Answer:
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"-These words, written above the main entrance to the Supreme Court Building, express the ultimate responsibility of the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court is "distinctly American in concept and function," as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed. Few other courts in the world have the same authority of constitutional interpretation and none have exercised it for as long or with as much influence. A century and a half ago, the French political observer Alexis de Tocqueville noted the unique position of the Supreme Court in the history of nations and of jurisprudence. "The representative system of government has been adopted in several states of Europe," he remarked, "but I am unaware that any nation of the globe has hitherto organized a judicial power in the same manner as the Americans. . . . A more imposing judicial power was never constituted by any people."
The unique position of the Supreme Court stems, in large part, from the deep commitment of the American people to the Rule of Law and to constitutional government. The United States has demonstrated an unprecedented determination to preserve and protect its written Constitution, thereby providing the American "experiment in democracy" with the oldest written Constitution still in force.
The Constitution of the United States is a carefully balanced document. It is designed to provide for a national government sufficiently strong and flexible to meet the needs of the republic, yet sufficiently limited and just to protect the guaranteed rights of citizens; it permits a balance between society’s need for order and the individual’s right to freedom. To assure these ends, the Framers of the Constitution created three independent and coequal branches of government. That this Constitution has provided continuous democratic government through the periodic stresses of more than two centuries illustrates the genius of the American system of government.
The complex role of the Supreme Court in this system derives from its authority to invalidate legislation or executive actions which, in the Court’s considered judgment, conflict with the Constitution. This power of "judicial review" has given the Court a crucial responsibility in assuring individual rights, as well as in maintaining a "living Constitution" whose broad provisions are continually applied to complicated new situations.
While the function of judicial review is not explicitly provided in the Constitution, it had been anticipated before the adoption of that document. Prior to 1789, state courts had already overturned legislative acts which conflicted with state constitutions. Moreover, many of the Founding Fathers expected the Supreme Court to assume this role in regard to the Constitution; Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, for example, had underlined the importance of judicial review in the Federalist Papers, which urged adoption of the Constitution.
Hamilton had written that through the practice of judicial review the Court ensured that the will of the whole people, as expressed in their Constitution, would be supreme over the will of a legislature, whose statutes might express only the temporary will of part of the people. And Madison had written that constitutional interpretation must be left to the reasoned judgment of independent judges, rather than to the tumult and conflict of the political process. If every constitutional question were to be decided by public political bargaining, Madison argued, the Constitution would be reduced to a battleground of competing factions, political passion and partisan spirit.
Despite this background the Court’s power of judicial review was not confirmed until 1803, when it was invoked by Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison. In this decision, the Chief Justice asserted that the Supreme Court's responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary consequence of its sworn duty to uphold the Constitution. That oath could not be fulfilled any other way. "It is emphatically the province of
explain one event from the cold war?
Answer:
The Vietnam War
Explanation:
This was many of the proxy wars that were fought between the US and the USSR through many different unstable countries. There are countless examples of similar proxy wars.
Main focus of the war in the west
Answer:
Early in the war, the focus was on two key states: Missouri and Kentucky. The Union cause would have been crippled if either had been lost. Missouri was kept in the Union primarily due to Captain Nathaniel Lyon's successes, particularly his victory at Boonville in June.
Explanation:
Match the following. Match the items in the left column to the items in the right column. No spam pls or report! Thanks a bunch!
Answer:
I’m sorry if it is wrong
Explanation:
Joy-We can have this, even in the midst of trials and difficulties
Peace-Comes from knowing God and the salvation he has given us
Faithfulness-Thr most important fruit of the spirit
What did policies like the Hawley-Smoot Tariff discourage?
A. international trade
B. buying American goods
C. purchasing imports and exports
D. discrimination against immigrants
B
Shhdjsjskksksndndhshdhdhjsje
The Declaration of Independence was written on the behalf of the American people and addressed to the monarchy of
Answer: The Declaration of Independence was written on the behalf of the American people and addressed to the monarchy of the British monarchy under King George III.
Explanation: The text of the Declaration of Independence not only confirmed the autonomy of the United States of America but also outlined the various transgressions committed by the British monarchy under King George III.
DURING the civil war, how did the context of The Civil War impact opinions about immigration. pls and thank you :)
why does the constitution stop people from lying?
Answer:
I did a bit of research, and basically its in the power of the goverment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Constitution stop people from lying because when regular people lie, sometimes their lies are detected, sometimes they’re not. Legally speaking, sometimes they’re protected by the First Amendment – and sometimes not, like when they commit fraud or perjury. Research found that lies by government officials can violate the Constitution in several different ways, especially when those lies deprive people of their rights.
