In Vernonia School District the court held that students may be searched at schools based on reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause (due to the schools need to maintain a healthy learning environment. The correct option is A.
The Court Held in this 1995 case that the school had a compelling interest in maintaining a drug-free environment unreasonable searches. the testing was minimally intrusive, so it did not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on the ruling determined that students' expectations of privacy in schools are lowered and that searches conducted in school settings are legal when there is a compelling interest, regardless of whether there is probable cause or not. The correct option is A.
Learn more about drug-free at:
brainly.com/question/531621
#SPJ4
True or False. One of the important reasons for a patient advocate is that the advocate can help educate patients on their current medical situations as well as their health plans.
The given statement " One of the important reasons for a patient advocate is that the advocate can help educate patients on their current medical situations as well as their health plans" is True because a patient advocate plays a vital role in helping patients understand their current medical situations and health plans.
Patient advocates serve as a bridge between the patient and the healthcare system, ensuring effective communication and providing essential support. A patient advocate educates patients by explaining complex medical terms, diagnoses, and treatment options in a comprehensible manner. They help patients make informed decisions about their healthcare by providing relevant information and guidance.
Additionally, a patient advocate assists with navigating the often-complicated health insurance landscape, ensuring patients are aware of their coverage and benefits. By being knowledgeable about the patient's health plan, an advocate can identify any potential barriers to care and work to find solutions. They may also help patients find financial assistance programs or negotiate with healthcare providers and insurance companies to minimize out-of-pocket costs.
Furthermore, a patient advocate offers emotional support and encouragement to patients and their families, helping them cope with the challenges of dealing with a medical condition. They also serve as a liaison between the patient, healthcare providers, and insurance companies, promoting effective communication and collaboration among all parties involved.
In conclusion, patient advocates are crucial in ensuring patients receive the best possible care by educating them on their medical situations and health plans. This support empowers patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare and navigate the complex healthcare system with greater ease and confidence.
Know more about patient advocate here:
https://brainly.com/question/26054678
#SPJ11
Violators may be subject to imprisonment in the county jail for (?) year, or state prison for (?), (?), or (?) years and/or a fine of up to $(?) for fraudulent claims other than workers' compensation.
Violators may be subject to imprisonment in the county jail for one year, or state prison for two, three, or five years and/or a fine of up to $10,000 for fraudulent claims other than workers' compensation.
Fraudulent claims refer to any false or misleading statements made in order to obtain financial benefits or compensation. In the context of the question, it is referring to individuals who make false claims in order to receive benefits other than workers' compensation. The specific penalties for fraudulent claims vary depending on the state and the severity of the offense. However, the violator may be subject to imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year, or state prison for two, three, or five years, as well as a fine of up to a specific amount.
It is important to note that committing fraudulent claims is a serious offense and can result in significant legal consequences.
To know more about Fraudulent claims, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14567130
#SPJ11
According to "Tip" O'Neil, "All politics is __________."
Explanation:
all politics is local according to him
Most reported crimes occur during which season?A). springB). summerC). fallD). winter
Answer:
summer
Explanation:
Crime is associated with the climate change
T/F In a SWOT analysis, strengths and weaknesses refer to a firm's external environment, while opportunities and threats refer to the internal environment.
'The given statement is false because strengths are the company's advantages over its competitors, such as its strong brand, skilled employees, or proprietary technology. These are internal factors that the company can control or improve upon.'
Weaknesses are the company's disadvantages compared to its competitors, such as poor financial management, lack of innovation, or limited resources. These are also internal factors that the company can address and improve upon.
Opportunities are external factors that the company can take advantage of, such as new markets, changes in consumer behavior, or advancements in technology. These are opportunities that the company can capitalize on to grow and improve.
Threats are external factors that could negatively impact the company's performance, such as economic downturns, increased competition, or changing regulations. These are potential threats that the company needs to be aware of and address to minimize their impact.
Overall, a SWOT analysis is a tool used to assess a company's internal and external environment, and can help identify areas for improvement and opportunities for growth.
For more such questions on proprietary visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27815508
#SPJ11
Why would having a plural executive weaken and destroy responsibility?
A plural executive refers to a system of government in which executive power is divided among multiple individuals or offices. This system is in contrast to a unitary executive, in which all executive power is vested in a single individual or office.
