Answer:
Nile
Explanation:
What view of the status of slavery in the territories was expressed in the Wilmot Proviso, Calhoun Resolutions, and Popular Sovereignty?
The Wilmot Proviso sought to ban slavery in the territories, the Calhoun Resolutions argued that Congress had no authority to regulate slavery in the territories, and Popular Sovereignty proposed that the issue of slavery should be decided by the settlers themselves.
The Wilmot Proviso, Calhoun Resolutions, and Popular Sovereignty all expressed different views on the status of slavery in the territories during the mid-19th century in the United States.
The Wilmot Proviso was a proposed amendment to a military appropriations bill in 1846 that sought to ban slavery in any territory acquired by the United States from Mexico as a result of the Mexican-American War. The Wilmot Proviso represented the view of many Northern lawmakers who opposed the expansion of slavery into new territories, seeing it as a threat to the balance of power between free and slave states. The Proviso was not passed into law, but it set the stage for a heated debate over the expansion of slavery.
The Calhoun Resolutions, introduced by Senator John C. Calhoun of South Carolina in 1847, asserted that Congress had no constitutional authority to regulate slavery in the territories. Calhoun argued that Congress could not deprive citizens of their property rights in slaves, and that any attempt to do so would be a violation of the Constitution. The Calhoun Resolutions represented the view of many Southern lawmakers who saw slavery as a vital part of their economy and way of life.
Popular Sovereignty, which was championed by Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois in the mid-1850s, proposed that the issue of whether to allow or prohibit slavery in a territory should be decided by the settlers themselves, rather than by Congress. Douglas argued that this approach would allow for a peaceful resolution of the debate over the expansion of slavery, and would give the people of each territory the power to determine their own fate. However, the concept of Popular Sovereignty proved controversial and ultimately failed to prevent the outbreak of the Civil War.
For more such questions on popular sovereignty
https://brainly.com/question/1853298
#SPJ4
As if having no shelter or no food wasn't enough, the Loyalists also faced the challenge of discrimination from the settlers who lived in The Bahamas as they tried to settle here. Develop and explain this point. Give couple reasons and state source
Answer:
Also try to check if my answer is correct. Source given at the bottom page
Explanation:
FIRST REASON for this discrimination was the economic competition between the Loyalists and the settlers. The Loyalists were often skilled and educated individuals who brought with them valuable resources and knowledge. This made them a threat to the local settlers, who felt that their own economic prospects were threatened by the Loyalists' arrival. As a result, the settlers sought to limit the Loyalists' access to land, resources, and opportunities, which further perpetuated the cycle of poverty and discrimination.
SECOND REASON for this discrimination was cultural differences between the Loyalists and the settlers. The Loyalists were often of British origin and brought with them a different set of customs and values. This made them stand out in The Bahamas, and many settlers viewed them with suspicion and hostility. The Loyalists were also often associated with the British government, which was seen as an oppressor by many of the settlers who had fought for their own independence.
Source: "Loyalists in The Bahamas" by Dr. Gail Saunders, published in The Bahamas Historical Society Journal, Volume 21 (October 1999).
What spawned the rise of interpretive journalism in the 1930s and 1940s?
a. Journalists' desire to do more creative reporting
b. The expensive nature of objective reporting
c. The world's increasing complexity
d. None of the above options is correct.
e. The success of the New York Times
The development of honest reporting in the 20th century began with yellow journalism in the 1890s.
Is a career in journalism desirable?The challenging field of journalism is crucial to the development of the nation.In order to excel in their job, modern journalists specialize in niche areas including money, education, legal, engineering, politics, sports, and science.
The finest degree for journalism is...Which degree program in journalism should you pursue? A journalism bachelor's degree is the best place to start if you are just starting your career with in news profession. A master's degree, however, can be something you want to think about if you have some work experience and are advancing in your career.
To know more about journalism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29115224
#SPJ1
Who was Cecil Rhodes? What role did he play in promoting British imperialism in the south of Africa?
Cecil Rhodes, a British politician, businessman, and mining tycoon who lived from 1853 to 1902 was instrumental in advancing the British empire in southern Africa.
One of the primary players in the colonization of what is now Zimbabwe and Zambia was Rhodes. In addition to founding the British South Africa Company (BSAC), which received a royal charter from Queen Victoria and was given control over the territories of contemporary Zambia and Zimbabwe,
He also founded the De Beers diamond company, which rose to become the largest diamond mining company in the world. Rhodes pursued his imperialist objectives using his enormous riches and political clout.
