Answer:
Anthropologists have learned about early hominids through a variety of methods, including:
Fossil evidence: Anthropologists have discovered and analyzed fossilized remains of early hominids, such as skulls, teeth, bones, and footprints. These fossils provide important information about the physical characteristics, behavior, and habitat of early hominids.Archaeological evidence: Anthropologists study the artifacts and tools left behind by early hominids, such as stone tools, fire pits, and animal bones. These artifacts provide insights into the technology, diet, and social organization of early hominids.Comparative anatomy: Anthropologists compare the physical characteristics of early hominids to those of modern humans and other primates to understand the evolutionary relationships and adaptations of early hominids.Genetics and molecular biology: Anthropologists use genetic and molecular techniques to study the DNA of early hominids, as well as their modern human and primate relatives. These studies can provide insights into the relationships and evolutionary history of different hominid species.Ethnographic studies: Anthropologists conduct ethnographic studies of modern human societies that have lifestyles similar to those of early hominids, such as hunter-gatherer societies. These studies can provide insights into the behavior, social organization, and technology of early hominids.Computer modeling: Anthropologists use computer modeling and simulations to reconstruct the behavior, habitat, and social organization of early hominids based on available evidence.Overall, anthropologists use a multidisciplinary approach to learn about early hominids, combining evidence from different sources to create a more complete picture of these early human ancestors.
Why did the election of 1912 feature four candidates and how did their platforms differ?
what is the difference between a nation and a state
A nation is a group of people who have things in common like their language. A state is a place with clear borders, a government, and the ability to make and enforce laws within those borders.
Bolshevism was just one of many responses to dysfunction and deprivation of Russia; describe non-Bolshevik groups
During the early 20th century, Russia faced a great deal of dysfunction and deprivation, and as a result, a number of non-Bolshevik groups emerged.
These groups were often focused on different methods of addressing the issues facing the country, and some of the most prominent included the Socialist Revolutionaries, the Mensheviks, and the Constitutional Democrats. The Socialist Revolutionaries were a populist group that believed in the power of the people to bring about change. They advocated for a socialist society that was more democratic and equitable, and they were particularly popular among the peasantry. The Mensheviks, on the other hand, were more moderate socialists who believed in working within the existing political system to achieve reform. They favored a more gradual approach to change and were often critical of the Bolsheviks' more radical tactics. Finally, the Constitutional Democrats, also known as the Cadets, were a liberal party that advocated for a constitutional monarchy and greater political freedoms.
Overall, these non-Bolshevik groups were united in their desire for change in Russia, but they differed in their methods and ideologies. While the Bolsheviks ultimately emerged as the dominant force in the country, these other groups played an important role in shaping the political landscape of Russia during this tumultuous time.
To learn more about Bolsheviks, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2781293
#SPJ11
how did hispanics suffer during the 1950s and the 1960s?
The most crucial way by which the Hispanics suffered during the time range of 1950s to 1960s is the threats arising from deportation, all of which giving vent to civil rights, and empowerment based movements.
The general threats that arose due to deportation includes; unemployment, immigrant worker hostility, job opportunity crisis, and food shortage. In the era of 1950s, also referred to as an "era of witch hunt" there was tremendous immigration of the Hispanics to the USA. This said immigration resulted in ethnic stereotyping, and discrimination.
Naturally, based on the above-mentioned statements, it can be pointed out that the primary way by which the Hispanics suffered in 1950s and 1960s, is by the threats arising from deportation.
To more about the suffering from of the Hispanics during 1950s, and 1960s:
brainly.com/question/14310895
The artist who created this poster of an Independence Day celebration in the new West African nation of Ghana in 1957 was
The artist who created this poster of an Independence Day celebration in the new West African nation of Ghana in 1957 was Amon Kotei.
Kotei was a leading artist in the Accra School of Art and was a part of the Creative Arts Centre, which had a mission to create art that was both modern and relevant to the culture and history of Ghana. His work often featured vibrant colors and bold lines. He used his art to celebrate the nation’s independence and to celebrate the culture of Ghana.
In this poster, Kotei combined traditional Ghanaian symbols and motifs with modern artwork to create a stunning image of a celebration of independence. Kotei was a major influence in the Accra School of Art, and his work is still appreciated today.
