on a car trip, jane ate some pretzels. after spilling and losing half of the pretzels, she at 14. her sister then ate on more than half the remaining pretzels, after which there was 3

Answer:

[tex]2\pi[/tex] inches

Option B

Step-by-step explanation:

The arc length is proportional to the central angle
If L is the arc length and θ is the central angle in degrees
[tex]L = \dfrac{\theta}{360} \times C[/tex]

where C is the circumference of the circle

Given radius r = 6 inches, C = 2πr = 2π·6 = 12π
θ = 60°

So
[tex]L = \dfrac{60}{360} \times 12\pi\\\\= \dfrac{1}{6} \times 12\pi\\\\= 2\pi\;inches[/tex]

Answer: $76.5 (rounded)

Step-by-step explanation:

$382.22*0.20=$76.466

Therefore, the value of the expression E¹⁰ⁿ=1 8(1/4)ⁿ⁻¹ is 27.

A fraction is a way of representing a part of a whole or a ratio between two quantities. It is written as two numbers, one above the other, with a horizontal line separating them. The number above the line is called the numerator and the number below the line is called the denominator. For example, the fraction 3/4 represents three parts out of four equal parts, or the ratio of three to four. Fractions can be used to represent a wide range of values, including numbers between whole numbers (such as 1/2 or 3/5), ratios between quantities (such as 2/3 cups of flour to 1 cup of sugar), and percentages (such as 75/100, which is equivalent to 75%, or three-quarters). Fractions are an important concept in mathematics and are used in many different contexts, such as in cooking, measurement, and finance.

Here,

The expression E¹⁰ⁿ=1 8(1/4)ⁿ⁻¹ means we need to evaluate the sum of the expression 8(1/4)ⁿ⁻¹, as n ranges from 1 to 10.

To do this, we can simply substitute each value of n into the expression and add up the results. Here are the first few terms of the sum:

n = 1: 8(1/4)⁰ = 8

n = 2: 8(1/4)¹ = 2

n = 3: 8(1/4)² = 1/2

n = 4: 8(1/4)³= 1/8

We can continue this pattern for the remaining values of n, and then add up all the terms:

8 + 2 + 1/2 + 1/8 + ... + (1/4)⁹

To simplify this expression, we can use the formula for the sum of a geometric series:

S = a(1 - rⁿ) / (1 - r)

where S is the sum of the series, a is the first term, r is the common ratio, and n is the number of terms.

In this case, the first term is 8, the common ratio is 1/4, and there are 10 terms. So we can substitute these values into the formula to get:

S = 8(1 - (1/4)¹⁰) / (1 - 1/4)

S = 8(1 - 1/1048576) / (3/4)

S = 8(1048575/1048576) * (4/3)

S = 8 * (3495250/1048576)

S = 27

To know more about fraction,

https://brainly.com/question/8969674

#SPJ1

The probability that he would have done at least this well if he had no ESP is 0.4335,

The probability of a man correctly predicting the outcome of a coin flip without having extrasensory perception (ESP) can be calculated by using probability theory.

In this case, we can calculate the probability of correctly predicting 16 or more coin flips out of 22, given that the man has no ESP. To do this, we first need to calculate the probability of correctly predicting each coin flip individually. Since each coin flip is an independent event, the probability of correctly predicting each coin flip is 0.5, or 50%.

Therefore, the probability of correctly predicting 16 or more coin flips out of 22 can be calculated as the sum of the probabilities of correctly predicting each coin flip, multiplied by the number of ways in which 16 or more coin flips can be correctly predicted. This can be expressed as

=> P(x ≥ 16) = 0.5²² x C(22, 16) + 0.5²² x C(22, 17) +…+ 0.5²² x C(22, 22),

where C is the combination operator.

Using this formula, the probability of correctly predicting 16 or more coin flips out of 22 without having ESP is 0.4335, meaning that it is highly unlikely that the man has ESP

To know more about probability here.

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is c

after distributing 13 to the expression within the Parentheses we get the equation 13*19 - 13x which can then be further simplified to 247 - 13x

Answer:

c=0.59p+2

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for a solid sphere is V = 4/3πr³

A sphere is a geometrical entity with three dimensions that resembles a two-dimensional circle. It is a group of points in three dimensions that are all situated at the same r-distance from one another. The supplied point is the sphere's centre, while the letter r stands for the sphere's radius. It has a spherical, symmetrical shape.

