Answer:
there were driven off there land and treated very badly. Most of them died due to disease.
Explanation:
One-third of all Cherokees and Seminoles in Indian Territory died from violence, starvation, and war-related illness.
which are accurate statements about US trade with Mexico since the time NAFTA was signed
US exports to Mexico have increased. US imports from Mexico have increased.
What occurred as a result of the NAFTA's signing?
The removal or lowering of trade and investment obstacles between the United States, Canada, and Mexico was made possible by the passage of NAFTA. Political disagreements have centered on how the agreement will affect matters like employment, the environment, and economic expansion.
What are NAFTA's two most significant advantages?
By doing away with all tariffs between the three nations, NAFTA increased commerce. It also produced accords on global commercial investor rights. That decreased the cost of doing business. Particularly for small enterprises, it encourages investment and growth.
Learn more about NAFTA
brainly.com/question/7458065
#SPJ1
What is the difference between territorial status and state status?
A territory is a region that is controlled by another state or government and lacks sovereignty, as opposed to a state, which is also referred to as a nation or an organised political group and has sovereignty.
What does sovereignty mean in plain English?A political notion known as "sovereignty" designates absolute control or supreme authority. In a monarchy, the "sovereign," or ruler, holds absolute authority. In contemporary democracies, the people themselves execute their autonomous authority through elected organisations like the House and the Parliament.
How does the Bible define sovereignty?In Christianity, the sovereign authority of God to rule over his creation can be described as well as secondarily, but not certainly, the act of exercising this power.
To know more about Sovereignty visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4288920
#SPJ1
Which question below did the Miranda v. Arizona outcome answer?
A) Should more evidence be required to arrest someone of a crime than just the victim's identification of the accused criminal?
B)Should legal counsel always be appointed by the court, or should the citizen accused of a crime have the right to choose the attorney he would like to represent him?
C) Justices hearing Marbury v. Madison declared "separate but equal" as unconstitutional, which ended segregation and introduced equality among men as we know it today.
Does the court always choose legal representation, or should the person accused of a crime be allowed to choose their own attorney? is the Miranda v. Arizona decision's answer to this query.
What does "representation" mean?
A representation's condition, for example: a sense of representationalism 2. b(1) The act of one person acting in another's place to enforce that person's rights and obligations. A person or thing's representation can be described as a drawing, model, or statue of the subject. We are able to function more productively because of the representations we employ. For one to be able to work on difficult tasks, limiting the use of cognitive resources like attention and short-term memory is essential.
Know more about crime Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14111944
#SPJ1
president theodore roosevelt transformed the american navy by emphasizing which of the following strategies?
Answer: President Theodore Roosevelt transformed the American navy by emphasizing the strategy of sea power, which involved building a modern navy that could project American military power around the world. He believed that a strong navy was essential for the protection of American interests and the advancement of American influence abroad. Roosevelt's naval policy was characterized by the construction of new battleships, the modernization of the navy's infrastructure, and the expansion of America's overseas naval bases, all aimed at enhancing America's ability to project power across the globe.
Explanation:
TAKE YOUR TIME TO WRITE THIS OUT! BEST GETS BRAINLIEST
REPORT: UNDERDEVELOPED COUNTRY
Here is your goal for this assignment:
Write a report analyzing an underdeveloped country of your choice!
things you should consider putting in would be, what is grown or mined in the country?
What products are exported and imported into this country?
What economic, social, or political changes are needed to improve this country?
Your report should be 350 words in length and written with correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation
THIS IS NOT A CHEAT FOR AN EXAM IT IS TO SEE WHO CAN GET BRAINLIEST!!!!
Report: Analyzing an Underdeveloped Country
This report will analyze an underdeveloped country chosen for this assignment, Bangladesh. Bangladesh is a small South Asian country, located between India and Myanmar. It is the world's 8th most populous country with over 164 million people.
Economical Overview:
The economy of Bangladesh is currently considered an underdeveloped economy, with a GDP of $266 billion and a GDP Per Capita of $1,666. The major contributors to the GDP include agriculture, industry, and services. The agriculture sector dominates the economy, with almost 43% of Bangladesh's people working directly in the sector. Rice and jute are two of the main crops grown in Bangladesh. The industrial sector makes up 28.5% of the GDP, with textiles, pharmaceuticals, and steel production being the major contributors. The services sector makes up 28.5% of the GDP and includes banking, insurance, telecommunications, and tourism.
