Answer:
The Albany movement was the goal to end segregation that resulted in over 1000 African Americans to be put in jail. This lead to MLK going to Albany in 1961. But it failed miserably because their was no plan for the movement.
Explanation:
hope this helps
How to be a Compound perfect
Answer:
Being a "Compound perfect" could refer to different things depending on the context. If you are referring to the compound perfect tense in grammar, it is a verb tense used to describe an action that was completed in the past before another past action or time. If you are referring to something else, please provide more context so I can better understand and provide a more accurate response. Here's how you can form the compound perfect tense in grammar:
Understand the compound perfect tense: The compound perfect tense, also known as the present perfect, is used to describe actions or states that started in the past and have a connection to the present. It is usually formed by using the auxiliary verb "have" or "has" with the past participle of the main verb.
Know the auxiliary verb "have" or "has": The auxiliary verb "have" is used with plural subjects (e.g., "we," "you," "they") and "has" is used with singular subjects (e.g., "he," "she," "it").
Use the past participle: The past participle is the form of the verb that typically ends in "-ed" for regular verbs (e.g., "worked," "played"), but irregular verbs have their own unique past participle forms (e.g., "gone," "written," "taken").
Combine the auxiliary verb and past participle: To form the compound perfect tense, simply combine the auxiliary verb "have" or "has" with the past participle of the main verb. Here are some examples:
I have studied for the exam.
He has finished his work.
We have eaten dinner.
Understand the usage: The compound perfect tense is used to express actions or states that have relevance to the present, such as actions completed in the recent past, actions that have an effect on the present, or actions that may continue into the future. It is important to understand the context and usage of the compound perfect tense in order to use it correctly in your writing or speech.
Practice and review: Like any other grammatical concept, practicing and reviewing is key to becoming proficient. Try to use the compound perfect tense in different contexts and review your sentences to make sure they are accurate.
By understanding and applying the rules of the compound perfect tense, and with practice and review, you can become proficient in using this verb tense in your writing and speech. Remember to always pay attention to context and usage for accurate communication.
Explanation:
The Holocaust
In the documentary Witness to the Holocaust, Miles Lehrman, a Holocaust survivor, argues, "A perpetrator is not the most dangerous enemy. The most dangerous part is the bystander because neutrality always helps the killer."
Read the text of the speech The Perils of Indifference: Lessons Learned from A Violent Century, by Elie Weisel.
Using what you have learned in this unit on the rise of the Nazis and the Holocaust, support, refute or modify Lehrman’s statement in a formal argumentative essay.
Introduce a precise claim, and develop it fully, using relevant and sufficient evidence from your readings on the Holocaust and other related texts from the unit. In your writing, distinguish your claim from alternate or opposing claims, and establish clear relationships among your claim, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Your essay should be at least 5 paragraphs in length.
The Holocaust was one of the most brutal and horrifying events in human history. It was a systematic extermination of Jews, homosexuals, disabled people, and others who were deemed undesirable by the Nazi regime.
Many people were involved in the Holocaust, including the perpetrators, the victims, and the bystanders. In the documentary Witness to the Holocaust, Miles Lehrman argues that bystanders were the most dangerous part of the Holocaust because neutrality always helps the killer. While this statement may seem harsh, it is a valid argument that can be supported by evidence.
Bystanders played a crucial role in the Holocaust. They were not directly involved in the killing, but they allowed it to happen by remaining silent and indifferent. The bystanders included ordinary citizens, government officials, and even some members of the Jewish community who chose to collaborate with the Nazis. They were not necessarily evil, but they were indifferent to the suffering of others. They failed to take action, even when they knew that innocent people were being murdered. In many cases, the bystanders were motivated by fear or self-interest. They did not want to risk their own lives or careers by opposing the Nazi regime.
To know more about Holocaust , here
https://brainly.com/question/12962
#SPJ1
Review the map.
A map titled Nazi Invasion of Western Europe. Arrows go from Germany and Luxembourg to Netherlands, Belgium, France, and Switzerland.
What does the map show about the Low Countries (Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands)?
They gave Nazi troops a defensive position against Switzerland.
They provided the Nazis with a quick route to its ally, Italy.
