Yes, the French physiologist Claude Bernard observed that the internal environment of the body constantly varied with change in the external environment.
Bernard's theory of homeostasis, or the maintenance of a relatively constant internal environment, was first proposed in 1856 and was based on his observation that the internal environment of the body constantly varied with change in the external . He proposed the concept of a "milieu interieur" or internal environment that must be kept in balance for the organism to survive under changing environmental conditions.
He hypothesized that the body's physiological processes worked to maintain this equilibrium, adjusting variables like temperature, salt concentration, and fluid balance. This theory of homeostasis paved the way for further understanding of homeostatic mechanisms and their importance in health and disease.
To know more about physiologist , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1404579
#SPJ4
______ is the risky game in which governments push to the edge of nuclear war without actually starting one. Brinkmanship. Events that occurred during the ...
The Cuban Missile Crisis serves as a prominent example of brinkmanship, where the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in high-stakes actions that brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. Here option C is the correct answer.
Brinkmanship is the risky strategy in which governments engage in high-stakes actions and escalate tensions, pushing their adversaries to the brink of a nuclear war without actually initiating one. This approach is characterized by taking calculated risks and displaying a willingness to go to the edge of conflict in order to achieve strategic objectives.
Events that occurred during the Cuban Missile Crisis best exemplify the concept of brinkmanship. The Cuban Missile Crisis took place in 1962 when the United States discovered that the Soviet Union had secretly installed nuclear missiles in Cuba. The crisis reached a critical point, with both superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union, engaging in a dangerous game of brinkmanship.
The world was on the brink of a nuclear war as the two nations faced off, each side carefully weighing their actions and risking catastrophic consequences. Fortunately, through intense negotiations and diplomatic efforts, a resolution was reached, averting a full-scale nuclear conflict. The Cuban Missile Crisis stands as a prominent example of brinkmanship in history.
To learn more about Cuban Missile Crisis
https://brainly.com/question/457425
#SPJ4
Complete question:
Which of the following is the risky game in which governments push to the edge of nuclear war without actually starting one?
A) Diplomacy
B) Escalation
C) Brinkmanship
D) Deterrence
Events that occurred during the __________.
How do many towns in the united states celebrate memorial day?.
Memorial Day is an important holiday in the United States, observed on the last Monday in May.
Many towns and cities across the country celebrate this day in various ways. Some of the ways in which many towns in the United States celebrate Memorial Day include:
Parades: Memorial Day parades are one of the most common ways to honor those who have lost their lives in military service. The parade usually features veterans, marching bands, and community organizations displaying their patriotism. Flags are usually placed along the parade route and are also given to spectators to wave in honor of those who have lost their lives in military service.
Military Honors: Many towns in the United States celebrate Memorial Day with military honors. These honors are usually conducted by the local National Guard unit, the American Legion, or Veterans of Foreign Wars. The honors usually include a gun salute, the playing of Taps, and the laying of a wreath on the graves of those who have lost their lives in military service.
Ceremonies: Some towns in the United States celebrate Memorial Day with ceremonies. These ceremonies usually include speeches, patriotic music, and the reading of the names of those who have lost their lives in military service. People may also light candles in memory of the fallen soldiers or place wreaths on memorials and graves.
Family Gatherings: Memorial Day is also a day for families to gather and remember loved ones who have lost their lives in military service. They may have a picnic, go to the beach, or simply spend time together as a family. Some families may also visit the graves of their loved ones who have died in military service.These are some of the ways in which many towns in the United States celebrate Memorial Day.
For more about Memorial Day:
https://brainly.com/question/13662447
#SPJ11
at the outset of the civil war, abraham lincoln invoked time-honored northern values to mobilize support for the war. which of the following are statements or ideas used by lincoln to garner support for the union war effort?
At the outset of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln invoked several time-honored northern values to mobilize support for the war. One of the key ideas used by Lincoln was the importance of preserving the Union.
He argued that the United States was founded on the principle of national unity, and that secession threatened the very existence of the country.
Additionally, Lincoln appealed to the idea of American exceptionalism, arguing that the United States had a unique role to play in the world as a beacon of freedom and democracy.
He also emphasized the importance of preserving the Constitution and the rule of law, arguing that the Confederacy was attempting to overthrow the legitimate government of the United States.
Finally, Lincoln appealed to the idea of sacrifice, calling on Americans to put aside their differences and work together to preserve the Union.
Overall, Lincoln's message emphasized the importance of unity, patriotism, and sacrifice in the face of a grave threat to the nation's future.
To know more about Civil War refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600#
#SPJ11
in his contingency theory, fred fiedler refers to _____ as the formal authority granted to a leader by an organization.
