The correct option for this question is Option (C)
C) The perception of multiple crises has led to the growth of an executive branch that is undermining the separation of powers in the government.
The author argues that the modern presidency has become the "imperial Presidency" due to a combination of doctrines and emotions that have led to the centralization of decisions and the exclusion of other branches of government. The author specifically mentions the belief in the permanent and universal crisis, fear of communism, and faith in the duty and right of the United States to intervene swiftly in every part of the world as factors that have contributed to the growth of the executive branch. This has led to the undermining of the separation of powers in the government, as the executive branch has overwhelmed the traditional separation of powers in foreign affairs and has begun to aspire toward an equivalent centralization of power in the domestic polity.
Therefore, the correct implication of the author's argument is that the perception of multiple crises has led to the growth of an executive branch that is undermining the separation of powers in the government.
#SPJ1
Similar Question: https://brainly.com/question/928599
how does mechanical solidarity approaches punishment
The mechanical solidarity tends to approach punishment by the way of treating an offense as a criminal act to all as a fact of common morality to exist in the shared system of values of existence.
The concept of mechanical solidarity states that offensive acts should be treated as criminal acts for the entire society under existence, and not just few sections or individuals of the society, considering it as an offense to common morality. This belief under the concept of mechanical solidarity exists because of the shared system of values that exists in the society that we live in.
Learn more about mechanical solidarity here:
https://brainly.com/question/11245416?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
In this type of plea, a defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a lesser included charge.a. Reduced-sentence plea.b. Vertical plea.c. Horizontal plea.d. Avoidance-of-stigma plea.
In the reduced sentence plea, the defendant basically pleads guilty or nolo contendere to get a included charge.
The correct option is option a.
The purpose of reduced sentences is when the offenders plead guilty in order to get them to admit their guilt and crimes as early as possible. When they do this, it particularly saves victims as well as the witnesses from the stress of basically going through a trial, such as having to relive their ordeal as well as being repeatedly cross examined about it.
This is very important when there are young and the vulnerable victims which should not be put through further traumatic experiences. It also helps in improving the efficiency of the criminal justice system.
Hence, the correct option is a.
To know more about reduced sentences
https://brainly.com/question/17238327
#SPJ4
where is the power of government located in a republic?
The people who elect representatives to establish and execute laws on their behalf have the authority of the government in a republic.
In a republic, the people have the authority of the government, which they indirectly wield through their chosen representatives. In a republic, as opposed to a direct democracy, the people choose representatives to make decisions on their behalf. Members of Congress, the president, and state and municipal politicians are examples of these representatives. The term "ecosystem" refers to a group of people who work in the construction industry. A system of checks and balances, which prevents any one part of government from becoming overly dominant, maintains the balance of power.
learn more about government here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
Pretend you are a police officer who just witnessed your partner shoot and kill a serial killer after the suspect had given up his fight by dropping his handgun to the floor at your partner’s order. Your partner claimed that he shot the suspect while the suspect was still holding up his gun, but you saw it differently.
There were no other witnesses. What would you do and why?
Answer:
As a police officer who just witnessed my partner shoot and kill a serial killer, I would feel conflicted and concerned about what I had observed. It would be my duty to report my observations to my superiors and to the relevant investigative authorities, even if it meant challenging the actions of my fellow officer. Upholding the law and ensuring that justice is served is paramount in such situations.
Explanation:
As a police officer who just witnessed my partner shoot and kill a serial killer, I would have to act according to my duty to serve and protect the public and uphold the law. If I saw it differently than my partner's version of events, I would need to report my observations to my superiors and to the relevant investigative authorities, such as internal affairs or the district attorney's office.
I would do this because it is important to ensure that the truth is uncovered and justice is served, even if it means reporting on a fellow officer. I would also want to ensure that the proper protocols and procedures were followed during the incident and that the use of force was justified and appropriate. Ultimately, my responsibility as a police officer is to serve and protect the public and uphold the law, even if it means challenging the actions of my fellow officers.
Muckraking journalism, aimed at investigating and exposing corruption and scandal, is a reason magazines began to overtake newspaper readership.TrueFalse
It is true that the Muckraking journalism, which is for investigating and exposing corruption and scandal, is a reason magazines began to overtake newspaper readership.