It is a three-dimensional solid with equal distances between each surface point and the centre. On the basis of its radius, it has a surface area and a volume. There are no faces, corners, or edges on this geometrical figure. The formula for a solid sphere is V = 4/3πr³. Here V is the volume of the shape and r is the radius of the shape.

Read more about sphere on:

https://brainly.com/question/22807400

#SPJ4

The radius of the circle is 2 units. The diameter of the circle is 4 units.

What is a circle?

A circle is a particular type of ellipse in mathematics or geometry where the eccentricity is zero and the two foci are congruent. A circle is also known as the location of points that are evenly spaced apart from the center. The radius of a circle is measured from the center to the edge. The line that divides a circle into two identical halves is its diameter, which is also twice as wide as its radius.

The arc length is = 2πr(θ/2π) = rθ

Where r is the radius and θ is the central angle.

Given that the angle measuring 11π/6 radius intercepts an arc length of 11π/3.

Putting arc length = 11π/3 and θ = 11π/6 in S = rθ:

11π/3 = r×11π/6

Rewrite the above equation:

r×11π/6 = 11π/3

Multiply both sides by (6/11π):

r×(11π/6)×(6/11π) = (11π/3)× (6/11π)

r = 2

The radius of the circle is 2 units. The diameter of the circle is (2×2) = 4 units.

To learn more about arc length, click on the below link:

https://brainly.com/question/26341009

#SPJ1

Answer: To determine which expressions are equivalent to the given expression, we need to simplify the given expression first:

2/3 (3a + 3b + 8) = 2a + 2b + 16/3

Now we can check which expressions are equivalent to this simplified expression:

A. 3a + 3b + (8 + 4) − 4 = 3a + 3b + 8, not equivalent

B. −(−¾a + ½¾⁄b + 8) = 3/4 a - 3/2 b - 8, not equivalent

C. (a + b + 8) (3a + 3b + 8) × ²1/1 = (3a^2 + 9ab + 24a + 3b^2 + 24b + 64)/1, not equivalent

D. 6x = 6x, not equivalent

E. a + b + 0 × c + 8 = a + b + 8, not equivalent

None of the expressions is equivalent to the given expression 2/3 (3a + 3b + 8).

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: To determine how much money each department will receive from this year's fundraiser, we need to know the percentage of the total amount raised that each department will receive. We can calculate this by dividing the amount raised by the total percentage allocated to each department. Here is an example calculation:

Assuming there are three departments - A, B, and C, and they will receive 40%, 30%, and 30% of the total amount raised, respectively.

Step 1: Calculate the total percentage allocated to all departments

40% + 30% + 30% = 100%

Step 2: Calculate how much money each department will receive based on their percentage share of the total amount raised

Department A: 40% of $160 = $64

Department B: 30% of $160 = $48

Department C: 30% of $160 = $48

So, department A will receive $64, department B will receive $48, and department C will receive $48 from this year's fundraiser.

Note: The percentage allocation for each department is assumed in this example, so you should adjust the percentage according to your specific situation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The measures of the other two sides of LMN are approximately 10.67cm and 16 centimeter.

We can start by using the fact that similar triangles have proportional side lengths.

Let x be the length of the side of LMN that is similar to EF. Then, we can set up the following proportion:

 [tex]\frac{LMN}{EF}=\frac{x}{15}[/tex]

We can cross-multiply to get:

[tex]LMN=\frac{x}{15} \times EF[/tex]

Next, we can use the fact that EFD is similar to LMN to set up another proportion:

[tex]\frac{LMN}{EFD}=\frac{x}{6}[/tex]

We can cross-multiply to get:

[tex]LMN=\frac{x}{6} \times EFD[/tex]

Now we can substitute the expressions we found for LMN in terms of x into both sides of the equation:

[tex]\frac{x}{15} \times EF[/tex]=   [tex]\frac{x}{6} \times EFD[/tex]

Substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]\frac{x}{15} \times 15[/tex] =   [tex]\frac{x}{6} \times 8[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

x = 20

The length of the other two sides of LMN are:

 [tex]\frac{20}{15} \times 8[/tex]= 10.67cm and  [tex]\frac{20}{15} \times 12[/tex]

= 16cm

For more such questions on length

https://brainly.com/question/24597672

#SPJ4

The bell shaped distribution is the continuous probability distribution with a specific shape resembling a symmetrical

Bell-shaped distribution is a statistical term that describes a continuous probability distribution with a specific shape resembling a symmetrical, bell-shaped curve. This distribution is also known as the normal distribution or Gaussian distribution.

