The answer is false as restriction of speech by the government still have to be scrutinzed by the court in order to make sure it doesn't breach constitutional rights.
What is the court ruling on restriction of speechA restriction on speech by the government that is content-neutral will still be subject to a certain level of scrutiny by the courts, but it may be more likely to be upheld than a restriction that is content-based. Content-neutral restrictions regulate speech based on the time, place, and manner of the speech rather than on the content of the speech itself. However, even content-neutral restrictions must still meet certain constitutional standards, such as being narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest and leaving open alternative channels for communication. The level of scrutiny applied will depend on the nature of the restriction and the circumstances in which it was imposed.
Learn more on restriction of speech here;
https://brainly.com/question/325850
#SPJ1
True or False: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act applies to all companies required to file their financial statements with the SEC.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a federal law that applies to all public companies required to file financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The law was enacted in response to a series of accounting scandals involving public companies, such as Enron and WorldCom, and aims to improve the accuracy and reliability of corporate financial reporting. SOX requires public companies to implement various internal controls and procedures related to financial reporting, auditing, and corporate governance, among other areas.
Yes, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act applies to all companies who are required to file their financial statements with the SEC. It was enacted to protect investors by ensuring financial transparency and integrity in reporting.
Explanation:True, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) does apply to all companies that are required to file their financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Enacted in 2002, this federal law was passed to protect investors from fraudulent financial reporting by corporations. Therefore, any company that is publicly traded and submits financial statements to the SEC must adhere to the regulations set by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to ensure integrity and transparency in their financial reporting practices.
Learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act here:https://brainly.com/question/32331510
#SPJ6
what was the purpose of the framers granting congress the power to tax?
is the u.s. federal tax system for individuals progressive or regressive?
In the United States, the federal tax system for individuals is progressive. Gradually increasing tax rates, from 10% to 37%, are available.
Since they place the onus of paying taxes on those who are probably the best able to pay it, progressive taxes are well-liked.
Progressive tax systems often permit a number of credits and deductions, similar to the federal income tax. Like the Earned Income Tax Credit, these tax benefits offer additional assistance to low-income individuals. They may also promote specific behavior. For instance, the American Opportunity Tax Credit and the mortgage interest deduction both promote homeownership and higher education, respectively.
Yet, some tax benefits might also enable high-income taxpayers to pay less tax than those with lower incomes. For instance, wealthier taxpayers occasionally pay a lower rate overall than their middle-class peers due to preferred rates on long-term capital gains.
"Bracket creeps" can also result from inflation. This occurs when taxpayers are forced into a higher tax band, even though their increasing income doesn't give them additional buying power.
A regressive tax contrasts with a progressive tax. It refers to paying a greater tax rate when your income drops. Regressive taxes come in two different varieties, namely proportional taxes and flat taxes.
To learn more about progressive, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/30104586
#SPJ4
the suspect committed a crime and was found ______ of breaking the law.
Whereas the goal of civil trials is to right a wrong done to the plaintiff, the goal of criminal cases is punishment. Unlike civil proceedings, where an individual might be the plaintiff, criminal cases are prosecuted by the government.
What type of offense was committed?It should be categorized as such since it constitutes a serious enough infraction against society as a whole, not just one specific individual. More technically, a crime is an act (something you do) or omission (something you don't do) that breaks the law and is adjudged to be criminal by a court of law.
How and why did the suspect do the crime?something that inspires someone to act in accordance with their mental state, such as a belief or emotion. A person's motive is frequently utilized in criminal law to support why they did or did not act in certain situations, such as to support the prosecution's case that the accused committed the crime.
Learn more about criminal law: https://brainly.com/question/493036
#SPJ1
how do you get away with murder?
in one sentence, explain why the separation of power between the federal and state governments now resembles a marbled cake as opposed to a layered cake.
The expressions "layer cake federalism" and "marble cake federalism" were first used in this paper by Grodzins.
He compared the dual federalism system to a layer cake, with the separated layers signifying the various domains of power that the state and federal governments had not yet occupied.
Federalism is a form of government in which a central authority and numerous national constituent parts share power.
A pragmatic blending of power and initiatives among the federal, state, and local governments is the foundation of marble-cake federalism. The foundation of layer cake federalism is a distinct division of responsibilities and initiatives among the various levels of government.