One of the main criticisms of a plural executive system is that it can weaken and destroy responsibility. This is because responsibility is diffused among multiple individuals, making it difficult to hold any one person accountable for actions or decisions made by the executive branch.
In a plural executive system, it can be challenging to determine who is responsible for a particular decision or action, leading to a lack of accountability. Additionally, because power is divided among multiple individuals or offices, there may be disagreements or conflicts over decision-making, which can further impede responsible governance.
Overall, while a plural executive system may offer some benefits, such as increased checks and balances, it also comes with the potential risk of weakened and destroyed responsibility, which can undermine effective governance.
To learn more about plural executive
https://brainly.com/question/5039460
#SPJ4
True or False: Criminal justice is defined as the system of law enforcement, adjudication, and correction that is directly involved in the apprehension, prosecution, and control of those charged with criminal offenses.
True: Criminal justice is defined as the system of law enforcement, adjudication, and correction that is directly involved in the apprehension, prosecution, and control of those charged with criminal offenses.
Prosecutors are typically lawyers who possess a law degree, and are recognised as suitable legal professionals by the court in which they are acting. This may mean they have been admitted to the bar, or obtained a comparable qualification where available - such as solicitor advocates in England and Wales. They become involved in a criminal case once a suspect has been identified and charges need to be filed. They are employed by an office of the government, with safeguards in place to ensure such an office can successfully pursue the prosecution of government officials. Multiple offices exist in a single country, especially in those countries with federal governments where sovereignty has been bifurcated or devolved in some way.
Learn more about prosecution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29970118
#SPJ11
Before making a lane change you should only check your side mirrors: (T/F)
Answer:
f
Explanation:
you check your rearview mirror too to see any blindspots your side mirrors might miss
hope this helps ;)
Home Products Company and House & Yard, Inc., use the mark "Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval" to certify the quality of their products. Home Products and House & Yard are not in business together and do not own this mark. This mark is:
a. a certification mark
b. a collective mark
c. a service mark
d. trade dress
Home Products Company and House & Yard, Inc., are not in business and do not own a certification mark.
A certification mark is a type of trademark used to indicate that a product or service meets certain quality or performance standards established by an organization that is not the producer. In this case, the "Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval" is used by both Home Products Company and House & Yard, Inc. to certify the quality of their products, even though they are not in business together and do not own the certification mark.
Certification marks are often used by independent organizations to verify the quality or authenticity of products and services.
To know more about certification mark, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28008818
#SPJ11
You should not pass another vehicle if you are within 1/3 mile of a curve or hill? (T/F)
The statement "You should not pass another vehicle if you are within 1/3 mile of a curve or hill" is true because it is crucial to be cautious and aware of potential hazards when driving on the road with curves or hills.
The correct answer is true.
In general, passing another vehicle is unsafe if you are within 1/3 mile of a curve or hill. This is because the curve or hill may obstruct your view of oncoming traffic, making it difficult to see if any vehicles are coming in the opposite direction.
In some states, passing on a hill or curve is explicitly prohibited by law. Drivers should always use caution when passing on any road and only do so when it is safe and legal. It's essential to pay attention to road signs and markings and to follow the road rules to help ensure the safety of all drivers and passengers.
To know more about Hill, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30812382
#SPJ4
The Sherman Antitrust Act was passed to combat the evils of...
The Sherman Antitrust Act was passed in 1890 to combat the evils of corporate monopolies.
The Act prohibits any “contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade” and makes it illegal for any business to monopolize or attempt to monopolize any part of interstate commerce. The Act also gives the federal government the power to bring civil cases against those who violate its provisions and to seek the dissolution of corporate trusts and monopolies that have established control over markets.
Additionally, it makes it a felony for anyone to attempt to monopolize trade or commerce, and provides for criminal sanctions for those found guilty. The Act was passed in response to a series of large mergers that had occurred in the late nineteenth century, which led to a concentration of economic power in the hands of a few large corporations. It was the first major federal antitrust law in the United States and has since been used to challenge a wide range of business practices.
Know more about corporate monopolies here
https://brainly.com/question/22430720#
#SPJ11
Payton v. New York ruled which if the following is NOT a restriction on home arrests? A. Knocking and announces rulesB. Reliable informantsC. Felonies and arrests made during the daytimeD. Stringent probably cause
Payton v. New York did not rule that reliable informants are not a restriction on home arrests. B
Instead, the case addressed the Fourth Amendment requirement that law enforcement officers have a warrant or probable cause before entering a suspect's home to make an arrest.