Explanation:
3. Which law was hated the most by
Native South Africans?
O Pass Law
O Voting Law
O Group Areas Act
O Prohibition of Marriage
which of the following was NOT a provision of the Treaty of versailles?
A) New European nations were created
B) Germany was not to be published for its role in world war 1
C) som European nations boundaries were redrawn
D) Germany had to claim responsibility for starting world war 1
All of the following were reasons for immigration except
Answer:
d i think hopes this helps
In what ways did women support the war effort?
Group of answer choices
They protested the war
They filled roles ordinarily left for men
They served in combat
They continued only in traditional roles
Answer:
B They protested the war
I.Civics.C
How does the judicial branch of the United States government protect individual rights?
Answer:
As cases are brought to the courts, court decisions shape policy outcomes. ... As part of checks and balances, courts protect the Constitution from breaches by the other branches of government, and they protect individual rights against societal and governmental oppression.
Explanation:
in his book, The Battle of Hastings 1066, published in 2003, historian M.K. Lawson argued that William was able to win the Battle of Hastings because of considerable luck.' How far do you agree with this view of William's victory in 10667
[20]
Answer:
England, is the right answer.
Explanation:
The Battle of Hastings was fought between the Duke of Normandy, the Norman-French militia of William, and King Harold Godwinson's English Army on 14th October 1066. This battle began because the king of England, King Edward, died with appointing his successor. Accordingly, Harold Godwinson, who initially came to the throne of England, had to face two side struggle from Harald Hardrada and William of Normandy. However, William finally conquered the battle and the throne of England.
A stock’s price is determined by the market forces of __________.
Answer:
supply and demand
Explanation:
I hope this helps :)
Answer: A Supply and demand
Explanation:
According to the compromise of 1850, what did the South get? Check all that apply. (Brailist will be given)
A. A new, more effective fugitive slave law was enacted
B. The slave trade (but not Slavery) was banned in the District of Columbia
C. Popular Sovereignty would decide slavery in the Utah and New Mexico territories
D. Texas received $10 million for giving up its land claim to New Mexico
Answer:
C
Explanation:
According to the compromise of 1850, the south was guaranteed that no restrictions would be made on slavery on Utah nor New Mexico at that time.
10 MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION Which type is the most numerous, according to him? Public interest groups or Economic interest groups
Answer:
Economic interest groups
Explanation:
Generally, the Economic interest groups are the most numerous group in the United States. They consisted of various trade associations, business organizations, labor unions, large corporations, individual unions, and others who are constantly advocating for the benefits of their organizations or members.
Unlike Public interest groups whose goals are to agitate for the benefits of the public. However, because it is difficult to define what is good for the generality of the people, such groups that advocate for public goods are sometimes seen as particular interest groups rather than public interest groups.
In a short paragraph, explain the role of the jury in administering justice. Include details about how the jury operates during the trial.
Answer:
The jury listens to the evidence during a trial, decides what facts the evidence has established, and draws inferences from those facts to form the basis for their decision.
Explanation:
The jury decides whether a defendant is "guilty" or "not guilty" in criminal cases, and "liable" or "not liable" in civil cases.
Answer:
A jury ensures that a case is tried fairly. They hear the evidence presented during the trial, deliberate, and reach a verdict. A jury decides whether the defendant is guilty or innocent. If guilty, the jury recommends a sentence to the judge. Sentences can include community service time, a fine, prison time, or in some states death.
Explanation:
11. What was Archimedes claim to fame?
www
Answer:
Explanation: Archimedes is especially important for his discovery of the relation between the surface and volume of a sphere and its circumscribing cylinder. He is known for his formulation of a hydrostatic principle (known as Archimedes' principle) and a device for raising water, still used, known as the Archimedes screw.
Answer:Archimedes' fame came from his relationship with Hiero, the king of Syracuse or Archimedes' principle.it depend of the stroy, u have to read some to know which one they talking bout.cos
Explanation:
Study the political cartoon. Which best describes the tone of this image?
a
Patriotic
b
Supportive
c
Disapproving
d
Boring
Answer:
C. Disapproving
Explanation:
because King Andrew the First (The man in the picture) is holding a slip of paper that reads "Veto".