He made agreements with African rulers that gave the British permission to conquer their territories, and he employed military force to crush local resistance. Also, he promoted the British colonization of the area, which resulted in the uprooting of African populations.
To know more about Cecil Rhodes
brainly.com/question/2861515
#SPJ4
Describe a barrier to democratization that is common to two (2) of the six countries being studied. (US AND CHINA)
Answer:
communist and socialist countries
Explanation:
One barrier to democratization that is common to both the United States and China is the concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals or institutions.
A barrier to democratization in US and ChinaIn the United States, the two-party system and the influence of money in politics often limit the ability of new or alternative voices to enter the political arena. The concentration of power among the wealthiest individuals and corporations can also limit the representation of marginalized groups and exacerbate income inequality.
Additionally, the Electoral College system can result in a candidate winning the presidency without winning the popular vote, which some argue undermines the principle of democratic representation.
In China, the concentration of power is even more pronounced, with the Communist Party holding a monopoly on political power. The Chinese government tightly controls the media and restricts freedom of speech and assembly, which limits the ability of citizens to participate in the political process. The lack of free and fair elections means that the Chinese people have limited opportunities to hold their leaders accountable or to shape the direction of the country.
In both the United States and China, the concentration of power in the hands of a few can limit the ability of citizens to fully participate in the democratic process and can undermine the principles of representation and accountability that are essential to democratic governance.
Read more on democratization here:https://brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ1
Please help me
Using the transcript of Brown's speech to the court attached below (the David Stathairn video is embedded for review) , address the following prompt in a well-written essay:
What elements of Brown's speech do you think were persuasive enough to lead to a change in thinking on slavery of Americans, at the time the speech was delivered? Cite textual evidence to support your choices.
Write your five-paragraph essay in a Word document. Make sure to double space your document and use Times New Roman, 14 point font.
I have, may it please the Court, a few words to say.
In the first place, I deny every thing but what I have already admitted, of a design on my
part to free Slaves. I intended, certainly, to have made a clean thing of that matter, as I did last
winter, when I went into Missouri, and there took Slaves, without the snapping of a gun on either
side, moving them through the country, and finally leaving them in Canada. I desired to have
done the same thing again, on a much larger scale. That was all I intended. I never did intend
murder, or treason, or the destruction of property, or to excite or incite Slaves to rebellion, or to
make insurrection.
I have another objection, and that is, that it is unjust that I should suffer such a penalty.
Had I interfered in the manner, and which I admit has been fairly proved, – for I admire the
truthfulness and candor of the greater portion of the witnesses who have testified in this case, –
had I so interfered in behalf of the Rich, the Powerful, the Intelligent, the so–called Great, or in
behalf of any of their friends, either father, mother, brother, sister, wife, or children, or any of
that class, and suffered and sacrificed what I have in this interference, it would have been all
right. Every man in this Court would have deemed it an act worthy a reward, rather than a
punishment.
This Court acknowledges too, as I suppose, the validity of the LAW OF GOD. I saw a
book kissed, which I suppose to be the BIBLE, or at least the NEW TESTAMENT, which teaches me that, "All things whatsoever I would that men should do to me, I should do even so to
them." It teaches me further, to "Remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them." I
endeavored to act up to that instruction. I say I am yet too young to understand that GOD is any
respecter of persons. I believe that to have interfered as I have done, as I have always freely
admitted I have done, in behalf of his despised poor, I have done no wrong, but RIGHT. Now, if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life, for the furtherance of the ends
of justice, and MINGLE MY BLOOD FURTHER WITH THE BLOOD OF MY CHILDREN,
and with the blood of millions in this Slave country, whose rights are disregarded by wicked,
cruel, and unjust enactments, – I say; LET IT BE DONE.
Let me say one word further: I feel entirely satisfied with the treatment I have received on
my trial. Considering all the circumstances, it has been more generous than I expected; but I feel
no consciousness of guilt. I have stated from the first what was my intention, and what was not.
I never had any design against the liberty of any person, nor any disposition to commit treason,
or excite Slaves to rebel, or make any general insurrection. I never encouraged any man to do
so, but always discouraged any idea of that kind.
Let me say something, also, in regard to the statements made by some of those who were
connected with me. I hear that it has been stated by some of them, that I have induced them to
join me; but the contrary is true. I do not say this to injure them, but as regarding their weakness.
Not one but joined me of his own accord, and the greater part at their own expense. A number of
them I never saw and never had a word of conversation with, till the day they came to me, and
that was for the purpose I have stated. Now I have done.