What is Muckraking Journalism?A handful of American authors were drawn to reform and exposé literature prior to World War I to start Muckraking Journalism. The power of big business in a rapidly industrialising United States led to social problems, political and economic corruption, and the muckrakers' reporting on these issues was thorough and accurate.
In his speech on April 14, 1906, U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt used the derogatory term "muckraker," using a line from John Bunyan's The Pilgrim's Journey about "the Man with the Muckrake...who could see no way but downward." However the term "muckraker" also grew to have positive associations with social concern and brave presentation.
To learn more about muckraking from the link
https://brainly.com/question/30051783
#SPJ1
A developer and an investor had been in the real estate business for many years. Because of their long-standing relationship, the developer and the investor, neither of whom was an attorney, often dispensed with certain legal formalities when dealing with each other, thus saving the costs of lawyers' fees and other attendant expenses. The investor owned a parcel of land that the developer was interested in. At lunch one day, the developer offered to buy the parcel from the investor for $50,000. The investor accepted the developer's offer, and the parties agreed on June 15 as the closing date. The developer wrote out and handed the investor a check for $2,500 with "earnest money" written in the memo, and they shook hands on their deal. A few weeks before closing, the developer called the investor and told him she had changed her mind about purchasing the land because of a sudden economic downturn in the area. The investor appeared at the developer's office on June 15 with the deed to the land in his hand. The developer refused to tender the balance due, and the investor sued the developer for specific performance. Will the investor prevail? (A) No, because the agreement does not comply with the Statute of Frauds and is, therefore, unenforceable. (B) No, but the court will allow the investor to keep the $2,500 earnest money as damages. (C) Yes, because the $2,500 payment constituted part performance of the contract. (D) Yes, because the developer and the investor had established a course of dealing.
Answer:
Based on the given facts, the correct answer is (B) No, but the court will allow the investor to keep the $2,500 earnest money as damages.
Explanation:
The agreement between the developer and the investor to sell the land was a contract, which was formed when the developer made an offer to purchase the land and the investor accepted it. The fact that the parties did not use attorneys or put the agreement in writing does not necessarily make the agreement unenforceable. However, the agreement does not comply with the Statute of Frauds, which requires certain contracts, including contracts for the sale of land, to be in writing in order to be enforceable.
The payment of $2,500 by the developer to the investor constitutes earnest money, which is a deposit made by a buyer to show good faith and to bind the contract. If the developer breaches the contract, the investor is entitled to keep the earnest money as liquidated damages. However, the investor cannot force the developer to purchase the land or to perform the contract because specific performance is an equitable remedy, and the court will not compel the developer to perform the contract when the contract is unenforceable due to the Statute of Frauds.
Therefore, the correct answer is (B) No, but the court will allow the investor to keep the $2,500 earnest money as damages.
summary jury trials are primarily used in federal courts but have occasionally been used in state courts when there are complex issues to be litigated. true or false?
True, summary jury trials are mostly used in federal courts, but they have been used in state courts on occasion when complex issues are at stake.
The procedure is not legally binding. Summary jury trials, on the other hand, generally promote dispute resolution. Summary jury trials are typically used in cases that are resistant to other pretrial settlement methods and are sufficiently complex to necessitate a lengthy full trial. More than substantive legal issues, the dynamics of the controversy determine whether or not cases are appropriate for summary jury trials. Normally, the decision to send a case to summary jury trial is made at the final pretrial conference, when plans for summary trial procedures are made. The format of a summary trial is similar to that of a traditional civil jury trial.
To learn more about jury trial:
https://brainly.com/question/12085109
#SPJ4
How improving communicating skills could help you to accept changes
Answer:
Improving communication skills can help individuals better express their concerns and understand the reasons for changes, leading to better acceptance of the changes. Clear communication can also help reduce misunderstandings and promote dialogue, leading to constructive conversations and problem-solving around the changes. Finally, good communication can help build trust between individuals and organizations, leading to greater openness to change in the future.