To know more about federal and state governments, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/13734473
#SPJ4
michael needs to discipline one of his employees. before doing so, he should make sure the punishment he is administering fits the crime.truefalse
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The "time" should match the "crime"
According to the United States Census Bureau, a Mexican American might also be considered a member of which races?
A) Japanese, Cuban, or another
B) Black, Mexican, or another
C) Black, White, or another
D) White, Guatemalan, or Mexican
E) White only
According to the United States Census Bureau, a Mexican American might also be considered a member of black, white and another races.
Hence, the correct option is C.
The population in United States is divided in various categories on the basis of races or color of a person. OMB recognizes five minimum categories (White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander) for race with a sixth category of other races permitted by the United States consensus bureau. People through these races identify their ethnicity whether they are of Hispanic or Latino origin the two forms of ethnicity.
Know more about "OMB" visit
brainly.com/question/3795841
#SPJ4
Which one of the following items is not normally included in a request for an exception to security policy?A. Description of a compensating controlB. Description of the risks associated with the exceptionC. Proposed revision to the security policyD. Business justification for the exception
Proposed revision to the security policy or requests for an exception to a security policy would not normally include in a request for an exception to security policy.
Hence, the correct option is C.
Security policy is a set of rules, comprehension or well organized plan to regulate access to an organization's system and the information that can include any private confidential data of a company. These security policies are distributed in three primary areas or classifications of security controls. such as management security, operational security, and physical security controls. Exceptions are the documented variances in the form of policy adopted in accordance with suitable specific technical and/or business requirements. These exceptions cannot alter the original policy, which remains in force for systems not covered by the exception. If such an exception violates the previous statutes then the framed exception will be considered null and void.
Know more about "security policy" visit
brainly.com/question/14783869
#SPJ4
Adding in parts of a memory based on the surrounding memory information and what would generally make the most sense in that situation is called what? a. Encoding b. Recoding c. Storage d. Retrieval
The correct answer is option d. Retrieval is the process of recalling information stored in memory.
It is the process of bringing knowledge into our conscious awareness from our long-term memory. It is a cognitive process that requires the capacity to retrieve information from our memory and to recall it.
Either explicit memory or implicit memory may be involved in retrieval. In contrast to implicit memory, which involves the unconscious recall of skills, habits, and conditioned responses, explicit memory involves the conscious recollection of facts and events that have previously been learnt and stored in the long-term memory.
The person is engaging in retrieval when they are adding details to a memory based on the information in the surrounding memories and what would typically make the most sense in that circumstance.
It takes memory recall to be able to recover information, which is a cognitive process called retrieval. It is the process of bringing knowledge into our conscious awareness from our long-term memory.
To learn more about explicit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29890654
#SPJ4
what part of the united states constitution protects the general right to privacy?
An all-encompassing right to privacy is not mentioned in the US Constitution. The Bill of Rights and other amendments.
The right to privacy is a vital component of individual liberty and dignity. It describes the degree to which one is free from invasion, surveillance, or unwelcome publicity as well as one's freedom to govern their personal information. Privacy has grown in importance as a concern in the digital age, since personal data is continually gathered, saved, and shared. People might be worried about their online behaviour, the information that businesses or governments collect, or the usage of surveillance tools. In order to protect privacy, policies and legislation must be put in place that strike a balance between security and privacy issues. Moreover, effective practises for protecting personal information must be made more widely known.
Learn more about privacy here:
https://brainly.com/question/14603023
#SPJ4
lloyd is drafting a complaint what should be included?
If Lloyd is drafting a complaint, it is likely that he is initiating a legal action against someone.
What are some of the general guideline of drafting a complaintHere are some general guidelines for what a complaint should include:
Caption: The caption should include the name of the court, the name of the plaintiff (Lloyd), the name of the defendant(s), and the case number.
Introduction: The introduction should briefly explain who the plaintiff is and what the defendant(s) did that caused harm.
Jurisdiction: The complaint should explain why the court has jurisdiction to hear the case. This means Lloyd should identify the legal basis for the court's authority to hear the case.
Factual allegations: The complaint should include a detailed description of the facts of the case, explaining what happened and how it resulted in harm to the plaintiff.
Legal claims: The complaint should set out the legal claims that Lloyd is making against the defendant(s). This could include claims for breach of contract, negligence, fraud, or any other legal cause of action that applies to the specific case.
Prayer for relief: The complaint should state what Lloyd is asking the court to do. This could include an award of damages, an injunction, or any other remedy that is appropriate under the circumstances.