The case specifically held that the Fourth Amendment prohibits warrantless arrests in a suspect's home, except in certain limited circumstances, such as when exigent circumstances exist.
The case did not address the other options listed in the question, such as knocking and announcing rules, reliable informants, or the timing of arrests. These issues may be relevant to the overall analysis of whether a particular arrest was constitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
Instead, the case focused on the Fourth Amendment requirement that police have a warrant or other valid reason to enter a person's house in order to conduct an arrest.
at the case, it was clearly decided that, with some exceptions, such as when urgent circumstances arise, the Fourth Amendment forbids warrantless arrests at a suspect's house.
The other choices in the inquiry, such as knocking and proclaiming rules, trustworthy informants, or the timing of arrests, were not addressed by the Court. These concerns could be significant in the overall evaluation of whether a specific arrest complied with the Fourth Amendment.
For Similar questions on Arrest
https://brainly.com/question/29743060
#SPJ11
A physician pays a long-term care administrator to refer all new Medicare and Medicaid patients to his medical practice. His is most likely to be accused of violating which federal law...
A. HIPAA
B. The Gramm-Rudman Law
C. The Federal Anti-Kickback Law
D. None of these
The physician is most likely to be accused of violating the Federal Anti-Kickback Law (Option C). This law prohibits offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving any remuneration in exchange for referrals of Medicare and Medicaid patients.
The Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) is an American federal law prohibiting financial payments or incentives for referring patients or generating federal healthcare business. The law, codified at 42 U.S. Code § 1320a–7b(b), imposes criminal and, particularly in association with the federal False Claims Act, civil liability on those that knowingly and willfully offer, solicit, receive, or pay any form of remuneration in exchange for the referral of services or products covered by any federal healthcare program (e.g., the referral of a Medicare patient for an MRI), subject to certain narrow exceptions.I
n other words, the statute covers both those that provide (or offer) kickbacks and those that receive (or solicit) kickbacks. The statute is among the most important healthcare fraud and abuse laws in the United States. Violation of the AKS is a felony.
Visit here to learn more about Anti-Kickback Statute : https://brainly.com/question/28662825
#SPJ11
Cathy uses, on her new recording Drive By, the melody of a song written by Earl, without Earl’s permission. This is likely:
a. copyright infringement
b. patent infringement
c. trademark infringement
d. theft of trade secrets
e. intentional infliction of emotional distress
Cathy's use of Earl's melody without his permission could be considered copyright infringement, and she may face legal consequences for her actions. Here option A is the correct answer.
Copyright is a form of legal protection for original works of authorship, including literary, musical, and artistic works. When a work is created, the author is granted exclusive rights to use and distribute the work. In the case of musical works, this includes the melody, lyrics, and arrangement.
Using the melody of a song written by someone else without their permission could be considered an infringement of their exclusive rights. To use a copyrighted work, one must obtain permission from the copyright owner or their authorized agent, typically through a licensing agreement or other contractual arrangement.
If Cathy did not obtain permission from Earl to use his melody, she may be liable for copyright infringement. The penalties for copyright infringement can include monetary damages, injunctions, and even criminal charges in some cases.
To learn more about copyright infringement
https://brainly.com/question/16774161
#SPJ4
Eli obtains a consumer loan from First State Bank at an interest rate that exceeds the state's maximum. First State has
In the given case, First State Bank has violated the usury laws.
Laws against usury set limits on how much interest can be added to loans. By placing limits on the most that can be charged in interest, usury laws target the practice of charging excessively high rates on loans. These regulations are mainly aimed to safeguard consumers.
In the US, each state is in charge of enacting its own usury regulations. State-specific usury laws set limits on interest rates for particular types of lending instruments in an effort to stop lenders from charging excessive or predatory interest rates.
The interest is determined when a lending instrument specifies an interest rate. While some states establish their maximum interest rates based on moving averages or other non-fixed variables, others give fixed rates.
To know more about usury laws, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3353856
#SPJ4
The right to a seedy public trial, the right to have a lawyer present during questioning and the remain silent so as not to incriminate oneself are all part of what...
The right to a speedy public trial, the right to have a lawyer present during questioning, and the right to remain silent so as not to incriminate oneself are all part of Miranda rights.
The correct answer is Miranda rights.
