Please do number 3___________________

Answer:

x=15

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the Pythagorean Theorem: a^2+b^2=c^2

1. a = 20, b = x, c = 25

2. 20^2+b^2= 25^2

3. Expand: 400+b^2= 625

4. Subtract + Simplify: b^2= 625-400

5. Fully Solve: b^2 = 225 -> Square root of b^2 = Square root of 225

6. Last Step: Simplify: b = 15.

Here is a similar problem for you to solve, put your answer in the comments.

a= 12, b=5, c=?

Solve for c using the Pythagorean theorem.

Answer:

3rd option

Step-by-step explanation:

y is negative below the x- axis , that is for values of x in the interval

x > - 6 and x < 6

Used formula

Answer:

6x+5

Step-by-step explanation:

the derivative of a sum is equal to the sum of derivatives:

(3x^2 + 5x + 2)' = (3x^2)' + (5x)' + (2)' = 6x + 5

Q.E.D.

52.94% of the viewers prefer videos on a mobile or laptop device

The given parameters are

Viewers that prefer videos on a mobile or laptop device = 18

Total number of viewers = 34

The percentage of voters in this category is then calculated as

Percentage = 18/34 * 100%

Evaluate the expression

Percentage = 52.94%

Hence, 52.94% of the viewers prefer videos on a mobile or laptop device

Read more about percentages at:

https://brainly.com/question/843074

#SPJ1

The volume will be one-eighth times the volume.

The scale factor k is given as

k = 1/2

Let the initial volume be v

When each side is multiplied by the scale factor, we have the new volume to be

V = k^3 * v

Substitute 1/2 for k in the above equation

V = (1/2)^3 *v

Evaluate the exponent

V = 1/8 *v

This gives

V = 1/8v

Hence, the volume will be one-eighth times the volume.

Read more about dilation at:

https://brainly.com/question/3457976

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Prime numbers between 20 - 29 = 23 and 29.

There are 2 prime numbers out of these 10.

Therefore,

P(choose prime number) = [tex]\frac{2}{10} \\=\frac{1}{5}[/tex]

The domain of the function is [1,  ∞) and the range is [0,  ∞)

The equation of the function is given as:

g(x) = 3√x - 1

The domain is the possible values of x.

Set the radicand to greater than or equal to 0

x - 1 >= 0

Add 1 to both sides

x >= 1

This can be rewritten as:

[1,  ∞)

Breakdown

g(x) = 3√x - 1

x - 1 >= 0

x >= 1

[1,  ∞)

The range is the possible values of y.

Set the radicand to 0

g(x) = 3 * 0

Evaluate the product

g(x) = 0

This can be rewritten as:

[0,  ∞)

Breakdown

g(x) = 3√x - 1

g(x) = 3 * 0

g(x) = 0

[0,  ∞)

Hence, the domain of the function is [1,  ∞) and the range is [0,  ∞)

Read more about domain and range at

https://brainly.com/question/10197594

#SPJ1

Answer:

Correct answer is D: [1, ∞) and R: (-∞, 0]

Step-by-step explanation:

Insert the given function on desmos to observe the following explanation.

The domain (x values) begin at 1, and go on to positive infinity (the squared bracket indicates a stop/start at that certain point). The range goes into negative infinity (y values) and begins at the y value of 0, so it does not go above that point on the y axis (hence the squared bracket).

Answer:

  a) payment: $1677.99

  b) total repaid: $604,076.40

  c) saved: $168,231.60

Step-by-step explanation:

The amortization formula can be used to find the monthly payment on the loan. The total repaid will be the sum of payments made. The amount saved will be the difference between the total repaid amounts for the different loans.

The payment A on a loan of principal P at annual rate r for t years is given by ...

  A = P(r/12)/(1 -(1 +r/12)^(-12t))

The loan of interest is for $425,000 × (1 -30%) = $297,500. Then the payments on a 30 year loan are ...

  A = $297,500(0.0544/12)/(1 -(1 +0.0544/12)^-360) ≈ $1677.99

For a 15-year loan, the payments are ...

  A = $297,500(0.0544/12)/(1 -(1 +0.0544/12)^-180) ≈ $2421.36

The above calculation shows the monthly payment is $1677.99.