Signature: The complaint should be signed by Lloyd or his attorney
Learn more about drafting a complaint at:
https://brainly.com/question/5715966
#SPJ1
which group is ultimately responsible for choosing the president of the united states?
The final decision on the united states president rests with the Electoral College. a group of 538 electors who, in line with the Constitution, are chosen by each state and the District of Columbia.
The Electoral College, a body of 538 electors chosen by each state and the District of Columbia in accordance with the Constitution, is ultimately responsible for selecting the President of the United States. Voters in presidential elections are actually choosing a slate of electors who have vowed to back a certain candidate. The candidate who receives a majority of the electoral votes (at least 270) is elected President. It is important to note that certain states have rules requiring electors to vote for the candidate who won the popular vote in their state, even though the Electoral College is the final arbiter of the presidential election.
learn more about United States here:
https://brainly.com/question/1527526
#SPJ4
Who was the naacp lawyer for Brown v. Board of Education?
Jack Greenberg was the lawyer, also the first white attorney, for Brown v. Board of Education.
The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in the favor of Brown v. Board of Education was basically the product of the hard work as well as the diligence of the best attorneys from the nation which included Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Robert Carter, Oliver Hill, Spottswood Robinson, Louis Redding, Charles and John Scott, Harold R. Boulware, James Nabrit, as well as George E.C. Hayes.
These LDF lawyers were further assisted by a number of brain trust of legal scholars. These legal minds were the ones who conceived, developed as well as executed the plan to dismantle the notion of “separate but equal” in the American life.
To know more about Brown v. Board of Education
https://brainly.com/question/14637388
#SPJ4
which of the following options is an unlikely response to a data request when a strong data governance plan is in place
When a strong data governance structure is in place, the data owner providing their login details is an unusual response to a data request.
Using a variety of policies and standards, data governance supports an organization's data's availability, quality, and security. These procedures identify the data's owners, security precautions, and intended usage. Data governance's overarching objective is to preserve high-quality data that is both safe and accessible for more in-depth business insights.
The main forces behind data governance programmes are big data and initiatives for digital transformation. Businesses must review their data management procedures in order to grow their business intelligence as the volume of data from new data sources, such as Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, rises.
To learn more about data governance visit;
https://brainly.com/question/23702492
#SPJ1
Which courts decide more than 95 percent of the nation's legal cases?
answer choices
State courts
Supreme court
Small claims court
District court
Answer:
State courts and District Courts decide more than 95 percent of the nation's legal cases.
political apathy among americans hurts which core political value the most?
The political apathy among the Americans hurts a core political value known as democracy, the most.
How does political apathy hurt democracy?Political apathy refers to a lack of interest, engagement, or participation in political activities or issues. When a significant portion of the population is politically apathetic, it can have a negative impact on democracy in several ways:
Reduced voter turnout: Political apathy can lead to low voter turnout in elections, which can make it easier for a small group of individuals or special interest groups to dominate the political process. When fewer people participate in elections, the legitimacy of the democratic process is undermined.Lack of representation: When people are politically apathetic, they may be less likely to engage with their elected officials or express their views on important issues. This can lead to a lack of representation for certain groups or viewpoints, which can ultimately harm democracy.In conclusion, political apathy can be detrimental to democracy because it undermines citizen engagement, representation, accountability, and the diversity of ideas necessary for a healthy and functioning democratic system.
Read more about political apathy
brainly.com/question/13305824
#SPJ1
In general, courts will not enforce a contract in which the offer states that the offeree's failure to respond will be considered an acceptance of the offer. True or False
Generally speaking, a contract in which the offer specifies that the offeree's refusal to react shall be deemed an acceptance shall not be enforced in court.
What does deeming mean in law?
Generally speaking, if an offer specifies that the offeree's failure to react shall be deemed an acceptance, a court will not enforce the contract.
The procedure through which another person's income and/or resources are taken into account in order to determine if an SSI claimant's (or recipient's) basic need for food and shelter may be satisfied is known by the Social Security Administration as "deeming."
Acting against the law or in defiance of it is not lawful since it is not permitted by law or justified by it. a possessor acting illegally.
Know more about speaking Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28735583
#SPJ1
What are examples of insuring domestic tranquility?
Examples of insuring domestic tranquility include ensuring that individuals have access to the courts of law, protecting the rights of individuals to voice their opinions, and maintaining an adequate level of public safety.