In his contingency theory, fred fiedler refers to "Position Power" as the formal authority granted to a leader by an organization.
Fiedler's contingency theory refers to "Position Power" as the formal authority granted to a leader by an organization. Position Power is considered a key factor in determining a leader's ability to make decisions and lead effectively. Position Power is composed of two components: legitimate power, which is derived from an individual's role, position, or title; and reward power, which is the ability to reward or punish the followers for their obedience or disobedience.
Fiedler believed that the effectiveness of a leader was based on the amount of influence their position grant, and that their effectiveness could be increased or decreased based on the type of position they had. He argued that a leader's ability to influence followers was largely based on how much power their position granted, with higher positions contributing to greater chance of successful outcomes. Fiedler's view of Position Power helps to explain why some individuals are able to lead effectively, while others are not. The higher the position, the greater the potential for successful outcomes.
To know more about Fiedler's contingency theory , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31441506
#SPJ4
Describe daily life in a maya city-state from the point of view of a maya priest.
Mayans everyday lives were busy, either with jobs, trading, producing crops and goods, ceremonies, games, dancing, writing, and astronomy and mathematics. Mayans made a writing system that used hieroglyphs, which each picture had its own meaning.
Mayan priests were those who withheld knowledge. According to history, they learned to read and write and taught it to others. His other duties are Keeping a calendar , Learning Astronomy, Fortune telling for the Shah, etc.
So the description of the Mayan priests in the city-state would be as follows:
Hustle and Early Bustle, the city began to close, Take your religious rites, Mark the calendar ,Practice reading and writing.
To know more about maya city-state click on the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/24800015
#SPJ4
Which of the following best describes Chinese resistance to Japanese forces? Chinese forces did not defeat the Japanese but they occupied much of their army.
The fact that Chinese soldiers controlled a sizable chunk of the Japanese army during World War II accurately describes Chinese resistance against Japanese forces. Here option C is the correct answer.
During World War II, China faced brutal aggression from the Japanese forces in what is commonly known as the Second Sino-Japanese War. While the Chinese forces were not able to achieve a complete victory over the Japanese army, they did put up a resilient and determined resistance.
Chinese forces, both regular military units and guerrilla fighters, engaged in numerous battles and campaigns to defend their territory and resist the Japanese invasion. The Chinese resistance efforts resulted in significant setbacks for the Japanese forces.
The Chinese were able to occupy and tie down a substantial portion of the Japanese army, preventing them from achieving their objectives and extending their control over China. The Chinese resistance played a crucial role in diverting Japanese resources, delaying their advances, and ultimately contributing to Japan's strategic difficulties in the region.
To learn more about Japanese forces
https://brainly.com/question/32399925
#SPJ4
Complete question:
Which of the following statements accurately describes Chinese resistance against Japanese forces during World War II?
A) Chinese forces completely defeated the Japanese army.
B) Chinese forces did not engage in any significant resistance against the Japanese.
C) Chinese forces occupied a substantial portion of the Japanese army.
D) Chinese forces collaborated with the Japanese during the war.
This mini-q asks why the battle of gettysburg is considered a major turning point of the civilwar. how does this map help answer that question
The map in question could potentially illustrate the positions of the Confederate and Union forces, the terrain, or the specific movements and strategies employed during the battle.
Analyzing the map could provide a visual understanding of the battle's dynamics, the challenges faced by each side, and the decisive moments that contributed to its status as a major turning point in the Civil War.
The Battle of Gettysburg, which took place from July 1 to July 3, 1863, was a crucial engagement between the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia, commanded by General Robert E. Lee, and the Union Army of the Potomac, led by General George G. Meade. This battle is widely regarded as a major turning point in the Civil War for several reasons:
Strategic Significance: The Confederate forces, under General Lee, aimed to invade the North and deliver a decisive blow to Union morale. However, their defeat at Gettysburg halted their advance, preventing a major Confederate victory on Northern soil and changing the momentum of the war.
High Casualties: The Battle of Gettysburg resulted in a significant loss of life, with both sides suffering heavy casualties. The Confederates lost a substantial portion of their experienced and skilled soldiers, weakening their overall military strength.
Lee's Retreat: Following the defeat at Gettysburg, General Lee was forced to retreat back to Virginia, ending his second invasion of the North. This retreat marked a significant setback for the Confederacy and a missed opportunity to potentially break the Union's resolve.
Boost to Union Morale: The Union victory at Gettysburg provided a much-needed morale boost for the North. It demonstrated that the Confederate forces were not invincible and boosted public support for the Union cause.
Gettysburg Address: President Abraham Lincoln delivered his iconic Gettysburg Address at the dedication of the Gettysburg National Cemetery. His speech emphasized the importance of preserving the Union and provided a powerful moral and political message that resonated throughout the country.