The bell-shaped distribution is characterized by its mean, which is the center of the curve, and its standard deviation, which measures the spread of the distribution. The curve is symmetric, meaning that the probabilities of values to the left and right of the mean are equal.

In a bell-shaped distribution, the majority of data points cluster around the mean, with fewer points as you move further away from the mean. The tails of the distribution extend infinitely in both directions, although the probability of observing values far from the mean becomes increasingly small.

The normal distribution is used in many fields, including science, engineering, and finance, to model real-world phenomena that are influenced by many small, random factors.

Learn more about probability distribution here

brainly.com/question/23630720

#SPJ4

Answer:

24

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula is number of possibilities = n (n-1) (n-2) ....1

Here, n = 4

So, number of possibilities = 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 24

You can also use following method to count:

ABCD

ABDC

ACBD

ACDB

ADBC

ADCB

--------

BACD

BADC

BCAD

BCDA

BDAC

BDCA

---------

CABD

CADB

CBAD

CBDA

CDAB

CDBA

--------

DABC

DACB

DBAC

DBCA

DCAB

DCBA

--------

Total 24 combinations

The solution for each parts is shown below.

Where two lines intersect, there are two vertical angles.

Given:

1. Two adjacent angles

<1 + <2 = 135

2x + 2x+ 7 = 135

4x + 7 = 135

4x = 128

x= 32

2. If one of the angles has a measure of 39° then other angle is

= 90 - 39

= 51 degree.

3. The angles are complementary.

2x + 3 + 2x = 90

4. Two complementary angles are expressed as 2x and 3x.

2x + 3x= 90

5x = 90

x = 18

So, 2x = 36 and 3x = 54 degree.

5. Angles j and k are supplementary angles.

<j + <k = 180

<j + 117 = 180

<j = 63

6. Two supplementary angles are ∠ABC=105° and ∠CBD=(3x−24)°.

105 + 3x -24 = 180

3x + 81 = 180

7. Two angles are supplementary. ∠ACB=4x° and ∠BCD=6x+50°.

<ACB + <BCD = 180

4x + 6x + 50 = 180

10x = 130

x= 13

8. For two vertical angles where ∠1=2x+26° and ∠3=3x−32°

<1 = < 3

2x + 26 = 3x -32

2x - 3x = -32 - 26

-x =-58

x= 58

Learn more about Vertical Angle here:

https://brainly.com/question/24460838

#SPJ1

The desired value is the target or goal for the variable, while the controlled value is the actual or measured value.

The difference between the desired value of a variable and the controlled (actual) value is known as the error or deviation. It addresses the sum by which the actual value varies from the desired value, and is normally utilized as criticism in control frameworks to change the framework yield.

The objective of a control framework is to limit this mistake and bring the actual value as close as conceivable to the desired value. The mistake can be positive (assuming the actual value is more noteworthy than the desired value), negative (in the event that the actual value is not exactly the desired value), or zero (in the event that the actual value equivalents the desired value).

Learn more about Deviation:

https://brainly.com/question/29295922

#SPJ4

A limit that does not exist is a limit that approaches infinity or negative infinity. The formula is [tex]\lim_{x \to \ > 2}+ f_(x)[/tex].

If the graph has any gap at the x value c, then two sided limits at that point will not exist. If the graph has vertical asymptote and one side of the asymptote goes towards the infinity and other goes towards negative infinity, then the "limit does not exist".

A limit that does not exist is when function does'nt approach a specific value as it approaches a certain point. This is usually due to the fact that the function is discontinuous or that it oscillates between two or more values.

This type of limit is known as an "infinite limit" or an "oscillatory limit" since the function does not converge or diverge, but instead fluctuates or oscillates between values. In this case, the limit does not exist because the function does not approach a single value as it reaches the point in question.