There are many other examples of insuring domestic tranquility, including ensuring that individuals are treated equally before the law, protecting the rights of workers to organize unions and engage in collective bargaining, and ensuring that individuals have the right to due process in criminal and civil proceedings.
In general, the government should take steps to ensure that the lives of its citizens are safe and secure from threats both internal and external. This includes taking steps to address the needs of communities and individuals who might be at risk of becoming involved in criminal activity.
To know more about right to due process go to
https://brainly.com/question/11591373
#SPJ4
why is every person obliged to follow moral law?
Some common arguments for why individuals are obligated to follow moral law are: promotes societal well-being, maintains social order, ensures consistency and fairness, etc.
1. Promotes societal well-being: Many ethical theories, such as utilitarianism, argue that moral laws promote the well-being of society as a whole.
2. Maintains social order: Moral laws also help to maintain social order by providing a framework for acceptable behavior. If everyone were to act purely based on their own self-interest and ignore moral principles, chaos and disorder could result.
3. Consistency and fairness: Moral laws are often seen as a way to ensure consistency and fairness in how individuals are treated. By adhering to moral laws, individuals can ensure that they are treating others in the same way they would like to be treated.
4. Personal integrity: Many individuals also believe that following moral laws is important for personal integrity and character. Following moral principles can help individuals to develop a sense of moral duty and purpose and can also provide a sense of personal fulfillment and satisfaction.
It's worth noting that different ethical theories may offer different justifications for why individuals are obligated to follow moral law, and there is ongoing debate among philosophers about the nature of moral obligation. However, the above arguments are commonly cited as reasons why individuals should follow moral law.
To know more about moral law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30479941
#SPJ4
What is the term for the defense that a product was manufactured in compliance with all safety and health standards required at that time and used current technical or scientific knowledge?
A. state-of-the-art defense
B. business advantage defense
C. cutting edge defense
D. puffery defense
The term for the defense that a product was manufactured in compliance with all safety and health standards required at that time and used current technical or scientific knowledge is state-of-the-art defense (A).
Define manufacturing compliance.Before we dive into manufacturing, we need to understand what compliance really is. Given the current situation, it's a word that's been circulating in many positions. Still, it's a fundamental part of running a business, no matter what industry you're in. Compliance, as the term suggests, is to demonstrate explicit adherence to laws, policies, policies, contracts, and moral practices. It can also be used to indicate the conditions under which these commands should be executed. This is also called consistency. A manufacturing company has two regulatory compliance structures:
Administrative compliance and corporate compliance. Organizations must comply with federal, state, and global laws and policies that apply to their compliance responsibilities. These laws are created and enforced by the terms and industry associations.
To know more about Administrative compliance, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5063270
#SPJ1
have you ever held a job under a different name? if so, please provide the name under which you worked. legal or illegal
You ever held a job under a different name. The name under you worked is legal. So the option a is correct.
Pre-employment interviews and employment application forms are the best tools for excluding untrained or unsuitable candidates from consideration for employment early on.
Yet, job prospects for women and people from minority groups can also be limited or denied through applications and interviews. When conducting a job interview, everyone is under anxiety. While you want to add the greatest new team member possible, the person being interviewed wants to make the best impression they can.
Follow the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Fair Inquiry Guidelines when interviewing candidates for your business to ensure that certain protected classes are specifically protected from discrimination in hiring.
To learn more about Pre-employment interviews link is here
brainly.com/question/14721945
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Have you ever held a job under a different name? If so, please provide the name under which you worked.
a. legal
b. Illegal
The use of so-called "passive consent" processes allow eligible students to opt out of data disclosure. This is generally used for _____.
Students who meet the criteria might choose not to have their data disclosed by using so-called "passive consent" procedures. Typically, this is utilised for student's directory information.
In other words, the study team must give a subject the information necessary for consent, but they are not obligated to get the subject's signature on the informed consent form.
The full informed consent procedure is providing a subject with sufficient information about the study, giving them enough time to consider all of their alternatives, answering their questions, making sure they understand this information, and getting their free consent.
Read more about data disclosure at
https://brainly.com/question/30328376
#SPJ4
what doraville police officer charged with concealing gwinnett 16-year-old’s death?
if a trial was fundamentally flawed, a party can ask the judge for a motion, and for a new trial in order to prevent a miscarriage of justice. (True or False)
True, if a trial was fundamentally flawed, a party may petition the judge for a motion and a new trial in order to avoid a miscarriage of justice.