Place the following affirmative action policy changes in order.A)-The supreme courts subjects affirmative action policies to strict scrutinyB)-President Johnson promotes minority employment among the federal civil service.C)-The federal government makes affirmative action a prominent goal
B) The federal civil service is encouraged to employ more people of colour by President Johnson. D) The federal government places a high priority on affirmative action. A) The Supreme Court closely examines affirmative action policies.
B) President Johnson encourages minority employment in the federal civil service.
C) The federal government prioritises affirmative action.
A) The Supreme Court examines affirmative action policies closely.
President Johnson's 1965 initiative to increase minority employment in the federal civil service is seen as the forerunner of today's affirmative action practises. The foundation for initiatives aimed at addressing past discrimination in employment and education was established by this presidential order. With several initiatives aimed at boosting diversity and providing opportunities for disadvantaged groups, the federal government later made affirmative action a top priority in the 1970s and beyond.
learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
what led to the passage of the sherman antitrust act? what practical impact did it have?
The Sherman antitrust act was passed by the congress to prevent merger of companies and restrained competition which can interfere in the free market and disturb free competition. Congress took it as a opportunity to divert people criticism of the government but was not likely given power. It was not enforced and later weakened by the courts of justice.
The Sherman antitrust act was passed in the United States in the year 1890 by the congress, which underlines importance of competitiveness in the market, outlawed trusts, monopolies, and cartels to increase economic competitiveness in the free market. The act prevented mergers of companies to form a monopoly protecting fair and healthy competitive behavior in the market but it was loosely worded and failed to define such critical terms as trust, monopoly, combination etc.
Know more about "Sherman antitrust act" visit
brainly.com/question/838791
#SPJ4
When parties to a dispute work out a solution for themselves without recourse to outside help or the courts, they have resolved the dispute through
a. Arbitration
b. Mediation
c. Negotiation
d. Novation
When parties to a dispute work out a solution for themselves without recourse to outside help or the courts, they have resolved the dispute through Negotiation. The correct option is C.
The process of settling disagreements between parties is referred to as dispute resolution or dispute settlement. Sometimes, the terms "conflict resolution" and "dispute resolution" are used synonymously.
It is also common for states to create their own arbitration tribunals to resolve conflicts. The International Court of Arbitration and the London Court of International Arbitration are renowned private international courts that resolve disputes between commercial private companies.
To know more about Tribunals, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13843175
#SPJ4
under the doctrine of worthier title, a conveyance by a grantor of "to a for life, then to my heirs" creates what type of interest in the grantor’s heirs?
No interest is being created in the grantor's legal heirs under the doctrine of worthier title, a conveyance by a grantor of “to a for life, then to my heirs”.
A legal heir may be taken into broader understanding as a person who will hold the rights to use, sell, or possess, the properties of an individual after his or her death. It is noteworthy to mention that a legal heir does not necessarily mean that the son or daughter of the deceased person hold the rights, rather the person named under the will of the doctrine hold the rights. Thus, it does not create any interest for the grantor's heirs.
Learn more about a legal heir here:
https://brainly.com/question/30208002?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
What step occurs after policy formulation in the policymaking process?A) Policy agendaB) Policy enactmentC) Policy evaluationD) Policy implementation
After policy formulation in the policy making process, the next step is typically policy enactment (Option B).
Policy enactment refers to the formal adoption of the policy by the relevant legislative body, executive agency, or other decision-making body. Policy enactment can involve a variety of activities, depending on the specific policy and political context. In some cases, it may involve the passage of a new law or regulation, while in others it may involve the revision or modification of existing policies or programs. Policy enactment is a crucial step in the policy making process, as it determines whether the policy will actually be implemented and enforced. It may involve negotiations and compromises among different stakeholders, as well as public hearings and other forms of public engagement. Once a policy has been enacted, the next step is typically policy implementation, in which the policy is put into practice and its impact is assessed. This may involve the allocation of resources, the development of new programs or initiatives, and the training of personnel to carry out the policy. Ultimately, policy evaluation will assess the effectiveness of the policy in achieving its goals and objectives, and inform future policy making efforts.
To know more about policy enactment, click here: https://brainly.com/question/29791671
#SPJ4
Hector believes that a law under which he was convicted for a crime violates the Constitution. If ultimately the Supreme Court agrees with him, that law will be declared..
a. unconstitutional
b. constitutional
Hector argues that the statute that led to his conviction for a crime violates the Constitution. If the Supreme Court eventually agrees with him, the statute will be ruled unconstitutional. Thus, option A is correct.