They provided an easy way for the Nazis to enter France.
They established a direct connection to the Soviet Union.
The map titled "Nazi Invasion of Western Europe" shows that the Low Countries (Luxembourg, Belgium, and the Netherlands) C. provided an easy way for the Nazis to enter France.
What did the low countries do ?The arrows on the map indicate the direction of the German invasion of Western Europe, with German troops entering France from the north via Belgium and the Netherlands.
This was one of the reasons why Germany decided to defeat and occupy the Low Countries, so that they would be able to get around French fortifications on the border with France.
Therefore, the correct answer is "They provided an easy way for the Nazis to enter France."
Find out more on Nazi Germany at https://brainly.com/question/20533600
#SPJ1
What law signed by President Roosevelt was influenced by the Townsend
Plan?
A. The Wagner Act
B. The Social Security Act
C. The Glass-Steagall Act
D. The Economy Act
Answer:
B. The Social Security Act
Explanation:
In January 1935, Roosevelt proposed the Social Security Act, which he presented as a more practical alternative to the Townsend Plan. After a series of congressional hearings, the Social Security Act became law in August 1935.
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
What are some examples of functional fixedness?
Functional fixedness has impacted various aspects of history, especially in the context of technological innovation and problem-solving. Some examples would be:
QWERTY keyboard: The QWERTY keyboard layout was designed to prevent jamming in early typewriters by slowing down the typing speed. Even with modern keyboards, we still use the QWERTY layout, despite the availability of more efficient layouts like the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard.
Steam locomotive: When steam locomotives were first introduced, they were built with a design that resembled horse-drawn carriages. It took time for engineers to break free from this traditional design concept and develop more efficient, streamlined locomotives.
Transition from horse-drawn carriages to cars: Early automobiles were designed to resemble horse-drawn carriages, as people were accustomed to the appearance and functionality of carriages. This functional fixedness limited the potential for innovation and improvement in automotive design.
Candlestick telephone: The candlestick telephone, which separated the mouthpiece from the earpiece, was designed based on the assumption that people would hold the mouthpiece near their mouths while listening through the earpiece. This functional fixedness led to the development of later telephone designs with integrated mouth and earpieces, improving the user experience.
These examples are some of the many ways to demonstrate how functional fixedness can hinder innovation and creative problem-solving by limiting the ways people think about the potential uses and designs of objects and technologies.
Which of the following is not a way for the other branches of government to keep the President in check under the system of checks and balances?
a) Senate confirmation of treaties made by the executive branch
b)Senate confirmation of Presidential appointees
c)Congressional approval of the Vice-President
d)Congressional ability to override presidential vetoes
Answer:b
Explanation:your wlecome
Which ideal of American democracy do you think is more important? Explain
Answer:
I think liberty and freedom is the most important American democracy based on the following.
Protecting individual rights: Liberty and Freedom is essential in protecting individual rights against government encroachment. The United States Constitution, through the Bill of Rights, explicitly protects individual liberties such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, the right to bear arms, the right to a fair trial, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. These protections are crucial in ensuring that individuals can live their lives without undue interference from the government.
Promoting innovation and progress: Liberty and Freedom encourages innovation and progress by allowing individuals to pursue their own goals and aspirations without undue restrictions. This freedom has allowed individuals to create new technologies, start new businesses, and make groundbreaking discoveries that have transformed society.
Encouraging personal responsibility: Liberty and Freedom encourages personal responsibility by allowing individuals to make their own choices and bear the consequences of those choices. This promotes accountability and self-reliance, which are essential in a democratic society where individuals have a responsibility to participate in the democratic process and contribute to the well-being of society.
Ensuring a diverse and inclusive society: Liberty and Freedom allows for a diverse and inclusive society by protecting the rights of individuals from all walks of life, regardless of their race, gender, religion, or socioeconomic status. This ideal has been critical in promoting social justice and ensuring that all individuals have an equal opportunity to succeed in life.
Explanation:
4. Woodrow Wilson first proposed a "League of Nations" many years earlier. He said,
"Friendship is the only cement that will hold the world together." The United States
refused to join the League of Nations, and the organization eventually dissolved. Why
do you think the nations of the world were more receptive to the United Nations than
the League of Nations?