Know more about battle here:
https://brainly.com/question/27228932
#SPJ11
Most of the communist governments of eastern europe fell because:.
The primary reasons for their collapse can be summarized as follows: Economic inefficiency, Political repression and lack of civil liberties, Influence of the Soviet Union, Popular uprisings and grassroots movements
Economic inefficiency: Communist governments in Eastern Europe struggled with economic inefficiency, characterized by centralized planning, lack of market mechanisms, and inadequate resource allocation. The resulting stagnation and shortages led to dissatisfaction among the population
Political repression and lack of civil liberties: Communist regimes in Eastern Europe were known for their authoritarian nature, curbing political freedoms, and suppressing dissent. People demanded greater political freedoms and human rights, leading to widespread protests and movements for democratic reforms.
Influence of the Soviet Union: The dominance of the Soviet Union played a significant role in maintaining communist governments in Eastern Europe. However, when the Soviet Union faced its own internal crisis and initiated political and economic reforms under Mikhail Gorbachev, it no longer intervened to support the Eastern European governments, leading to their loss of backing.
Popular uprisings and grassroots movements: Grassroots movements, such as Solidarity in Poland and the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia, emerged as powerful forces demanding political change. These movements gained support from the general population and played a crucial role in the overthrow of communist regimes.
In summary, the fall of communist governments in Eastern Europe resulted from a combination of economic inefficiency, political repression, popular uprisings, the changing geopolitical landscape, and the withdrawal of support from the Soviet Union.
Know more about Europe, refer here
https://brainly.com/question/1068709
#SPJ11
1. What happened when U.S. troops fought the German army for the first time in western Tunisia? What action did General Dwight D. Eisenhower take after the attack?
U.S. troops won the battle in western Tunisia, but suffered significant casualties. General Eisenhower called for reinforcements to continue the offensive.
When U.S. troops fought the German army for the first time in western Tunisia, they were met with fierce resistance.
The Germans had already been fighting in the region for some time and were well prepared for the American offensive.
Despite this, the U.S. troops were able to hold their ground and successfully repel the German counterattack.
General Dwight D. Eisenhower, who was in charge of the Allied forces in North Africa at the time, recognized the need for better communication and coordination between the different units.
He reorganized the command structure to better facilitate cooperation between the various branches of the military.
Additionally, Eisenhower ordered a series of strategic bombings to weaken German positions and disrupt their supply lines.
These actions helped to turn the tide of the war in North Africa in favor of the Allies.
For more such questions on Western Tunisia:
https://brainly.com/question/2759866
#SPJ8
La raza unida was organized as a political party to represent the interests of mexican americans in texas during which era of the state’s history?.
La Raza Unida was organized as a political party to represent the interests of Mexican Americans in Texas during the Civil Rights Era.
The Civil Rights Era refers to the period of time in the United States, particularly the 1950s and 1960s, when various civil rights movements and activism emerged to fight against racial discrimination and segregation.
La Raza Unida was founded in 1970 and aimed to address the social, economic, and political issues faced by Mexican Americans in Texas. The party sought to mobilize Mexican American voters, promote equal representation, and advocate for policies that would benefit the Mexican American community.
To know more about Civil Rights refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/14397578
#SPJ11
Vladimir Lenin's New Economic Policy was a political compromise with what group?
a) Urban industrial workers
B) Rural peasants
c) White counter-revolutionaries
d) Foreign capitalists
Vladimir Lenin’s New Economic Policy (NEP) was a political compromise with the rural peasants in Russia.
The correct option is B.
Essentially, it aimed to relax some of the restrictions of the War Communism policy that had been implemented a few years before, and make the current economic system more balanced. It allowed for limited private enterprise; limited redistribution of assets and some tax reform. The state took over capitalist industry, but allowed private peasants and traders to run their businesses independently.
The introduction of this policy saw an increase in food production, prompting Lenin to remark that “economics has overcome politics.” This economic compromise proved to be very successful, aiding in the Soviet Union’s economic recovery from the Civil War. Although Lenin’s NEP was successful, it was eventually abandoned in favor of Stalin’s policies of heavy industrialization and collectivization.
To know more about New Economic Policy , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/22412062
#SPJ4
Suki is Japanese and lives in Tokyo with her family. Considering that Japan is a collectivist culture, Suki is likely to do which of the following when using social networking sites?
Compliment her friends on their recent accomplishments
Announce her latest personal achievement
Express her personal opinions about the prime minister's latest policy
Share photos of herself alone
Compliment her friends on their recent accomplishments
In a collectivist culture like Japan, Suki is likely to complement her friends on their accomplishments when using social networking sites, emphasizing social harmony and maintaining positive relationships.