– John Brown
Who do Queen Victoria, Kaiser Wilhelm I, and the Chinese representative appear to look more cartoonish than these other figures?
The cartoon is intended to highlight these countries' imperialist tendencies toward China: Caricatures of several foreign leaders are dividing a cake that represents China.
Who was queen Victoria ?The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was ruled by Victoria (Alexandrina Victoria; 24 May 1819 – 22 January 1901) from 20 June 1837 until her demise in 1901. The Victorian era, which began during her 63-year and 216-day reign, was the longest ever for a British monarch.
Throughout the United Kingdom, it was a time of significant industrial, political, scientific, and military development, which was accompanied by a significant British Imperial expansion. She was given the extra title of Empress of India by a decision of the British Parliament in 1876.
Learn more about Queen Victoria, from:
brainly.com/question/4693482
#SPJ1
What was the main issue of the Republican Party in 1854?
Answer:
The Republican Party formed primarily as opposition to the Democratic Party. It consisted mainly of antislavery Whigs, whose party had dissolved by the end of 1854 due to conflict over the issue of slavery, the work of anti-slavery Democrats, and members of the Free-Soil Party.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
what the greek goddesses and gods were like and unlike humans guided reading
Greek mythology played a significant role in ancient peoples' daily lives. Their culture and ceremonies were founded on these tales.
The ancient Greeks practiced polytheism, which is a religion in which they worshiped multiple deities. Each god was given a certain aspect of life or concept to stand for. The gods were viewed as embodiments of their ideas. Major deities with greater strength than other gods existed.
Impressive gods who dominated over their weaker contemporaries included the Titans and the Olympians. The Titans were Gaia's offspring. Up until the Olympians overthrew them, they dominated the universe. The group of significant gods depicted in ancient Greek mythology is known as the Greek pantheon.
To learn more about the Greek mythology follow the link: https://brainly.com/question/16000352
#SPJ4
What was the Romans' attitude toward Christianity before A.D. 313?
Romans' attitude toward Christianity before A.D. 313 was generally negative as Christianity was a very new religion and people saw Christianity as strange religion.
The rulers of roman during that time saw Christianity as a threat to their rule and power in the longer term. Christians were generally treated very harshly and they were subjected to torture and execution.
Nero who was emperor of Rome during the 1st century was infamous for his execution of Christians for their beliefs. Even after many executions of Christians, it spread like wildfire, especially among lower classes and particularly among slaves. It was the Edict of Milan in A.D. 313 that recognized Christianity.
To know more about the origin of Christianity -
brainly.com/question/11578816
#SPJ4
the german artist, ________, was a skilled printmaker as well as painter.
The german artist, Albrecht Düre was a skilled printmaker as well as painter.
Dürer, who flourished during the Renaissance, is regarded as one of history's finest artists. He was renowned for his paintings of portraiture, religious themes, and mythical topics as well as for his deft use of perspective and attention to detail. Moreover, Dürer was a prolific printer who created engravings and woodcuts that had a significant impact on the evolution of printing as an art form. He frequently included religious and mythical subjects in his prints, in addition to landscapes and people. The art of the Northern Renaissance was greatly influenced by Dürer, and his work is still studied and revered today. Dürer was raised by his father, a goldsmith, and started his career as an apprentice. He was born in Nuremberg, Germany. He then pursued painting training.
For such more questions on Albrecht Düre :
brainly.com/question/14902369
#SPJ4
When the young Shawnee Chief Tecumseh witnessed more and more of his tribe dying out, he A suggested signing a peace treaty with white AmericansB begged his people to not give up without a fightс took his fight to the Supreme CourtD sold the remainder of his land and headed west
begged his people to not give up without a fight. so the option B is the correct answer.
When the young Shawnee Chief Tecumseh witnessed more and more of his tribe dying out, he did not suggest signing a peace treaty with white Americans or take his fight to the Supreme Court or sell the remainder of his land and head west. Instead, he urged his people to resist the encroachment of white settlers and to unite with other Native American tribes to form a pan-Indian confederation to protect their lands and way of life. Tecumseh believed that Native Americans should reject the ways of the white man and return to their traditional customs and beliefs. He is known for his efforts to unite the tribes and for his role in the Battle of Tippecanoe in 1811.
learn more about Battle of Tippecanoe here
https://brainly.com/question/30551930
#SPJ4
The above information is describing the qualifications to be a
a
senator.
b
governor.
c
representative.
d
supreme court justice.
The material up top outlines the requirements to become a senator.