To know more about limit that does not exist:

brainly.com/question/20056500

#SPJ4

The given statement about two variables is false. This is because to determine whether the respective two variables are related, we cannot compare two marginal distributions.

A correlation coefficient is used to assess the relationship between the two variables. The letter r is used to represent this coefficient. The r values range from -1 to  +1.

Based on this value, the correlation is classified into two types negative correlation and positive correlation. When the r value is -1, it is referred to as a perfect negative correlation. When the r value is +1, it is referred to as a perfect positive correlation. So to compare the relation of two variables, we require a correlation coefficient, not marginal distribution. Therefore, the given statement is false.

To know more about correlation coefficient:

https://brainly.com/question/29208602

#SPJ4

Answer:divideing by the whole number

Step-by-step explanation:

The required proof is inductively and deductively that the sum of six consecutive numbers is divisible by 3 in the solution part.

Deductive reasoning is a method of reasoning in which conclusions are drawn based on premises that are known or assumed to be true.

Let's assume that the six consecutive numbers are n, n+1, n+2, n+3, n+4, and n+5.

We have to show that the sum of these numbers is divisible by 3.

First, we can express the sum of the six numbers as follows:

n + (n+1) + (n+2) + (n+3) + (n+4) + (n+5)

Simplify the expression by combining like terms:

6n + 15

Next, factor out 3 from the expression:

6n + 15 = 3(2n + 5)

Since 2n + 5 is an integer, we can see that 3(2n + 5) is divisible by 3. Therefore, the sum of six consecutive numbers is divisible by 3.

This is an example of deductive reasoning because we started with a premise (the assumption that the six consecutive numbers are n, n+1, n+2, n+3, n+4, and n+5) and used logical steps to arrive at a conclusion (that the sum of the six numbers is divisible by 3).

Learn more about deductive reasoning here:

https://brainly.com/question/971917

#SPJ9

Answer:

96 squared meters

Step-by-step explanation:

Area is the total space taken up by a flat (2-D) surface or shape. The area is always measured in square units.

To solve this, we need to first find out how big the area is with the path. To do this, we need to add the 2m on to the length and width of the lawn.

Now, we have the numbers we need to solve for the total area. If we know that the area can be solved using length × width, we can use this equation:

So, the lawn's area including the fence is 576 square meters.

To find out the area of just the fence, we can take the area of the lawn with the fence and subtract the area of the lawn from it. The equation can look like this:

Therefore, the area of the path is 96 squared meters.

Answer:

The area of the path is 200 m².

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the area of the path, subtract the area of the lawn from the area of the path and lawn.

If a lawn that is 30 m long and 16 m wide is surrounded by a path that is 2 m wide, then the length and width of the area of the path and lawn is 34 m long and 20 m wide.  

Given the area of a rectangle is the product of the measures of its length and width:

Therefore, the area of the path is:

A polar to rectangular calculator equation is an online tool that converts polar coordinates (r, θ) to rectangular coordinates (x, y).

A polar to rectangular calculator equation is a math tool used to convert polar coordinates to rectangular coordinates. Polar coordinates are expressed in terms of a radius r and an angle θ, while rectangular coordinates are expressed in terms of x and y.

To use the calculator, users input the radius and angle in degrees or radians, and the calculator uses the formulas x = r cos(θ) and y = r sin(θ) to calculate the corresponding rectangular coordinates. This tool is commonly used in physics, engineering, and other applications that involve two-dimensional coordinates. It is also useful in graphing polar functions, such as polar curves or polar graphs.

Learn more about rectangular equations:

https://brainly.com/question/3405830

#SPJ4

Answer:

I'm positive the answer is 56000

The solution of equation 4000 x 12 is,

4000 x 12 = 48,000

We have to given that,

Expression to solve,

⇒ 4000 x 12

We can multiply it,

⇒ 4000 x 12

⇒ 48,000

Therefore, The solution of equation 4000 x 12 is,

4000 x 12 = 48,000

Learn more about the multiplication visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10873737

#SPJ6

101 kg can be converted to into lbs by simply multiply the kg by 2.2046 so the value will be 222.67 lbs

Unit conversion is the process of converting the measurement of a given amount between various units, often by multiplicative conversion factors that alter the value of the measured quantity without altering its effects.