The total repaid is the sum of 360 monthly payments:

  360×$1677.99 = $604,076.40

The total repaid is the sum of 180 monthly payments:

  180×$2421.36 = $435,844.80

and the savings is ...

  $604,076.40 -435,844.80 = $168,231.60

__

Additional comment

We are asked to round to the nearest cent. The payment amounts here are accurately calculated to that precision. The total repaid on an actual loan will be slightly different, because the final payment will be slightly different.

The 30-year mortgage will have a slightly lower final payment because the monthly amount is rounded up. The 15-year mortgage will have a slightly higher final payment because the monthly amount is rounded down.

Overall, this means the totals of payments shown here, and their difference, vary slightly from the reality of loans of this kind. (They're probably not accurate to the nearest cent.)

Even using the "exact" payment value may not give the actual loan values. This is because the actual amortization schedule is rounded to the nearest cent each month. The cumulative effect of this rounding seems to be calculable only by figuring the 360 (or 180) actual monthly balance amounts.

We have calculated the answers in the manner we suppose is expected. Producing an actual amortization spreadsheet is a bit more work.

Using the Factor Theorem, the expression 3x² + 2 is factored as follows:

[tex]3x^2 + 2 = (\sqrt{3}x + i\sqrt{2})((\sqrt{3}x - i\sqrt{2}))[/tex]

The Factor Theorem states that a polynomial function with roots [tex]x_1, x_2, \codts, x_n[/tex] is given by:

[tex]f(x) = a(x - x_1)(x - x_2) \cdots (x - x_n)[/tex]

In which a is the leading coefficient.

In this problem, the expression is:

3x² + 2.

The roots are found as follows:

[tex]3x^2 + 2 = 0[/tex]

[tex]x^2 = -\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

[tex]x = \pm \sqrt{-\frac{2}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]x_1 = -i\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]x_2 = i\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}[/tex]

Hence the factored expression is:

[tex]3x^2 + 2 = \left(x + i\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\right)(x - 1\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\right) = (\sqrt{3}x + i\sqrt{2})((\sqrt{3}x - i\sqrt{2}))[/tex]

More can be learned about the Factor Theorem at https://brainly.com/question/24380382

#SPJ1

No she is not correct 1/3 is great that 1/4

Answer:

No, she isn't correct because if the numerator are same but if denominators is different,then the fraction with smaller denominator is greater.

By taking the quotient between the total number of hours and the number of shifts each shift is 1.5 hours long.

We know that Paolo worked (2 + 3/4) hours this week, and that is equivalent to (1 + 5/6) shifts.

To find the number of hours that each shift takes, we need to take the quotient between the total number of hours and the number of shifts:

[tex]\frac{(2 + 3/4)h}{1 + 5/6} = 1.5 h[/tex]

This means that each shift is 1.5 hours long.

If you want to learn more about quotients:

https://brainly.com/question/8952483

#SPJ1

Answer:

impossible

Step-by-step explanation:

a scalene triangle is a triangle in which all three sides are in different lengths, and all three angles are of different measures.

because all 3 angles must be different, they cannot be congruent.

because if angles are congruent, it means that they are of equal size.

the desired definition is a paradox or oxymoron. it contradicts itself and can never be true.

Answer:

it cannot have all angles congruent: impossible.

Step-by-step explanation:

by the definition scalene, it means no angle is the same length. meaning, to have all the sides congruent (the same length) that would be impossible and it can never happen. if you would like a congruent triangle, an isosceles or equilateral is the triangle you're looking for.

Point [tex](1,5)[/tex] is a solution of the equation [tex]g(x)=3x+2[/tex] and point [tex](1,5)[/tex] is not a solution of equation [tex]f(x)=|x-1|+1[/tex]

Why point [tex](1,5)[/tex] is solution of the equation [tex]g(x)=3x+2[/tex] ?

If point [tex](1,5)[/tex] is solution of the equation then they must satisfy the equation.

So we need to check one by one

[tex](x,y)=(1,5)[/tex]

equation [tex]g(x)=3x+2[/tex]

We can write as

[tex]y=3x+2\\5=3*1+2\\5=5[/tex]

So  point [tex](1,5)[/tex] is solution of this equation.

