pls help me out lol

Answer:

yuojsjsjskakavbhjsmsnnxjxj

The answer is: $9,186.69

example 1: this is basically reducing WHILE multiplying. since 5 and 10 have a greatest common factor and is able to be reduced by each other, we do so. hence the reason 5 went to 1 and 10 went to 2 because 5 goes into 5 once and 5 goes into 10 twice. it was a different case for 3 and 8. 3 obviously cant go into 8 and 3 is prime so nothing can be done with those. ONLY REDUCE WHILE MULTIPLYING DIAGONALLY you CANNOT do up and down or side to side. so our new fractions are [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{1}{8}[/tex] so multiply across and get [tex]\frac{3}{16}[/tex] which cant be reduced more.

example 2: this one in my opinion is pretty easy. you take the two fractions and multiply regularly across. you get [tex]\frac{27}{80}[/tex]. that fraction can be reduced. so we find the prime factorization of each number. 3 is a prime factor. 3x3x3=27 which is our top number. 2 and 5 are all prime numbers used to reach 80. 2x2x2x2x5=80. that's the prime factorization method its an easier way to check your work also.

example 3: this one is practically a combination of the two previous ones. [tex]\frac{16}{21}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{7}{8}[/tex] can be diagonally reduced on both diagonals. 7 goes into 7 once and 7 goes into 21 three times 8 goes into 8 once and 8 goes into 16 twice. now we have [tex]\frac{1}{1}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex] multiply across and get just [tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex]. prime factorization is the best way to do this but, more effective with larger numbers. [tex]\frac{2*2*2*2*7}{3*7*2*2*2}[/tex] now cross out the numbers that are the same on the top and bottom. three 2's cancel out, one 7 cancels out, and now we're left with [tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex].

I really hope this helps you!!

Answer:

The answer to 7/5x11 is 15.4, so A. Greater than.

Step-by-step explanation:

7/5= 1.4, 1.4x11=15.4.

Answer:

The length is 7 m

The width is 10 m

Step-by-step explanation:

length = x

width = 2x - 4

length * width = area

It is given that the area is 70 [tex]m^{2}[/tex]

From there

x * (2x - 4) = 70

[tex]2x^{2}[/tex] - 4x = 70

[tex]2x^{2}[/tex] - 4x - 70 = 0

[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - 2x - 35 = 0

Now we have a quadratic equation, which is  a[tex]x^{2}[/tex] + bx + c = 0, where a [tex]\neq[/tex] 0

In this equation a = 1, b = -2 and c = -35

Discriminant (D) formula is b² - 4ac

D = [tex]-2^{2}[/tex]  - 4 * 1 * (-35) = 144 > 0

This discriminant is more than 0, so there are two possible x

Their formulas are  [tex]\frac{- b - \sqrt{D} }{2a}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{- b + \sqrt{D} }{2a}[/tex]

[tex]x_{1}[/tex] =  [tex]\frac{- (-2) - \sqrt{144} }{2}[/tex] = -5 < 0 (the length of the rectangle has to be more than 0, so we don't use this x)

[tex]x_{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{- (-2) + \sqrt{144} }{2}[/tex] = 7 > 0 (this one is right)

Calculating the dimensions

length = x = 7 (m)

width = 2x - 4 = 2 * 7 - 4 = 10 (m)

Answer:

y= 16                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

Step-by-step explanation:

y= -3/4(-8)+10

     (-3/4 x -8= 6)

y= 6 + 10

y=16

The answer is,

[tex]x < - 3[/tex]

Answer:

24 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

Question:

Adler and Erika solved the same equation using the calculations below.

Adler’s Work

[tex]\frac{13}{8}= k + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{13}{8} - \frac{1}{2} = k + \frac{1}{2} -\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{9}{8}= k[/tex]

Erika’s Work

[tex]\frac{13}{8}= k + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{13}{8}+ (-\frac{1}{2}) = k + \frac{1}{2} + (-\frac{1}{2}).[/tex]

[tex]\frac{9}{8}= k[/tex]

Which statement is true about their work?

Answer:

Both Adler and Erika solved for k correctly because either the addition property of equality or the subtraction property of equality can be used to solve for k.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]\frac{13}{8}= k + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Required

What is true about Adler and Erika's workings

Analyzing Adler's work;

[tex]\frac{13}{8}= k + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Adler subtracted 1/2 from both sides

[tex]\frac{13}{8} - \frac{1}{2} = k + \frac{1}{2} -\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Solving the expression on the left-hand side

[tex]\frac{13}{8} - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{13 - 4}{8} = \frac{9}{8}[/tex]

Solving the expression on the right-hand side

[tex]k + \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2} = k[/tex]

Hence:

[tex]\frac{9}{8}= k[/tex]

So, Adler's workings is correct

Analyzing Erika's work;

[tex]\frac{13}{8}= k + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Erika added -1/2 to both sides

[tex]\frac{13}{8}+ (-\frac{1}{2}) = k + \frac{1}{2} + (-\frac{1}{2}).[/tex]

Solving the expression on the left-hand side

[tex]\frac{13}{8} + (-\frac{1}{2}) = \frac{13}{8} - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{13 - 4}{8} = \frac{9}{8}[/tex]

Solving the expression on the right-hand side

[tex]k + \frac{1}{2} + (-\frac{1}{2}) =k + \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2} = k[/tex]

Hence:

[tex]\frac{9}{8}= k[/tex]

So, Erika's workings is correct

Both workings are correct

Answer: Both Adler and Erika are correct

Step-by-step explanation:

On Edge 2021

Answer:

option b.

61/1000.

................

Answer:

B: 61/1000

Step-by-step explanation:

B: 61/1000 = 0.061

as a percent is 6.1%

Therefore B or 61/1000 is correct hope this helped!

Answer:

same i dont know just need points but good luck

Answer:

Ce clasă ești sa văd daca te pot ajuta

Step-by-step explanation:

=-8×(-11)×(-4)

=22×(-4)

= -88

hope it helps.

Answer: −9×(−11)×(−4)=−396

Step-by-step explanation:

The Answer is is y=2x-3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

l= 28 feet

b = 2 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter of a rectangle is given by;

P= 2(l + b)

Comparing this to the equation; 8x + 4 = 60, i can write;

2(4x + 2) = 60

This means that;

l = 4x

b = 2

but x =7

So;

l = 4* 7 = 28 feet

b = 2 feet

Answer:

.66

Step-by-step explanation:

cmon bro how do u not know this

4 divide 6

.66666666666666666666666666666666666

Answer:

Domain: {7, 4, 0} Range: {-8, 4, 1, 8}

Step-by-step explanation:

the domain is just the x values and the range is just the y values when just a list of cordinates are given.

Answer:

1. vertical translation (the point goes straight up)

2. P'(0,7) (the translation was up five units and over 1 unit)

3. f(-2)=2(-2)^2-4= (all y values are 4) (0,4)

f(0)=2(0)^2-4= (all y values are -4) (0,-4)

f(1)=2(1)^2-4= (all y values are -2) (0,-2)

Answer:

-8/21

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Write more compactly about functional relationships such as, “If you sell x tickets, then your profit will be ... Jason goes to an amusement park where he pays $8 admission and $2 per ride.

Answer:

3² = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

45 =  3² × 5

81  = 3⁴

================

HCF = 3²

Answer:

28 units

hope this helps have an amazing day

Answer:

x = 1.6

Step-by-step explanation:

If you count the lines, it is the sixth line. Each line seems to represent .1 since when you count from 1 to 2, it would work out with 2 being the tenth line.

1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the fraction:

Rationalize the denominator by multiplying (7 - √14x):

Matching choice us A

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To circumscribe a circle to a given triangle implies constructing a circle outside the triangle, so that it touches the three vertices of the given triangle externally.

The step requires bisecting two sides of the triangle so as to locate the center of the circle. Then with the center and one of the edges, draw a complete circle. The circles should be outside the triangle and passing through its three vertices.

The construction is as shown in the attachment to this answer.

Answer:

The p-value is 0.07, which is more than 0.05. Fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C. 609

Step-by-step explanation:

In the question, 4-digits number were given to be divided by a 2-digits number. Without performing the division, it is only reasonable to say that the quotient will be a 3-digits number.

In the given options, the only 3-digits number is 609

Also, you can multiply 609 by 12 to check how reasonable your guess is.

⇒ 609 x 12 = 7308

The difference between 7315 and 7308 is 7.

The remaining number (7) is not up to 12 and when 7 is divided by 12 it will not give a whole number digit.

Therefore, the only reasonable quotient in the given options is 609.