A constitution is defined as the collection of fundamental ideas or additional content that operate as the legal foundation of a polity, organization, or other sort of body and typically prescribe that the organization is to be governed.
The Hector claims that the legislation that led to his imprisonment is unconstitutional. This means that it is not in compliance with the political constitution or procedural standards.
Therefore, the legislation will be declared illegal if the Court of Appeals ultimately agrees with him.
Learn more about the constitution, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ4
which of the following situations is not one of the six situations in which a warrantless search is valid?
Therefore, a situation that is not one of the six is likely to involve a circumstance that does not fall under any of the above categories.
What is a warrantless search?Generally, A warrantless search is a search conducted by law enforcement without the need for a valid search warrant. The power of a warrantless search is usually based on the concept of implied or apparent consent, or on the existence of exigent circumstances. Examples of warrantless searches include searches incident to arrest, searches of items in plain view, and emergency searches.
speaking, the six situations in which a warrantless search might be considered valid are:
Incident to a lawful arrestStop and friskPlain viewConsentAutomobile searchesEmergency searchesRead more about warrantless search
https://brainly.com/question/140436
#SPJ1
which progressive reformers tend to be the least successful at influencing legislation and at what level?
Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt were the progressive reformers tend to be the least successful at influencing legislation and at the union level.
Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson both increased the federal government's authority to impose restrictions on the private sector and put in place safeguards for workers, consumers, and the environment.
The approval of numerous important pieces of legislation, including multiple amendments to the US Constitution, was effectively influenced by progressive reformers. The Seventeenth Amendment permitted senators to be elected directly, the Eighteenth Amendment outlawed the sale of alcohol, and the Nineteenth Amendment granted the right to vote to women. The Sixteenth Amendment established a federal income tax.
To learn more about progressive reformers, click at:
https://brainly.com/question/30609053
#SPJ4
A. What is the problem that the city council will be trying to address with
the proposed ordinance?
B. What is the legislative intent of the city council in drafting the ordinance?
C. List all the details you think should be included in the proposed ordinance.
D. Draft four sentences that you think would make a good ordinance to
deal with the problem.
E. Role-play a legislative committee meeting at which the members have
worked on four-sentence versions of the proposed ordinance and are
trying to agree on a final version.
F. After the four-sentence law is drafted, use the guidelines for drafting
laws on page 22 to analyze possible problems with the law as drafted.
Are there problems? If so, what are they, and how can they be solved?
Two public meetings are typically held by a city, town, or county, one in front of the plan commission and the other in front of the city or county legislature.
What is commission?A commission is a payment made by a broker or investment advisor in return for managing a client's purchases and sales of securities or providing investment advice. Commissions and fees differ greatly from one another, at least in the context of expert advisors in the financial services industry. The primary source of income for commission-based advisors and brokers is the sale of financial products like mutual funds and annuities, as well as the management of client funds. A fee-based advisor incurs a set cost when managing a client's funds. A monetary amount or a percentage of the assets being managed could be used here (AUM). The majority of family sales are uncompensated gifts of land.
To learn more about commission, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29564439
#SPJ1
______ elections tend to have the lowest voter turnout.a. Localb. Statec. Nationald. International
The local elections tend to have the lowest voter turnout. The correct option is option a.
Voter turnout basically refers to the percentage or the number of the eligible voters who can cast their ballots. A high voter turnout is basically considered to be indicative of the vitality of a particular democracy, whereas a low voter turnout is usually associated with voter apathy as well as a mistrust among the people for the political process.
The voter turnout for a local election is going to be the lowest when compared to voting at a state, national or international level.
Hence, the correct option is option a.
To know more about voter turnout
https://brainly.com/question/1270103
#SPJ4
the idea of a criminal justice nonsystem, in which different criminal justice agencies are more self-serving and focus more on performance measures than on justice, is the basis of the ________.
The idea of a criminal justice non-system, in which different criminal justice agencies are more self-serving and focus more on performance measures than on justice, is the basis of the conflict model.