Answer:
C. Disapproving
Explanation:
An enslaved person who escaped to a free state (1. became free forever 2.did not become free)
Answer:
they became free , but sometimes they would take them to the not free state because they would look like the person in the drawing,, but i would pick 1. but
Explanation:
Answer:
Please Give Brainliest
Explanation:
Which leader was a member of the Communist Party yet made the most changes against Communism
when he took office?
Leonid Brezhnev
Mikael Gorbachev
Boris Yeltsin
Alexander Putin
Why was the tet Offensive a major turning point in the Vietnam war
The correct answer is D. It changed the minds of many war supporters in the United States
Explanation
During the Vietnam War, the North Vietnamese Communist Army planned an offensive to weaken the South Vietnamese Army and achieve victory much faster. This military plan is known as "the Tet offensive" that was carried out in 1968, however, the results were not as expected since the effects on the enemy army were not as expected. This plan had a consequence on the American population because the United States Army and the government had campaigned in support of the Vietnam War and the population was deceived into believing that they were close to victory, but once This attack occurred, the confidence of the people in the army decreased and they though that all was a lie, so the support for this intervention declined quickly. So, the correct answer is D. It changed the minds of many war supporters in the United States
who eventually won the civil war? Was it good or bad that the side that won took control of China?
Answer:
the answer is whoever is in the government in China today do u Think they are good or bad
Explanation:
explanation is un answer
This poem was a literary contribution from the
A Great Awakening
B Great Migration
C South Side Renaissance
D Harlem Renaissance
Answer:
the great migration....,..............
How did Mao win the Chinese Civil War?
From 1911 to 1945, China experienced a revolution, a
struggle against warlords, a civil war between the
Nationalists led by Chiang Kai-Shek and the
Communists led by Mao Zedong, and invasion by the
Japanese. After the defeat of the Japanese in World
War II in 1945, a full-blown civil war erupted again in
1946. The Nationalists were backed by the United
States and the Communists had support from the
Soviet Union. By 1949, Chiang and the Nationalists,
despite having more soldiers than the Communists,
were defeated and forced to evacuate the Chinese
mainland for the island of Taiwan.
Historians point to a number of factors for the
nationalists defeat.
Chiang’s Kuomintang government was filled with
incompetent and corrupt officials. The people especially hated the tax collectors, who
were commonly called “blood-sucking devils.” Chiang himself held dictatorial powers,
but his orders were often ignored. He had little success in rallying Chinese nationalism
to win an unpopular war against the Communists.
Chiang’s decision to go to war against the Communists in 1946 came at the cost of
postponing the economic reconstruction of China. This meant diverting tax revenues,
investment, and other resources to the war effort rather than to the needs of the people.
Heavy taxes, a huge government debt, inflation, unemployment, and food shortages
caused many, especially in the cities, to lose faith in the Nationalist government.
From 1911 to 1945, China went through a revolution, a fight against warlords. Following Japan's loss in World War II in 1945, a full-fledged civil war emerged in 1946.
Why did China start a civil war?The Chinese war has started from 1927 to 1949 due to the difference between the thinking of Chinese Communist Party and Chinese Nationalist Party.
It erupted immediate post - War, after a period of intermittent fighting between the two factions dating back to the 1920s.
Thus, From 1911 to 1945, China went through a revolution, a fight against warlords
For more information about Chinese war, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10039122
#SPJ2
Route 66 connected what two cities?
It connected Chicago and Los Angeles.
Answer:
Chicago, Los Angeles
Explanation:
i just shorten it
hope this helps bro ski :)
How does the process for amending the constitution of florida compare to that of amending the u.S constitution
Answer:
Explanation:
Amending the FL Constitution is much more difficult to amend then the US Constitution
It is more difficult to amend the Florida Constitution than the U.S Constitution
Which event opened Asian countries to trade with Europe?
Answer:
Opium Wars
Explanation:
Opium Wars opened Asian countries to trade with Europe.
Why are checks and balances and separation of powers important?
A They make the government more efficient.
B They make the government more powerful.
C They limit the branches' ability to become too powerful.
D They give citizens more access to their government.
PLEASEEEE HURRY TIMED TEST
Answer:
C- they limit the branches' ability to become too powerful
Explanation:
They did this so that one branch of the government can't control the other branches. :)
Hope this helps and good luck on your test :)
What effects of Reconstruction were the Patricians willing to accept?
A: It resulted in the election of a pro-lottery governor, lieutenant governor, and treasurer.
B: They accepted voting rights for African Americans, as well as some basic government services.
C: They wanted to end protections for freedmen and return to white supremacy, politically and socially.