Trade:
Bangladesh's main exports include apparel, frozen seafood, jute and jute products, leather, pharmaceuticals, and tea. Major export markets are the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The main imports include capital goods, chemicals, petroleum products, and food grains. Major import markets for Bangladesh are China, India, and the United Arab Emirates.
Challenges and Solutions:
Despite the progress Bangladesh has made in recent years, there are still a number of challenges it faces. Poor infrastructure, inadequate access to education and healthcare, and a lack of job opportunities are some of the biggest challenges. To address these issues, the Bangladeshi government has implemented a number of reforms, including investments in infrastructure, educational reforms, and job-creation initiatives. Furthermore, the government has increased its focus on the agricultural sector, in an effort to increase food security, and has promoted foreign investment to attract capital.
In conclusion, Bangladesh is an underdeveloped country with a number of economic and social challenges. To address these issues, the government has implemented various reforms, such as investments in infrastructure and job-creation initiatives. It is hoped that these measures will help Bangladesh to move towards greater economic and social development in the future.
please help me with this please
When does the 2020 census counting officially begin?
How did the use of Black Americans differ between the North and the South?
Black labor has been foundational to the boom of America and our economy.
Enslaved human beings constructed the country's early infrastructure and produced moneymaking commodities such as cotton and tobacco. After emancipation, African American labor used to be imperative in industry, agriculture, and service.
What name was given to the mass motion of African Americans from the South to northern cities?The Great Migration was one of the biggest moves of human beings in United States history. Approximately six million Black humans moved from the American South to Northern, Midwestern, and Western states roughly from the 1910s until the 1970s.
Contact between Africans and Native Americans used to be now not restricted to shared slavery. Friendship and believe additionally fashioned between African Americans and citizens of sovereign Native American nations, ensuing in intermarriage and children.
Learn more about Black Americans here:
https://brainly.com/question/29813419#SPJ1Why were more Americans able to buy homes after World War II?
O A. Banks were less involved in the buying process
OB. Home prices fell to record lows
OC. People were more willing to take on debt
O D. All of the above
Answer:
C. People were more willing to take on debt.
Explanation:
Public policy, like the so-called GI Bill of Rights passed in 1944, provided money for veterans to attend college, to purchase homes, and to buy farms.
1. What is the name of the tax that is paid on the value of a person's real estate?
Land Tax
Riches tax
Property Tax
State tax
Answer: property tax
Explanation:
How did Britain respond to the Boston Tea Party and other "tea parties"?
a-It enacted the Coercive Acts.
b.It declared Boston to be in rebellion and closed its port.
C.It passed the Quartering Act, which forced Americans to house and feed British soldiers when asked.
d. All of the above.
the romans drastically altered the classical greek landscape when they took power. which of the following is not an example of the roman alteration of the greek landscape?
The answer choice that is NOT an example of the Roman alteration of the Greek landscape is the Rebuilding of the Parthenon
How did the Romans alter Classical Greek landscapes?The Romans were heavily influenced by Classical Greek art, architecture, and culture, and as they expanded their empire, they often altered the Greek landscapes in various ways.
One of the most notable ways in which the Romans altered Greek landscapes was through the construction of new buildings and infrastructure. For example, the Romans built numerous roads, aqueducts, and other public works throughout Greece, which helped to connect and unify the various regions under their control.
Read more about the Romans here:
https://brainly.com/question/1892495
#SPJ1
wilson's dream of ethnic self-determination in europe was not realized because of the following reasons: (choose all that apply)
Answer:
Wilson had a dream of international peace, though, and he wanted to make that dream a reality. He believed that a lasting peace required a fair and unbiased leader, such as himself, to attend the Paris Peace Conference.
differences and similarities between valances and swags
Swags are additional cloth strips used for the window's top. But they are even less structured than valances.
Swags actually consist of a longer, wider stretch of fabric draped out across window's upper edge.
