#SPJ2
What is a designated driver?
A. A driver who only has a little to drink.
B. A driver who stays under the legal limit.
C. A driver who has not been drinking.
Answers
Answer: C
Explanation:
A driver who has not been drinking
I need the anwsers for module 5 DBA flvs civics please!!!
Answers
Answer: have you checked quizlet.. they have like flashcards for specific modules and class.. its helped me alot before trust
Explanation:
How does proper crime scene examination secure evidence for forensic investigation
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
They take photographs and physical measurements of the scene, identify and collect forensic evidence, and maintain the proper chain of custody of that evidence. Crime scene investigators collect evidence such as fingerprints, footprints, tire tracks, blood and other body fluids, hairs, fibers and fire debris.
Only State's and local jurisdiction's food safety requirements are important to
follow
Answers
There appear to be no major fundamental differences between state and federal food safety laws, although some state laws are based on the 1906 Pure Food and Drugs Act and others on the 1938 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
David is driving and a dog runs into the road. He misses the dog but instead runs into a ditch, damaging his car. What type of insurance would be used in this situation?
Answers
car insurance I'm sure ..
Which of the following is a key element in the criminal act of arson?
A. The intent to do harm or defraud
B. Physical harm done to others
C. The location on the private property of another party
D. Business property destroyed
SUBMIT
Answers
Answer:
A. The intent to do harm or defraud
Select the correct answer.
What is the age range to join the Military?
A.
16 - 35
B.
17 - 39
C.
18 - 40
D.
20 - 40
Answers
Answer:
B. 17-39
Explanation:
Simplify the expression.
Answers
Answer:
c
Explanation:
i did this before and i got that right
Refer to the attachment!
The correct option according to the my simplification is B...
What is the Move Over Law?
A. You must move over one lane if you are driving slower than the flow of traffic.
B. You must move over one lane for any parked emergency vehicle.
C. You must move over one lane for bicyclists when there are no bike lanes.
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Insurance that will pay for injury to another driver and/or damage to their car if you are in an accident is called...
Answers
When insurance pays for injury to another driver and the damage to their car if you cause an accident, this is Liability Insurance.
What is liability insurance?This is a type of insurance that covers you and people involved in accidents if you are the cause of that accident.
Premiums for such plans are generally higher as they involve paying out for more than one person when claimed.
Find out more on liability insurance at https://brainly.com/question/11464345
#SPJ1
Which was a result of the interaction between European Settlers and Native Americans?
Answers
The result of the interaction between European settlers and Native Americans was Native Americans were continually pushed westward onto the poorest lands for hunting and farming.
What happened when the Natives met the Europeans?The Europeans were militarily superior and so defeated the Natives on several occasions.
This allowed them to push the Natives westward to areas that were not very conducive for survival.
Find out more on Native American - European interaction at https://brainly.com/question/13393911
#SPJ1
Tenants rights are within the purview of state and federal law.
a. False
b. True
Answers
Answer: true
Explanation:
freedom of speech is incorporated into law by
A barron vs baltimore
B the first congress
C gitlow vs new york
D the 10th amendment
Answers
Paragraph #1
In this paragraph, restate what rights you get according to the 4th amendment. Then, write your thesis statement. Your thesis should restate the question and pick a side - either Yes, the government did violate the 4th amendment or No, the government did not violate the 4th amendment.
STUDENT ANSWER:
Paragraph #2
In this paragraph we are going to use the evidence to support your thesis. Use two pieces of evidence from the document analysis work from Thursday to support your thesis.
Evidence #1, and why it supports your thesis:
Evidence #2, and why it supports your thesis:
Paragraph #3
In this paragraph, restate your evidence and your thesis as your conclusion.
Answers
The 4th amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.
What rights do you get according to the 4th amendment?The Fourth Amendment provides protection to the people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment protects people from searches that are deemed unreasonable under the law.
So we can conclude that the 4th amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.
Learn more about amendment here: https://brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ1
Lindsey lived in a public housing project. The Housing Authority tacked an eviction notice on Lindsey’s door, giving her notice that she was being legally evicted. The Housing Authority appeared in court on the appointed day, but Lindsey did not. The court granted the Housing Authority’s request for eviction because Lindsey did not appear in court as per her notice. When Lindsey’s time to appeal expired, she was evicted from her home. Lindsey claimed that she never received the Housing Authority’s notice. The Housing Authority relied on a state law that allowed it to give legal notice by tacking a notice of eviction to the occupant’s door. Lindsey filed a lawsuit against the Housing Authority alleging that her constitutional rights to due process were violated by the law. Were they? Explain your answer. [Greene v. Lindsey, 456 U.S. 444 (1982)]
Answers
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Because the Housing Authority tacked an eviction notice on Lindsey’s door. That means she has to receive it. If they send it through the mail, it'll make sense that she hasn't received the letter because it could be lost in the other mail, but the Housing Authority put it on the door which means she did see it, but she just ignored it. She knows that she was supposed to come to court on time and on the correct date. It's like if she's turning in homework late in #oogle Classroom while ignoring the due date and time. To be honest, I think that maybe the Housing Authority should of give her at least two or three warnings, but Lindsey did actually see the letter.
Brainlist pls!
1. How would a teacher who chooses to tutor students after school be fulfilling her responsibilities as a good citizen?
Answers
Answer:
The Teacher is a good citizen
Explanation:
The teacher would be a good citizen since he is dedicating his free time to help another students who would not be able to pass a course without his help.
HELPPPP
If upheld, what argument would have most likely caused the Supreme Court's decision to support the California law?
Answers
The argument that would most likely cause the supreme court to support the California law is if the law is protected under the constitution of the country.
What kind arguments does the supreme court support?The Supreme court of the United States is known to support the arguments that are based on upholding the constitution.
The laws of California is upheld based on the fact that it has a provision under the constitution.
Read more on the supreme court here:
https://brainly.com/question/341135
#SPJ1
1. The government’s position is that the thermal scan was not a search. What arguments does it make to support that position?
2. What, in your view, is the strongest argument for the respondent?
3. If you were the attorney for DLK, how might you counter the argument you listed above?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
bio
Which of these groups did not come to the unified states voluntary?
Answers
Rule 1: Students can decide for themselves whether to do their homework in study hall.
Rule 2: Students don’t have to do homework in study hall if they have at least a B average.
Rule 3: Students who do their homework in study hall (or complete it) will get a vending machine credit in the lunchroom.
Rule 4: Students who do not do their homework in study hall will get detention.
Create a pro/con list for each rule in the chart below:
Answers
The truth is that every student is and will always be responsible for every win or failure in their academics
Students can decide for themselves whether to do their homework in study hall.
It pros: When students do their homework in study hall, it gives them the opportunity to do it with the freshness of the lecture/lesson in their minds, brainstorm with other colleagues and can easily copy from each other
It cons: Students who decide not to do their homework in study hall but home may feel too lazy to it sometimes due to house chores or won't be able to do it when they don't have materials
In general, home works are meant to be done at home and not in school
What is home work?A home work is an assignment usually given to students to do at home to test their understanding in what had been taught and to familiarize them more to it
Learn more about student's home work:
https://brainly.com/question/16707071
#SPJ1
6. Do you see a conflict between Fourth Amendment rights and the work of law enforcement? Why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
THE CONSTITUTION, THROUGH THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, PROTECTS PEOPLE FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES BY THE GOVERNMENT. THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, HOWEVER US NOT A GUARANTEE AGANIST ALL SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, BUT THOSE THAT ARE DEEMED UNREASONABLE UNDER THE LAW.
20 points for the question
Answers
The accurate statement about the European population in America is European Americans make up the largest population segment today.
How much of Americans are of European descent?currently, about 58% of Americans are considered to be of European descent.
this means that the largest portion of Americans are of European descent but this percentage is on the decline.
find out more on European Americans at https://brainly.com/question/25012837.
#spj1
Please answer it's due today!!
1. What were the forensic evidence that points to O.J. Simpson ?
2. What were some of the behaviour by Simpdon after the murder that may infer guilt ?
3. How did past relationship with his spouse that led to his suspicion?
4. What was the defense theory of the case ?
5. How did the defense create reasonable doubt ?
6. IN your opinion was the verdict correct ?
Answers
Answer: i have attached a screenshot of what i said and answerd it was not letting me post it so here you go
how to increase numerical skill ? give some tricks?
Answers
Numerical skill can be increased through constant practice and by making time out for studying.
What are numerical skills?Numeracy skills are skills that helps am individual to master the act of numbering and solving problems that are relates to numerical.
Therefore, Numerical skill can be increased through constant practice and by making time out for studying.
Learn more on numerical skills below
https://brainly.com/question/27801816
#SPJ1
We can increase our numerical skill by:
Identifying the skills we needPractice the skill as much as possibleWhat is a numerical skill?This refers to our ability to use, interpret and manipulate series of mathematical information for solving a real-world problems.
It is important to develop our numerical skill because it help individuals to develop logical thinking and reasoning strategies in their everyday activities.
Read more about numerical skill
brainly.com/question/13162939
#SPJ1
Historically, what sort of governing systems were supported by religious organizations?
Answers
Majority of religious organizations preferred the democracy system of government because it is a system that listens to the citizens for what need to be done.
What is a democracy system?It is a government system where the laws, policies, leadership of the state are directly or indirectly decided by the people,
Hence, the religious organizations preferred the democracy system of government because it is a system that listens to the citizens for what need to be done.
Read more about democracy system
brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ1
The monarchy was the type of religious system that was supported by organizations.
What was the Monarchy?This was the belief that the King or the queen had been appointed as the ruler of a place by God.
The religious organizations supported this type of leadership. The people were ruled by this system based on religious principles as well.
Read more on monarchy here:
https://brainly.com/question/3710014
#SPJ1
1. What is a precedent case? Why is it important to know about precedent cases before you decide on the DLK case?
Answers
Answer: Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts. Some judges have stated that precedent ensures that individuals in similar situations are treated alike instead of based on a particular judge's personal views.