To know more about Ghana, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/4318962
#SPJ4
History of Watergate
**Choose TWO of the following questions to answer in paragraph form.**
>Why is Watergate an important historical event?
>What do you think was the impact of Watergate on how the public perceives the presidency and politicians?
>Should Nixon’s presidency be judged more on his accomplishments or the Watergate scandal? Why?
>Do you think Nixon’s actions were much different from other politicians?
Watergate is an important historical event as from 1972 to 1974, President Richard Nixon's administration was embroiled in the massive political scandal known as "Watergate," which forced Nixon to resign.
Events of Watergate Scandal-The Nixon administration's repeated efforts to hide its participation in the June 17, 1972 break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Washington, D.C., Watergate Office Building led to the scandal.
The Oval Office was equipped with a voice-activated recording device, according to witnesses, and Nixon authorized preparations to hide his administration's involvement in the break-in.
Nixon's government consistently rejected the investigation's inquiries, which resulted in a constitutional crisis. PBS transmitted "gavel-to-gavel" across the country during the Senate Watergate hearings, piqued popular attention.
2. What do you think was the impact of Watergate on how the public perceives the presidency and politicians?- The controversy altered how people saw the president and lawmakers. Throughout the country, there was a feeling of mistrust and rage. Politicians started to be seen by them as burglars.
The incident caused a generalized mistrust of the administration, which altered the political calculus for many issues.
"The controversy is still being felt today throughout the political spectrum. In an editorial that CNN published in 2014, Princeton history and public affairs professor Julian Zeilzer stated, "We still live in the Watergate period.
To know more about Watergate Scandal visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3440982
#SPJ1
Books such as Mercy Otis Warren's History of the Revolution and Mason Weems' Life of Washington were popular in the early republic because they
Books such as Mercy Otis Warren's "History of the Revolution" and Mason Weems' "Life of Washington" were popular in the early republic because they played an important role in shaping the historical narrative of the new nation.
At the time, the United States was still in its infancy, and there was a great deal of uncertainty about its future. Americans were eager to create a national identity and to celebrate the accomplishments of their founding generation.
Warren's "History of the Revolution" was one of the first comprehensive histories of the American Revolution, and it provided a detailed account of the events that led to the nation's independence.
It also emphasized the contributions of lesser-known figures, such as women and African Americans, who played important roles in the struggle for independence. The book was widely read and helped to cement the legacy of the revolutionary generation as heroes and patriots.
Similarly, Weems' "Life of Washington" helped to create a mythic image of the nation's first president as a heroic and virtuous leader. Weems emphasized Washington's humility, honesty, and bravery, painting a picture of a man who embodied the virtues of the American people. The book was enormously popular and helped to solidify Washington's place as a national hero and role model.
Both books were important in shaping the historical narrative of the early republic, and in establishing a sense of national identity and pride. They helped to establish the idea that the United States was a unique and exceptional nation, founded on the principles of liberty and democracy, and that its leaders were virtuous and heroic figures who embodied those principles.
To know more about republic refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/12880388
#SPJ11
Aryans moved onto the Ganges Plain, they
A
took on the religious and social systems of the local civilizations.
B
were peaceful and acquired more land using treaties and bartering.
C
had chariot races and built enormous horse ranches.
D
imported their culture, language and religion into Ancient India.
Answer:
b is the answer
Explanation:
isn't it so cool
Due May 5 Please Hurry! 18 Points
Answer the questions below in paragraph form. Be sure to check your grammar and elaborate.
What is humanism?
What was different about Renaissance art?
How did the Renaissance influence writers?
What was new in science and technology?
Why does the Renaissance matter?
To answer such questions related to the Renaissance, we must conduct research on the topic.
How can we answer these questions?Humanism corresponds to a cultural movement related to the Renaissance, that is, its ideas and precepts were related to the focus on the individual and his issues, such as emotions, individualism and rationalism.Renaissance art was based on themes opposed to sacred themes, based on realism and humanist aspects with a focus on individualism. In the literary part, the renaissance influenced the writers in the sense of the transition of themes beyond the religious ones, with the development of the narratives and drama.The Renaissance also impacted science and technology by bringing rationalism as the method of understanding the world instead of the religious perspective, The Renaissance is important for the development of the scientific method, critical thinking, etc.Therefore, based on these questions, we conclude that the Renaissance contributed to the development of critical thinking, knowledge and rationalism.