Suki, being from a collectivist culture like Japan, is likely to complement her friends on their recent accomplishments when using social networking sites. In collectivist cultures, there is a strong emphasis on social harmony, group cohesion, and maintaining positive relationships.
Complimenting others' achievements is a way to show support, reinforce social bonds, and contribute to the collective well-being.
Announcing personal achievements may be perceived as self-centered, expressing personal opinions on political matters may be seen as disruptive, and
sharing photos alone may be considered less common in collectivist cultures where group-oriented activities and connections are highly valued.
Read more about collectivist :
https://brainly.com/question/27996982
#SPJ4
A bowling ball rolls without slipping straight down a hill. The bowling ball has a mass of 16 kg and a radius of 0.11 m. What is the translational speed of the bowling ball at the bottom of the hill if it is released from rest at a height of 3.5 m? Isphere = (2/5)mr2.
According to the information, the translational speed of the bowling ball at the bottom of the hill is approximately 7.78 m/s.
What is the translational speed of the bowling ball at the bottom of the hill?To find the translational speed of the bowling ball at the bottom of the hill, we can use the principle of conservation of energy.
The initial potential energy (mgh) of the bowling ball at the top of the hill is converted into both translational kinetic energy (½mv²) and rotational kinetic energy (½Iω²), where I is the moment of inertia and ω is the angular velocity.
Since the bowling ball rolls without slipping, we can relate the linear speed (v) and angular velocity (ω) using the formula ω = v/r, where r is the radius of the bowling ball.
The moment of inertia (I) for a solid sphere rotating about its diameter is given by I = (2/5)mr², as provided.
Equating the initial potential energy to the sum of translational and rotational kinetic energies, we have:
mgh = ½mv² + ½I(ω²)Substituting I = (2/5)mr² and ω = v/r, we get:
mgh = ½mv² + ½[(2/5)mr²][(v/r)²]Simplifying the equation, we can solve for v:
mgh = ½mv² + (1/5)mv²Multiplying both sides by 2/7m, we have:
gh = (4/7)v²Solving for v, we get:
v² = (7gh) / 4Taking the square root of both sides, we find:
v = √[(7gh) / 4]Substituting the given values:
m = 16 kgr = 0.11 mh = 3.5 mg ≈ 9.8 m/s²v ≈ √[(7 * 9.8 * 3.5) / 4]v ≈ √(24.5)v ≈ 4.95 m/sSo, the translational speed of the bowling ball at the bottom of the hill, when released from rest at a height of 3.5 m, is approximately 4.95 m/s.
Learn more about speed in: https://brainly.com/question/17661499
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE hindu philosophical systems include both dualistic and non-dualist viewpoints
This is true that Hindu philosophical systems include both dualistic and non-dualist viewpoints.
Hinduism is a complex and diverse religion that includes a wide range of philosophical beliefs. One of the most fundamental debates within Hindu philosophy is the nature of ultimate reality. Some schools of thought, such as Samkhya and Vedanta, argue that reality is ultimately dualistic, consisting of both a material world and a transcendent spiritual realm.
Others, such as Advaita Vedanta and Yoga, take a non-dualist view, asserting that ultimate reality is singular and indivisible. Both of these perspectives have played a significant role in shaping Hindu theology and spirituality, and continue to be important areas of discussion and debate among scholars and practitioners of Hinduism.
To know more about Hinduism refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/31033044
#SPJ11
which enlightenment thinker did the antifederalists use to defend their position for small republics?
The Antifederalists, a group of opponents to the ratification of the United States Constitution, drew upon the ideas of the Enlightenment thinker Montesquieu to support their position for small republics.
Montesquieu, a French political philosopher, proposed the concept of the separation of powers and advocated for a system of government based on checks and balances.
The Antifederalists argued that a centralized and strong federal government, as proposed in the Constitution, would potentially lead to a concentration of power and endanger individual liberties.
They believed that small, localized republics would better preserve the principles of liberty and protect against tyranny.
Montesquieu's ideas, particularly his emphasis on the importance of limiting the powers of government and maintaining a system of checks and balances, provided intellectual ammunition for the Antifederalists.
They cited his writings, such as "The Spirit of the Laws," to argue that small republics were better equipped to safeguard the rights and interests of the people.
By invoking Montesquieu's ideas, the Antifederalists sought to bolster their case against a strong central government and advocate for the preservation of small republics as a means of protecting individual freedoms and preventing the consolidation of power.
To learn more about republics, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/19044837
#SPJ11
4. what might the effects of the borders drawn by sykes and picot be if the middle east is divided up the way they have chose?