Valance:
In between tier curtains and indeed the valance, even when tiers and a valance are utilised, you remain able to see outside.In log homes alone, decorative valances are frequently employed (without other curtains). They don't obstruct the lovely views that everyone adore, but they do provide a little colour and intrigue.A valance may also be used in lieu of curtains and placed over a mini-blind or window shade.Swag:
The curtain swag set like this one is an example. Take note of how the drape panels hang so elegantly.On either side of a window, swags of curtains dangle.Moreover, you have a choice between two curtain panel swags or a single swag that is one piece and joined at the top.To know more about the curtains, here
https://brainly.com/question/29787088
#SPJ1
a number of writers and reformers in the period 1865-1914 discussed the growing gap between wealth and poverty in the united states. compare and contrastany four of the following authors' explanations for this condition and their proposals for dealing with it:
Explanation:
1. Booker T. Washington: Washington believed that African Americans should focus on economic advancement through education and hard work rather than through political and social change. He argued that economic development would lead to greater respect for African Americans, and that this respect would eventually lead to the improvement of their political and social status. He proposed that African Americans should work to build strong businesses, and ultimately create a thriving middle class.
2. W.E.B. Du Bois: Du Bois argued that the growing gap between wealth and poverty was the result of racism and social injustice, and he advocated for political and social changes to combat these inequalities. He argued for greater economic opportunities for African Americans, and for government intervention to ensure these opportunities. He also called for more civil rights for African Americans, including the right to vote and to receive an education.
3. Ida B. Wells: Wells argued that the growing gap between wealth and poverty was the result of discrimination against African Americans. She proposed a variety of measures to combat this discrimination, including boycotts, lawsuits, and political activism. She also argued that African Americans should take advantage of the economic opportunities available to them and use them to build wealth.
when thomas jefferson became president in 1800, he was the first anti-federalist to assume the position. which of the following actions did he take to dismantle the federalist policies of the washington and adams administrations?
When Thomas Jefferson became President in 1800, he took several actions to dismantle the Federalist policies of the Washington and Adams administrations. These actions were aimed at reducing the power and influence of the federal government and promoting individual liberty and state sovereignty.
What was Thomas Jefferson best known for?Jefferson is best known for his role in the writing of the Declaration of Independence, his abroad service, his two terms as President, and his ubiquity on the modern nickel.
Some of the actions he took are:
He reduced the size and cost of the federal government by cutting the number of government employees and military expenditures.He repealed the excise tax on whiskey, which had been a major source of revenue for the federal government.He reduced the size of the army and navy, which he believed were unnecessary and expensive.Learn more about Thomas Jefferson here:
https://brainly.com/question/13346823
#SPJ1
“The federal government never acknowledged that a Conservative insurgency was underway in the South [after 1865]. . . . [It] simply divided the former Confederate states into five military districts, each commanded by a major general. . . .
“Army officers had neither the orders nor the desire to provide military protection for the fledgling Republican state governments created by the Reconstruction Acts. Like any other states in the Union, these were expected to provide for their own security. Anxious to gain political legitimacy in the eyes of a white population who largely regarded them as ‘regimes,’ these state governments had strong reasons to downplay the subversive activities within their borders. Instead, . . . they respected the civil liberties of ex-Confederates and, with only a few exceptions, permitted their bitterest foes full participation [in] the political process. They treated the Ku Klux Klan’s extensive campaigns of murder, assault, and intimidation as mere criminal activity. Those accused of such acts therefore enjoyed full access to the courts—and often dominated them.”
Mark Grimsley, historian, “Wars for the American South: The First and Second Reconstructions Considered as Insurgencies,” Civil War History, 2012
Question
The events described in the excerpt best support which of the following arguments about Reconstruction?
Responses
Reconstruction created only temporary political opportunities for formerly enslaved people.
Reconstruction created only temporary political opportunities for formerly enslaved people.
The Union army generally took extensive measures to reorder race relations in the South.
The Union army generally took extensive measures to reorder race relations in the South.
African Americans were generally opposed to Southern Republican state governments.
African Americans were generally opposed to Southern Republican state governments.
Northern resolve to engage in Reconstruction began to wane only in the mid-1870s.
The events described in the excerpt support the argument that the federal government's approach to Reconstruction after the Civil War was ineffective in protecting the rights and security of newly freed Black people and the Republican state governments in the South.