These rights are named after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), which established that a person taken into police custody must be informed of their rights before being interrogated by law enforcement.
The Miranda warning, typically recited by law enforcement when taking a suspect into custody, informs the individual of their right to remain silent, their right to have an attorney present during questioning, and the warning that anything they say can and will be used against them in court. The purpose of the Miranda warning is to protect individuals from self-incrimination and ensure that they are aware of their rights during police interrogations.
To know more about Miranda rights, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27506910
#SPJ4
The majority of arrests:A. Do not require a warrant to make the arrest reasonable as long as there is probably cause to arrestB. Require a warrant based on probably causeC. Occur in the home but still do not require a warrantD. Occur after stops and frisks
The majority of arrests Option A do not require a warrant to make the arrest reasonable as long as there is probable cause to arrest.
This means that if law enforcement officers have reasonable cause to believe that a person has committed a crime, they can make an arrest without obtaining a warrant.
Probable cause is defined as a reasonable belief that a crime has been or is being committed, based on the facts and circumstances at hand.
There are, however, certain situations where a warrant is required for an arrest. These situations include when the arrest is made in the person's home, and the arrest is not made in a public place.
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution requires that law enforcement obtain a warrant before making an arrest in a person's home, unless certain exigent circumstances exist.
For example, if the officers believe that evidence may be destroyed or that someone is in immediate danger, they may be able to make an arrest without a warrant.
Arrests can also occur after stops and frisks, which are often referred to as Terry stops, after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio. In Terry stops, officers may briefly detain and pat down individuals if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is involved in criminal activity.
If during the pat-down the officer feels something that could be a weapon, they may also seize that item. In conclusion, the majority of arrests (Option A) do not require a warrant to make the arrest reasonable as long as there is probable cause to make the arrest.
However, there are situations where a warrant is required, such as when making an arrest in a person's home. Arrests can also occur after stops and frisks, which may lead to probable cause for an arrest.
For more question on "Arrest" :
https://brainly.com/question/31453383
#SPJ11
The "means" side of the end means balance:A. is committed towards fairness in dealing with defendantsB. is devoted to giving government officials as much power possibleC. is concerned that too many defendants go free on technicalitiesD. fosters the result side of the criminal justice process
The "means" side of the equation denotes balance with a commitment to treating defendants fairly. Here option A is the correct answer.
The "end means balance" is a principle in criminal justice that seeks to balance the ends or goals of the criminal justice system with the means or methods used to achieve those ends. It acknowledges that the criminal justice system has multiple goals, including protecting public safety, punishing offenders, and ensuring fairness and due process.
At the same time, it recognizes that the methods used to achieve these goals, such as arrests, searches, and prosecutions, can have significant consequences for individuals and society. The "means" side of the end means balance is committed towards fairness in dealing with defendants. This means that the criminal justice system should use fair and just methods to investigate, prosecute, and punish individuals accused of crimes.
This includes protecting the rights of defendants, ensuring a fair trial, and preventing wrongful convictions. The means side of the balance acknowledges that the criminal justice system should not use excessive or unfair methods to achieve its goals, even if the ends are important.
To learn more about criminal justice
https://brainly.com/question/30629034
#SPJ4
Your client is Donna Osborne. Donna has been accused of killing her husband. You will
defend Donna and inform her of what to expect at each state of the pre-trial process
while also giving her advice on what to do.
1) Arraignment
The day after a defendant is arrested, she is brought before a judge for an initial hearing on
the case. At that time, she learns more about her rights and the charges against her,
arrangements are made for her to have an attorney, and the judge decides if the defendant
will be held in prison or released until the trial.
In many cases, the law allows the defendant to be released from prison before a trial if she
meets the requirements for bail. Before the judge makes the decision on whether to grant
bail, she must hold a hearing to learn facts about the defendant including how long the
defendant has lived in the area, if she has family nearby, her prior criminal record, and if she
has threatened any witnesses in the case. The judge also considers the defendant's
potential danger to the community.
The judge turns to you and asks "Why should your client be granted bail?" What do you say?
What I would say, given the circumstances is: "Your Honor, my client Donna Osborne is a longtime resident of this community and has strong ties to the area."
Why is this important?She boasts an encouraging family unit that verifies her negligible chance for flight risk. Furthermore, she does not have any evidence of criminal history and has proposed no threats towards the witnesses in this case.