There are 2.204622622 pounds per kilogramme and 0.45359237 kilogrammes in a lbs. Hence, there are two ways to translate 101 kilogrammes into lbs. Either divide 101 by 0.45359237 or increase it by 2.204622622. The calculation is as follows: multiply 101 kg by 2.204622622 to obtain the answer.

101 divided by 2.204622622 equals 222.666884822 101 kilogram or 222.67 lbs.

Learn more about Kilogram to lbs:

https://brainly.com/question/30403032

#SPJ4

The correct answer to this question is option D: (0.60 minus 0.70) plus-or-minus 1.96 StartRoot StartFraction 0.60 (1 minus 0.60) Over 50 EndFraction + StartFraction 0.70 (1 minus 0.70) Over 50 EndFraction EndRoot.

To find the 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions of patients experiencing stress relief from the yoga and meditation groups, we need to use the formula:

CI = (p1 - p2) ± z*√[(p1(1-p1)/n1) + (p2(1-p2)/n2)]

Where p1 and p2 are the proportions of patients experiencing stress relief in the yoga and meditation groups, respectively, n1 and n2 are the sample sizes of the yoga and meditation groups, respectively, and z is the critical value from the z-table corresponding to the 95% confidence level.

Plugging in the given values:

p1 = 30/50 = 0.60
p2 = 35/50 = 0.70
n1 = 50
n2 = 50
z = 1.96 (from the z-table for a 95% confidence level)

CI = (0.60 - 0.70) ± 1.96*√[(0.60(1-0.60)/50) + (0.70(1-0.70)/50)]
CI = (-0.10) ± 1.96*√[(0.24/50) + (0.21/50)]
CI = (-0.10) ± 1.96*√[0.009]
CI = (-0.10) ± 1.96*(0.095)
CI = (-0.10) ± 0.186

Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions of patients experiencing stress relief from the yoga and meditation groups is (-0.286, 0.086).

https://brainly.com/question/6096474

#SPJ1

You cannot compare two marginal distributions to see if the corresponding two variables are related.

Therefore the answer is False.

Comparing two marginal distributions only provides information about the individual variables, not their relationship. Marginal distributions represent the frequencies or probabilities of each variable independently of the other variables in the dataset. To determine the relationship between two variables, a joint distribution or a statistical test such as correlation or regression analysis should be used. These methods allow for a deeper understanding of the relationship between the variables and can provide insights into their direction and strength of association. Therefore the given statement "You can compare two marginal distributions to see if the corresponding two variables are related." is False.

To know more on marginal distribution

https://brainly.com/question/14310262

#SPJ4

The probability that at most three records will be incomplete is approximately 0.650 (rounded to three decimal places).

What is Binomial Distribution ?

The binomial distribution is the discrete probability distribution used in probability theory and statistics that only allows for Success or Failure as the possible outcomes of an experiment.

This is a binomial distribution problem with n=10 and p=0.156. Let X be the number of incomplete records. We need to find P(X ≤ 3).

Using a TI-83, TI-83 Plus, or TI-84 calculator, we can use the binomial cumulative distribution function (binomcdf) to find this probability:

binomcdf(10, 0.156, 3) ≈ 0.650

Therefore, the probability that at most three records will be incomplete is approximately 0.650 (rounded to three decimal places).

Learn more about Binomial Distribution , visit

https://brainly.com/question/14565246

#SPJ1

The value of weight of 67 kg when converted to pounds is   147.70954 pounds.

kilogram is the standard unit of mass in the International System of Units (SI), while pounds are a common unit of mass used in the United States and other countries.

To Know how to convert between different units of measurement is essential for accurate calculations and comparisons. convert 67kg to pounds, you can use the formula: 1 kilogram is equal to 2.20462 pounds.

Therefore, to convert 67kg to pounds, you would multiply 64 by 2.20462.

67 x 2.20462 =  147.70954 pounds

So, weight of 64kg is equivalent to  141.09568 pounds.

To know more about weight:

brainly.com/question/30176113

#SPJ4

Answer:

Measuring Spoon

Step-by-step explanation:

The tool you would use is a measuring spoon.

Answer:

Measuring spoon

Step-by-step explanation: