What did John Locke say about democracy?

The "Bill of Rights 1689" is a legal document that the British Parliament ratified in 1689 that promises a number of rights to its inhabitants.

Following the Glorious Revolution, which resulted in the toppling of King James II and the inauguration of William III and Mary II as joint monarchs, the English Parliament approved the Bill of Rights 1689.

The right to petition the queen, the prohibition against harsh and unusual punishment, and the right to a fair trial are just a few of the rights and liberties that were created by the Bill of Rights in 1689 and were expected to be protected by both the monarch and the government.

The Bill of Rights of 1689 also placed limitations on the power of the monarch and the government, requiring parliamentary authorization for some measures like taxation and army mobilisation. A foundational piece in the evolution of England's constitutional monarchy and the larger Western heritage of democratic administration is the Bill of Rights of 1689. There were still limitations on who may vote and hold office, and these rights were not made available to all residents.

For such more question on British Parliament

https://brainly.com/question/30811959

#SPJ4

The successful party in the trial court is known as the appellee when the outcome of a litigation at the trial court level is appealed.

District courts settle disputes by gathering the relevant information and using legal standards to determine who is correct. Trial courts have a district judge who conducts the trial and a jury who renders the verdict.

A court with original jurisdiction where trials are conducted is known as a trial court or court of first instance. Higher courts having the ability of appellate review typically hear appeals from the judgements of trial courts (appellate courts).

To know more about Trial court visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14839358

#SPJ1

True. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution, which protects the right to carry weapons, has been used as justification to challenge the federal law that prohibits marijuana users from owning firearms.

Although marijuana usage for medical or recreational purposes has been authorised in certain states, it remains a Schedule 1 substance under federal law, indicating it has no recognised medical benefit and a high potential for misuse. The federal restriction on medicinal marijuana users owning guns, according to a 2016 decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, is a violation of the Second Amendment. The court determined that the restriction was unlawful because it interfered with law-abiding persons' Second Amendment rights to possess weapons and use marijuana for medicinal purposes.
It's crucial to remember that this ruling only affects the states covered by the Ninth Circuit's authority. Different federal circuits may interpret the Second Amendment and the permissibility of gun ownership by marijuana users differently.

To learn more about marijuana, click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/30624927

#SPJ4

A major goal of the allied statesmen at the Congress of Vienna was to option B: maintain a balance of power in Europe.

The "balance of power" was the congress' guiding philosophy, which sought to ensure that no nation had sufficient influence to destabilize international relations. Klemens von Metternich, an Austrian diplomat, was concerned that Tsar Alexander may incite revolution as a means of establishing Russian dominion in Europe.

Von Metternich had serious concerns about Russian expansionism and political/social upheaval. The Confederation of the Rhine, which increased German unity and prevented revolution, was supported by European nations in order to deter potential Russian aggression. Bavaria, Wurttemberg, and Saxony were also kept as autonomous kingdoms.

To know more about Congress of Vienna, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/14225676

#SPJ4

Prior to 9/11, aviation security consisted of metal detectors, X-ray machines, and limited searches of passengers and their luggage. Passengers would be randomly selected for additional screening, as well as questioning.

Metal detectors are electronic devices used to detect the presence of metal objects. They are used in a wide variety of applications, including security screening, archaeological prospecting, and industrial production. Metal detectors are usually composed of a search coil, transmitter, and receiver, with the search coil generating a magnetic field and the receiver detecting metal objects passing through the field. They can detect various kinds of metal objects, including coins, jewelry, weapons, and other valuable items.

After 9/11, aviation security underwent a drastic overhaul to ensure the safety of all air passengers. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was created to implement and manage a more comprehensive security system. This included additional screening measures, such as enhanced pat-downs, full body scans, and the use of explosive trace detection systems.

To learn more about metal detectors

https://brainly.com/question/28894363

#SPJ1

Iran, Israel, and India are the three countries that follow religious law.

The countries that follow religious law, follow religious cultures. Religious cultures are to teach ethical and moral principles as part of their law. These religious cultures are often believed to put different levels of significance on sacred law. These counties include India, Iran, Israel, and Pakistan.

Religious law comes from the deity, who searched it through prophets, whereas secular law is human created. The logical conclusion is that whereas secular laws can be altered by their authors, religious laws are seen as timeless and unchanging.

Furthermore, while secular law deals with our activities' effects on others, religious law instructs people on both what to believe and how to conduct.

To know more about religious law, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/11558625

#SPJ4

The Berlin Blockade was implemented by Soviet leader Joseph Stalin starting on June 24 1948 to 12 May 1949, cutting off all land and river transit between West Berlin and West Germany.

The Soviet Union (USSR) blocked access to the western sector of Berlin, which was governed by the US, UK, and France.

Joseph Stalin, the leader of the Soviet Union, desired to increase its area and create a barrier separating it from Europe after a lengthy history of hostile incursions. He also desired power over the nations of Central and Eastern Europe that the Soviets had assisted in liberating.

The USSR blocked the highways to prevent the NATO countries from delivering supplies to the war-torn Berlin because they intended to have the entire city to themselves.

The Berlin Blockade was an effort by the Soviet Union in 1948 to restrict access for travellers from the United States, Great Britain, and France to their respective parts of Berlin, which were wholly located inside Russian-occupied East Germany.

Nonetheless, the Americans launched the Berlin Airlift, which over a period of time transported thousands, if not millions, of supplies to West Berlin.

To known more about Berline blockade https://brainly.com/question/3798821

#SPJ4

A corporation is regarded as a citizen of each state in which it was incorporated as well as the state that serves as its primary place of business for the purposes of diverse jurisdiction. As a result, a business is allowed to have citizenship in two or more states for diversity-related reasons.

A citizen and a country have a legal tie when they are citizens. Typically, the nation is the one where a person was born, resides, supports, and receives protection. Normally, a person is a citizen of the nation in which they were born, but occasionally, a person will seek for naturalisation in order to become citizen of another nation. There are nations that permit dual citizenship and nations that do not. Jus soli, or right of soil, entitles people who are born in the nation to citizenship. Individuals with foreign parents may be citizens by naturalisation. Jus sanguinis, the right of citizenship for members of the national diaspora, is also recognised by some nations. Jus sanguinis, which translates to "right of blood," is a Latin term.

To know more about Citizenship visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11052165

#SPJ1

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a prominent example of marble cake federalism in which state and federal authorities are intertwined in an inseparable mix.

While providing federal cash to support private health insurance exchanges and provide other healthcare-related protections, the ACA compels states to extend Medicaid eligibility.

States can choose to implement the ACA on their own, but if they do not, the federal government will take over and do so. But, states are given significant latitude in how they carry out specific provisions of the legislation, such as how they run their Medicaid programmes and establish their insurance exchanges.

Under this form of federalism, states have some flexibility over how they carry out the law while federal authorities make sure that it is adhered to, creating the ideal balance between state and federal authority.

To learn more about legislation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27893557

#SPJ4

If REALTOR Marguerite alters photos in a way that misrepresents the property's current condition, it would be a violation of the Code of Ethics.

Code ethics, also known as computer ethics or digital ethics, refers to the ethical principles and values that govern the behavior of individuals and organizations in the use and development of technology and computer systems. It involves considering the impact of technology on society and the environment, as well as the responsibilities and rights of those who create, design, develop, and use technology.

Code ethics covers a wide range of topics, such as privacy, security, intellectual property, access, freedom of expression, and responsible use of technology. It aims to ensure that technology is developed and used in a way that is ethical, equitable, and beneficial to society as a whole.

To learn more about the Code of Ethics, click

https://brainly.com/question/28268879

#SPJ1

Batch prep means the process of preparing a larger volume of a legal document in order to reduce turnaround times and improve efficiency.

The use of batch prep techniques can help to reduce the time and cost associated with preparing and filing legal documents, and can also help to improve the overall quality of legal work produced.  

Batch prep can include pre-drafting standard documents that may be used repeatedly and then just editing the pre-drafted documents to fit a specific case. This can also include using software that will automatically generate certain parts of a legal document such as standard sections like the table of contents, headings and page numbers. This can save a lot of time when preparing legal documents, which can lead to lower costs for the client.

To know more about legal documents go to

https://brainly.com/question/3239989

#SPJ4

The law of diminishing marginal utility is an economic concept that explains why the satisfaction or usefulness that a person derives from consuming additional units of a good or service tends to decrease as they consume more of it.

The law states that as a person consumes more and more of a good or service, the marginal utility, or the additional satisfaction or benefit they receive from consuming each additional unit, decreases. This means that while the first unit of a good or service consumed may provide a lot of satisfaction or utility, each additional unit consumed provides progressively less satisfaction.

This concept is important because it helps to explain consumer behavior and how people make choices about how to allocate their resources. For example, a person may be willing to pay a high price for the first unit of a good or service, but as they consume more of it, they may become less willing to pay the same high price, because the marginal utility they receive from each additional unit is decreasing.

The law of diminishing marginal utility is a fundamental concept in economics and helps to explain a wide range of phenomena, from consumer behavior to the pricing of goods and services in the marketplace.

For such more question on law of diminishing

https://brainly.com/question/19070161

#SPJ4

According to the human right to a speedy trial, which is recognised in criminal law, a government prosecutor is not permitted to unilaterally or indefinitely postpone a criminal suspect's trial.

If not, the ability to impose such delays basically would give prosecutors the right to imprison anyone for a predetermined period of time without a trial.

Although having a court where a defendant can complain about an undue delay in the trial is necessary for the protection of speedy trial rights, it is equally crucial that countries put in place procedures to prevent delays.

The requirement of a "speedy trial" encourages prosecutors to rigorously develop cases within a reasonable length of time in jurisdictions with strong rule of law.

To know more about speedy trial

https://brainly.com/question/9479564

#SPJ4

The forensic scientist's conclusion that Brittany Evans is being held in the north-western tip of Missouri based solely on the orange-red soil from the tools and footprints is likely premature and may be unreliable.

While soil samples can provide important clues about a suspect's location, it is important to consider other factors before drawing definitive conclusions. For example, it is possible that the soil samples could have been transported to a different location before the crime occurred or that the suspect deliberately left misleading evidence to throw investigators off their trail. In addition, footprints alone may not provide enough information to accurately pinpoint a suspect's location. To further evaluate the forensic scientist's conclusion, it would be important to conduct additional analysis of the soil samples and footprints, as well as gather other forms of evidence and intelligence to corroborate the findings. It would also be important to consider other potential locations and suspects before making any definitive conclusions about Brittany Evans' whereabouts.

To know more about forensic soil analysis, click here: https://brainly.com/question/30589606
#SPJ4

When Mary thinks it is moral to employ a hiring technique that is unlawful in the United States in a nation where it is acceptable, she is probably mistaken.

What word best describes employ?

Use and use are frequent synonyms for employ. Employ implies the employment of a person or thing that is available but idle, inactive, or disengaged, even though all three words have the same meaning—"to put into service especially to gain an end”—to achieve. The business has 18 employees. In the tourism sector, there are around 3,000 local employees. Her first spouse had worked for a chemical manufacturer.

Know more about  nation Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9015813

#SPJ1

False. The number of laws passed when the government is unified is not much higher compared to the times when the government is under divided control.

The process for passing a law typically involves several steps, which may vary depending on the specific country or jurisdiction. Generally, a member of the legislature introduces a bill, which then goes through a series of committees and debates for review and possible revision. If the bill is approved by the legislature, it may be sent to the executive branch for approval or veto. If approved, the bill becomes law and may be implemented or enforced by the appropriate agencies. The law may also be subject to judicial review or challenges, which may impact its ultimate interpretation and application.

To learn more about law click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30037866

#SPJ4

The correct question is given as:

When the government is unified, it passes a significantly higher number of laws compared to times when the government is under divided control. True or false?

The filibuster is a parliamentary procedure in the United States Senate that allows a minority of senators to block a bill or a nomination from proceeding to a vote by continuously debating the issue, thus preventing the Senate from taking action.

Here is a basic overview of how the filibuster works:

Debate: When the Senate takes up a bill or nomination, senators are allowed to debate the issue for as long as they wish.

Cloture: If a senator or group of senators wishes to end the debate and proceed to a vote, they can file a cloture motion, which requires the support of at least 60 senators to pass.

Vote on Cloture: Once a cloture motion is filed, the Senate must hold a vote to end the debate. If the cloture motion passes, the debate is limited to a specific period of time (usually 30 hours) and the Senate can proceed to a final vote on the bill or nomination.

Filibuster: If the cloture motion fails to get the necessary 60 votes, senators can continue to debate the issue indefinitely, effectively preventing the Senate from taking any action.

Learn more about filibuster at:

https://brainly.com/question/11993117

#SPJ1

It is false that the retributive era is a return to the positive school of criminality, in which offenders have free choice to commit their crimes.

The retributive era is a type of legal punishment that mandates the perpetrator be given a sentence for a crime that is both proportionate to and parallel to the offense.

Retributive justice, as contrasted to vengeance, is non-personal, only intended to punish injustice, has built-in boundaries, doesn't take pleasure in the pain of others, and adheres to procedural rules. The retributive era contrasts with other criminal justice goals, including deterrence (preventing future crimes) and offender rehabilitation.

Retributive justice serves as a conduit for public sentiments of vengeance in the political and judicial spheres. Lynchings, blood feuds, and other kinds of vigilante self-help are intended to be discouraged. On the premise that "the society that slays together, stays together", it is done in an effort to strengthen social cohesion by engaging in acts of punishment. To avoid a circumstance where a person who would have chosen to follow the law as part of his civic responsibilities thinks that it would be foolish for him to not break it when so many others are going to get away with it that the purpose of his obedience is largely lost.

To learn more about Retributive, click below:

https://brainly.com/question/30506033

#SPJ4

Although both fact  witnesses and expert witnesses can offer crucial testimony during a trial, there are some significant distinctions between the two.

A fact witness is a person who has firsthand knowledge of the events leading up to a legal dispute. In a trial or hearing, they are asked to testify to give their personal account of incidents or actions that are important to the case. Everyone who has seen the events in question or took part in them qualifies as a fact witness, including victims, spectators, and law enforcement personnel. Both the prosecution and the defence often cross-examine fact witnesses, whose testimony can be used to establish the chronology of events, demonstrate or refute elements of a crime, or support or refute other pieces of evidence in the case. They are not allowed to provide their own opinions during their testimony, which is restricted to the case's facts.

Learn more about Fact witnesses here:

https://brainly.com/question/16268618

#SPJ4

It is false that if a restriction imposed by the government is content-neutral, then a court will not allow it.

Content-neutral regulations are those that apply to all expressions without taking into account their message or substance.

Such prohibitions frequently only regulate the place, time, and manner of speech, as opposed to laws that restrict speech based on its content. This distinction is critical in First Amendment challenges because content-based legislation is subject to intense scrutiny, the highest level of judicial review, but content-neutral legislation is only subject to intermediate, or mid-level, assessment.

Because many content-based laws are overturned and many content-neutral laws are upheld by the courts, the distinction frequently has an impact on how a case turns out.

Reviewing courts usually look at whether the government meant to repress expression when it established the law to assess whether the statute is content-based or content-neutral.

To learn more about content-neutral, click below:

https://brainly.com/question/30691182

#SPJ4

The first thing that you should do after entering your vehicle is to make sure that all of your vehicle's safety features are working properly.

This includes making sure that your seat belt is properly buckled, that your mirrors are properly adjusted, and that all of your lights are in working order.

While you are buckling your seatbelt and adjusting your mirrors, you should also check to ensure that there are no obstructions to your vision, such as a dirty or cracked windshield. Once you have taken these preliminary steps, you can then proceed to start your vehicle.

To know more about vehicle go to

https://brainly.com/question/24745369

#SPJ4

True, An unconscious adult victim is gasping for breath and having difficulty breathing. The scene is safe and help has been called. Next, you should use the head tilt chin lift procedure.

A patient who is unconscious runs the danger of obstructing their airway and suffocating. The tongue is primarily to blame for this happening. The tongue also loses its muscle tone when a patient is unconscious. The tongue may recoil and obstruct the airway. A lack of oxygen will cause the sufferer to suffocate in a matter of minutes, making this scenario urgent.

To open the airway during CPR, we adopt the head-tilt, chin-lift technique. The modified jaw thrust would be performed in place of "head-tilt, chin-lift" if a cervical spine injury was suspected. The jaw push is a method applied to supine patients who have a suspected spinal injury.

To learn more about the head tilt chin lift procedure, click at:

https://brainly.com/question/6849463

#SPJ4

The organization's staff training programme is one of the main challenges at hand. Employee productivity and efficiency increase with training.

By implementing innovative training techniques, the OD practitioner aids the organisation by assisting in the improvement of employees' skill sets, which is advantageous to the business. The effects of a recent change in the company's procedures or organisational structure are another problem that an OD petitioner must address. The new strategy will be examined by OD professionals, who will also gather data about it, compile a report, and then submit it.

Those tasked with implementing the firm's preplanned changes are organisational development practitioners. By implementing appropriate adjustments to the current system that will be highly effective, they play a significant part in the development of an organisation. About the problems the company is facing, they engage with other specialists there and come up with a workable plan for change.

To know more about OD practitioner, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30265271

#SPJ4

False. The Supreme Court has supported restrictions on speech that are not based on content in a number of situations, including noise ordinances.