Find out more about humanism at:
https://brainly.com/question/25959355
#SPJ1
What did Alexander McGillivray and William McIntosh have in common?
Alexander McGillivray and William McIntosh were both prominent Creek leaders who played important roles in the relations between the Creek Nation and the United States government in the late 18th and early 19th centuries.
In the late 18th century, Alexander McGillivray was a mixed-race Creek leader who was influential in negotiating peace treaties between the Creek Nation and the United States government.
He was a powerful orator and diplomat who advocated for the Creek Nation's interests, and his leadership was essential in preserving the Creek Nation's sovereignty and territorial integrity during a period of intense pressure from American settlers and government authorities.
William McIntosh, also known as Tustunnuggee Hutkee or "White Warrior," was another major Creek leader who was involved in the Creek Nation's dealings with the US government.
For such more question on government:
https://brainly.com/question/1772602
#SPJ11
6. Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom
a. advocated social-welfare programs.
b. opposed fragmentation of big industrial combines.
c. favored small enterprise and entrepreneurship.
d. supported minimum-wage laws.
e. opposed banking and tariff reform.
Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom: favored small enterprise and entrepreneurship. The correct option is C
The New Freedom policy primarily focused on supporting small enterprises, promoting entrepreneurship, and advocating for banking and tariff reforms.
The policy favored small enterprise and entrepreneurship, as Wilson believed that a competitive market would lead to innovation and economic growth. He also opposed banking and tariff reforms to ensure a more equitable economic environment for smaller businesses.
These reforms included the establishment of the Federal Reserve System to stabilize the banking sector and the reduction of tariffs through the Underwood Tariff Act.
The New Freedom policy did not heavily advocate for social-welfare programs, nor did it support minimum-wage laws (d). It also (b) opposed the fragmentation of big industrial combines, as Wilson aimed to break up monopolies and trusts to encourage competition in the market.
In summary, Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom policy was centered around supporting small businesses and entrepreneurs, advocating for banking and tariff reforms, and opposing monopolistic practices in the industry. It did not focus on social-welfare programs or minimum-wage laws, and it opposed the fragmentation of big industrial combines.
To know more about Woodrow Wilson, refer here:
brainly.com/question/29888956#
#SPJ11
The Treaty of Kanagawa opened trade with what Pacific nation?
Answer:
Empire of Japan
Explanation:
According to Beatrice Webb, how did her father relate
outwardly to his business associates? What priorities governed his business
decisions, and what concerns was he willing to sacrifice in order to achieve these
priorities?
Beatrice Webb father was very outwardly friendly with his business associates, often treating them as close friends.
His priorities rested upon long-term investments that would be beneficial in the future, and he was willing to sacrifice short-term gains in order to ensure that those benefits would still exist down the line. He was also willing to make large personal sacrifices in order to attain his goals and serve those he had associated himself with.
He was a strong believer in integrity and honesty when it came do conducting business, always looking out for the best interests of all involved.
To know more about short-term gains visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29838458
#SPJ4
what does Kennan consider the most notable characteristics of the russian past
According to Kennan, the most notable characteristics of the Russian past are the deep roots of authoritarianism and the lack of experience with democratic institutions.
He also highlights the strong influence of the Orthodox Church, leading to the fusion of spiritual and temporal power, the persistent sense of insecurity and the expansionist tendencies of Russia.
Additionally, Kennan notes the central role of the collective rather than the individual, which can be traced back to the traditional Slavic social structures.
To know more about authoritarianism
brainly.com/question/30019371
#SPJ1
Under the 1965 Voting Rights Act, prior to 2013, what criteria was used for determining which voting jurisdictions needed federal preclearance before changing their voting laws or practices?