The judge denies a motion for a new trial, explain why:Defendants typically file motions for new trials following a guilty verdict. Without the defendant's request, the trial judge in some jurisdictions can order a new trial. If the trial judge denies a motion for a new trial, the defendant may file an appeal, asking a higher court to overturn the trial judge's decision. One reason for granting a new trial motion is legal errors during trial. A judge who incorrectly excluded evidence that could have changed the outcome of a trial is one example.
To know more about new trial ; Visit -
https://brainly.com/question/14434716
#SPJ1
What are the main duties of national association for the advancement of secrecy?
Official Secrets Act prohibits the public from having access to confidential information pertaining to the security and integrity of the country.
How does prohibition operate?
Someone would be prohibited from doing something if there was a legislation against the sale of alcohol. to forbid something from being used or done, especially through legal means. It is forbidden for businesses to use trademarks that are confusingly similar to those that are already in use.
This indicates grade level based on how complex the word is. a prohibition in action. regulations governing the manufacturing and promotion of alcoholic beverages aimed to the general public. The act of prohibiting anything, like when my mother disallowed watching television while we were having dinner.
Know more about manufacturing Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14275016
#SPJ1
Which of the following organizations is NOT a US agency?
A. PEPFAR
B. USAID
C.WHO
D.CDC
Founded in 1948, the World Health Organization (WHO) is not part of the US agency. It is a specialised agency of the UN with a broad mandate to serve as a coordinating authority on global health concerns.
The United States government has been actively involved with WHO for a long time, contributing financial and technical support as well as taking part in its governance structure. Future challenges for the WHO include a wide-ranging mandate, constrained, rigid budget, and a convoluted bureaucratic structure. Although the agency has made adjustments to address some of these problems, many governments, including the United States, are pressing for additional reforms to enable WHO to more effectively respond to upcoming epidemics.
Learn more about bureaucratic here:
https://brainly.com/question/28661392
#SPJ4
which of the following statements concerning power is correct?
Power can be found in all human relationships, it can be exercised obviously or subtly and involves a person to act according to the wishes of another person.
The correct option is option e.
Power can basically be defined as the ability of a particular person to get another person to act according to the first person's wishes as well as intentions. Authority can be defined as the rights which allow a person to use their power.
Power can be exercised in an obvious manner and also it can exercised in a subtle manner. Power can be found in all types of human relationships.
To know more about power
https://brainly.com/question/11481567
#SPJ4
--The given question is incomplete, the complete question is
"Which of the following statements concerning power is correct?
a. Its exercise can sometimes be obvious.
b. It can be exercised in subtle ways.
c. It involves a person getting another person to act in accordance with the first person's wishes.
d. It is found in all human relationships.
e. All of the above."
The state took possession of Oliver's farm when he passed away because he did not have a will or any heirs. What right did the state exercise?
a. condemnation
b. eminent domain
c. escheat
d. inverse condemnation
The state took possession of Oliver's farm when he passed away because he did not have a will or any heirs. Here the state exercised the power of escheat. The correct option is C.
The real estate of a person who passes away without heirs is given to the state or the crown under the common law doctrine of escheat. It makes sure that property does not remain unclaimed and in "limbo."
It first applied to a variety of circumstances in which a legal interest in land was eliminated by operation of law, reverting to the immediately superior feudal lord as the new owner.
Escheat is a concept that is embodied in Section 29. According to the doctrine of escheat, if a person passes away intestate and does not leave behind an eligible heir, their property passes to the government.
To know more about law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ4
The Bill of Rights: What Does it Say?
Ten of the first amendments to the Constitution together make up the Bill of Rights. Regarding their government, it explains how Americans are entitled to certain fundamental rights.
The rights to freedom of expression, of the press, and of religion are ensured. Any jurisdiction not granted to the federal government is reserved for the people or the States, and it lays out guidelines for the administration of justice in conformity with the law. The Constitution further states that "the mention of certain rights in the Constitution shall not be regarded as a rejection or denigration of those preserved by the people." The First Amendment guarantees a number of rights, including the freedom to petition the government, form or join a group for a protest or other purpose, and the freedom to express one's political views.
Learn more about fundamental here:
https://brainly.com/question/28941950
#SPJ4