An imposition of a limitation or prohibition on something or someone is known as a restriction. A restriction on speech refers to a judicially imposed constraint on a person's capacity to communicate through spoken or written words. Governments or private organisations may impose speech restrictions, and these restrictions may take many various forms. For instance, laws that penalise specific forms of communication, like defamation or hate speech, or regulations that restrict the way, when, and where speech can be expressed are examples of speech limitations. While the right to free speech is a fundamental human right protected by many countries' laws and constitutions, restrictions on speech are frequently the subject of legal disputes.

Learn more about restriction here:

https://brainly.com/question/8062739

#SPJ4

The judge is the least informed member of the courtroom work group.

The judges are the most prestigious members of the courtroom yet are least informed member of the courtroom work group the facts of the cases as the prosecutor and defendant talk about limited information in the court and the judges act upon such an information only. Judges couldn't read the whole case rather they frame a summary from the information gathered from the proceedings and therefore take a informed decision on the basis of their virtue and sense. Judges are the voice of sentencing, but their freedom of choice is limited by the statutes and sentencing structures existing in a particular state, they act in accordance with information provided to them which may sometime be wrongly interpreted.

Know more about "judge" visit

brainly.com/question/1059156

#SPJ4

The responsibility to provide evidence to support your claims, such as when you are accusing someone of a crime. This prosecution has the burden of proof.

The legal illustration the innocence of those accused of crimes is assumed. It is the prosecutor's responsibility to provide evidence that they are guilty. The accuser is not required to provide any evidence. Innocent until proven guilty is the presumption that applies if the prosecution fails to achieve its burden of proof. One side in a legal disagreement has the duty of proving their case, whereas the other side has no such burden and is assumed to be right. The burden of proof demands a party to present proof to demonstrate the veracity of the facts necessary to substantiate the necessary legal requirements for the dispute. Determining who is in charge of presenting evidence that supports or refutes a claim is a requirement under the law. It also establishes how much proof is required to reach that objective. The law compels you to present sufficient proof to substantiate your allegations if your side is the one with the burden of proof.

Learn more about burden of proof here:

https://brainly.com/question/12960124

#SPJ4

The lex mercatoria was an unbiased system of rules for deciding commercial disputes across borders and political boundaries.

The corpus of commercial law utilised by merchants across mediaeval Europe was called lex mercatoria, or "merchant law," often known as "the Law Merchant" in English.

It developed as a body of custom and accepted practises, much like English common law, and was upheld by a network of merchant courts situated along the major trade routes. It evolved into a comprehensive body of law that was created, decided, and upheld freely, reducing conflict resulting from the members' varied backgrounds and regional customs.

Local state law was not always relevant due to the international context, and merchant law gave a standardised framework to conduct transactions, minimising the need for a third party to be trusted.

It highlighted contractual flexibility and the non-transferability of property, while eschewing legal minutiae and making decisions ex aequo et bono. Professional traders resurrected Europe's nearly nonexistent economic operations, which had collapsed with the fall of the Roman Empire, with the lex mercatoria.

To learn more about Lex mercatoria follow link; https://brainly.com/question/30755370

#SPJ4

The rule of law is a fundamental democratic policy that provides a framework for governance that is essential for the functioning of a democratic society.

To learn more about investment, click

https://brainly.com/question/15105766

#SPJ1

In 2020, the United States Supreme Court was composed of nine justices. The three justices who garnered significant attention that year were Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, and Associate Justice Samuel Alito.

John Roberts, who was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2005, is the current Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Roberts is often seen as a swing vote on the court, meaning he has the ability to decide cases that are closely divided among the other justices.

Clarence Thomas was appointed by President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and is the longest-serving member of the current court. Thomas is known for his conservative views and originalist interpretation of the Constitution.

Samuel Alito was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2006 and is also considered a conservative justice. Alito is known for his strong views on individual rights, free speech, and the Second Amendment.

Complete question:

Who were the 3 Supreme Court justices in 2020 in the united states?

To learn more about Supreme Court

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ4

The statement "The rediscovery process is in its final stage when activists make headway toward their goals" is false.

The rediscovery process of the victims of crime, Americans became more active and informed of the increasing crime so in order to support the victims this social movement to rediscover the victims started. During 1980s politicians engaged in social struggles and enacting laws that can help rediscover the plight of innocent victims. Various social groups and activists joined the movement to help these victims and pressurize the government to make strict provisions for various crimes. Many bills were presented in front of the senate which were ratified to uplift these survivors of crimes. The rediscovery process can analyze the effectiveness of certain  measures taken to help survivors of crime but not in protecting others from the same fate.

Know more about "rediscovery process" visit

brainly.com/question/30301067

#SPJ4