What exactly is civil war?A civil war is a type of armed conflict that takes place within a single country, usually between two or more factions that are vying for control of the government or territory. Civil wars typically involve large-scale violence, including battles between military forces, guerrilla warfare, and acts of terrorism. They often have complex causes, including ideological, economic, and ethnic or religious differences, and can be triggered by various factors, such as political instability, disputes over resources or land, or the breakdown of social order. Civil wars can be long-lasting, and devastating, and have profound effects on the people and countries involved, including economic and social disruption, displacement of populations, and loss of life and property.
To learn more about Civil War, click
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ1
If the Romans shared and followed the same Gods as the Greeks then why rename them?
The Romans adopted the Greek gods and integrated them into their own religious practices, often giving them their own unique names and attributes.
This process of adopting and adapting gods from other cultures was a common practice in ancient Rome, as the Romans were known for their syncretism - the blending of different cultures and traditions.One reason for renaming the gods may have been to make them more relatable to the Roman people, who had their own unique cultural and historical background.By giving the gods new names and attributes that were relevant to Roman society, the Romans were able to incorporate these gods into their religious practices and rituals more seamlessly. Additionally, renaming the gods may have helped to reinforce the idea that the Romans were a distinct and powerful culture, separate from the Greeks and other neighboring societies.To know more about Romans visit:
https://brainly.com/question/924819
#SPJ1
fill in the blank. the___was the mandate the us congress gave to president lyndon b. johnson to resolve the hostilities brought about by the firing of north vietnamese boats on a us naval vessel via any means he thought necessary, an act widely considered to have started the vietnam war.
Answer:
Explanation:
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
People who lived in eastern bloc countries after World War II could not:
a Participate in government.
b Travel on street cars.
c Send children to school.true or false?
People who lived in eastern bloc countries after World War II could not Participate in government, travel on street cars and send children to school. This statement is false.
What are the eastern bloc countries?
The Communist, Socialist, and Soviet blocs of Central and Eastern Europe, East Asia, Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America together referred to as the Eastern Bloc existed throughout the Cold War (1947–1991). In contrast to the capitalist Western Bloc, these states adhered to the Marxist-Leninist philosophy. The term "Third World" referred to the non-aligned countries, which were primarily in Africa, Asia, and South America but it also included erstwhile pre-1948 Soviet ally Yugoslavia, which was located in Europe.
Know more about eastern bloc - brainly.com/question/28724691
#SPJ1
What were the main factors that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union?
Answer:
Explanation:
The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 was a complex event that resulted from various factors, both internal and external. Some of the most significant factors that contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union are:
Economic challenges: The Soviet economy was characterized by inefficiency, corruption, and lack of innovation. The government's attempts to control the economy through central planning and state ownership led to stagnation, shortages, and declining standards of living for ordinary citizens. The country's reliance on oil exports made it vulnerable to fluctuations in global oil prices.
Political repression and lack of freedom: The Soviet government maintained tight control over all aspects of society, including politics, media, and culture. This repression created widespread dissatisfaction among the population and made it difficult for the government to respond to changing circumstances.
Nationalism and ethnic tensions: The Soviet Union was a multinational state composed of various ethnic groups, some of which had a history of conflict with each other. Nationalist movements emerged in the republics, calling for greater autonomy or even independence. The Soviet government's attempts to suppress these movements and maintain centralized control only fueled these tensions.
Leadership struggles and corruption: The leadership of the Soviet Union was characterized by a lack of stability, with frequent changes in leadership and power struggles within the Communist Party. Corruption was widespread at all levels of government and further undermined public confidence in the government.
External pressures: The Soviet Union was engaged in a costly arms race with the United States, and its involvement in Afghanistan drained resources and further weakened the economy. The collapse of the oil market in the 1980s, combined with the arms race and military intervention in Afghanistan, put significant strain on the Soviet Union's finances.
In summary, the collapse of the Soviet Union was a complex and multifaceted event resulting from a combination of economic, political, and social factors, both internal and external.
do you think it was fair for the cartoonist to portray Webster as a slave catcher? Give reasons for your answer. please
It was fair for the cartoonist to portray Webster as a slave catcher is William Lloyd Garrison was the holding the slave women n equality (one arm).
Who is William Lloyd Garrison?William Lloyd Garrison was the born on 10 December 1805, and he died on 24 May 1879. He was the founded on American Anti-Slavery Society. Spouse of Helen Eliza Benson in period between the 1834–1876.