The conflict model of criminal justice, also known as the non-system viewpoint or system conflict perspective, proposes that a criminal justice system's organizations should or do operate competitively rather than cooperatively in order to deliver justice.
According to the system conflict theory, the criminal justice system is in conflict with itself because of concerns about success, money, promotions, and fame. As adversarial processes are considered as being fundamental to the "system," this perspective contends that there is no real system. It also highlights the fact that many criminal justice institutions have a tendency to divulge as little information as possible.
Both groups contend that the conflict perspective is the reality of criminal justice, but the consensus model is the goal, and groups that contend that the argument is both the reality and the ideal subscribe to this school of thought.
To learn more about criminal justice, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/30629034
#SPJ4
Why would I get mail from the Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service?
The Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service contacts us if the balance is due, bigger or smaller refund is yours to get, regarding your tax return, we have a query, or so that we can confirm your identity.
Some more cases include getting further information for an individual, adjustments regarding your refund, or if there are any delays in processing your return.
You must carefully study each letter or notification sent by the Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service since it provides a wealth of crucial information. Compare the data we gave in the notice or letter with the data in your initial return to see if we made any changes to your tax return.
There are two major reasons you should comply if your notice or letter requests a response by a certain date:
to reduce additional interest and penalty fees.to protect your right to appeal if you disagree.Use the special access code included in your letter or notice to respond as instructed, which may be via mail, FAX, or, if accessible, electronically through the Internal Revenue Service's Documentation Upload Tool.
To know more about Internal Revenue Service, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/12072112
#SPJ4
which statement about trends in texas government spending is best supported by the information presented in the following figure?
“Spending by the state has been more or less steady since the 2008-09 biennium” is the statement about trends in Texas government spending is best supported by the information presented in the following figure.
What do you mean by Government Spending?Government expenditure is the amount of money allocated by the public sector for the purchase of products and the delivery of services, such as defense, social protection, healthcare, and education.
The state receives more than $250 billion in income each year through more than 60 various taxes, fees, and levies. The majority of the money is spent on things like road building, professional licenses, jails, and university research.
Public welfare ($1,512) and elementary and secondary education ($2,179) were Texas's two highest per-capita expenditure categories. The majority of Medicaid funding is classified by the Census Bureau as part of public welfare, although some of it is also given to public hospitals.
Therefore, spending by the state has been more or less steady since the 2008-09 biennium.
Learn more about Government Spending, here;
https://brainly.com/question/474561
#SPJ1
What type of political jurisdiction is created from the bottom up?a. cityb. countyc. stated. national
Answer:
Explanation:
a
what theory can explain why some drug dealers experience property victimization?
The theory some drug dealers experience property was victimization, considered as, lifestyle theory.
What is experience?As the word experience is referring as, the experience refers to intended psychological feature in general, and perceptual experience in particular, as well as the practical knowledge and acquaintance produced by these intended processes.
As, the lifestyle theory is considered, as people may become the unfortunate person of law-breaking because of their lifestyles and choices. For example, someone with a speculation or substance dependence could be as an “easy victim” by a con creative person.
Therefore, As a result, the lifestyle theory was the dealers experience property victimization.
Learn more about the experience here:
https://brainly.com/question/11256472
#SPJ1
What is reasoning from a general case that we know to be true to a specific instance?
The process of deductive reasoning can be regarded as a way to and from a general case that the society knows to be true to a particular instances.
The process of deductive reasoning can be referred to or taken into consideration as the process in which a specific conclusion is derived by assuming for general pieces of evidences available, and are known to be true by the reasoning provided for them under the general cases. This type of reasoning used by the scientists as a proper scientific method.
Learn more about deductive reasoning here:
https://brainly.com/question/6651188
#SPJ4
this 1896 supreme court decision created legal justification for segregation laws. ruled separate but equal was constitutional (True or False)
The supreme court's 1896 ruling established the legitimacy of segregation legislation. Separate but equal was deemed to be constitutional (a). true statement.
Because the "separate but equal" principle, which justified racial segregation, was maintained by the Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson, a decision rendered in 1896.
The highest federal court in the country, the United States Supreme Court, has the final say in disputes involving the interpretation of federal law and the Constitution. The president appoints and the senate confirms the nine justices that make up the court.
