the brown decision officially ended the racial and legal doctrine of __________.

The prosecutor can A. Have Witness read her notes to the jury C. Show Witness the list and then take it away and have her testify from her refreshed recollection.The correct answer is D. A and C but not B.

The witness has testified that she cannot remember exactly what entries were missing from the records, but that seeing her notes would help to refresh her recollection. Therefore, the prosecutor can show the witness the list and then take it away and have her testify from her refreshed recollection, as this would allow the witness to testify accurately based on her own recollection.

The prosecutor cannot have the witness read her notes to the jury because this would be hearsay evidence, as the witness would be testifying based on the contents of the notes rather than her own personal recollection.

The prosecutor can also not have the notes entered into evidence, as this would be considered hearsay evidence, and the notes would not be subject to cross-examination by the defense.

To know more about embezzlement here

https://brainly.com/question/28503275

#SPJ4

One can get a form SSA-1099/1042S, Social Security Benefit Statement Using your personal my Social Security account, and if you don't already have an account, you can create one online or by Calling at 1-800-772-1213.

A Social Security 1099 or 1042S Benefit Statement, also called an SSA-1099 or SSA-1042S, is a form of tax that shows the total amount of benefits a person receives from Social Security in the previous year. It is informed through mails out in each January of every year to people who can receive benefits and tells about the amount of social income to report to the IRS on the tax returns. Non-citizens who live outside United States get 1042S Benefit Statement instead of 1099. The replacement is probably available after 1st of February for the previous tax year. This social benefit is not available for people who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI).

Know more about "Social Security Benefit Statement" visit

brainly.com/question/28803551

#SPJ4

As a trustee, a member of Congress is expected to vote in accordance with the interests of their constituents, rather than their own personal beliefs or interests.

This means that they should take into consideration the views and preferences of their constituents when casting their vote.

In practice, a member of Congress acting as a trustee might gather input from their constituents through town hall meetings, surveys, or other means of public engagement. They might also consult with experts and stakeholders to inform their decision-making.

When it comes time to vote, the member of Congress would weigh the various factors and make a decision that they believe best serves the interests of their constituents.

They might also communicate their reasoning and decision to their constituents to ensure transparency and accountability.

To know more about member of Congress here:

https://brainly.com/question/28583709

#SPJ4

The claim seems to be accurate. That implies that any attempts to register duplicates (more than once) for a given market would be rejected.

Depending on the situation, the word "market" might indicate many things. A market is typically used to describe a certain business or sector where products or services are bought and sold. It may also refer to the region or demographic segment where a good or service is marketed or offered for sale. In business and economics, the idea of a market is crucial because it influences supply and demand, pricing, and competition. In some situations, the word "market" can also refer to a system or platform where transactions are carried out, such a stock exchange or an online marketplace. Creating a winning company plan and achieving commercial success require an understanding of the market.

Learn more about market here:

https://brainly.com/question/13627328

#SPJ4

The case of FTC v. Standard Education was important in the legal transition because it marked the first time that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) successfully challenged false advertising claims made by a for-profit educational institution.

Explanatory answer: In the 1970s, Standard Education Corporation (SEC), a for-profit company that offered vocational training programs, launched a series of aggressive advertising campaigns that made inflated claims about the employment opportunities and earning potential of its graduates. The FTC launched an investigation into the company's practices and ultimately filed a lawsuit against SEC for false advertising. The case went to trial in 1975, and the court found that SEC had indeed made false and misleading statements in its advertising. This marked a significant shift in the legal landscape, as it was the first time that the FTC had successfully challenged false advertising claims made by a for-profit educational institution. The case helped establish the FTC's authority to regulate the advertising practices of for-profit schools and paved the way for further legal action against companies that engage in deceptive marketing. It also underscored the importance of truth in advertising and consumer protection in the education industry.

learn more about FTC at :

https://brainly.com/question/24304308

#SPJ4

After hearing the testimony of the inmates, according to the court reporter, the jurors were sent back to their cells for the evening.

What is testimony supposed to imply?

a formal declaration made verbally under oath by a witness in answer to inquiries from a lawyer or other qualified public authority. Evidence is the actual declaration of a fact. By "to witness" or "to deliver one's testimony," Christians in general—and particularly those who adhere to the Evangelical tradition—mean to "relate the tale of how one became a Christian." It usually refers to a certain period in a Christian's life when God performed something that was deemed to be extremely remarkable.

Know more about  qualified  Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22944127

#SPJ1

Democratic leaders can facilitate group brainstorming sessions to solicit a variety of ideas from the participants. This may inspire inventiveness, original approaches to problem-solving, and original solutions. Democratic leadership supports team members' empowerment as well.

In a democracy, the populace has the power to enact laws, or to elect representatives who will do so. Who is referred to as "the people" and how power is distributed among or delegated by the people have changed over time and at varying rates in various nations.

Freedom of assembly, association, property rights, freedom of expression, inclusivity and equality, citizenship, consent of the governed, voting rights, freedom from unjustified governmental deprivation of the right to life and liberty, and minority rights are frequently characteristics of democracies.

To know more about citizenship, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/18099945

#SPJ4

Michels's analysis of the iron law of oligarchy reflected the ideas of the conflict perspective.

He argued that organizations are inevitably dominated by a small group of leaders who maintain power through manipulation and control.

Robert Michels was a German-Italian sociologist who lived from 1876 to 1936. His most famous work is "Political Parties," published in 1911, in which he introduced the concept of the "iron law of oligarchy." This idea suggests that all organizations, no matter how democratic they may start out, will eventually develop a small group of leaders who hold power and make decisions on behalf of the rest of the members. Michels believed that this was an inevitable result of the complexity of modern organizations and the need for efficiency and stability.

To know more about Political Parties visit:

brainly.com/question/12401053

#SPJ1

Answer:

parliamentary system

Explanation:

The type of government where the members of parliament choose the leader is a parliamentary system of government. In a parliamentary system, the executive branch of government, which includes the head of government or prime minister, is accountable to the legislative branch or parliament. The prime minister is typically chosen by the members of the ruling political party or coalition in parliament, rather than being directly elected by the people. This system is often contrasted with a presidential system of government, in which the head of government or president is elected directly by the people and is separate from the legislative branch.

John C. Calhoun served as Andrew Jackson's vice president in the US. From 1829 until 1832, Calhoun served as Andrew Jackson's vice president.

John C. Calhoun served as the country's vice president under Andrew Jackson. From 1829 to 1832, Calhoun served as Jackson's vice president, but their relationship deteriorated due to differences of opinion on a number of topics, such as states' rights and tariff policy. In the nullification crisis, which was focused on the issue of whether states had the authority to void federal legislation, he later rose to prominence as a strong supporter of states' rights.

learn more about Andrew Jackson here:

https://brainly.com/question/27920494

#SPJ4

The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution contains the Equal Protection Clause, which was used in the decision in Brown v. Board of Education.

The Equal Protection Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This clause provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause was central to the landmark Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which declared racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional. The Court held that separate educational facilities were inherently unequal and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision paved the way for the desegregation of public schools and became a catalyst for the broader civil rights movement in the United States.

learn more about Constitution here:

https://brainly.com/question/29799909

#SPJ4

Answer:

Lower voting age

Explanation:

The 26th Amendment to the US Constitution was passed in 1971 to ensure that young Americans who were being drafted to fight in the Vietnam War could vote. It lowered the minimum voting age to 18.

b. The activities of the House Un-American Activities Committee and Senator Joseph McCarthy proved that the government disregarded the rights of the people while ostensibly defending national security.

The acts of Senator Joseph McCarthy and the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) proved that the government violated people' rights while ostensibly defending national security. HUAC and McCarthy led a campaign to find accused communists and Soviet spies in the US during the Cold War, frequently utilising intimidation and terror to accuse innocent individuals of being traitors. This created an atmosphere of mistrust and anxiety that violated people's rights and threatened democratic principles. A more general dread of Soviet influence and the imagined threat of communist infiltration in American culture was mirrored in the acts of the HUAC and McCarthy, which constituted an extreme kind of anti-communist hysteria.

learn more about government here:

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ4

A driver with recent traffic convictions may pay more for insurance because they are considered to be at a higher risk of being involved in an accident.

Insurance companies determine premiums based on the likelihood of the insured filing a claim, and drivers with recent traffic convictions are considered to be a higher risk because they have demonstrated a history of unsafe driving behaviors.

Traffic convictions such as speeding, reckless driving, driving under the influence, or at-fault accidents may result in an increase in insurance premiums. Insurance companies may also check a driver's driving record periodically, and any recent traffic convictions may lead to an increase in premiums.

For such more question on traffic convictions

https://brainly.com/question/15388145

#SPJ4

When hearing a disparate treatment case, the court first tries to rule out the "legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons". Most obvious reasons for rejecting the plaintiff's claim.

This means that the defendant (usually an employer) has the opportunity to present evidence that their actions were based on reasons other than discrimination, such as the plaintiff's performance or qualifications for a particular job.

The burden of proof then shifts back to the plaintiff to show that the defendant's proffered reasons are merely a pretext for discrimination.

Disparate treatment is a type of employment discrimination that occurs when an employer treats an employee or group of employees less favorably because of their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability status.

When an employee alleges that they have been subjected to disparate treatment, they must first establish a prima facie case.

To know more about disparate treatment here:

https://brainly.com/question/9811846

#SPJ4

Halal refers to food and beverages that are permissible according to Islamic dietary laws.

In general, halal food must meet the following criteria:

   The animal must be slaughtered by a Muslim in the name of Allah.

   The animal must be healthy and free from disease at the time of slaughter.

   The animal must be killed with a swift cut to the throat with a sharp knife.

   The blood must be completely drained from the animal.

   The meat must be handled and prepared according to Islamic guidelines.

Some common examples of halal food include:

   Meat from animals that have been slaughtered according to Islamic guidelines (beef, lamb, chicken, goat, etc.)

   Fish and seafood

   Fruits and vegetables

   Dairy products (milk, cheese, yogurt, etc.) that are made with halal ingredients and do not contain any animal-derived rennet

   Grains and legumes (rice, wheat, barley, lentils, etc.)

   Eggs from chickens that have been fed a halal diet

It's important to note that not all food products are automatically halal, and some may contain ingredients or additives that are not permissible under Islamic dietary laws. Therefore, it's important to check the ingredients list or look for halal certification labels to ensure that a particular food product is halal approved.

For such more question on halal food

https://brainly.com/question/30787965

#SPJ4

In the United States, women received the right to vote in b) 1920. After decades of battle by the women's suffrage movement, the US Constitution's 19th Amendment, which gave women the right to vote, was ratified on August 18, 1920.

A key component of democracy is the freedom to vote, which enables people to take part in politics and influence how their government is governed. It is a fundamental human right and the cornerstone of democratic nations. The right to vote has not always been guaranteed; historically, many groups, including women, minorities, and people of low wealth, have experienced prolonged suffrage denial. Voting rights have, however, been extended to a larger spectrum of people thanks to the hard work of activists and campaigners, ensuring that more voices can be heard and reflected in the political sphere. Voting rights are still an essential feature of democratic governance and civic engagement today.

Learn more about  right to vote here:

https://brainly.com/question/17700963

#SPJ4

Officials in order to avoid disastrous and costly mistakes; want information that reduces uncertainty and the likelihood of unpleasant surprises for the public therefore lawmakers collect information about public policies.

Lawmakers make laws and statutes for the common public and in order to deliver laws in favor and with expectation of public needs lawmakers collect information through open surveys about public policies, so that the new laws can be much more efficient and effective to use. It also helps in reducing nasty surprises to the public which may cause havoc in the public, all the laws are framed keeping the interest of the common public protecting their rights, welfare and maintaining peace and harmony in the state.

Know more about "lawmakers" visit

brainly.com/question/4178282

#SPJ4

The belief that is the defining characteristic of pluralism is that it encourages a diversity of political opinion.

In political science, pluralism is the idea that power in modern democracies should not be held by a single elite or group of elites, but rather should be distributed among a range of economic and ideological pressure groups.

According to pluralism, diverse functional or cultural groups within a community, such as religious organisations, labour unions, professional associations, and racial minorities, should be allowed to exercise their autonomy.

A political concept known as pluralism asserts that people of various backgrounds, ideologies, and lifestyles can live in harmony and equally participate in politics.

To know more about pluralism, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/20712075

#SPJ4

Otpion B: The sales price of the property or the way in which the price will be determined, is the valid element for option contract.

An offer made to purchase a piece of real estate without an obligation to buy it is what we call an option contract. It gives a choice to the lease to which the contract is attached to buy it in the future. This type of contract also contain an element which discusses about the sales price of the property. Hence, option B is correct.

A promise that satisfies the criteria for the creation of a contract and restricts the promisor's ability to rescind an offer is known as an option contract, or simply option. Normally, an offeree can pay money for the contract or provide value in another way, as by delivering additional performance or forbearance, to provide consideration for the option contract.

To know more about an option contract, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/29572630

#SPJ4

The term commonly used to describe a situation where two countries get as close as possible to going to war before stopping is "brinksmanship."

"A brinkmanship" is the word used to describe a scenario in which two nations are extremely near to engaging in military combat but finally decide against it. A perilous situation is pushed to the verge of collapse as part of the tactic known as "brinkmanship" in international affairs. It entails conducting dangerous activities or issuing threats in an effort to persuade the opposing party to back down or concede. It is hoped that the threat of conflict will terrify the other side into acceding to the demands. But, if one side underestimates the other's readiness to use force, brinkmanship can quickly turn into a full-fledged conflict.

Learn more about war here:

https://brainly.com/question/3445478

#SPJ4

The first important difference between a sublease and an assignment is that in an assignment, responsibility for the original lease is completely transferred to the assignee.

This means that the assignee takes on all rights and obligations under the original lease contract and the original tenant has no further responsibility for fulfillment of the lease. In a sublease, on the other hand, the original tenant retains primary responsibility for performance of the original lease contract.

This means that the original tenant still has some responsibility for fulfillment of the lease, even after subleasing the right to occupy the property to another tenant.

To know more about lease contract go to

https://brainly.com/question/29380983

#SPJ4

As interrogation without counsel throughout a crucial stage of the case violates the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel, the court should exclude the defendant's admission of the theft.

It is likely that the court will determine that the defendant's rights under the Sixth Amendment were violated. Every "critical stage" of a criminal prosecution, including any police questioning after the defendant has been accused of a crime, is covered by the Sixth Amendment's assurance that the defendant has the right to legal representation. The police questioned the defendant in this case while he was already on trial for arson for a similar theft. Due to the denial of the defendant's right to legal representation, the confession acquired during that questioning may be deemed inadmissible.

learn more about court here:

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ4

A defendant was on trial for arson of an office building. During the trial, the police officers who initially arrested him began to suspect that the defendant was also responsible for a theft of several computers that took place in the office building on the same night as the arson. One evening during the arson trial, the police visited the defendant in jail, read him his Miranda rights, and began to question him about the theft. The defendant eventually confessed, and the police informed the prosecutor of his confession. The prosecutor later wants to charge the defendant with theft, using the statement that was obtained by the police in the jail. The defendant's attorney objects on the grounds that the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights were violated. The court should:

Ultimately, the success of the plaintiff's workers' compensation case will depend on a variety of factors, including the strength of the evidence, the legal arguments presented, and the decisions of the judge or jury assigned to the case.

Generally, Based on the given information, it appears that the employer's destruction of the business records was accidental and not intentional. Therefore, the plaintiff in this case may not have a cause of action for wrongful destruction of business records under the ruling in Idle v. City Co.

However, the fact that the records were destroyed while the client's workers' compensation case was pending could potentially have an impact on the case. Without access to the business records, it may be more difficult to establish the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, the nature of her job duties, and other relevant information that could support her claim.

As the plaintiff's attorney, it would be important to thoroughly investigate the circumstances surrounding the destruction of the records, and to gather as much evidence as possible to support the client's case. This could include obtaining witness statements, reviewing any available documentation, and working with experts to establish the plaintiff's injuries and other relevant factors.

Read more about workers' compensation case.

https://brainly.com/question/28432146

#SPJ1

13:30 in military time on a 12-hour clock, time is equal to 1:30 PM in standard time. The 24-hour time format, which has been embraced by the military, first responders, and hospital time settings, is utilized by the military and other organizations around the world (not just the military).

As expressed in 24-hour time (military time), 12:00 am is 0000, or "0 hundred hours." The time is pronounced as "zero one hundred hours" at 1:00 am, or 0100. The remaining hours, from 12:00 AM to noon on a 12-hour clock, correspond to those between 0000 AM and 1200 AM. So, 12:00 am equals 0000 hours, and 1:00 am equals 0100 hours.

The standard of timekeeping in which the day extends from midnight to midnight and is split into 24 hours is known as the modern 24-hour clock or military time in the United States. The hours (and minutes) since midnight, from 0(:00) to 23 represent this (:59). The international standard ISO 8601 uses this system, which is more frequently used than the 12-hour clock in the modern world.

To learn more about military time, click below:

https://brainly.com/question/30387466

#SPJ4

One result of Muller v. Oregon was that women were still considered weak, dependent, and incapable of enjoying the same economic rights as men. - True

Despite the fact that Muller v. Oregon was an important Supreme Court case that contributed to the establishment of some rights for women in the workplace, the ruling for the case was founded in part on the idea that women were weaker and less competent than men. Because people thought that women were more prone to health problems and other negative effects of long working hours, the state once created a rule that limited the number of hours that they might work in certain professions.

Curt Muller, the proprietor of a laundry who had been penalised for breaking the law, contested the law, and the matter ultimately reached the Supreme Court. The Court had then upheld the statute in its ruling, citing worries for the health and well-being of female workers. But, the Court's decision also included some of the then-dominant viewpoints on the capabilities and restrictions of women.

Read more about Muller v. Oregon on:

https://brainly.com/question/2899136

#SPJ4

The return policy of the American Eagles company states that there is no limit related to time as such for returning the product and getting a refund for the same if the consumer is not satisfied with the products that they have purchased from the company.

The return policy can be taken into interpretation as the policy offered by a company to accept its products being returned to it by the consumers, wherein the company is under an obligation to provide a refund for the same to their customers. This policy is usually provided by the company to protect its consumers against any manufacturing defects, or malfunctioning of the products.

Learn more about return policy here:

https://brainly.com/question/14337606

#SPJ4

The statement "The public's right to know via the media does not conflict with the victim's right to privacy" is false.

Whenever a person suffers a crime, its identity is safeguarded from media so as to protect their rights, but the facts of cases can't be concealed until personal or private in order spread awareness among the masses. The UN Declaration recognized the major components of the rights of victims of crime: 1. access to justice and fair treatment; 2. restitution 3. compensation in the form of money or job that can secure the future of the victims from society; 4. rehabilitation or assistance throughout the legal process and right to protection of privacy and safety.

Know more about "right to privacy" visit

brainly.com/question/1145825

#SPJ4

The US Justice Department may disapprove of reciprocity because it could compromise the country's legal system and sovereignty, lead to a race to the bottom in legal standards, or be used for political coercion or retaliation.

Reciprocity is a practice where one country recognizes and enforces the legal judgments of another country within its own jurisdiction. While reciprocity is not strictly illegal, the US Justice Department may disapprove of it because it could compromise the country's legal system and sovereignty. This could happen if the US recognizes the judgments of a country with a weak legal system or poor human rights record, which could put the US in the position of enforcing judgments that do not meet its legal standards or values.

Additionally, reciprocity could lead to a race to the bottom in terms of legal standards, where countries lower their legal standards to gain recognition from the US. Finally, reciprocity could be used as a tool for political coercion or retaliation, where the US is expected to recognize all judgments of a country as a political favor, even if they do not meet US legal standards. For these reasons, the US Justice Department may disapprove of reciprocity and may prefer to rely on other mechanisms for international legal cooperation.

learn more about justice department at :

https://brainly.com/question/16047810

#SPJ4