Quizlet: What are the top three requirements to be a senator?must be at least 30 years old, residents of the states from which they are elected, and citizens of the United States for at least nine years.
Which of the following is a formal requirement for Senate service?A senator must be at least thirty years old, a citizen of the United States for at least nine years, and a resident of the state they will be representing when elected, according to the Constitution.
Which of the following about the quizlet's requirements for senators is true?Senators are required to be citizens of the state they serve.
To Know more about Constitution.
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
who was the person most responsible for bringing independence to mexico by 1821?
The person most responsible for bringing independence to Mexico by 1821 was Father Miguel Hidalgo.
Father Miguel Hidalgo is widely regarded as the driving force behind Mexico's independence from Spain in 1821. A Catholic priest, Hidalgo's most notable act of resistance against Spanish colonial rule was issuing the Grito de Dolores, a rallying call to the people of Mexico to rise up against their Spanish rulers.
Hidalgo's success in inspiring the Mexican people to stand up for their independence laid the groundwork for subsequent revolutionaries, and eventually led to Mexico's independence in 1821. His legacy lives on today in Mexico, where Father Miguel Hidalgo is remembered as the most influential figure in the fight for independence.
To know more about Mexico , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29695772
#SPJ4
which is not a goal of life hindu
In Hinduism, the four goals of life, known as purusharthas, are considered important and interconnected.
The ultimate purpose of life, according to Hinduism, is to reach moksha, which is escape from the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth (samsara) and union with the divine (Brahman).
Purusharthas are the four aims of life in Hinduism.
Dharma is the Sanskrit word for righteousness, obligation, and moral order.Artha represents wealth, power, and success.Kama: Pleasure, affection, and physical pleasure.Moksha is the state of being free of the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth.As a result, while all four aims of life are significant in Hinduism, the ultimate goal is Moksha.
For such more question on Hindu:
https://brainly.com/question/24705748
#SPJ4
The following question may be like this:
What is the goal of Hindu?
which banking merger is generally associated with the riegle neal legislation of 1994
The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 is associated with the merger of two major banks in the United States.
The Branching Efficiency act was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on September 29, 1994, and it paved the way for the creation of large, multi-state banks.The merger that is generally associated with the Riegle-Neal legislation of 1994 is the merger of First Union Corp. and First Fidelity Bancorporation. First Union Corp. was a large bank based in Charlotte, North Carolina, while First Fidelity Bancorporation was a banking holding company headquartered in Newark, New Jersey.The merger between First Union Corp. and First Fidelity Bancorporation was significant because it created one of the largest banking organizations in the United States. The combined company had more than 1,700 branches in 11 states and total assets of more than $130 billion.
learn more about Riegle-Neal here:
https://brainly.com/question/15994838
#SPJ4
When the Articles of Confederation was passed, the states were given more power than the national government. Why did this happen?
A. It was an accident that happened when writing the Articles of Confederation.
B. They told the British the government would be set up that way.
C. Americans did not trust strong national governments
D. Thomas Jefferson trusted state governments more than the Federal government.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. Americans did not trust strong national governments.
Explanation:
At the time the Articles of Confederation were drafted and passed in 1781, many Americans were wary of a strong central government that could potentially become too powerful and oppressive, like the British government they had just fought a war against. As a result, the Articles of Confederation gave more power to the states, with a relatively weak central government that had limited authority and no power to tax or regulate commerce. This arrangement was seen as a way to protect individual liberties and prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals or a single governing body.
While the Articles of Confederation ultimately proved ineffective in governing the young United States and were replaced by the Constitution in 1789, the idea of limiting the power of the federal government and protecting individual rights and liberties has remained a fundamental principle of American governance.
Help! What’s the right answer?!?
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Yankel, age 23, who had contracted typhus. Nazi officials often left behind prisoners that were considered too weak or ill to make the march, so Yankel was likely left behind due to his illness.
Answer:
C. Yankel age 23 who contracted typhus
explain briefly why each side in the war thought it was right
When the Civil War began, each of the sides was of the belief that its cause was right and just, as the Southerners believed that they had the right to leave the Union, whereas, the northerners believed that the nation should be unified.
The Civil War is to be taken into general understanding as the war within the United States of America before it became completely unified as a whole. Moreover, the Civil War divided the American society into two different ideologies, the southerners and those from the North. They had differentiated opinions and believed them to be just and righteous.