Equation [tex]f(x)=|x-1|+1[/tex]

We can write as

[tex]y=|x-1|+1\\5=|1-1|+1\\5=0+1\\5\neq 1[/tex]

So point [tex](1,5)[/tex] is not solution of equation [tex]f(x)=|x-1|+1[/tex]

Learn more about solution of equation here :

https://brainly.com/question/28048877

#SPJ4

There is a total of 10 games played.

There are 5 players, If we select a given player, then that player will play one game with each of the other 4 players.

So we have 4 games at the moment.

Now we select one of the other 4 players, (we don't count the one we choose before). The one that we choose now will play one game wich each one of the remaining 3, so we add 3 more games.

Now we do the same with the remaining 3, this time we add 2 more games.

Now we do that with the remaining 2, now we add 1 more game.

Adding all the games we have:

4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 10

There is a total of 10 games played.

If you want to learn more about addition:

https://brainly.com/question/11562149

#SPJ1

The green mathematics tells about the impulse response of an in homogeneous linear differential operator.

According to the statement

we have to explain the green mathematics.

In mathematics, Actually there is a Green Function which was founded by a mathematician George Green.

In this function, a Green's function is the impulse response of an in homogeneous linear differential operator defined on a domain with specified initial conditions or boundary conditions.

The example of green function is the Green's function G is the solution of the equation LG = δ, where δ is Dirac's delta function; the solution of the initial-value problem Ly = f is the convolution (G ⁎ f), where G is the Green's function.

Actually in this function, it gives the relationship between the line integral of two dimensional vector over a closed path by a integral.

In this there is a green theorem, which  relates a line integral around a simply closed plane curve C and a double integral over the region enclosed by C.

So, The green mathematics tells about the impulse response of an in homogeneous linear differential operator.

Learn  more about FUNCTION here https://brainly.com/question/2328150

#SPJ1

17.32 the number of units in the length of diagonal $DA$ of the regular hexagon.

Six equilateral triangles can be formed from the hexagon. The equilateral triangle has an equal length on each side. The diagonal of the hexagon is formed by joining two of the sum of the lengths of the equilateral triangles. As a result, the hexagon's diagonal is twice as long as its sides.

For a polygon, the SUM of the internal angles is:

(n-2) * 180 (n=6 for hexagon)

(6-2)*180 = 720   Thus EACH angle is :   720/6 = 120 degrees

Therefore, the triangle's main angle is 120 degrees, and its other two angles are equal.

There are 180 degrees in any triangle:  

(180-120) / 2 = 30 degrees for each of the smaller angles.

Now use the law of sines:

10/sin30 = x/(sin120)

10/(.5)  × (sqrt3 )/ 2 = x

10 sqrt 3

10/sin30  ×  sin 120  =  17.32

17.32 is the number of units in the length of diagonal $DA$ of the regular hexagon.

Learn more about hexagon here:

https://brainly.com/question/28016053

#SPJ4

The values which would help complete the table according to the complete part of the task content are as evaluated.

First, the total number of average players can be evaluated by summing up the total number of players vertically as follows;

180 + average + 80 = 600

The number of average players is therefore; 600-180-80 = 340 average players.

Also, the number of female expert players can be evaluated vertically as;

50 + 50 + female expert = 150

Female expert = 150-50-50 = 50 female experts.

The number of male novice players can be evaluated horizontally as;

Male novice + 50 = 180

Male novice = 180 - 50 = 130.

The number of average male players is therefore easily evaluated vertically as;

130 + male average + 30 = 600

male average = 600-130-30 = 440.

Remarks: The table which is required to be completed is that which is in the attached image.

Read more on completing tables;

https://brainly.com/question/28008666

#SPJ1

Answer:

130, 290, 340, 50

Step-by-step explanation:

just do the math, I got it right on edmentum.

The slope of the line is - 3 / 2 .

The slope of a line is the change in y coordinate with respect to the change in x coordinate.

Therefore, using (0, 6)(4, 0)

Hence,

m = slope = y₂ - y₁ / x₂ - x₁

slope = 0 - 6 / 4 - 0

slope = -6 / 4

slope = - 3 / 2

learn more on slope here: https://brainly.com/question/3956596

#SPJ1

Answer:

x = -7 and x = 4.

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = x^2 + 3x - 28

= (x + 7)(x - 4).