A major reason why the nations of the world were more receptive to the United Nations than the League of Nations was that it included the world powers such as the USA and the Soviet Union .
Why was the UN more successful than the League ?The League of Nations lacked the support and backing of the United States, a major global power, leading to weakened legitimacy and efficacy .
In contrast, in the aftermath of World War II - which had far-reaching impacts - the formation and success of the United Nations was greatly influenced by American involvement and assistance .
Find out more on the League of Nations at https://brainly.com/question/15136206
#SPJ1
In the future days, which we seek to make secure, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms. The first is freedom of speech and expression-everywhere in the world
2 The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way everywhere in the world.
3 The third is freedom from want which, translated into world terms, means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants- everywhere in the world.
4 The fourth is freedom from fear--which, translated into world terms, means a worldwide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor-anywhere in the world.
5 That is no vision of a distant millennium. It is a definite basis for a kind of world attainable in our own time and generation. That kind of world is the very antithesis of the so-called new order of tyranny which the dictators seek to create with the crash of a bomb.
6 To that new order we oppose the greater conception the moral order. A good society is able to face schemes of world domination and foreign revolutions alike without fear.
7 Since the beginning of our American history, we have been engaged in change in a perpetual peaceful revolution--a revolution which goes on steadily, quietly adjusting itself to changing conditions-without the concentration camp or the quick-lime in the ditch.
The world order which we seek is the cooperation of free countries, working together in a friendly, civilized society.
8 This nation has placed its destiny in the hands and heads and hearts of its millions of free men and women; and its faith in freedom under the guidance of God. Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere. Our support goes to those who struggle to gain those rights or keep them. Our strength is our unity of purpose.
9 To that high concept there can be no end save victory.
From Congressional Record, 1941, Vol. 87, Pt. I.
The "Four Freedoms" by Franklin D. Roosevelt, speech before Congress, 1941.
The given passage contains a segment of a discourse made by a representative from the United States. Roosevelt was the head of the United States government during World War II.
What is the freedom about?President Franklin D. Roosevelt served as the leader of the American government throughout the duration of World War II. In 1941, Roosevelt addressed the Congress.
During his speech, Roosevelt outlined a concept for a global society based on four crucial human freedoms that he deemed crucial for ensuring a tranquil and prosperous future.
Learn more about freedom from
#SPJ1
after the horrors of the first World War the US was keen to stay out of the conflict. That being said it could be argued that getting into the war helped drag the US out of the Great Depression. Is this true or was the US already on its way out of the Depression with or without getting involved in the War?
Answer:
The impact of World War I on the US economy and the Great Depression is a complex and debated topic among economists and historians. While it is true that the US entry into World War I had a significant impact on the economy, it is difficult to say whether it was the sole factor that helped the US recover from the Great Depression.
The US entry into World War I did bring about significant changes to the economy. The US government spent billions of dollars on the war effort, which helped create jobs and stimulate economic growth. The demand for goods and services increased, and industries such as steel, coal, and manufacturing saw significant growth as a result.
Furthermore, the war led to a boom in US exports, as European countries were in need of US goods and materials to support their war efforts. This helped boost the US economy and provided new markets for US products.
However, it is important to note that the US economy was already showing signs of recovery before the country entered the war. The New Deal policies implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, such as the creation of public works programs and new social welfare programs, helped create jobs and stimulate economic growth.
Additionally, the US economy was already benefiting from the growth of new industries, such as automobiles and radio, which helped create new jobs and stimulate economic growth.
Therefore, while the US entry into World War I had a significant impact on the economy, it is difficult to say whether or not it was the sole factor that helped the country recover from the Great Depression. The recovery was likely the result of a combination of factors, including government policies and the growth of new industries.
What is the longest continuous excavation of caves in ancient China?
Which of the following is the basis for nearly all the boundaries of today's sub-Saharan African states?
Nearly all of the borders of current sub-Saharan African republics were based on the statement, "Britain rushes to take possession of Egypt before the rest of its European rivals."
Which European rivalry is the fiercest?