Learn more about the Civil War here:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ4
Complete question
Explain briefly why each side in the civil war thought it was right.
what were the negative consequences of colonial rule for the african continentA) labor exploitation, B) unfair taxation, C) lack of industrializationD) both of all
Answer: A
Explanation: Labor exploitation
What made it harder for the Chinese to resist Western influence?
A. The technology developed during the Industrial Revolution
B. The political changes of the Enlightenment
C. The cultural ideas of the Renaissance
D. The growing slave trade in the Americas
which of these describe the area of applied ethics that focuses on real-world situations and the context and environment in which transactions occur?
Business ethics describes the area of applied ethics that focuses on real-world situations and the context and environment in which transactions occur.
Business ethics is a subset of professional ethics or applied ethics that investigates ethical principles but instead moral or ethical issues that may arise in the workplace. It covers every aspect of business behaviour and is applicable to both individuals and entire organisations.
Business ethics are the practises and policies that businesses was using to guide them through financial decisions, negotiations and deals, social responsibility as a business, and other issues. Without a sturdy set of principles, an organisation can violate the law, face financial difficulties, and face moral quandaries.
Ethics investigates the rational basis for our moral judgements; it investigates what is ethically acceptable or unacceptable, just or unjust. In a larger sense, integrity is concerned with human beings but also their interactions.
Learn more about business ethics here:
https://brainly.com/question/30166875?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
in 1689, british parliament signs into law a list of guarantees to its citizens. what is the document called?
In 1689, British parliament signs into law a list of guarantees to its citizens. The document is called the Bill of Rights.
In 1689, the British Parliament passed a document known as the Bill of Rights, which provided a list of guarantees to British citizens. These guarantees included the right to petition the government, the right to bear arms, the right to a trial by jury, and the right to freedom of speech and assembly.
The Bill of Rights also established the supremacy of Parliament over the monarchy and the right of citizens to petition the government for the redress of grievances. This document was a major milestone in the development of democracy in Britain, and it served as a model for other countries in the years to come.
To know more about parliament , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/15900958
#SPJ4
In what year did the average stock price start to rise again?
Answer:
1921? I think it's been a few years since I've learned this
Answer:
1945 (after WW2)
Explanation:
The stock market crash of 1929 was one of the key events that set off the Great Depression, a period of severe economic slump that lasted from 1929 to 1939.
The stock market dropped precipitously after the crash and hit its lowest point in July 1932. The widely used stock market index, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), dropped from a high of 381.2 in September 1929 to a low of 41.2 in July 1932.
After that, the stock market began to slowly rebound, but it wasn't until the end of World War II in 1945 that it started to expand consistently. Consequently, following the Great Depression, it took over ten years for the average stock price to start increasing once more.
Use the map below to answer the following question:
Political map of the Inca Empire, showing the extent of territories under Pachacuti, Tupac Inca, Huayna Capac, Huascar, and Atahualpa.
Public Domain
HELPPPPP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Which of these describes this map?
A special purpose map showing the size of the Inca Empire under different rulers
A political map showing the boundaries of the modern Inca Empire
A physical map showing the geography of the Inca Empire
A special purpose map showing the elevation of the region
Answer:
The correct answer is:
A special purpose map showing the size of the Inca Empire under different rulers.
The map is showing the territories under the rule of different Inca emperors, including Pachacuti, Tupac Inca, Huayna Capac, Huascar, and Atahualpa. This is a type of special purpose map that is designed to show a specific aspect or theme, in this case, the extent of the Inca Empire under different rulers. A political map shows the boundaries of modern countries, states, or territories, while a physical map shows the geography, including the landforms, bodies of water, and natural features of a region.
Explanation:
What were the effects of U. S. Federal policies toward Native Americans from 1851 to 1934? How did Native Americans resist those policies?
Native Americans were forced to leave their native grounds, and the federal government made them move onto reservations, which are set aside for tribes that have received federal recognition.
What effects did the Native Americans' treatment by the American government have?Between 1850 and 1900, there was a considerable change in the way of life of Native People. Due to U.S. government policy, American Indians were forced to leave their homes when their ancestral lands were divided up. They were no longer wandering the Plains alone since white immigrants had moved there.
What effects on Native People did government policy toward Indians have?Under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, Roosevelt ended allotment, forbade further sales of Native American territory, and returned some lands to the tribes. But, after the Second World War, proponents of assimilation, tribe annihilation, and reservation abolition began to gain ground.
Learn more about Indian Reorganization Act of 1934: https://brainly.com/question/12499920
#SPJ1
who led the slave revolt in virginia in 1831?
Which state are you comparing to Kentucky?