We acknowledge the gravity of the accusations against her, yet we trust she poses no hazard to the community and can guaranteefulfill her duty to all court obligations. Hence, we humbly request bail being granted.
Read more about fair trial here:
https://brainly.com/question/15727277
#SPJ1
Question 19 Marks: 1 Hazardous waste is governed by theChoose one answer. a. Clean Water Act b. Occupational Safety and Health Act c. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act d. Food and Drug Act
Hazardous waste is governed by Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. C
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) is the primary federal law governing the management of hazardous waste.
The RCRA establishes a cradle-to-grave system for managing hazardous waste, from its generation to its ultimate disposal, to ensure that it is managed in a way that protects human health and the environment.
The other options listed are federal laws that address different areas of environmental and occupational health and safety, but they do not specifically govern hazardous waste.
The main federal statute controlling the handling of hazardous waste is the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
To guarantee that hazardous waste is managed in a way that safeguards both human health and the environment, the RCRA established a cradle-to-grave system for managing it from the time it is generated to the point at which it is finally disposed of.
The other choices include federal statutes that cover various aspects of occupational and environmental health and safety, but they do not directly address hazardous waste.
For similar questions on governed
https://brainly.com/question/14992025
#SPJ11
How often do you check your rearview mirrors to keep your eye on your blind spot?
1-2 seconds
3-5 seconds
5-10 seconds
10-15 seconds
The government issues an expansionary monetary policy. What happens to private investments
When the government issues an expansionary monetary policy, the private investments would increase the money supply, lower interest rates, and stimulate economic growth.
A central bank's measures to raise the money supply, lower interest rates, and promote economic growth are referred to as an expansionary monetary policy.
Decreased interest rates Lowering interest rates is one of the key objectives of an expansionary monetary policy.
However, an expansionary monetary policy can also result in increased inflation, which can raise the cost of inputs for firms and lower consumer purchasing power.
Overall, a number of variables, such as the level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, and the state of the economy as a whole, influence how an expansionary monetary policy affects private investments.
For such more question on monetary
https://brainly.com/question/13926715
#SPJ11
A government in which a city and a county government have joined to form a single government is called...
A government in which a city and a county have joined to form a single government is commonly called a unified or consolidated government.
The correct answer is consolidated or unified government.
In a consolidated government, the functions and responsibilities of the city and county governments are combined into a single entity. Consolidated governments are often created to improve efficiency and reduce duplication of services. By combining the resources and functions of both city and county governments, a consolidated government can often provide better services to its residents and reduce costs.
A consolidated government's exact structure and organization can vary depending on the jurisdiction. In some cases, the city and county functions may be combined thoroughly.
To know more about consolidated government, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29347812
#SPJ4
Violation of a cease and desist order imposes a penalty of up to $(?) per violation or a maximum penalty of $(?) if the violation is willful
A violation of a cease and desist order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can result in civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation for individuals and up to $50,000 per violation for entities.
If the violation is willful, the penalty can be increased to $10,000 per violation for individuals and $100,000 per violation for entities.
The penalties for violating a cease-and-desist order can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific order that was violated.
In some jurisdictions, the penalty for violating a cease and desist order can include both civil and criminal consequences.
In the United States, a violation of a cease and desist order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can result in civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation for individuals and up to $50,000 per violation for entities.
If the violation is willful, the penalty can be increased to $10,000 per violation for individuals and $100,000 per violation for entities.
Additionally, a willful violation of a cease-and-desist order can also result in criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment.
The penalties for violating a cease and desist order can vary widely depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. It's always best to consult with a legal professional to fully understand the potential consequences of violating a cease and desist order.
For similar questions penalties
https://brainly.com/question/8860723
#SPJ11
Draper v US established that an anonymous tip can ____ be used in and of itself to establish probable cause.A. Selectivity B. NeverC. SometimesD. Always
Draper v US established that an anonymous tip can Sometimes be used in and of itself to establish probable cause. C
In Draper v. United States, the Supreme Court held that an anonymous tip, if sufficiently detailed and reliable, can provide the basis for probable cause to support a warrantless search or arrest.
The Court held that the reliability of an anonymous tip must be assessed based on the totality of the circumstances, including the level of detail provided in the tip, whether the information is corroborated by other sources, and the degree of urgency or risk involved in the situation.
If the tip is found to be reliable and provides enough information to establish probable cause, then it can be used to support a warrantless search or arrest.