Because it respects the Constitution and protects citizens' rights, the Supreme Court is crucial to the American system of governance. Its decisions have a tremendous social impact and have influenced important issues like voting rights, free speech, and civil rights.
To know more about supreme court
https://brainly.com/question/9717905
#SPJ4
which scenario would violate a person’s 5th amendment right?
When confessions are coerced from a suspect, their 5th amendment right has been violated.
The fifth amendment right states that “no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself".
The right to stay silent, the right to have legal representation present while being questioned, and the right to have a government-appointed lawyer if the suspect cannot afford one are all examples of what are known as the Miranda rights.
The Fifth Amendment is divided into five rights or safeguards: the right to a jury trial when you are accused of a crime, the safeguard against double jeopardy, the safeguard against self-incrimination, the safeguard for a fair trial, and the safeguard against the government seizing your property without just compensation.
To know more about the fifth amendment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30391361
#SPJ4
Which courts decide more than 95 percent of the nation’s legal cases?
answer choices
State courts
Supreme court
Small claims court
District courts
the virginia state constitution of 1776 gave nearly all power to the governor; however, it also included a bill of rights
The statement that the Virginia State Constitution of 1776 gave nearly all power to the governor and included a bill of rights is False.
What did the Virginia State Constitution of 1776 include ?The Virginia State Constitution of 1776 did establish a strong governorship, but it did not give nearly all power to the governor. Instead, it created a system of checks and balances between the governor, the legislature, and the judiciary.
The judiciary was also given the power of judicial review, allowing it to interpret the constitutionality of laws and executive actions. Additionally, the Virginia State Constitution of 1776 did include a Bill of Rights, which enumerated a set of individual rights and protections, including freedom of speech and religion
Find out more on the Virginia State Constitution of 1776 at https://brainly.com/question/5800706
#SPJ1
A man believed that he and his wife were headed toward a divorce, and was concerned that his wife would fight to keep a valuable painting they had purchased together on their honeymoon. Although the man was staying at a hotel, he decided to break into the house and take the painting when he believed his wife would be out. So as not to draw any neighbors' attention by walking in the front door, the man climbed through an open window in the back. The wife was in fact home, and she was furious when she saw the man there. She pushed him repeatedly, telling him to get out of her house. The man pushed the wife back, and the wife hit her head on the corner of a table. Because she had a blood clotting disorder, the injury caused excessive bleeding in her brain, and she died the next day. The man has been charged with felony murder. The evidence at trial shows that the man knew of his wife's blood clotting disorder. Is the man likely to be convicted of felony murder?
It is possible that the man could be convicted of felony murder. Felony murder is a legal doctrine that holds a person responsible for any deaths that occur during the commission of certain felonies, such as burglary.
In this case, the man committed the felony of burglary when he broke into the house to take the painting. During the commission of this felony, the man caused the death of his wife. The fact that the man knew of his wife's blood clotting disorder may be considered in determining his level of intent or knowledge, but it may not necessarily absolve him of responsibility for her death.
The specific details of the case and the laws of the jurisdiction in which it takes place would ultimately determine the outcome of the trial.
To know more about felony murder go to
https://brainly.com/question/3325097
#SPJ4
who is responsible for perimeter control at a terrorism incident?
Option d. Law enforcement personnel is responsible for perimeter control at a terrorism incident.
In its broadest sense, terrorism is the intentional use of violence and fear to further political or ideological objectives. When used in this context, the phrase primarily refers to intentional acts of violence committed against non-combatants (typically civilians and members of the armed forces acting in a neutral capacity) in both peacetime and wartime.
The terms "terrorist" and "terrorism," which date back to the in history as of late 18th century French Revolution, were widely used internationally during the Troubles in Northern Ireland, the Basque conflict, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the 1970s. This increase in sui-cide attacks since the 1980s is best further exemplified by the September 11 attacks in the United States in 2001.
To learn more about terrorism: https://brainly.com/question/9450062
#SPJ4
Note that the full question is:
Who is responsible for perimeter control at a terrorism incident?
a. EMS personnel
b. Fire department personnel
c. FEMA personnel
d. Law enforcement personnel