Under the 1965 Voting Rights Act, prior to 2013, the criteria used for determining which voting jurisdictions needed federal preclearance before changing their voting laws or practices was based on a formula known as the "coverage formula." This formula used a combination of factors, including whether the jurisdiction had a history of discriminatory voting practices and whether it had low voter turnout or a high number of voting-related complaints.
The formula applied to certain states and counties, primarily in the South, with a history of discrimination against minority voters. These jurisdictions were required to seek approval from the Department of Justice or a federal court before making any changes to their voting laws or procedures.The coverage formula was based on data from the 1960 census and included states and counties in which fewer than 50 percent of eligible voters were registered to vote or had voted in the 1964 presidential election. It also included jurisdictions that had a history of using discriminatory voting practices, such as literacy tests, poll taxes, or other barriers to voting.Under the preclearance requirement, covered jurisdictions had to obtain approval from the federal government before making any changes to their voting laws or practices. This was intended to prevent these jurisdictions from enacting new laws or practices that would have a discriminatory effect on minority voters.In 2013, the Supreme Court struck down the coverage formula in Shelby County v. Holder, ruling that it was based on outdated data and that the formula was no longer an appropriate way to identify jurisdictions that needed preclearance. As a result, the preclearance requirement is no longer in effect, and covered jurisdictions are no longer required to obtain federal approval before changing their voting laws or practices.
Learn more about jurisdictions here:
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ11
The trade policy of Great Britain during the period of colonization was called
Colonization refers to the process of establishing and maintaining political and economic control over a territory or people outside of one's own borders.
The trade policy of Great Britain during the period of colonization was called mercantilism. This policy aimed to increase the country's wealth and power by controlling trade and maximizing exports while minimizing imports. The British government imposed regulations and taxes on colonial trade, which led to tensions and eventually the American Revolution.
Learn more about Coloniation here:
https://brainly.com/question/30737309
#SPJ11
True or False: The US and Allied forces were able to move quickly through the Pacific towards Japan?
Answer:
false
Explanation:
As American and Allied forces “Island Hopped” through the Pacific, one of their key objectives was to cut off Japanese bases from resupply or rescue. After the initial amphibious landings of the “hop,” Allied land and sea forces would gain control of the areas around the bypassed Japanese bases.
Why did many New England mills begin to move south?
Answer:
Labor was cheap, moving rivers were no longer required, and cotton grew close by.
Explanation:
What new forms of campaigning arose during the elections of 1824 and 1828?
The elections of 1824 and 1828 in United States marked a significant shift in the way campaigns were conducted, with new forms of campaigning emerging during this time.
What are elections?Elections are a process by which individuals or groups choose their representatives in government or other decision-making bodies. Typically, elections involve voters casting their ballots to select candidates who they believe will best represent their interests and values. Elections can take many different forms, including local, regional, national, and even international elections. The candidates in an election typically represent different political parties, each with their own policies and platforms. During the election campaign, candidates will often engage in debates and other forms of public engagement to persuade voters to support them. Elections play a crucial role in democratic societies, providing citizens with a way to hold their leaders accountable and to express their preferences for how their government should be run.
To learn more about elections, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/253891
#SPJ1
In September 2007, this Morgantown science teacher was named West Virginia Teacher of the Year for 2008.
In September 2007, a Morgantown science teacher was named West Virginia Teacher of the Year for 2008.
Answer - Dr. Kincaid is a recipient of the Milken Educator Award, and was named the 2008 West Virginia Teacher of the Year. In 2007 he received Harvard's Singer Prize for Excellence in Secondary School Teaching and he was named West Virginia Outstanding Biology Teacher in 2013
to learn more about teacher awards, click on this -
brainly.com/question/30275203
#SPJ11
1. Before he was elected president in 1912, Woodrow Wilson had been
a. Presbyterian minister.
b. state governor.
c. successful businessman. d. Progressive Republican.
e. United States Senator.
Before he was elected president in 1912, Woodrow Wilson had been a B. State governor.
Specifically, Wilson served as the governor of New Jersey from 1911 to 1913. Prior to his governorship, Wilson was a Presbyterian minister's son and an academic, having earned his PhD from Johns Hopkins University. He held various positions in academia, including serving as president of Princeton University.