According to the cartoonist ""Practical illustration of the Fugitive Slave Law" was the shown on emancipation of William Lloyd Garrison. It was the slave catcher to woman in one arm and the handgun toward a strapping slave catcher. It was the fixed on the place of Daniel Webster.
As a result, the concluded is cartoonist to portray Webster as a slave catcher are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on William Lloyd Garrison, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30715816
#SPJ9
How did the Texas Constitution bring civil and political freedom to the Republic of Texas?
identify the statements that best describe turn-of-the-century indian nationalism. select all that apply.
One statements that best describe turn-of-the-century Indian nationalism is: "It was a response to the British colonial rule and the economic, political, and social exploitation of India by the British."
What is the rationale for the above response?The turn-of-the-century Indian nationalism refers to the period from the late 19th century to the early 20th century when India was under British colonial rule, and various movements emerged to demand independence and self-rule. Here are other statements that best describe turn-of-the-century Indian nationalism:
It was marked by the emergence of various nationalist leaders and organizations, such as the Indian National Congress, which aimed to unite and mobilize Indians to demand independence.It was influenced by various ideologies, including liberalism, socialism, and religious revivalism, which contributed to the diversity of the nationalist movement.It was marked by various forms of protest, such as boycotts, strikes, and demonstrations, which aimed to challenge British rule and create a sense of national unity.It was supported by various sections of Indian society, including the educated middle class, peasants, workers, and women, who were affected by British colonial policies and sought to assert their rights and interests.Learn more about indian nationalism at:
https://brainly.com/question/28202861
#SPJ1
Question 9 (1 point)
Which region of the colonies felt a devastating effect from the colonial wars from
1689-1754?
a) New England
b) Middle
c) Southern
d) Caribbean
Who did Matilda show her powers to in the book “Matilda”?
A. Mrs.Trunchbull
B. Mrs. Honey
C. Her mother
D. Her brother
Answer:
B.) Miss Honey
Explanation:
On page 272, the author writes that Matilda asked Miss Honey to demonstrate again, and when Miss Honey agreed, Matilda pushed over the glass with “millions of tiny invisible arms.”
Answer:
B
Explanation:
HELP PLEASE!!! Why was banning the slave trade in 1808 important? (1 point)
O It showed that the movement to end slavery was growing.
O It resulted in the freedom of thousands of enslaved people.
O It decreased the amount of slaves in the United States.
O Itwas the start of a civil war.
Answer:
It showed that the movement to end slavery was growing.
Explain two arguments made against ratifying the Treaty of Nations.
Answer:
Hay varios argumentos en contra de ratificar el Tratado de las Naciones, que fue un tratado propuesto en 1919 para establecer la Liga de las Naciones después de la Primera Guerra Mundial. A continuación se presente
Soberanía nacional: Uno de los argumentos en contra de ratificar el Tratado de las Naciones fue que podría debilitar la soberanía nacional de los países miembros. En ese momento, muchos países se resistían a ceder su soberanía a una organización internacional y temían que la Liga de las Naciones pudiera tomar decisiones que fueran en contra de sus intereses nacionales. Algunos argumento
Ineficacia: Otro argumento en contra de ratificar el Tratado de las Naciones fue que la Liga de las Naciones no sería efectiva en la resolución de conflictos internacionales. Algunos argumento
En general, estos argumentos en contra de ratificar el Tratado de las Naciones se centraron en cuestiones de soberanía nacional y eficacia en la resolución de conflictos internacionales. Aunque la Liga de las Naciones finalmente fue fundada, estos argumentos siguen siendo relevantes hoy en día cuando se discuten los beneficios y limitaciones de las organizaciones internacionales y la cooperación internacional.