Answer:
(If you like this answer i would appreciate if u give brainliest but otherwise, i hope this helped ^^)
Explanation:
The Sykes-Picot Agreement, signed in 1916 during World War I, aimed to divide the Ottoman Empire's territories in the Middle East between the British and the French. The agreement had significant consequences for the region and its people. Here are some potential effects of the borders drawn by Sykes and Picot:
Artificial Boundaries: The borders created by the Sykes-Picot Agreement were largely drawn without considering the region's ethnic, religious, and tribal dynamics. As a result, they divided communities and often ignored natural geographic boundaries. This led to the formation of artificial nation-states, which did not necessarily align with the ethnic or sectarian composition of the populations.
Ethnic and Sectarian Tensions: The arbitrary borders exacerbated ethnic and sectarian tensions in the region. Communities that found themselves on different sides of the borders were separated, while others were forced to live together within the same nation-state. This contributed to long-standing conflicts and divisions that persist to this day.
Creation of New States: The Sykes-Picot Agreement laid the foundation for the establishment of several new states in the Middle East, such as Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. These states were often formed by merging diverse groups and imposing centralized governance structures, which in some cases resulted in internal power struggles, governance challenges, and instability.
Legacy of Colonialism: The agreement has been widely criticized for its colonial nature, as it reflected the interests of European powers rather than the aspirations of the local populations. This has led to a sense of resentment and anti-colonial sentiment, shaping the region's history and political dynamics.
Long-Term Conflicts: The division of the Middle East by Sykes and Picot contributed to long-term conflicts in the region. The unresolved territorial disputes, ethnic tensions, and struggles for self-determination have fueled ongoing conflicts and instability, such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Syrian civil war, and sectarian conflicts in Iraq.
It is important to note that while the Sykes-Picot Agreement played a significant role in shaping the Middle East's borders, other historical factors and events have also influenced the region's geopolitical landscape. The effects mentioned above are complex and multifaceted, influenced by various historical, political, and social factors beyond just the Sykes-Picot Agreement.
how did the industrial revolution change the social structure and political alignment of the west? in essay form
The Industrial Revolution drastically transformed the social structure and political alignment of the Western world.
How did Industrial Revolution reshape landscape of West?The Revolution brought about significant changes in the social structure and political alignment of the Western countries. Prior to this period, societies were predominantly agrarian with a hierarchical structure centered around landowners and agricultural workers.
But with the advent of industrialization, there was shift towards urbanization and the rise of the industrial working class. This led to the emergence of a new social class, the industrial bourgeoisie, who were the owners of factories and capital.
Read more about industrial revolution
brainly.com/question/13323062
#SPJ1
How did prince henry of portugal contribute to maritime exploration?.
Prince Henry of Portugal significantly contributed to maritime exploration by establishing a navigation school and sponsoring numerous expeditions.
As a key figure during the Age of Discovery, Prince Henry, also known as "Henry the Navigator," played a crucial role in promoting maritime exploration. In 1419, he founded a navigation school in Sagres, Portugal, which attracted expert cartographers, navigators, and astronomers. This institution was instrumental in advancing the knowledge of navigation, shipbuilding, and cartography, leading to improved exploration techniques and more accurate maps.
Furthermore, Prince Henry financed and organized various voyages along the West African coast, aimed at discovering new trade routes and expanding Portugal's global influence. These expeditions led to the exploration of previously unknown territories and the establishment of trade connections, paving the way for further European exploration and colonization in the following centuries.
To know more about Prince Henry refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30287308
#SPJ11
true/false. european societies in the middle ages were highly buerecratic and centralized
Answer:
Explanation:
Dissolution and instability
Seen against the background of the millennia, the fall of the Roman Empire was so commonplace an event that it is almost surprising that so much ink has been spilled in the attempt to explain it. The Visigoths were merely one among the peoples who had been dislodged from the steppe in the usual fashion. They and others, unable to crack the defenses of Sāsānian Persia or of the Roman Empire in the East (though it was a near thing), probed farther west and at length found the point of weakness they were seeking on the Alps and the Rhine.
What really needs explaining is the fact that the Western Empire was never restored. Elsewhere imperial thrones were never vacant for long. Thus in China, after every time of troubles, a new dynasty received “the mandate of heaven,” and a new emperor, or “son of heaven,” rebuilt order. For instance, in 304 CE the nomadic Huns invaded China, and a long period of disruption followed, but at the beginning of the 7th century the Tang dynasty took charge and began 300 years of rule. Similar patterns mark the history of India and Japan.