Perhaps the most well-known rivalry in the world is El Clásico. Everyone is aware that El Clásico refers to the rivalry game between Real Madrid and Barcelona. When Real Madrid continued to be referred to as Madrid CF, their first meeting took place in 1902. This friendly game was won by FC Barcelona 3-1.
Who are the European opponents of Barcelona?El Clásico refers to the rivalry between the club and Real Madrid, which has existed for a very long time. Barcelona has one of the highest social media followings among sports clubs worldwide and is one of its most widely supported organisations in the world.
To know more about European rivals visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11381679
#SPJ1
Jefferson believed that large estates should be divided as a way to diminish the ———- of wealth in the early republic
Answer:
Jefferson believed that large estates should be divided as a way to diminish the concentration of wealth in the early republic.
PLS HURRY TIMED!!!! What was MOST radical about Descartes's statement, “I think therefore I am”?
It did not require any higher power or authority.
No one had questioned the nature of being before.
Descartes emphasized the role of the mind over the body.
The Catholic Church had been responsible for defining being.
Answer:
Explanation:
Descartes's statement, “I think therefore I am” was MOST radical because it emphasized the role of the mind over the body.
How did the electoral votes in the 1860 election reflect sectional divisions?
Will Mark Brainliest
(05.02 MC)
What democratic feature of the Roman government was adopted by the United States? A senatorial body with lifetime appointments Two heads of government who ruled together A body of praetors who judged and created laws A tripartite system with separation of powers
Answer:
A tripartite system with separation of powers.
Explanation:
which change has most affected us factory workers since 1990
Answer:
The most significant change that has affected US factory workers since 1990 is likely the increased adoption of automation and technology in manufacturing. Automation and technology have led to significant improvements in efficiency, productivity, and quality control in the manufacturing process, but they have also contributed to a decline in manufacturing employment.
With the rise of automation, many routine and repetitive tasks that were previously performed by human workers can now be done by machines. This has led to a decrease in the demand for low-skilled manufacturing jobs, such as assembly line work. At the same time, the demand for workers with advanced technical skills, such as computer programming and robotics, has increased.
The impact of automation on employment has been significant. According to a report by the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University, automation accounted for 85% of the decline in US manufacturing employment between 2000 and 2010. Furthermore, the adoption of automation and technology in manufacturing is likely to continue in the future, which means that the impact on employment is likely to persist.
In summary, the increased adoption of automation and technology in manufacturing is the most significant change that has affected US factory workers since 1990. While this has led to improvements in efficiency and productivity, it has also contributed to a decline in manufacturing employment, particularly for low-skilled workers.
Which feature of the U.S. government is an expression of the concept of
federalism?
O A. The powers of the federal government are divided into three
branches with a system of checks and balances.
B. Certain powers are given to the federal government, while others
are reserved for the states.
• C. States have equal representation in the Senate but proportional
representation in the House of Representatives.
• D. The Constitution is defined as the supreme law of the land.
B. Certain powers are given to the federal government, while others
are reserved for the states.
Explanation:Federalism supports the idea that the powers of government should be divided among different levels.
Federalism
Federalism is a form of government where power is shared between the national and state levels. The United States is one of the most prominent examples of federalism. The US Constitution states that powers not given to the national government are reserved for the state. This means that the states have the ability to do things such as create social programs and justice systems. Unlike unitary governments, in federalism, power is held by multiple levels of government.
Uses of Federalism
Federalism is especially useful for large or diverse countries. Since some power is reserved for local governments, the smaller governments can better help and represent the people that live in that region. In unitary governments, everyone must be served and represented by the same, large government. However, this is ineffective for countries where people are spread out over a large distance or when the people of a country are diverse from each other.
What is one benefit to the Constitution giving powers to state governments?
Answer:that it allows for a more localized approach to governing,
Explanation: One of the many benefits of this document is that it gives powers to both the federal government and state governments.
By giving powers to state governments, the Constitution allows for a system of federalism. This means that power is shared between the national government and the individual states. This is a wonderful thing because it allows each state to have some degree of autonomy and the ability to make decisions that are specific to their state's needs.
For example, a state like Alaska may have different environmental concerns than a state like Florida, and the state government is better equipped to make decisions that are tailored to their unique needs. By giving power to state governments, the Constitution allows for a more localized approach to governing, where decisions can be made on a smaller scale with more consideration for the needs and opinions of the people living in that particular state.