Explanation:
espero te sirva
Answer: Hay varios argumentos en contra de ratificar el Tratado de las Naciones, que fue un tratado propuesto en 1919 para establecer la Liga de las Naciones después de la Primera Guerra Mundial. A continuación se presenteSoberanía nacional: Uno de los argumentos en contra de ratificar el Tratado de las Naciones fue que podría debilitar la soberanía nacional de los países miembros. En ese momento, muchos países se resistían a ceder su soberanía a una organización internacional y temían que la Liga de las Naciones pudiera tomar decisiones que fueran en contra de sus intereses nacionales. Algunos argumentoIneficacia: Otro argumento en contra de ratificar el Tratado de las Naciones fue que la Liga de las Naciones no sería efectiva en la resolución de conflictos internacionales. Algunos argumentoEn general, estos argumentos en contra de ratificar el Tratado de las Naciones se centraron en cuestiones de soberanía nacional y eficacia en la resolución de conflictos internacionales. Aunque la Liga de las Naciones finalmente fue fundada, estos argumentos siguen siendo relevantes hoy en día cuando se discuten los beneficios y limitaciones de las organizaciones internacionales y la cooperación internacional.
Explanation: espero que esto ayude0^0
Predict what might have happened if the South had won the Civil War. Write an essay
describing the differences.
Answer:
If the South had won the Civil War, the United States as we know it today would look very different. The outcome of the Civil War had far-reaching implications for the country's political, social, and economic systems. A Confederate victory would have changed the course of American history in significant ways. In this essay, I will explore what might have happened if the South had won the Civil War and describe the differences between that world and the one we live in today.
Firstly, the institution of slavery would have continued in the South, as the Confederacy's entire economy was built on the backs of enslaved people. The Confederacy was founded on the principle that slavery was essential to the Southern way of life, and a Confederate victory would have ensured that the practice continued. This would have perpetuated the human rights abuses that characterized the antebellum South and prevented the progress that the United States has made in the area of civil rights.
Secondly, the Confederate States of America would have become a separate nation. A Confederate victory would have made the Confederacy a sovereign state, and it is possible that the United States would have recognized its independence. The secession of the South would have created a significant geopolitical shift in North America, as the United States would have been reduced in size and power. The Confederacy would have been recognized as a legitimate nation and could have become a dominant force in the Southern Hemisphere.
Thirdly, the relationship between the North and South would have been severely damaged, and there may have been further conflicts between the two regions. If the Confederacy had won, it is likely that the North would have been resentful of the South's victory, and tensions between the two regions would have persisted. This could have led to further conflicts between the two regions or even a second civil war.
Fourthly, the issue of states' rights would have been more significant. The Confederacy was founded on the principle that states should have the right to determine their own policies, including the legality of slavery. If the Confederacy had won, states' rights would have been a more significant issue, and the federal government's power may have been limited.
Finally, the United States would not have become a global superpower. If the Confederacy had won the Civil War, it is unlikely that the United States would have become the dominant power that it is today. The Confederacy would have been a weaker nation, and the United States would have lost the resources and people that the South provided.
In conclusion, if the South had won the Civil War, the United States would be a vastly different country than it is today. The institution of slavery would have continued, the Confederacy would have become a separate nation, tensions between the North and South would have persisted, states' rights would have been a more significant issue, and the United States would not have become a global superpower. The outcome of the Civil War was critical in shaping the country that we live in today.
In your view, are the Hindu philosophies
of South Asia more about escaping this world, or
more about engaging with the world? Or both? In
what ways?
In my view, the Hindu philosophies of South Asia are more about engaging with the world.
What is the Hinduism philosophy?Hindus hold to the concepts of karma and samsara, or the eternal cycle of birth, death, and rebirth (the universal law of cause and effect). Hinduism places a high value on the concept of "atman," or the existence of a soul. According to this school of thought, every living thing is a part of the supreme soul and has its own soul.
The eventual objective is "moksha," or salvation, which puts a stop to the series of rebirths and makes one a permanent member of the absolute soul. One of the religion's core tenets is that people's actions and ideas directly impact their present and future lives.
Learn more about Hinduism philosophy here:
https://brainly.com/question/13803986
#SPJ1
The Mayflower Voyage
Separatists arranged the trip and
joined.
The Leiden Separatists arranged the trip and joined to sail to America.
Who were the Leiden Separatists in the Mayflower Voyage ?The Leiden Separatists were a group of English Protestants who separated from the Church of England and formed their own independent congregations in the Dutch city of Leiden in the early 17th century.
In 1620, a group of about 100 Leiden Separatists, along with some other English colonists, set sail on the Mayflower to establish a new colony in what is now Massachusetts.
Find out more on the Mayflower Voyage at https://brainly.com/question/19589268
#SPJ1