Charlemagne and Leo III
Charlemagne and Leo III
The Europeans failed to emulate that story. Justinian I, the greatest of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) emperors, reconquered large portions of the West in the 6th century, though the destruction wreaked by his soldiers made things worse rather than better. In 800 Charlemagne, king of the Franks, was actually crowned emperor of the Romans by the pope. In later centuries the Hohenstaufen and Habsburg dynasties tried to restore the empire, and as late as the 19th century so did Napoleon I. None of those attempts succeeded. Probably the chance was only real in the earliest period, before western Europe had become used to doing without an overlord. But at that time there was never enough breathing space for society to regain its stability and strength. Most of the barbarian kingdoms, successor states to Rome, succumbed to later assailants. Britain fell away from the empire in the 5th century; the little kingdoms of the Angles and Saxons were just coming together as one kingdom, England, when the Viking invasions began. In the 7th century the Arabs conquered North Africa; in the 8th they took Spain and invaded Gaul. Lombards, Avars, Slavs, Bulgars, and Magyars poured into Europe from the east. Not until German king Otto I’s victory over the Magyars at Lechfeld in 955 did those incursions cease, and not until the late 11th century was Latin Christendom more or less secure within its borders, and by then it had been without an effective emperor for more than 600 years.
Feudalism
Various institutions had emerged to fill the gap. The Christian church, against enormous odds, had kept the light of religion and learning alive and spread what was left of Roman civilization into Ireland, England, central Europe, and Scandinavia. It also provided a reservoir of literacy against the day when professional government should again be possible. The kings of the barbarians, of whom Charlemagne was the greatest, had provided military leadership and tried to acquire some of the prestige and governmental machinery of the Roman emperors. But the troublous times, during which trade and urban life were minimal, meant that effective power lay with those who controlled the land and its products: a military aristocracy of great estates and fiefs (Latin feodum, hence “feudal system”). The aristocrats called themselves nobiles in the Roman fashion and appropriated various late imperial titles, such as comes (count) and dux (duke). But those titles were mere decoration. The new kings, lacking the machinery for imperial taxation, could not pay for standing armies. Besides, this was the age in which the heavily armoured cavalryman (chevalier in French, knight in English) dominated war. He was an autonomous force and thus a much less-dependable instrument than a Roman legionary had been. Legally, the new masters of the soil were liegemen of the various kings and princes (it was a maxim that every man had a lord), but in practice they could usually ignore royal claims if they chose. Europe thus fell under the rule of armoured knights, and the course of the next few hundred years gives reason to think that the democrats of Greece were right to distrust the very idea of oligarchy, for the keynote of noble rule seemed to be almost incessant warfare.
in the stele of hammurabi, hammurabi stands before the seated god shamash in an attitude of
In the stele of Hammurabi, Hammurabi stands before the seated god shamash in an attitude/gesture of prayer.
Hammurabi's Laws Stela was used as a symbol of governmental power. The top of the Stela depicts a regal investiture scenario, and the artist skillfully altered the artwork to increase Hammurabi's authority and legitimacy. Standard imagery is expertly rearranged to elevate him. Shamash, the deity of justice, is approached by the monarch alone, and their direct stare serves as a metaphor of their intimate relationship and close equality in position.
Other aspects of the artwork effectively emphasised the idea that Gods had exalted and appointed Hammurabi as ruler. Therefore, it is not surprising that several stelae bearing the Laws of Hammurabi were erected. Ironically, Stela itself was taken by a different king who wanted to assert his control centuries later, and then by a modern state who wanted to show off its cultural might.
To learn more about Hammurabi, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32258241
#SPJ4
Complete question:
In the stele of Hammurabi, Hammurabi stands before the seated god shamash in an attitude of?
the young turk movement, also known as the ottoman society for unity and progress, originated in
The Young Turk movement, also known as the Ottoman Society for Unity and Progress, was formed in the Ottoman Empire.
The Young Turk movement was a general political reform movement that is chosen over the Ottoman Empire. It states a single monarchy with a constitutional government. This action was led by Sultan Abdulhamid II to reintroduce the new constitution to get military sympathies in war.
The Young Turk's idea was to reform the Ottoman Empire and execute new ideas both socially and politically. This results in improving its strength and preserving its territorial integrity. They implemented nationalism, and secularism to change and modernize the Empire.
To learn more about the Young Turk movement
https://brainly.com/question/10377606
#SPJ4
The complete question is;
the young turk movement, also known as the ottoman society for Unity and Progress, originated in _________
A drug test is accurate 97% of the time. If the test is given to 2300 people who have not taken drugs, what is the probability that at least 71 will test positive
To calculate the probability that at least 71 out of 2300 people who have not taken drugs will test positive on a drug test with an accuracy rate of 97%, we can use the binomial probability formula.