Additionally, the Constitution's division of powers between the federal and state governments helps to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. This is a key aspect of our system of checks and balances, which ensures that no one person or group has too much control over our government.
So, to sum it up, one of the benefits of the Constitution giving powers to state governments is that it allows for a more localized approach to governing, where decisions can be made on a smaller scale with more consideration for the unique needs of each state.
Answer:
State governments have the power to do many things. They provide schooling and education. State and local governments provide protection and safety. States give drivers' licenses, and approve zoning and land use.
Explanation:
prego <3
What best explains the causes of the French Revolution that led to a new Constitution in 1791?
A.)Challenged the enormous power of the 3rd Estate.
B.)The lack of power of the clergy
C.)Large amount of government power for the bourgeoisie
D.)Heavy taxation and the lack of property ownership of the 3rd estate
Answer:D
Explanation:
The causes of the French Revolution that led to a new Constitution in 1791 can best be explained by option D, which is the heavy taxation and the lack of property ownership of the 3rd estate. The 3rd Estate, which comprised the common people and the lower classes, was heavily taxed and had limited political power compared to the first two estates, which consisted of the nobility and the clergy. The 3rd Estate was also burdened by the feudal system, which prevented them from owning land and advancing socially. These factors led to widespread poverty, resentment, and social unrest, which eventually led to the French Revolution and the demand for a new Constitution that would establish a more equitable and just society.
lots of points
Question refers to the excerpt below.
"And whereas great Quantities of the like Manufactures have of late been made and are daily increasing in the Kingdom of Ireland and in the English Plantations in America and are exported from thence to Forreigne Marketts heretofore supplyed from England which will inevitably sink the Value of Lands and tend to the ruine of the Trade and the Woollen Manufactures of this Realme … Be it enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same:
That no Person or Persons … shall directly or indirectly export … out of or from the said Kingdom of Ireland into any Forreigne Realme States or Dominions … other than the Parts within the Kingdom of England."—Wool Act, 1699
What did the Parliament of England's enactment of acts such as the Wool Act signify to the colonists?
A weak attempt at economic equality
An act of control and increasing taxation
Endorsement of the superiority of Irish products
Protection of British trade interests
to germany who posed the greatest threat and why
The two major powers that posed a threat to Germany during the period leading up to World War II were the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom.
What was the reason?
The Soviet Union, under Stalin's leadership, was seen as a threat due to its ideology of communism, which was viewed as a direct threat to Nazi Germany's fascist ideology.
The United Kingdom, on the other hand, posed a threat due to its strong military and economic power, which could potentially challenge Germany's own ambitions of expansion in Europe.
Additionally, the UK's close alliance with France and other European powers made it a formidable opponent to Germany's expansionist goals.
To know more about Germany related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1061130
#SPJ1
complete question:
Who posed the greatest threat to Germany during the period leading up to World War II and why?
Jefferson believed that large estates should be divided as a way to diminish the ———- of wealth in the early republic
Jefferson believed that the large estates should be divided as way to diminish concentration of wealth in early republic.
What is republic?A republic is a form of government where the power is held by the people, either directly or through elected representatives. In a republic, the leaders are chosen through democratic elections and are accountable to the citizens. The term "republic" comes from the Latin "res publica," meaning "public thing" or "public affair," emphasizing the importance of the common good. In contrast to a monarchy or dictatorship, where power is held by a single individual or group, a republic aims to distribute power and ensure that no one person or group becomes too powerful. The United States is an example of a federal republic, where power is divided between the federal government and state governments.
To learn more about republic, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30336520
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Jefferson believed that large estates should be divided as a way to diminish the ———- of wealth in the early republic.
When watching the report on the Jupiter rocket, what kind of message do you think the news report was trying to convey? Was this report also influencing the viewers? In which way?
The report on Jupiter Rocket was trying to give the message that Soviet Union was perceived to pose a serious threat to US national security as a result of the launch and orbit of Sputnik 1.
This led to significant federal investments in national security, research and development, and education.
2. Was this report also influencing the viewers?Yes, watching Russia's accomplishments had an impact on the spectators in a way that made them feel more competitive.
