Pls help me I’m to s t u p i d -cries-

Perhaps take from my answer. Sorry if this isn't good, i'm a bit tired. You can add on and change up the words. I was unsure what was exactly wanted for this.

Answer:

Hello, as the speaker of this, I say the motion is correct. Modern movies are run by acting and scripts, while people are off script and anything could truly happen. Younger people tend to leach from what they see on T.V. and from elders, thus certain movies may give them bad views. Say with common action movies: That would most likely give the person a taste of violence as an answer. Humans can be violent, but are not always fighting like how thrillers and action movies show. People do break out into fights, just not like that. If someone was trying to figure out how some commonly interact and behave from a movie, it wouldn't be a good choice, since that would provide the wrong view. Unless it's a documentary or educational film, modern movies do indeed give a bad model. It is understandable for others to have different opinions on this matter, this is my own. Thank you for your time.

Answer:

The question we can form using the information in the sentence and the word in parentheses is:

Whose grandfather had a small farm in the county?

Explanation:

"Whose" is a pronoun used to indicate possession, be it in a declarative sentence or in an interrogative one. If I wish to know, for instance, who the owner of a car parked in front of my house is, I can ask: Whose car is this?

Since we are supposed to use "whose" to ask a question as well as the information in the given sentence, we need to find a possession relationship to ask about. Of course, the farm has an owner - the grandfather. But the way the sentence is structure does not allow us to ask about him while using "whose". However, the grandfather "belongs", so to speak, to Roger, and the structure allows us to use "whose" to ask about him. Therefore, the question we can form is:

Whose grandfather had a small farm in the county?

Answer:

piece of a plant

Explanation:

a stalk in this case is a stalk of celery/ a piece of celery.

Answer:

Bernard's research question needs to be improved. She can improve it by broadening his research question.

Explanation:

I just got it right

The correct way to complete the sentence is to add the sentences:

This refers to the use of questions to try to find out more about a particular phenomenon by asking precise questions.

Hence, we can see that from the complete text, it should be noted that the research question Bernard needs to improve and this can be done by broadening the questions.

Read more about research questions here:

https://brainly.com/question/25257437

#SPj2

Answer:

1 no. I guess...so i hope u will be pass

Answer:

it identifies the problems the soldiers faced while trying to keep the bear.

Explanation:

the whole passage is talking about how the bear had to become a soldier or else they couldn't keep the bear.

Answer:

George and Lennie have a relationship like a master and his dog. George is responsible for Lennie, making sure he has work, food, and does not get into too much trouble

hes like a master for lennie

george tells lennie what to do but if lennie disobeys he scoulds him

Joining two simple sentences into another simple sentence

Sentence synthesis means combining two or more simple sentences into one new sentence. ...

By using infinitives.

We can combine these two sentences into one using a to-infinitive.

By using a noun or phrase in apposition.

By using a participle.

We can combine two simple sentences into one by using a present or past participle

Answer: A

Explanation:

A - credible and relevant. correct on edmentum,

B - wrong b/c  isn't really related to stress and physical activity

C - wrong b/c blogs may be unreliable, isn't really related to stress and physical activity

D - blogs may be unreliable, isn't at all related to stress and physical activity

An example that would best support the student's claim is research from the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human services highlighting the benefits of physical activity and an infographic explaining how teenagers should deal with challenges. Thus the correct option is A.

A claim refers to proving something in the absence of evidence by providing arguments in order to win a conversation. This claim is based on assumption and does not provides factual information.

In the given excerpt, the student claims about an issue that physical activity relieves stress and helps to the brain as high school is providing a complicated atmosphere.

To support this claim one needs enough evidence which is proved from research from any credible source which provides authentic information which proves the point.

The US dept of health highlights the benefits of physical activity and the challenges faced by teenagers help to prove the claim. Therefore, option A is appropriate.

Learn more about the claim, here:

https://brainly.com/question/22898077

#SPJ5

number one makes the most sense.

Answer: D

Explanation: I did the usa test prep :)

In order to discuss effects of pollution, the readers should understand what pollution is. The correct option is D.

The term "introduction" refers to the opening or start of a presentation, written piece, or other type of communication. It establishes the tone for the remaining content and works to grab the audience's interest.

An engaging hook or opening line, a succinct and clear thesis statement or presenting goal, and a quick summary of what the audience may expect to learn or gain from the content are all typical components of a strong introduction.

It's critical to provide readers a thorough knowledge of what pollution is in order to discuss its effects.

The presence or introduction of dangerous compounds into the environment that have the potential to harm ecosystems, living things, and natural resources is referred to as pollution.

Thus, the correct option is D.

For more details regarding introduction, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/26523961

#SPJ6

Answer:

1.) Eternal youth, specifically, to never grow older than I currently am, while retaining all normal bodily functions of someone my current age.

2.) Invulnerability, specifically, to never be capable of being harmed unless I specifically and consciously desire myself to be, and only during that time, after which I will be once again invulnerable to harm.