Let's assume that each individual's test result is independent of others, and the probability of a false positive (testing positive without having taken drugs) is 1 - 0.97 = 0.03.
The probability of at least 71 people testing positive can be calculated by summing the probabilities of each possible outcome (71 or more positive results) using the binomial probability formula.
P(at least 71 positive) = 1 - P(70 or fewer positive)
Using a binomial probability calculator or software, we can calculate the probability:
P(at least 71 positive) ≈ 1 - binomcdf(2300, 0.03, 70)
The value of binomcdf(n, p, k) represents the cumulative probability of getting k or fewer successes in n trials with a probability of success p.
The result will depend on the specific software or calculator used. For example, if we use a binomial calculator and calculate the expression above, the probability is approximately 0.9999999999 (rounded to 10 decimal places).
Therefore, the probability that at least 71 out of 2300 people who have not taken drugs will test positive is extremely close to 1 or virtually certain.
To learn more about binomial probability, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12474772
#SPJ11
In Acts 13, Paul met a proconsul named ___________ ______________. Skeptical historians doubted this person's existence until a stone was found with his inscription on it.
In Acts 13, Paul met a proconsul named Sergius Paulus. Skeptical historians initially doubted the existence of Sergius Paulus, as there was no concrete evidence to support his existence beyond the biblical account.
However, their skepticism was challenged when an archaeological discovery provided confirmation. In 1877, a stone was unearthed in Cyprus that bore an inscription mentioning a certain "Sergius Paulus."
The inscription revealed that Sergius Paulus held the title of proconsul in Cyprus during the first century, aligning with the biblical narrative. This discovery provided valuable historical evidence validating the existence of Sergius Paulus and affirming the accuracy of the biblical account in Acts.
The inscription on the stone read: "Paulli Proculi, proconsulis imperio," which translates to "in the proconsulship of Paulus." This finding shed light on the presence of Sergius Paulus in Cyprus and his official role as a Roman proconsul, offering substantial support for the historical reliability of the biblical narrative in Acts 13.
To learn more about Sergius Paulus
https://brainly.com/question/32311308
#SPJ4
The decision in Plyler v. Doe (1981) was based upon an interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and required states to provide K-12 education for undocumented immigrants and their children. T/F
The given statement" The Plyler v. Doe (1981) decision was based on the interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, specifically the 14th Amendment" is True because This clause states that no state shall "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
In this case, the Supreme Court held that states must provide K-12 education to undocumented immigrants and their children.
The Court reasoned that denying education to these children would create a permanent underclass of individuals who would not have the opportunity to become productive members of society. Furthermore, the Court emphasized that children should not be punished for their parents' actions or immigration status.
The majority opinion in Plyler v. Doe also noted that education is a crucial component in maintaining a democratic society, as it promotes informed and engaged citizens.
The Court's decision in Plyler v. Doe reflects a commitment to ensuring equal protection under the law for all individuals, regardless of their immigration status. This landmark ruling highlights the importance of education as a fundamental right and its significance in fostering a just and inclusive society.
Consequently, states are required to provide K-12 education to undocumented immigrants and their children, upholding the principles of fairness and equal opportunity enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.
To learn more about U.S. Constitution click here:
https://brainly.com/question/453546#
#SPJ11
Based on Map 13-2, the Aztec and Incan Empires most likely did not come into direct conflict because
A) they shared common leadership.
B) they were separated by a large area of difficult terrain.
C) they were more concerned with religion than warfare.
D) they maintained a close military alliance.
Based on Map 13-2, the Aztec and Incan Empires most likely did not come into direct conflict because they were separated by a large area of difficult terrain.
The Andes Mountains and the dense rainforests of Central America made communication and travel difficult between the two empires, which likely limited the potential for direct conflict. The Aztec and Incan Empires had distinct cultural and linguistic differences, which could have contributed to their limited interactions. They developed separate political, economic, and religious systems and were primarily focused on managing their respective territories and internal affairs. Therefore, it is the geographical separation and the lack of direct contact due to the difficult terrain played a significant role in preventing direct conflict between the Aztec and Incan Empires.
For further information on Aztec and Incan Empires visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13974127
#SPJ11
Mandatory spending is money that
A. needs to be used by the end of the year.
B. can never be increased or decreased.
C. the government previously budgeted to spend in the current year.
D. the government borrows to pay for the deficit.
Answer:
C. The government previously budgeted to spend in the current year.
Explanation:
Mandatory spending refers to government spending on certain programs that are required by law. These expenditures are mandated by laws and are not subject to the annual budget review process. Examples of mandatory spending in the United States include Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. These funds are automatically obligated due to previously-enacted laws, hence the term 'mandatory'.
I know it's late but why not still answer it.
the panic of 1819 increased the american people's faith in the second bank of the united states.
The Panic of 1819 was a severe depression that caused widespread financial ruin in the United States.
The panic was largely blamed on the Second Bank of the United States, which was seen by many as too powerful and lacked sufficient regulation. Many people began to call for its elimination, but that changed during the Panic of 1819 when its aid became invaluable. The bank provided assistance to states and merchants in times of financial need, and it even suspended foreclosures on outstanding debts.
Ultimately, the Panic of 1819 increased the American people’s faith in the Second Bank of the United States. Many Americans saw the Bank as a stabilizing force rather than a dangerous monopoly. The Panic also shaped the banking system in the United States; it led to the growth of small state and local banks, which enjoyed more public trust than their larger counterparts due to their local focus and sense of community. The Panic of 1819 also left a lasting legacy of vigilance and guarded trust in banks and other financial institutions.
To know more about United States, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8147900
#SPJ4
Respond to the prompt with a historically defensible thesis or claim that establishes a line of reasoning. describe a broader historical context relevant to the prompt. support an argument in response to the prompt using all but one of the documents. use at least one additional piece of specific historical evidence (beyond that found in the documents) relevant to an argument about the prompt. evaluate the extent to which regional differences about slavery contributed to political tensions in the period from 1830 to 1861.
The regional differences regarding slavery in the United States were a significant factor that contributed to political tensions in the period from 1830 to 1861.
The North and the South held divergent economic, social, and political interests, largely stemming from their contrasting labor systems. The North had increasingly embraced industrialization and wage labor, leading to a growing anti-slavery sentiment. In contrast, the South heavily relied on enslaved labor for their agrarian economy, which led to a strong pro-slavery stance.This regional divide was evident in political debates and compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850, which attempted to maintain a delicate balance between free and slave states. The issue of slavery intensified with the acquisition of new territories, as both sides sought to expand their influence and maintain political power.One document that supports this argument is the "Cornerstone Speech" by Alexander Stephens, Vice President of the Confederacy. Stephens explicitly stated that the Confederacy's cornerstone rested upon the belief in the inequality of races and the moral rightness of slavery, highlighting the South's staunch defense of the institution.Furthermore, the 1857 Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford, which ruled that enslaved individuals were not citizens and had no rights, further exemplified the deep-rooted differences and tensions surrounding slavery.Additional historical evidence includes the rise of abolitionist movements in the North, such as the formation of the American Anti-Slavery Society in 1833 and the publication of influential anti-slavery literature like Uncle Tom's Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe in 1852. These developments fueled the North's growing opposition to slavery and heightened sectional tensions.In conclusion, regional differences regarding slavery were a primary source of political tensions between the North and the South from 1830 to 1861. The contrasting economic systems, social values, and political ideologies contributed to a deep divide that ultimately led to the secession of the Southern states and the outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861.Know more about abolitionist movements here
https://brainly.com/question/6590062#
#SPJ11
Stalin revived his dictatorial rule over the Soviet Union after World War II by declaring war on
A. capitalism.
B. communism.
C. slavery.
D. socialism.
Stalin revived his dictatorial rule over the Soviet Union after World War II by declaring war on A. capitalism.
Why did Stalin declare war on capitalism?
Stalin's focus was primarily on spreading and consolidating communism, rather than declaring war on capitalism as a whole. The Soviet Union, under Stalin's leadership, maintained a socialist planned economy and a political system characterized by authoritarianism and a single-party rule.
While there was tension and competition between the Soviet Union and Western capitalist powers during the Cold War, with ideological differences and geopolitical conflicts, it was not a literal declaration of war on capitalism by Stalin.
Read more on Stalin here:https://brainly.com/question/903444
#SPJ1
The centralists were supported by the following groups: Group of answer choices the Indians, the hacendados, and the army officers. the liberal criollos and mestizos who supported the French and American revolutions, the U.S. Constitution and the Spanish Constitution of 1812. the clergy, the hacendados, and supporters of the French and American revolutions. the clergy, the hacendados, and the army officers.
The centralists were supported mainly by the clergy, hacendados, and the army officers.
The clergy supported the idea that absolute power should be concentrated in the executive branch of the government that was often ruled by a dictator. The hacendados, or landlords, saw centralism as an advantage since it allowed them to control their regions of influence with little interference from other groups.
The army officers were also able to maintain their influence due to the increased power that centralism brought to them. Centralism was also supported by some Indian groups, Liberal criollos and mestizos who saw it as an advancement of democratic ideals, as well as some groups who wanted to continue to uphold the French and American revolutions.
To know more about democratic , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14320124
#SPJ4