If the tip is vague, unreliable, or lacks corroboration, then it may not be sufficient to establish probable cause on its own.
For similar questions on Establish
https://brainly.com/question/28340480
#SPJ11
The aggregate expenditures equation states that in equilibrium, income, or real GDP, equals
According to the aggregate expenditures model, real GDP (Y), the output in equilibrium, will equal C + I plus G plus NX. Changes in interest rates are rarely if ever, a factor in government purchases.
What is real GDP?A macroeconomic metric called real GDP, which accounts for price fluctuations, estimates the value of the products and services generated by an economy over a certain period. In essence, it assesses a nation's overall economic performance while accounting for price fluctuations, whether they result from inflation or deflation. The basic data in current dollars, untouched by inflation, is reflected in nominal GDP. Real GDP corrects the data by fixing the value of the currency, removing any distortion brought on by inflation or deflation. By either multiplying or dividing the nominal GDP by a deflationary number (N), one can determine the real gross domestic product.To learn more about real GDP, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/17110800
A minor may have his or her license canceled at any time by
A minor may have his or her driver's license canceled at any time by their legal guardian or the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).
A minor may have his or her license canceled at any time by the state's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) if the minor is found to be driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, driving recklessly or negligently, or violating any other traffic laws. Additionally, if the minor fails to maintain good academic standing or violates any other terms of their provisional license, their license may be suspended or canceled by the DMV.
It is important for minors to understand the responsibilities that come with having a driver's license and to always drive safely and responsibly.
To know more about Department of Motor Vehicles, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30328368
#SPJ11
The Center for American Progress and the Heritage Foundation often use ______ to promote a preferred policy.A. scientific policy analysis B. professional policy analysisC. political policy analysis D. program evaluation
Political policy analysis is a common tool used by the Heritage Foundation and the Centre for American Progress to advance a chosen policy. Here option C is the correct answer.
The Center for American Progress and the Heritage Foundation are both think tanks that aim to influence policy decisions in the United States. They use various methods to promote their preferred policy, but one of the most common is through policy analysis.
Policy analysis is the process of evaluating policy options and their potential impacts. It involves gathering and analyzing data, identifying the strengths and weaknesses of different policy options, and making recommendations based on the analysis.
In the case of the Center for American Progress and the Heritage Foundation, they often use political policy analysis to promote their preferred policy. Political policy analysis involves taking into account the political context in which the policy is being considered, including the political beliefs and values of key decision-makers, public opinion, and the political feasibility of different policy options.
To learn more about policy analysis
https://brainly.com/question/14094920
#SPJ4
What was one of the first documented legal codes, which was based on Sumerian and Akkadian laws?
The Code of Ur-Nammu was one of the first documented legal codes, which was based on Sumerian and Akkadian laws.
It was created around 2100 BCE and is based on Sumerian and Akkadian laws. It was practiced in ancient Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq). The more well-known Hammurabi code is about 300 decades older than the Code of Ur-Nammu.
The world's first empire was built by King Sargon of the Akkadians. The Akkadians created a unique language. On stones craftsmen carved beautiful relief sculptures. Every person living in the Empire was subject to the laws that its king, Hammurabi, drafted.
The so-called Code of Lipit Ishtar, which contains the typical preface, articles, and conclusion and covers topics like person rights, marriages, successions, penalties, property rights, and contracts, is the source of Sumerian law.
Learn more about Akkadian laws at:
brainly.com/question/632211
#SPJ4
In which case did the Supreme Court rule that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected to service in a militia?
In the Heller decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 26, 2008, (5-4) that the Second Amendment ensures a person's freedom to own weapons without having to participate in a state militia and to use firearms for customarily legal purposes, including self-defense inside the house.
What is Second Amendment protects?The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be violated as a well-regulated militia is necessary to ensure the safety of a free State. To put it simply, the Supreme Court did its job when it ruled that the Second Amendment does not protect assault weapons—exactly because they are designed for the battlefield and are not "in common use at the time for lawful purposes." Id. at 624–25, 627–28; in agreement with Kolbe, 849 F. According to the First Amendment, Congress may not enact any legislation that would respect religious freedom or forbid it altogether. It safeguards the rights to assembly, freedom of the press, and petitioning the government to make amends for wrongdoings. People have the freedom to bear weapons under the Second Amendment.To learn more about Second Amendment protects, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1750552