In which way?In terms of motivating young people to have a feeling of global competition to compete against countries with top-tier technology, like Russia, it can be claimed that the impact the media had was beneficial.
To know more about News Reporting visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16175806
#SPJ1
What was one outcome of the Madrid Conference of 1991?
A stable and long-term peace the Middle East was achieved.
B. A working relationship began between the United States and the Soviet Union
C. It encouraged future attempts at peace in the Middle East.
D. Palestine received full independence and the ability to rule itself.
Answer: C. It encouraged future attempts at peace in the Middle East.
Explanation: One outcome of the Madrid Conference of 1991 was:C. It encouraged future attempts at peace in the Middle East.The Madrid Conference was the first direct, face-to-face peace talks between Israel and its Arab neighbors, including Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and the Palestinians, with both the United States and the Soviet Union serving as co-sponsors. Although the conference itself did not produce any significant peace agreements, it did set the stage for future negotiations and talks.The conference was important because it represented a shift in the United States' approach to the Middle East conflict, moving away from the bilateral approach of dealing with only Israel and Palestinians, and expanding to include the other Arab nations as stakeholders.Therefore, the correct option is C. It encouraged future attempts at peace in the Middle East.
The Madrid Conference of 1991 was a critical event in Middle Eastern diplomacy, primarily encouraging future attempts at peace, but not achieving immediate peace or Palestinian independence.
Explanation:The Madrid Conference of 1991 was a significant historical event in the context of Middle Eastern diplomacy. Its primary objective was to negotiate peace in the Middle East, particularly the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The key outcome of the Madrid Conference was indeed option C: it encouraged future attempts at peace in the Middle East. This was notable as it marked a shift in international policy and galvanized future diplomatic efforts, although it did not achieve immediate peace or Palestinian independence.
Learn more about Madrid Conference of 1991 here:https://brainly.com/question/32177285
#SPJ2
What is the message of the song "I Will Go West!"? How is it different from that of "Clementine"?
"I Will Go West!" and "Clementine" are both songs that tell stories of people going on journeys, but they have different messages.
The message of "I Will Go West!" is one of determination and optimism. The lyrics speak of the singer's desire to travel west and make a new life for themselves, despite the challenges that lie ahead. The song encourages the listener to take risks and pursue their dreams.
On the other hand, the message of "Clementine" is one of sadness and loss. The lyrics tell the story of a miner's daughter who drowned in a river, leaving her father grief-stricken. The song is a cautionary tale about the dangers of taking risks and the importance of cherishing what we have while we have it.
Overall, "I Will Go West!" is a more uplifting song that celebrates the spirit of adventure, while "Clementine" is a more somber song that reminds us of the fragility of life.
~~~Harsha~~~
What short term consequences did hosting the 1996 Olympic Games have on Georgias economy and population
Explanation:
Hosting the 1996 Olympic Games had several short-term consequences on Georgia's economy and population, including:
1. Boost to the economy: The Olympics brought in a significant amount of revenue to the state of Georgia, as tourists from all over the world visited Atlanta to attend the games. This influx of visitors helped to stimulate the local economy, as businesses such as hotels, restaurants, and stores saw an increase in sales.
2. Job creation: The Olympics also created many temporary jobs, as the city of Atlanta needed to hire staff to manage the events and provide services to the visitors. This helped to reduce unemployment rates in the area and provided a boost to the local job market.
3. Infrastructure improvements: In preparation for the Olympics, the city of Atlanta invested heavily in infrastructure improvements, such as building new roads, bridges, and public transportation systems. This not only helped to accommodate the large number of visitors during the games but also left a lasting impact on the city's infrastructure.
4. Population growth: The influx of visitors during the Olympics also contributed to a temporary population surge in the city of Atlanta. While many of these visitors returned to their home countries after the games, some chose to stay in Georgia, leading to a small but noticeable increase in the state's population.
Overall, hosting the 1996 Olympic Games had several positive short-term consequences for Georgia's economy and population, including a boost to the local economy, job creation, infrastructure improvements, and temporary population growth.
history
Question refers to the excerpt below.