3.) Wealth, specifically, to be able to manifest within any wallet in my possession any amount I desire, of any form of currency I desire which will be recognized as legitimate by the issuers and users of that currency, and in any denomination I desire it to be manifested.

Explanation:

Hope this helped you:D

Answer:

The poem describes the opposing experiences between two birds: one bird is able to live in nature as it pleases, while a different caged bird suffers in captivity. Due to its profound suffering, the caged bird sings, both to cope with its circumstances and to express its own longing for freedom.

Explanation:

Answer:

It is written in a formal writing

Explanation:

also tell me if I'm wrong but don't troll with links just stop

Answer:

convincing

effective

impressive

Explanation:

You could always just look up synonyms.  

Answer:

1. It is wrong (false).

2. It is wrong (false).

3. It is correct (true).

4. It is wrong (false).

5. It is correct (true).

Part B.

1. Polite.

2. Hard-working.

3. Dishonest.

4. Honest.

5. Lazy.

6. Rude.

Explanation:

1. A man who is not sure of himself is self-confident. .... It is wrong.

A man who is self-confident is sure of himself.

2. A man who is always polite is tactless. .... It is wrong.

A man who is always rude is tactless.

3. A man who thinks only of himself is selfish. .... It is correct.

4. A man who likes to live in a city is a suburban man. .... It is wrong.

A man who likes to live in a city is an urban man.

5. A man who easily loses control of himself is very touchy..... It is correct.

Part B.

1. Polite: You can say this about a person who says "please" and "thank you".

2. Hard-working: You can say this about a person who always works much.

3. Dishonest: Someone who lies or steals.

4. Honest: Someone who never lies or steals.

5. Lazy: Someone who doesn't like to work.

6. Rude: Someone who is not polite.

Answer:

A. It is so harsh that it may cause the protagonist's death.  

Explanation:

The setting of Julie of the Wolves was somewhere in Northern Alaska and it was set on open ground in cold harsh weather and this setting is important because It is so harsh that it may cause the protagonist's death

Answer:

A. Pangu grew inside an egg, then hatched into a giant creature, releasing shells that formed the sky and the earth. After Pangu died, he became the world and its elements.

Explanation:

Option A is the correct answer that best summarizes the excerpt.

This is true because this particular option uses important details in the main passage to the summarize. It maintained the main idea of the passage.

Option A revealed how he grew inside the egg, hatched, released shells which formed sky and earth and then died; after his death, he became the world and its elements.  

Answer:

Good advice

To be frank, I agree with you

Answer:

B. repetition

Explanation:

Answer: I would say the Zonarch zone or manarch zone but forgot the name but they have to cover up there entire face and theres whole bunch of bad people and you have to look it up and it's very dangours or another place is north koroe

Explanation:

Answer:

to take pictures of things in space so NASA can examine what is in the picture for any important info

Explanation:

Answer:A

Explanation:

I got it right on the test.

Zaroff thinks Rainsford is “droll” and “naïve” as Zaroff thinks it’s foolish and old-fashioned that Rainsford values human life even after fighting in the war.  Thus the correct option is A.

Zaroff is surprised and amused by Rainsford's remark, saying, "You'll find this game worth playing... your opinion of me will fundamentally change... you'll find it droll..." I bet you'll abandon your concepts of decency... I have no qualms about destroying them."

Rainsford's belief in the value of human life, according to Zaroff, is outmoded and naive given the conditions, when killing humans is merely a game.

Therefore, option A is appropriate.

Learn more about Zaroff, here:

https://brainly.com/question/31895154

#SPJ6

Answer:

B, "just about plumb out of fuel".

Explanation:

I'm assuming this book is Team Moon: How 40,000 people landed Apollo 11 on the moon by Catherine Thimmesh.

This book describes events that are stated as part of your question. All 4 of those options are technically correct, there's only 1 that is absolutely correct.

The first option describes how the problem was; the third option describes how the trip/landing was planned out; and the fourth option states how far away the ship was from the moon.

The question is asking for which option BEST IDENTIFIES the problem. Not how it was, not how it was planned, and not some facts about how far away the ship was.

Therefore, option B (Just about plumb out of fuel) is the best option.

Best of luck :3

Answer: I got A on mine

Explanation:

Answer:I think it’s “it is not what it seems”  I might be wrong

Explanation:

”It is hard to look at” is definitely wrong and so is “It is difficult to conquer” Because the second story does not talk about them not being able to look or get something. The girls just want to figure out the cryptogram.

Answer:

a. simile

Explanation:

it is a simile because it uses the word "like" to compare two different things

Answer and Explanation:

According to the paragraph, "Hueter believes the teeth are vestigial, an evolutionary leftover from the whale shark's ancestor." This explains why the whale shark does not bite or chew. A vestigial structure or organ is an anatomical feature that remains even though it no longer has use for the more evolved creature. An example of vestigial organ in humans is the appendix. In the case of the whale shark, the teeth are vestigial structures - they no longer function, but have remained as a leftover of evolution. That is why the whale shark cannot use them to bite or chew.

Answer:

Simon asked his dad, "Have you been to South Africa?"

Hope this helped! <3