How many different court levels are there… (count the boxes in the Court Chart)
In the US Federal Court System? (we covered this last class)
In Kentucky’s State Court System?
In your state of choosing’s State Court System?
What courts serve as trial courts in… (look at the Chart key at the bottom to figure out which are trial or appellate)
In Kentucky:
In your other State:
How many appellate courts are there… (look at the Chart key at the bottom to figure out which are trial or appellate)
In Kentucky:
In your other State:
If someone committed a crime resulting in property damage of over 15,000$, which court (or courts) would oversee their case…
In Kentucky:
Other State:
If someone was to be charged with domestic violence, which court (or courts) would process their case…
In Kentucky:
Other State:
Which courts can process Juvenile cases…
In Kentucky:
Other State:
Some States have special courts that deal with misdemeanor (minor crime less than 1 year jail) cases. Where are misdemeanor cases handled…
In Kentucky:
Other State:
Answer:
Which state are you comparing to Kentucky? - Texas
How many different court levels are there…
In the US Federal Court System? - There are three different court levels: District Courts, Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the Supreme Court.
In Kentucky’s State Court System? - There are four different court levels: District Court, Circuit Court, Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court of Kentucky.In Texas’ State Court System? - There are six different court levels: Justice of the Peace, Municipal Court, County Court, District Court, Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court of Texas.What courts serve as trial courts in…
In Kentucky: The District Court and the Circuit Court.In Texas: The County Court and the District Court.How many appellate courts are there…
In Kentucky: One appellate court, the Court of Appeals.In Texas: There are 14 appellate courts, which are divided into 13 Courts of Appeals and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.If someone committed a crime resulting in property damage of over 15,000$, which court (or courts) would oversee their case…
In Kentucky: The Circuit Court would oversee the case.In Texas: The District Court would oversee the case.If someone was to be charged with domestic violence, which court (or courts) would process their case…
In Kentucky: The District Court and the Circuit Court both have jurisdiction over domestic violence cases.In Texas: Domestic violence cases can be heard in either the County Court or the District Court.Which courts can process Juvenile cases…
In Kentucky: The District Court has jurisdiction over juvenile cases.In Texas: Juvenile cases are heard in a separate court system, the Texas Juvenile Justice Department.Some States have special courts that deal with misdemeanor (minor crime less than 1 year jail) cases. Where are misdemeanor cases handled…
In Kentucky: Misdemeanor cases are heard in the District Court.In Texas: Misdemeanor cases can be heard in either the Municipal Court, Justice of the Peace Court, or the County Court.liu bang parlayed his success against the chu forces at the 203 bc battle of gaixia to becomes the first emperor of which imperial dynasty of china?
Liu Bang parlayed the success that he obtained against the Chu forced during the 203 BC Battle of Gaixia in order to become the first emperor of the Han Dynasty of China.
The Battle of Gaixia, which was fought in the December of 203 BC during the Chu–Han Contention, was basically the last battle which happened among the forces of Xiang Yu and Liu Bang (who later became the Emperor Gaozu of Han).
The battle ended up with victory for Liu Bang, who then proclaimed himself to be the Emperor of China and ended up laying the foundation of the Han Dynasty. This was the last major battle of the Chu-Han Contention which also ended with the s-uicide of Xiang Yu and also the undisputed rule of Liu Bang.
To know more about Liu Bang
https://brainly.com/question/21809904
#SPJ4
Before it was declared the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire, the place that became known as Constantinople was ?
A. an ancient Roman colony that had few inhabitants.
B. a small Greek farming village on the banks of a major river.
C. an ancient Greek city with an ideal location for trade.
D. a city built by Roman generals to train Roman soldiers.
Before it was declared the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire, the place that became known as Constantinople was an ancient Greek city with an ideal location for trade.
The Eastern Roman Empire, often known as the Byzantine Empire, existed between the years of 330 and 1453. Later, the Latin Empire (1204–1261), the Ottoman Empire, and the Latin Empire all had their capitals in Constantinople (1453–1922). The Turkish capital then shifted to Ankara after the Turkish War of Independence. The Republic of Turkey's greatest city and financial hub, Istanbul, was renamed officially in 1930. Moreover, it is the biggest city in Europe. Emperor Constantine the Great designated the ancient city of Byzantium as the new capital of the Roman Empire in 324 and changed its name to "New Rome." On 11 May 330, it was renamed to Constantinople, and dedicated to Constantine.
Learn more about Constantinopole here:
https://brainly.com/question/14235394
#SPJ4