The reciprocal of f(x) can be written as

1 / (x + 7)(x - 4).

When the denominator is zero we have vertical asymptotes

so they are x = -7 and x = 4.

The graph of the rational function is shown below

From the question, we are to graph the given rational function

To determine the graph that corresponds to the given rational function,

First, we will graph the given rational function.

The given rational function is

x²+3x-1/x+1

The graph of the rational function is shown below

Now, we will compare each of the rational graphs in the provided options with the attached graph

The graph that corresponds to the given rational graph in the attachment below is the graph that represents the given rational function.

Learn more on Graphs of rational functions here: https://brainly.com/question/15267147

#SPJ1

Answer:

856.5ft^2

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test.

A relationship between two variables in which the variables vary in the opposite direction (i.e., one increases while the other decreases, or vice versa) is referred to as a negative correlation.

When two variables move in opposite sizes and directions from one another, so that when one increases, the other drops, and vice versa, this is referred to as having a negative correlation or inverse correlation.

In order for investors to profit from price increases in some assets when others decline, negative correlation is used when building diverse portfolios.

Over time, the correlation between two variables might change significantly. Bonds and stocks typically have negative correlation.

Learn more about negative correlation here:

https://brainly.com/question/16913516

#SPJ4

Answer: (2, 18)

Step-by-step explanation:

When x=2, [tex]f(2)=2(3)^{2}=18[/tex].

So, it should pass through (2, 18).

We have proven that ∠BEC ≅ ∠BCE by using the alternate interior angles theorem

From the question, we are to write a proof to prove that ∠BEC ≅ ∠BCE

From the given information, we have that

BC || EF

Note that line DE is a transversal

Thus, by the alternate interior angles theorem, we have that

∠BCE ≅ ∠FEC

Also, we were given that line EC bisects ∠BEF

That is,

Line EC divides ∠BEF into two equal angles.

Therefore,

∠BEC ≅ ∠FEC

By the substitution property of equality, we get

∠BEC ≅ ∠BCE

Hence, we have proven that ∠BEC ≅ ∠BCE by using the alternate interior angles theorem

Learn more on Proof of angles here: https://brainly.com/question/12038510

#SPJ1

The angle formed by the line of sight and the horizontal line can best be described as an angle of elevation.

The angle of elevation is an angle that is formed between the horizontal line and the line of sight.

The angle of elevation is says to be the angle made between a horizontal plane and a straight line to a given object that is elevated off the ground.

Therefore, the angle formed by the line of sight and the horizontal line can best be described as an angle of elevation.

learn more on  angle of elevation here: https://brainly.com/question/28160314

#SPJ1

Answer:

x ≤ 135/2

Step-by-step explanation:

x is the cost per night. You have to pay for 2 nights, and you do not want to spend more than $135 total. Another way to say that, is you want to spend less than or equal to $135.

x = cost per night

2 = number of nights

2x = total cost

Total cost must be less than or equal to $135.

2x ≤ 135

Divide each side by 2.

x ≤ 135/2

The probability that each guest of each type m+n will receive a roll is 79.

Given that the breakfast should have consisted of three types of rolls, one each of the nut, cheese and fruit rolls, and the cook should have wrapped each of the nine rolls.

The denominator of m/n equals the total number of possible role configurations assigned to the three people. It [tex]${9 \choose 3}{6 \choose3}$[/tex] is the same as the number of ways to choose three roles out of 9 to give to the first person [tex]${9 \choose 3}$[/tex], and three rolls of 6 [tex]${6 \choose3}$[/tex]. After that, the remaining three roles have no more configurations.

The numerator is the number of ways to assign a roll of each type to each of the three people, which can be done by defining the three types of roles such as flavored x, flavored y and flavored z.

xxx, yyy, zzz

So we have to choose one x, one y and one z to give to the first person. There are 3x, 3y and 3z to choose from, resulting in 3³ combinations. Multiply that by the combinations of xs, ys and zs for the second person, which is clearly 2³ since there are two of each letter left. simplify to our fraction m / n, which is 9/70. If you add them together, you get 9 + 70 = 79.

Thus, the probability that each guest has obtained a roll of each type is m / n, where m and n are relatively prime, so m + n is 79.

Learn more about probability from here brainly.com/question/3435109

#SPJ1