Wilson was a member of the Democratic Party, not a Progressive Republican, and he was never a United States Senator or a successful businessman. His political career began with his election as New Jersey's governor, where he implemented progressive reforms such as regulating public utilities and improving labor conditions.
As president, Wilson continued his progressive agenda, leading the country through important reforms such as the Federal Reserve Act, the Clayton Antitrust Act, and the creation of the Federal Trade Commission. These measures aimed to strengthen the national economy and protect the rights of workers and consumers.
In summary, before being elected president in 1912, Woodrow Wilson was a state governor of New Jersey, where he gained recognition for his progressive policies. This experience, combined with his background as an academic, contributed to his election as the 28th President of the United States. Therefore, the correct option is B.
Know more about State governor here:
https://brainly.com/question/27488620
#SPJ11
In the space provided, explain the Kansas-Nebraska act and compare the effects of this act to the Missouri Compromise.
NEED NOW
The Kansas-Nebraska Act caused widespread controversy and violence as pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers moved into the Kansas territory and fought for control.
While the Missouri Compromise had established a clear boundary between free and slave states, the Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed for the expansion of slavery into new territories.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a law passed by the United States Congress in 1854, which created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and allowed the settlers in those territories to determine through popular sovereignty whether they would allow slavery within their borders.
The act effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which prohibited slavery in territories north of the 36°30' parallel. The situation became known as "Bleeding Kansas," and it ultimately contributed to the start of the American Civil War.
The effects of the Kansas-Nebraska Act were significantly different from those of the Missouri Compromise. The act also resulted in the creation of two rival governments in Kansas, one pro-slavery and one anti-slavery, and led to violent confrontations between the two sides.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act ultimately contributed to the breakdown of the political compromise over slavery that had been in place since the early 19th century, leading to increasing tensions between the North and South and the eventual outbreak of the Civil War.
To learn more about Kansas-Nebraska act click on,
https://brainly.com/question/2544311
#SPJ4
4. Which of the following text citations from "From Emperor to Citizen" best supports the answer selected above? (1 point) O "The 'Articles for Favorable Treatment' stipulated that I could live temporarily in the Imperial Palace without fixing any definite time limit." O"Whenever I think of my childhood, my head fills with a yellow mist." O "When I learned to ride a bicycle and ordered the removal of all the upright wooden thresholds in the palace so that I could ride around without obstruction, the procession was no longer able to follow me, and so it had to be temporarily abolished." O"Thus it was that with the connivance of the Republican authorities we continued our prodigious waste of the sweat and blood of the people in order to maintain our former pomp and continue our parasitic way of life."
The text citation that best supports the answer is: "The 'Articles for Favorable Treatment' stipulated that I could live temporarily in the Imperial Palace without fixing any definite time limit." The Option A is correct.
Which text citation supports the author's description of his childhood living?The quote stipulated that I could live temporarily in the Imperial Palace without fixing any definite time limit which best supports the author's description of his childhood living in the Imperial Palace.
It highlights the fact that he was able to live there for an indefinite period of time, despite the fact that China was supposed to be a republic in the twentieth century. The author goes on to describe how he lived a life of extravagance and luxury, similar to that of an emperor from the nineteenth century despite the fact that the rest of the world was advancing rapidly.
Read more about Emperor to Citizen
brainly.com/question/1366900
#SPJ1
How does Hamlet allude to the importance of Old Hamlet in his convictions?
Hamlet often alludes to the importance of Old Hamlet, his father, in his convictions.
Hamlet's belief in the importance of his father is evident in his famous soliloquy in Act 1, Scene 2, where he says "O that this too too solid flesh would melt. Thaw and resolve itself into a dew, / Or that the Everlasting had not fixed. His canon ’gainst self-slaughter! O God! God!" Here, Hamlet expresses his deep grief over his father's death and his disgust at the fact that his mother has married his uncle so soon after his father's death.
Throughout the play, Hamlet's obsession with his father's memory drives his actions and decisions. He uses his father's ghost as a source of guidance and motivation, and he constantly compares himself to his father, both in terms of his virtues and his flaws. Hamlet sees himself as continuing his father's legacy and avenging his death, which underscores the importance of Old Hamlet in Hamlet's convictions.