"The homes of the Indians were copied by the English, being ready adaptations of natural and plentiful resources. Wigwams in the South were of plaited rush or grass mats; of deerskins pinned on a frame; of tree boughs rudely piled into a cover, and in the far South, of layers of palmetto leaves. In the mild climate of the Middle and Southern states a 'half-faced camp,' of the Indian form, with one open side, which served for windows and door, and where the fire was built, made a good temporary home. In such for a time, in his youth, lived Abraham Lincoln. Bark wigwams were the most easily made of all; they could be quickly pinned together on a light frame. In 1626 there were thirty home-buildings of Europeans on the island of Manhattan, now New York, and all but one of them were of bark."—Alice Morse Earle, Home Life in Colonial Days, 1898
Americans Indians had significant, immediate influence on the colonists and their communities on the Atlantic Seaboard because
permanent villages aided the colonists in forming political alliances and allocating resources found in the Americas
the colonists arrived with a need to build shelters but didn't understand the materials or tools available
the weather conditions on the Atlantic Seaboard were foreign to the colonists, and they sought help from the native peoples
they were familiar with the farming techniques that the colonists needed to establish their permanent communities
the Atlantic Seaboard is: "the colonists arrived with a need to build shelters but didn't understand the materials or tools available."
What excerpt highlights?
The excerpt highlights the fact that the colonists were able to adapt the homes of the American Indians to their own needs because they lacked the knowledge and understanding of the materials and tools available in the Americas. This suggests that the colonists relied on the expertise and knowledge of the American Indians to build shelters and establish their communities.
While the excerpt does mention the benefits of permanent villages in forming political alliances and allocating resources, and the importance of farming techniques in establishing permanent communities, these are not the primary focus of the passage and are not supported by the evidence presented.
To know more about colonist related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17745401
#SPJ1
Choose one of the following groups that was inspired by the Civil Rights Movement, and give an example of the work they
accomplished.
NAACP
NOW
AIM
UFW
The NAACP (the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), was inspired by the Civil Rights Movement and it played a crucial role in the fight for racial equality.
One of their notable accomplishments was the 1954 landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, which led to the desegregation of public schools in the United States.
What is NAACP?NAACP, or the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, is a civil rights organization in the United States.
It was founded in 1909 and is dedicated to fighting for the rights and equality of African Americans and other marginalized groups through legal, legislative, and advocacy efforts.
The NAACP has been involved in landmark cases and initiatives aimed at combating racial discrimination and promoting civil rights for over a century.
Learn more about NAACP at brainly.com/question/1146050
#SPJ1
history
Question refers to the excerpt below.
"To the People of the State of New York:
There are again two methods of removing the causes of faction: the one, by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence; the other, by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.
It could never be more truly said than of the first remedy, that it was worse than the disease. Liberty is to faction what air is to fire, an aliment without which it instantly expires. But it could not be less folly to abolish liberty, which is essential to political life, because it nourishes faction, than it would be to wish the annihilation of air, which is essential to animal life, because it imparts to fire its destructive agency."—James Madison, The Federalist No. 10, 1787
The focus in The Federalist No. 10 shares support for which of the following with Romanticism and the Second Great Awakening?
The idea that government could solve all social problems
The ideas of self-determination and societal improvement
The idea that nature could redeem personal loss and create wealth
The ideas of individuality and spiritual unity
Answer:
Explanation:
The ideas of self-determination and societal improvement
James Madison's The Federalist No. 10 reflects strong support for the notions of self-determination and societal development, concepts that were also propagated under Romanticism and the Second Great Awakening.
Explanation:The ideas expressed in James Madison's The Federalist No. 10 align best with the tenets of self-determination and societal improvement, common themes found in both the Romantic movement and the Second Great Awakening. Madison's concept that fault should not be found in liberty for nurturing faction, but rather, that these factions are a necessary part of political life supports self-autonomy and societal betterment, as citizens are expected to engage in these factions to discuss, negotiate, and compromise. This involvement is a form of self-determination, an echo of the Romantics' emphasis on individual freedom, as well as the Second Great Awakening's focus on personal salvation and moral reform as methods of societal improvement.
Learn more about Self-determination and societal improvement here:https://brainly.com/question/32396136
#SPJ2