the image of rosie the riveter inspired woman to

Answer:

The Carolingian Empire weakened after the death of Charlemagne. The empire was divided into three parts, ruled by Charlemagne's grandsons. The middle of the three kingdoms was weak and was absorbed by the eastern and western kingdoms. These two kingdoms would emerge as the modern countries of France and Germany.

Option 2. President Harry favored a limited war because Truman ruled out huge commitments of troops and atomic weapons.

This was due to the fact that the army general was in favor of an all out war at the expense of a lot of commitment.

The president wanted to limit the war because they he did not want to jeopardize the life of people and resources.

Read more on Harry Truman here:

https://brainly.com/question/14920954

#SPJ1

Answer: Truman ruled out huge commitments of troops and atomic weapons.

Explanation: Gradpoint

It was the official name of the Lewis and Clark Expedition.

The bill of rights was an unusual document for its day because it was excluded by the Federalists as they felt it was unnecessary.

The idea that a bill of rights was required was denied by federalists. They made a point of differentiating the U.S. Constitution from state constitutions.

Federalists claimed that all rights and powers that were not expressly reserved to the people were transferred to the state when the people created their state constitutions, using the language of the social compact. Even personal and private matters were subject to extensive state government regulation.

However, according to the U.S. Constitution, any rights and powers that were not expressly assigned to the federal government were retained by the people or the states. In essence, nothing was reserved that was not surrendered.

Only clearly delegated authority, firmly confined to the national interest, was granted to the United States government.

To learn more about the bill of rights refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/10618576

#SPJ1

The abolitionist and early women’s movements were related because they both aimed at granting the members of their particular groups a free and ultimately better life.

The abolitionist meant the people that wanted to abolish slavery while the women’s movements fought for woman rights especially suffrage right.

However, they are similar because they both aimed at granting the members of their particular groups a free and ultimately better life.

Read more about social movements

brainly.com/question/13062533

#SPJ1

The official who has the power to make appointments, veto laws, grant pardons, and make executive orders is the President of the United States.

The President of the United States is a United States government position that allows an individual to be the head of state and government of the United States for a 4-year presidential term.

The president has the role of leading the executive branch of government. He additionally has other functions that are established in the Constitution of the United States (art. II) such as:

According to the above, it can be inferred that the aforementioned functions belong to the president of the republic.

Learn more about president in: https://brainly.com/question/497462

#SPJ1

Answer:

B. A farmer forces people to work in the fields.

Explanation:

Coerced Labor is when someone is compelled against there will to provide work or service through the use of force, fraud, or coercion. A student doing an assignment is not coerced labor because it is though an education system. A shop owner paying people to work is payed labor which is done voluntarily and with agreed upon compensation. A man who picks up a friend is just a simple favor that he's doing because of his personal connection with the person which is done freely. Finally a farmer who is forcing people to work for him is the answer because they are doing it out of force rather than of free will or with compensation.

The efficiency gap measure of gerrymandering, which involves placing voters into electoral districts in a way that increases the wasted votes of one political faction and decreases the wasted votes of the other, is based on wasted votes.

By drawing electoral district lines to benefit certain political interests inside legislative bodies, a technique known as gerrymandering, districts are frequently created that have twisted, tangled boundaries rather than compact ones.  It is the process of redistricting legislative districts to suit the ruling political party.

Because the ruling party will do all it takes to increase the advantage of its rival in its stronger districts, gerrymandering has an unintended negative impact on congressional elections.

This is unjust because it gives some voters less sway than others, skews the vote in one direction, prolongs the tenure of the incumbent, and increases the likelihood that members of the incumbent's party will win office in subsequent elections.

To learn more about Gerrymandering refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/20524077

#SPJ1

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Blackboard is a grade database.

Leading the progressive movement, Roosevelt promoted his "Square Deal" domestic initiatives.

Following an examination of the meat packing industry, Theodore Roosevelt backed the creation of the Pure Food and Drug Act. He dismantled a monopoly by utilizing the Sherman Antitrust Act as well. By 1901, state borders could no longer contain the reform upheaval. Furthermore, solutions were urgently needed for some issues that only the federal government seemed to be able to handle.

Roosevelt led his supporters out of the Republican convention after becoming convinced that his nomination had been stolen by the establishment. The Progressive ("Bull Moose") Party was established in August, with Roosevelt chosen to serve as its leader. The reform Republican governor of California, Hiram Johnson, was chosen as Roosevelt's running mate.

To learn more about Roosevelt refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/12931978

#SPJ1

if you can its so important for you to say after the second term George Washington gave up power for the sake of democracy which in those days didnt really happen. revolutionaries and kings didnt give up power. but washington did for the sake of the system : democracy

its very super important that he did that

he took a huge risk fighting without everyones support

he started a war with england not knowing if everyone was on board with american independence. there were a lot of people who thought being with england was better...so he took a huge risk fighting without everyones support

what makes america & washington different from european democracy and revolutions is that american has political freedom and CULTURAL & ECONOMIC freedom. europeans felt the people could NOT be trusted to make the right decisions. in europe revolutions sometimes meant no religion or only a few allowed. Washington & founders said ALL religions are ok. Washington felt the people could be trusted. in europe it meant in economics : communism or socialism with heavy state or monarchical intervention. but america has had capitalism which is a form of freedom. to business without the kings permission and without the permission of the state. Boston tea party is an example

point of the second amendment and of the founding fathers like washington was to NOT have a standing army because it was thought of as a risk of being undemocratic. it was thought to make those in power might possibly use a standing army to stay in power illegally. to not have an army was a very new and unusual step for a country to take. in the case of war a draft would be used to create an army and after a war was done the army was supposed to be disbanded. this was not done anywhere else and the idea was revolutionary.

many european democracies have CHANGED their constitutions more than once. America has not changed it since the 1700's

washington and other founders made a special provision in the consitution for a freedom of the press

Answer:

“A good friend will always stab you in the front.”

- Oscar Wilde

Answer: C. A Caste System

Explanation: The caste system, which keeps people in strict social classes, was brought to India by the Aryans.

Henry Clay, a negotiator at Ghent and one of the greatest political actors of his age, summed up three points that the United States had gained from the treaty of Ghent.

1-The British reputation had suffered at Ghent, not the Americans

2- By standing up singlehandedly to the mightiest power on Earth, the United States had established its national character

3- In the ordeal of war and peace, the republican government born of the Revolution had met the crucial test

In addition I would add a few other points. The powerful Indian nations of the Southwest and Northwest that had been able to play off off rival Western powers against each other for generations lay defeated. The United States was able to acquire large amounts of territory in the Southwest, which can be seen here. Secondly while the United States filibusters had failed in their attempts to acquire East Florida, they managed to hold onto West Florida. The late war victories ushered in a degree of unprecedented nationalism leading to the drastic expansion of Federal power far exceeding the Federalist era of 1788-1800, many of these programs are difficult to explain absent a new emerging American nationalism, which can be read more in The Awakening of American Nationalism: 1815 - 1828 by George Dangerfield. Some of these new institutions and programs included but are not limited to: The Second Bank of the United States ( similar to the first but on more Republican principles), The drastic expansion of the United States Navy in 1817, the first protective tariff in American history to protect growing American industry, Federal support for the colonization society, the first Federal pension. Others have argued that the war increased the pace of liberalization within the United States and increased the pace of the market revolution (a term no longer in favor) see The Republic Reborn: War and the Making of Liberal America, 1790-1820.

To expand a bit, what was the point of the whole affair? Was it really about impressment of American sailors into the British navy, which is the only reason I remember for the war from high school

In short no it wasn't just about impressment. Until 1811 in fact the main point of contention between the United States and Britain had been over trade issues. A cornerstone of Republican ideology for both Madison and Jefferson was that free ships made free goods, and that the free transfer of goods around the world would serve as a carrier for Republicanism. The ongoing wars in Europe had resulted in both France and Britain imposing sanctions on neutral vessels, the United States was one of the largest merchant states in the western world and the largest neutral carrier and the restrictions fell hard on the Republic. Events like the Chesapeake-leopard affair hardened attitudes in the United States towards Britain.Moreover Britain had grown fearful over the dramatic expansion of the American merchant fleet, and while willing to give concessions to smaller carriers like Sweden, was not willing to do so for the United States. You also had British support for the native peoples in the Northwest. Finally political relations between Republicans and Federalists had grown increasingly hostile, and Britain was viewed as popularly supporting the Federalist minority, see America on the Brink:How the Political Struggle Over the War of 1812 Almost Destroyed the Young Republic for the struggle between Federalists and Republicans that is particularly harsh on the Federalist for Anglo-American relations see Bradford Perkins Prologue to War:Prologue to War: England and the United States, 1805-1812.

Did the US "win" the war? I always had the impression that the British mainly couldn't be bothered to fight much (being busy with the whole Napoleon thing) and the victories the US achieved (USS Constitution, Lake Champlain, New Orleans) were not that strategically significant.

Through the details of the excerpt "It's Our World Too! Young People Who Are Making a Difference," the author's purpose is C. encouraging the reader to believe in something.

The author's purpose or theme is the main or central idea or underlying meaning of a story.

Some authors convey the theme of a story using the following literary elements:

In Phillip Hoose's "It's Our World Too! Young People Who Are Making a Difference," young readers are encouraged to do something about what they believe in.  This means that the book encourages young people to constructively work for change.  They should not be passive.

Thus, in "It's Our World Too! Young People Who Are Making a Difference," the author's purpose or theme is C. encouraging the reader to believe in something.

Learn more about the theme of the story at https://brainly.com/question/25336781

#SPJ1

Answer:

B

Explanation:

His actions led to the glorious revolution... which was basically him being overthrown and replaced by his daughter Mary and her husband William of Orange

Answer:

Candidates utilized TV to reach voters. Television is an easy way to do so since it's already in people's homes, unlike newspapers. The candidate performs some work while being displayed on TV, but the media consultant controls the picture given to voters.

They make sure candidates don't do anything on TV to hurt their image. Nixon's media advisor was exceedingly careful when he went on TV. Nixon avoided spontaneous press conferences. He was present in rehearsed talks to safeguard his image. Another example is President Ronald Reagan, who appeared on TV with a tractor, making him popular with the working class. Candidates stage how they appear and use TV to promote their message.

Explanation:

This is my point-of-view feel free to alter.

If this answer is helpful, please click the thanks button below.

Answer:

It would be an oracle since they were warriors as they were in tier 3 and fulfilled the role of a healer and bard however in my career I never came across that IF Druids are associated with Bards.

Explanation:

If I am wrong I am sorry.

The inference that can be drawn about the Cold War is that the United States wanted to remain powerful and did not want the Soviet Union to increase its power base.

This refers to the conflict that existed between the Soviet Union and the United States about the spread of communism and this led to economic sanctions and many other non-violent tactics by both sides.

Hence, we can see that the conflict almost escalated to a crescendo during the Cuban Missile Crisis when the Soviets kept weapons with strike capabilities to the United States in Cuba.

Read more about the Cold War here:

https://brainly.com/question/856013

#SPJ1

Answer:Yes, I drew original inferences based on the information I was presented.

What is information?

Information is the knowledge and understanding gained through study or experience. It is data that has been collected, organized, and presented in an understandable format. Information is used to make decisions, solve problems, and increase understanding. It is also used to educate, entertain, and influence people's actions and decisions.

This activity helped me better understand the history of the Cold War by illustrating the impact it had on US domestic policies, as well as the ways in which the US attempted to counter the spread of communism and the Soviet Union's influence. I was especially challenged by the complexity of the foreign policy decisions and the multiple levels at which they were made. I also gained a new appreciation for the amount of work and resources that went into creating and maintaining the Cold War.

Explanation:

So, the term "Manifest Destiny" refers to the belief that the United States was not only capable of, but also destined to, extend from coast to coast during the 19th century period of American development. This attitude helped fuel western settlement, Native American removal and war with Mexico. It implies that everything we are going to accomplish has already been planned.

Some of the cons of Manifest Destiny are Native American tribes being massacred, Mexico being forced into war and suffering a humiliating defeat in 1849, the United States continued its involvement further into Latin America, and Manifest Destiny continued into Hawaii and Asian continent.

The Native Americans had little regard for Manifest Destiny; whether they were vanquished and displaced by the United States or by Mexico made little difference to them.  California, Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona were taken from Mexico as a result of the American war with Mexico and the doctrine of Manifest Destiny. Because Mexico's ties with the Native Americans were as terrible as those of the United States of America, the Native Americans would have been just as badly off if Mexico had held that land. The majority of the Apache chief Goyaale's war career was spent battling Mexico rather than the USA. He is better known to us by his Spanish name Geronimo. Similar to how the entrance of the Americans did, the Spanish and subsequently Mexican missions in California brought with them sickness, dispossession, and forced labor. Whether California is controlled by Mexico or the United States, if gold is discovered there, the entire globe will swarm there, bringing sickness and bloodshed to the unfortunate locals. Mexican forces continued to put down Native American uprisings in Chiapas as late as 1994.

The transcontinental railroad, though, is the unpredictable factor. Mexico lacked the industrial might of the United States and would have found it challenging to construct its own railroads into the West. On the other hand, it might have hired American businesses to construct railways, which would have prevented Mexico from being delayed by the divisions that America experienced (the North wanted a northern transcontinental railroad, the South wanted a southern one, which was the main reason it took until after the Civil War to get it built). Because they control how rapidly the bison herds are wiped out, railways have a big impact on how quickly the Native Americans are vanquished. The construction of the transcontinental railroad and the terrible loss of Native American sovereignty may happen much sooner or much later than they did historically if Manifest Destiny were not a factor.

The three statements that accurately describe the beliefs of the members of the American Indian Movement in the 1970s are options B., D., and E. They are:

The American Indian Movement (AIM) is a Native American homebased movement founded in July 1968 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, initially centered in urban areas to address systemic issues of poverty, discrimination, and police brutality against Native Americans.

Therefore, the correct answers are options B., D., and E.

learn more about American Indian Movement: https://brainly.com/question/863447

#SPJ1

From the excerpt the statements that correctly describes the beliefs of the American Indian movement was that

This was the movement that was started by the Indigenous native Americans based on the fact that they believed that the United States had not being fair to the Indians.

The movement was started as a way of ensuring that the Indians got their rights in America.

Read more on the  American Indian movement here:

https://brainly.com/question/863447

#SPJ1

Answer: They’re both composed of human beings.

They both have millenary cultures.

They both suffered under european imperialism.

Their native populations both have genes in the A haplogroups (although Mexico is actually about half R1b dominant).

They both had advancements in math (and Astronomy, in Mexico’s case) that matched or exceeded what was available in Europe at the time.

Ah, maybe one more. There’s a lot of chinatowns in Mexico because Mexico has always had Chinese in-migration, but one in particular is the largest: Mexicali, Baja California, is a very chinese city in Mexico.

Other than that, everything else is different. Everything.

Answer: During the scientific revolution, the scientific method provided a way of proving the truth of some theses discredited by skepticism.

Explanation: The scientific method allowed scientists to repeat and verify the work of others.

Earmarks , Unrequested Funding. At the broadest level, unrequested funding is any extra funding provided by Congress -- in either bill or report language -- for activities/projects/programs not asked by the Administration. Earmarks are a subset of uninvited funding. The distinction between earmarks and unrequested funding is programmatic command or lack thereof of in the allocation process.

When a government's payments on goods, services, or transfer payments exceed their tax revenue, the government has run a budget deficit. Governments borrow money to pay for budget deficits, and whenever a government borrows money, this counts to its national debt.

Main Drivers of Debt. Varying demographics of an aging population, increasing healthcare costs, and rapidly growing interest payments are the main drivers of U.S. debt.

To learn more about Earmarks, refer

https://brainly.com/question/2197830

#SPJ9

The Articles of Confederation created a national government composed of a Congress, which had the power to declare war, appoint military officers, sign treaties, make alliances, appoint foreign ambassadors, and manage relations with Indians.

This is further explained below.

Generally, It was established by the Articles of Confederation that the Congress had the authority to declare war, select military commanders, form treaties and alliances, appoint foreign ambassadors, and regulate relations with the Indians.

In conclusion, The Congress, which was given the authority to declare war, select military commanders, sign treaties, form alliances, name foreign ambassadors, and regulate relations with Indians, was the national government established under the Articles of Confederation.

Read more about the Article of Confederation

https://brainly.com/question/13608970

#SPJ1