Learn more about Old Hamlet:
https://brainly.com/question/11035926
#SPJ11
the founding of georga had the utopian ideal of providing a haven for worhy______ who had been imprsoned in london, england
The founding of Georgia had the utopian ideal of providing a haven for worthy debtors who had been imprisoned in London, England.
The founding of Georgia had the utopian ideal of providing a haven for worthy debtors who had been imprisoned in London, England. James Oglethorpe, one of the founders of the colony, envisioned Georgia as a place where debtors could start anew and be given a second chance at life. He believed that by giving them a fresh start, they could become productive members of society and help build a prosperous colony. This vision was also influenced by the Enlightenment philosophy of social reform and the belief in the possibility of creating a perfect society.
Learn more about society here: brainly.com/question/12006768
#SPJ11
Who accompanies Gulliver after he is sold?
Answer:
Glum, the farmer's daughter.
hope this helps ;)
Why did civil war occur in the Roman Republic in 49 BC? Julius Caesar led his army across the Rubicon River into Italy. Pompey arrested Julius Caesar for leaving his army in Gaul. Pompey forced Julius Caesar to give up his army. Julius Caesar conquered Gaul and Britain.
Civil War occurred in the Roman Republic when A. Julius Caesar led his army across the Rubicon River into Italy.
How did civil war break out ?In the tumultuous 49 BC, Julius Caesar was a renowned martial and politicial figure within the Roman Republic. With the numerous competing contenders vying for supremacy, Pompey, then-consul, seized the opportunity to undermine his authority by apprehending him for deserting his legion in Gaul.
When he attempted to force Caesar to yield up his military, the latter repudiated and assembled his adherents to back him, inciting Civil War against Pompey that concluded in the elimination of the Roman Republic and Caesar's emerge as triumphant.
Find out more on the Roman Civil War at https://brainly.com/question/24398934
#SPJ1
When thinking about politics in the United States, your mind might immediately turn to the two major political parties: the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. Would it surprise you to know that there are more than two parties in other countries?
Some countries, such as the United Kingdom, allow for many political parties to form, but in practice have only two or three. Other countries, such as Denmark, Germany, and Mexico, tend to have three or more parties represented in government at all times. With so many parties, gaining a majority in the legislature becomes difficult and agreements between two or more parties to temporarily work together in a coalition are common.
In the United States, however, having only two major political parties has become the norm. These two parties have developed an antagonistic relationship in which the members of one party refuse to work or agree with members of the other party. The idea of being so committed to the politics of your party is called partisanship.
Let’s explore the relationship of the political parties to each other, how partisanship affects the political process in the United States, and whether partisan politics are beneficial or detrimental to US society.
Based on your own knowledge, why are partisanship and a two-party system significant parts of US politics?
Answer: by looking up this is the information I can find
Explanation:Political factions or parties began to form during the struggle over ratification of the federal Constitution of 1787. Friction between them increased as attention shifted from the creation of a new federal government to the question of how powerful that federal government would be. The Federalists, led by Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton, wanted a strong central government, while the Anti-Federalists, led by Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson, advocated states’ rights instead of centralized power. Federalists coalesced around the commercial sector of the country while their opponents drew their strength from those favoring an agrarian society. The ensuing partisan battles led George Washington to warn of “the baneful effects of the spirit of party” in his Farewell Address as president of United States.
How did European rulers justify the growth of state authority and the expansion of government bureaucracies in the wake of the Thirty Years' War?
The Thirty Years' War (1618-1648) was a devastating conflict that caused widespread destruction and loss of life across Europe.
The concept of "divine right of kings" was one way in which European rulers justified the extension of state authority and administrative bureaucracies.
This school of thought maintained that monarchs were appointed by God to reign over their subjects, and that their authority was absolute and unchallengeable.
European kings were able to defend the extension of state authority and the creation of government bureaucracy as vital for maintaining order and stability by emphasising their divine right to rule.
For such more question on conflict:
https://brainly.com/question/155125
#SPJ11
What is the primary reason Congress established the Freedmen's Bureau in 1865?
Answer:
to provide food, shelter, clothing, medical services, and land to displaced Southerners, including newly freed African Americans
Explanation: