The Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919, between Germany and the Allied powers, formally ending World War I.
The treaty imposed significant penalties and restrictions on Germany, including forcing Germany to accept full responsibility for the war and pay large reparations to the Allies. It also required Germany to give up significant portions of its territories, limit its military capabilities, and accept strict conditions on its political and economic policies. The treaty created a sense of resentment among the German people, who felt they had been unfairly punished and humiliated. This resentment helped fuel the rise of Nazi Germany and ultimately led to the outbreak of World War II.
Learn more about economic policies :
https://brainly.com/question/6837106
#SPJ4
When the Articles of Confederation was passed, the states were given more power than the national government. Why did this happen?
A. It was an accident that happened when writing the Articles of Confederation.
B. They told the British the government would be set up that way.
C. Americans did not trust strong national governments
D. Thomas Jefferson trusted state governments more than the Federal government.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. Americans did not trust strong national governments.
Explanation:
At the time the Articles of Confederation were drafted and passed in 1781, many Americans were wary of a strong central government that could potentially become too powerful and oppressive, like the British government they had just fought a war against. As a result, the Articles of Confederation gave more power to the states, with a relatively weak central government that had limited authority and no power to tax or regulate commerce. This arrangement was seen as a way to protect individual liberties and prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals or a single governing body.
While the Articles of Confederation ultimately proved ineffective in governing the young United States and were replaced by the Constitution in 1789, the idea of limiting the power of the federal government and protecting individual rights and liberties has remained a fundamental principle of American governance.
What was the main issue of the Republican Party in 1854?
Answer:
The Republican Party formed primarily as opposition to the Democratic Party. It consisted mainly of antislavery Whigs, whose party had dissolved by the end of 1854 due to conflict over the issue of slavery, the work of anti-slavery Democrats, and members of the Free-Soil Party.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
Who do Queen Victoria, Kaiser Wilhelm I, and the Chinese representative appear to look more cartoonish than these other figures?
The cartoon is intended to highlight these countries' imperialist tendencies toward China: Caricatures of several foreign leaders are dividing a cake that represents China.
Who was queen Victoria ?The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was ruled by Victoria (Alexandrina Victoria; 24 May 1819 – 22 January 1901) from 20 June 1837 until her demise in 1901. The Victorian era, which began during her 63-year and 216-day reign, was the longest ever for a British monarch.
Throughout the United Kingdom, it was a time of significant industrial, political, scientific, and military development, which was accompanied by a significant British Imperial expansion. She was given the extra title of Empress of India by a decision of the British Parliament in 1876.
Learn more about Queen Victoria, from:
brainly.com/question/4693482
#SPJ1
why did the united states add in god we trust to our currency during the cold war?
Answer:
here to help!
Explanation:
During the Cold War era, the U.S. government tried to distinguish itself from the Soviet Union, which promoted state-sponsored atheism. The 84th Congress of 1956 passed a joint resolution "declaring IN GOD WE TRUST the national motto of the United States." "In God We Trust" appeared on all American currency after 1956.
Which of the following statements accurately represents a major difference between the North and the South in the antebellumperiod?A. The North was more rural while the South was more urban.B. The South relied heavily on agriculture while the North focused more on industry.C. The North had fewer railroad lines than the South.D. The South moved past slavery and towards tenant farming prior to the Civil War
Answer:
A
Explanation:
they relied in agriculture
Use the map below to answer the following question:
Political map of the Inca Empire, showing the extent of territories under Pachacuti, Tupac Inca, Huayna Capac, Huascar, and Atahualpa.
Public Domain
HELPPPPP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Which of these describes this map?
A special purpose map showing the size of the Inca Empire under different rulers
A political map showing the boundaries of the modern Inca Empire
A physical map showing the geography of the Inca Empire
A special purpose map showing the elevation of the region
Answer:
The correct answer is:
A special purpose map showing the size of the Inca Empire under different rulers.
The map is showing the territories under the rule of different Inca emperors, including Pachacuti, Tupac Inca, Huayna Capac, Huascar, and Atahualpa. This is a type of special purpose map that is designed to show a specific aspect or theme, in this case, the extent of the Inca Empire under different rulers. A political map shows the boundaries of modern countries, states, or territories, while a physical map shows the geography, including the landforms, bodies of water, and natural features of a region.
Explanation:
12. Why is "The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County' a good example of Regionalism?
It uses sophisticated language and focuses on prestigious, well-known people.
Its story is told mostly in dialect, and it focuses on local people and topics.
O It focuses on the thoughts and actions of the narrator, an Eastemer.
O It uses a frame story to highlight the differences between two storytellers.
Answer:
"Its story is told mostly in dialect, and it focuses on local people and topics" is the best answer to why "The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County" is a good example of Regionalism.
Explanation:
Regionalism is a literary movement that emphasizes the specific setting, customs, and speech of a particular geographic region, often with a focus on rural or small-town life. This short story by Mark Twain is set in the American West, and it uses the dialect and speech patterns of the people in that region to tell a humorous story about a frog-jumping contest. The story also features local characters and references to real places and events in the region. Overall, the story is a great example of how Regionalism can be used to capture the unique qualities of a particular time and place.
Answer:
Its story is told mostly in dialect, and it focuses on local people and topics.
Explanation:
"The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County" by Mark Twain is a prime example of Regionalism because it focuses on local people and topics, and is told in a regional dialect. The story is set in Calaveras County, a rural area of California, and the characters are typical of the area. The narrator, Simon Wheeler, speaks in a dialect common to the region, and this adds to the story's realism and authenticity.
Additionally, the story highlights the customs, values, and attitudes of the people in the region, such as their love of gambling and storytelling. By focusing on the local, Mark Twain highlights the distinctiveness of the region and its people, which is a hallmark of Regionalism in American literature.
What were the effects of U. S. Federal policies toward Native Americans from 1851 to 1934? How did Native Americans resist those policies?
Native Americans were forced to leave their native grounds, and the federal government made them move onto reservations, which are set aside for tribes that have received federal recognition.
What effects did the Native Americans' treatment by the American government have?Between 1850 and 1900, there was a considerable change in the way of life of Native People. Due to U.S. government policy, American Indians were forced to leave their homes when their ancestral lands were divided up. They were no longer wandering the Plains alone since white immigrants had moved there.
What effects on Native People did government policy toward Indians have?Under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, Roosevelt ended allotment, forbade further sales of Native American territory, and returned some lands to the tribes. But, after the Second World War, proponents of assimilation, tribe annihilation, and reservation abolition began to gain ground.
Learn more about Indian Reorganization Act of 1934: https://brainly.com/question/12499920
#SPJ1
What made it harder for the Chinese to resist Western influence?
A. The technology developed during the Industrial Revolution
B. The political changes of the Enlightenment
C. The cultural ideas of the Renaissance
D. The growing slave trade in the Americas
Do you feel that Daniel Shays was justified in his call to stop the courts and free those in debt to the government? Why? How do you think that Shays' Rebellion encouraged the idea of a new government in America?
Daniel Shays was a Revolutionary War veteran who led a group of farmers and working-class people in a rebellion against the government of Massachusetts in 1786-87.
The rebellion, which came to be known as Shays' Rebellion, was sparked by the economic hardship faced by many people in the aftermath of the war, as well as by the perceived injustice of the government's debt-collection policies.
Shays and his followers believed that the government's actions were unfair and unjust, and that they had a right to protest and resist. However, their methods were ultimately unsuccessful and many of them were arrested and imprisoned.
In terms of whether Shays was justified in his call to stop the courts and free those in debt to the government, opinions may vary.
However, Shays' Rebellion did have a significant impact on the development of American government and politics.
Therefore, in this sense, Shays' Rebellion can be seen as a catalyst for the development of a new government in America.
For such more question on Daniel Shays
https://brainly.com/question/28833467
#SPJ4
the german artist, ________, was a skilled printmaker as well as painter.
The german artist, Albrecht Düre was a skilled printmaker as well as painter.
Dürer, who flourished during the Renaissance, is regarded as one of history's finest artists. He was renowned for his paintings of portraiture, religious themes, and mythical topics as well as for his deft use of perspective and attention to detail. Moreover, Dürer was a prolific printer who created engravings and woodcuts that had a significant impact on the evolution of printing as an art form. He frequently included religious and mythical subjects in his prints, in addition to landscapes and people. The art of the Northern Renaissance was greatly influenced by Dürer, and his work is still studied and revered today. Dürer was raised by his father, a goldsmith, and started his career as an apprentice. He was born in Nuremberg, Germany. He then pursued painting training.
For such more questions on Albrecht Düre :
brainly.com/question/14902369
#SPJ4
The above information is describing the qualifications to be a
a
senator.
b
governor.
c
representative.
d
supreme court justice.
The material up top outlines the requirements to become a senator.
Quizlet: What are the top three requirements to be a senator?must be at least 30 years old, residents of the states from which they are elected, and citizens of the United States for at least nine years.
Which of the following is a formal requirement for Senate service?A senator must be at least thirty years old, a citizen of the United States for at least nine years, and a resident of the state they will be representing when elected, according to the Constitution.
Which of the following about the quizlet's requirements for senators is true?Senators are required to be citizens of the state they serve.
To Know more about Constitution.
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
Write as if you are a worker in America in the late 19th century. Describe the struggles you endure and what changes you think needs to be made. Explain why you would contemplate following Eugene V. Debs and why his theories appeal to you.
Your journal response should be at least 200 words long.
Answer:
Dear Journal,
As a worker in America during the late 19th century, life is a constant struggle. I work long hours, sometimes up to 12 hours a day, with very little pay. My working conditions are terrible, with dangerous machinery, cramped workspaces, and no job security. The company I work for doesn't provide any healthcare or other benefits, and if I get injured on the job, I'll be out of work without any compensation.
The reality is that there are few options for me to improve my situation. I'm not alone in this struggle; many other workers are in the same position. We've talked about banding together and forming a union to fight for better working conditions, higher wages, and more benefits. However, our employers are hostile to unions and have used violence and intimidation to prevent us from organizing.
It's in this context that Eugene V. Debs and his theories are so appealing. Debs is calling for a fundamental shift in our society, where the workers take control of the means of production and govern themselves democratically. Debs is advocating for a cooperative society where everyone's needs are met and there's no exploitation of labor.
Debs' theories appeal to me because they offer a way out of the oppressive conditions that I and other workers face. Debs believes that we can create a society where everyone has a say in the decisions that affect their lives and where we work together to build a better world. Debs is not content with minor reforms; he's calling for a complete transformation of our economic and political system.
In conclusion, life as a worker in America during the late 19th century is a daily struggle, and the only way to improve our situation is to band together and fight for our rights. The theories of Eugene V. Debs offer hope that we can create a better world where everyone has a say and everyone's needs are met.
Answer:
Dear Journal,
As a worker in America during the late 19th century, life is a constant struggle. I work long hours, sometimes up to 12 hours a day, with very little pay. My working conditions are terrible, with dangerous machinery, cramped workspaces, and no job security. The company I work for doesn't provide any healthcare or other benefits, and if I get injured on the job, I'll be out of work without any compensation.
The reality is that there are few options for me to improve my situation. I'm not alone in this struggle; many other workers are in the same position. We've talked about banding together and forming a union to fight for better working conditions, higher wages, and more benefits. However, our employers are hostile to unions and have used violence and intimidation to prevent us from organizing.
Explanation:
who was the person most responsible for bringing independence to mexico by 1821?
The person most responsible for bringing independence to Mexico by 1821 was Father Miguel Hidalgo.
Father Miguel Hidalgo is widely regarded as the driving force behind Mexico's independence from Spain in 1821. A Catholic priest, Hidalgo's most notable act of resistance against Spanish colonial rule was issuing the Grito de Dolores, a rallying call to the people of Mexico to rise up against their Spanish rulers.
Hidalgo's success in inspiring the Mexican people to stand up for their independence laid the groundwork for subsequent revolutionaries, and eventually led to Mexico's independence in 1821. His legacy lives on today in Mexico, where Father Miguel Hidalgo is remembered as the most influential figure in the fight for independence.
To know more about Mexico , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29695772
#SPJ4
identify: what defines the classic motown sound, and why is it so popular?
The 1960s' sophisticated strain of pop, R&B, and soul music is known as the "Motown Sound." The particular musical sound, which consisted only of tambourines, pounding bass lines, and gospel-inspired vocal harmonies, came to be associated with both the Detroit recording studio where the songs were made and the celebrities who sung them.
Gordy would often refer to the Motown sound as "rats, roaches, soul, guts, and love," and its songs demanded a global audience because of their easily identifiable musical themes.
Several of the best musicians from the 1960s and 1970s came from records. Songs like "Dancing in the Street" and "What's Going On?" of this era focused on American social concerns and gave African-Americans a voice via their thoughts. The music label enjoyed quick success with its release of "money[that's what i want]" by barrett strong , and it is the first hit song,and the first record sold more than one million copies.
To know more about the sound visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/
why did tribes migrate to oklahoma in the early 1800s?
Native American tribes were forced to migrate to Oklahoma in the early 1800s due to the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which authorized their relocation from ancestral lands to designated Indian Territory in present-day Oklahoma.
In the early 1800s, Native American tribes were forcibly removed from their ancestral lands and relocated to present-day Oklahoma under the Indian Removal Act of 1830.
This legislation authorized the government to displace hundreds of thousands of Indigenous people and cause mass displacement, upending their traditional way of life and threatening their cultural heritage. This tragic event left a lasting impact on many of these tribes and resulted in the forced migration of hundreds of thousands of Native Americans to the Indian Territory of Oklahoma.
To know more about Tribes, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/17086100
#SPJ4
which of these describe the area of applied ethics that focuses on real-world situations and the context and environment in which transactions occur?
Business ethics describes the area of applied ethics that focuses on real-world situations and the context and environment in which transactions occur.
Business ethics is a subset of professional ethics or applied ethics that investigates ethical principles but instead moral or ethical issues that may arise in the workplace. It covers every aspect of business behaviour and is applicable to both individuals and entire organisations.
Business ethics are the practises and policies that businesses was using to guide them through financial decisions, negotiations and deals, social responsibility as a business, and other issues. Without a sturdy set of principles, an organisation can violate the law, face financial difficulties, and face moral quandaries.
Ethics investigates the rational basis for our moral judgements; it investigates what is ethically acceptable or unacceptable, just or unjust. In a larger sense, integrity is concerned with human beings but also their interactions.
Learn more about business ethics here:
https://brainly.com/question/30166875?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Help! What’s the right answer?!?
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Yankel, age 23, who had contracted typhus. Nazi officials often left behind prisoners that were considered too weak or ill to make the march, so Yankel was likely left behind due to his illness.
Answer:
C. Yankel age 23 who contracted typhus
what is the significance of the samovar that tchebutykin presents to irina for her birthday?
The samovar that Chebutykin presents to Irina for her birthday in Chekhov's play "Three Sisters" carries multiple symbolic meanings.
The samovar represents the characters' longing for a simpler and more fulfilling life. It is a reminder of a time when the characters were happier and more contented.The samovar symbolizes the characters' sense of nostalgia and their yearning for the past. It highlights their dissatisfaction with the present and their longing for a better future.The gift also reveals Chebutykin's affection for Irina and his desire to bring some joy into her life. It shows that he cares about her and wants to make her happy.The samovar is a traditional Russian tea urn that represents hospitality, warmth, and comfort. It suggests that the characters value these qualities and seek them in their lives.The gift reflects the characters' love of tea and the importance of tea-drinking in Russian culture. It is a reminder of the rituals and traditions that bring people together.
learn more about Three Sisters here:
https://brainly.com/question/13082446
#SPJ4
which is not a goal of life hindu
In Hinduism, the four goals of life, known as purusharthas, are considered important and interconnected.
The ultimate purpose of life, according to Hinduism, is to reach moksha, which is escape from the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth (samsara) and union with the divine (Brahman).
Purusharthas are the four aims of life in Hinduism.
Dharma is the Sanskrit word for righteousness, obligation, and moral order.Artha represents wealth, power, and success.Kama: Pleasure, affection, and physical pleasure.Moksha is the state of being free of the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth.As a result, while all four aims of life are significant in Hinduism, the ultimate goal is Moksha.
For such more question on Hindu:
https://brainly.com/question/24705748
#SPJ4
The following question may be like this:
What is the goal of Hindu?
What view of the status of slavery in the territories was expressed in the Wilmot Proviso, Calhoun Resolutions, and Popular Sovereignty?
The Wilmot Proviso sought to ban slavery in the territories, the Calhoun Resolutions argued that Congress had no authority to regulate slavery in the territories, and Popular Sovereignty proposed that the issue of slavery should be decided by the settlers themselves.
The Wilmot Proviso, Calhoun Resolutions, and Popular Sovereignty all expressed different views on the status of slavery in the territories during the mid-19th century in the United States.
The Wilmot Proviso was a proposed amendment to a military appropriations bill in 1846 that sought to ban slavery in any territory acquired by the United States from Mexico as a result of the Mexican-American War. The Wilmot Proviso represented the view of many Northern lawmakers who opposed the expansion of slavery into new territories, seeing it as a threat to the balance of power between free and slave states. The Proviso was not passed into law, but it set the stage for a heated debate over the expansion of slavery.
The Calhoun Resolutions, introduced by Senator John C. Calhoun of South Carolina in 1847, asserted that Congress had no constitutional authority to regulate slavery in the territories. Calhoun argued that Congress could not deprive citizens of their property rights in slaves, and that any attempt to do so would be a violation of the Constitution. The Calhoun Resolutions represented the view of many Southern lawmakers who saw slavery as a vital part of their economy and way of life.
Popular Sovereignty, which was championed by Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois in the mid-1850s, proposed that the issue of whether to allow or prohibit slavery in a territory should be decided by the settlers themselves, rather than by Congress. Douglas argued that this approach would allow for a peaceful resolution of the debate over the expansion of slavery, and would give the people of each territory the power to determine their own fate. However, the concept of Popular Sovereignty proved controversial and ultimately failed to prevent the outbreak of the Civil War.
For more such questions on popular sovereignty
https://brainly.com/question/1853298
#SPJ4
why did rural african americans move to northern cities?
Answer:
Rural African Americans moved to Northern cities to escape racial violence
pursue economic and educational opportunities and obtain freedom from the oppression of Jim Crow.
PLEASE MARK BRAINLEST
Write a one to two paragraph journal entry from the perspective of a soldier fighting in the war, describing life in the trenches. Be sure to include details similar to those in the readings. Use supporting evidence to discuss enemy weapons, conditions, and the stalemate.
Answer:
The days been long, longer then usual. It's hard to keep pushing. The constant rain pouring down causes the trenches to fill with water. Creating mud that's impossible to move in. Compared to the gas the other unit experienced this is nothing.
The constant fear of not knowing what might happen next is terrifying. The only thing that keeps me going is knowing that all this will mean something in the end. All this blood shed will eventually end and life will continue. If I live long enough to experience it.
Explanation:
Answer:
The days have been long, far longer than normal. It's difficult to keep going. The trenches fill up with water due to the endless rain. Making mud that is impossible to move through. Though it is nothing compared to the gas the other unit encountered.
It's horrible to live in continual worry of not knowing what will happen next. The only thing that keeps me going is knowing that it will all be worthwhile in the end. All of this bloodshed will come to an end, and life will go on. If I live long enough to see it.
Explanation:
Which state are you comparing to Kentucky?
How many different court levels are there… (count the boxes in the Court Chart)
In the US Federal Court System? (we covered this last class)
In Kentucky’s State Court System?
In your state of choosing’s State Court System?
What courts serve as trial courts in… (look at the Chart key at the bottom to figure out which are trial or appellate)
In Kentucky:
In your other State:
How many appellate courts are there… (look at the Chart key at the bottom to figure out which are trial or appellate)
In Kentucky:
In your other State:
If someone committed a crime resulting in property damage of over 15,000$, which court (or courts) would oversee their case…
In Kentucky:
Other State:
If someone was to be charged with domestic violence, which court (or courts) would process their case…
In Kentucky:
Other State:
Which courts can process Juvenile cases…
In Kentucky:
Other State:
Some States have special courts that deal with misdemeanor (minor crime less than 1 year jail) cases. Where are misdemeanor cases handled…
In Kentucky:
Other State:
Answer:
Which state are you comparing to Kentucky? - Texas
How many different court levels are there…
In the US Federal Court System? - There are three different court levels: District Courts, Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the Supreme Court.
In Kentucky’s State Court System? - There are four different court levels: District Court, Circuit Court, Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court of Kentucky.In Texas’ State Court System? - There are six different court levels: Justice of the Peace, Municipal Court, County Court, District Court, Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court of Texas.What courts serve as trial courts in…
In Kentucky: The District Court and the Circuit Court.In Texas: The County Court and the District Court.How many appellate courts are there…
In Kentucky: One appellate court, the Court of Appeals.In Texas: There are 14 appellate courts, which are divided into 13 Courts of Appeals and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.If someone committed a crime resulting in property damage of over 15,000$, which court (or courts) would oversee their case…
In Kentucky: The Circuit Court would oversee the case.In Texas: The District Court would oversee the case.If someone was to be charged with domestic violence, which court (or courts) would process their case…
In Kentucky: The District Court and the Circuit Court both have jurisdiction over domestic violence cases.In Texas: Domestic violence cases can be heard in either the County Court or the District Court.Which courts can process Juvenile cases…
In Kentucky: The District Court has jurisdiction over juvenile cases.In Texas: Juvenile cases are heard in a separate court system, the Texas Juvenile Justice Department.Some States have special courts that deal with misdemeanor (minor crime less than 1 year jail) cases. Where are misdemeanor cases handled…
In Kentucky: Misdemeanor cases are heard in the District Court.In Texas: Misdemeanor cases can be heard in either the Municipal Court, Justice of the Peace Court, or the County Court.liu bang parlayed his success against the chu forces at the 203 bc battle of gaixia to becomes the first emperor of which imperial dynasty of china?
Liu Bang parlayed the success that he obtained against the Chu forced during the 203 BC Battle of Gaixia in order to become the first emperor of the Han Dynasty of China.
The Battle of Gaixia, which was fought in the December of 203 BC during the Chu–Han Contention, was basically the last battle which happened among the forces of Xiang Yu and Liu Bang (who later became the Emperor Gaozu of Han).
The battle ended up with victory for Liu Bang, who then proclaimed himself to be the Emperor of China and ended up laying the foundation of the Han Dynasty. This was the last major battle of the Chu-Han Contention which also ended with the s-uicide of Xiang Yu and also the undisputed rule of Liu Bang.
To know more about Liu Bang
https://brainly.com/question/21809904
#SPJ4
Please help me
Using the transcript of Brown's speech to the court attached below (the David Stathairn video is embedded for review) , address the following prompt in a well-written essay:
What elements of Brown's speech do you think were persuasive enough to lead to a change in thinking on slavery of Americans, at the time the speech was delivered? Cite textual evidence to support your choices.
Write your five-paragraph essay in a Word document. Make sure to double space your document and use Times New Roman, 14 point font.
I have, may it please the Court, a few words to say.
In the first place, I deny every thing but what I have already admitted, of a design on my
part to free Slaves. I intended, certainly, to have made a clean thing of that matter, as I did last
winter, when I went into Missouri, and there took Slaves, without the snapping of a gun on either
side, moving them through the country, and finally leaving them in Canada. I desired to have
done the same thing again, on a much larger scale. That was all I intended. I never did intend
murder, or treason, or the destruction of property, or to excite or incite Slaves to rebellion, or to
make insurrection.
I have another objection, and that is, that it is unjust that I should suffer such a penalty.
Had I interfered in the manner, and which I admit has been fairly proved, – for I admire the
truthfulness and candor of the greater portion of the witnesses who have testified in this case, –
had I so interfered in behalf of the Rich, the Powerful, the Intelligent, the so–called Great, or in
behalf of any of their friends, either father, mother, brother, sister, wife, or children, or any of
that class, and suffered and sacrificed what I have in this interference, it would have been all
right. Every man in this Court would have deemed it an act worthy a reward, rather than a
punishment.
This Court acknowledges too, as I suppose, the validity of the LAW OF GOD. I saw a
book kissed, which I suppose to be the BIBLE, or at least the NEW TESTAMENT, which teaches me that, "All things whatsoever I would that men should do to me, I should do even so to
them." It teaches me further, to "Remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them." I
endeavored to act up to that instruction. I say I am yet too young to understand that GOD is any
respecter of persons. I believe that to have interfered as I have done, as I have always freely
admitted I have done, in behalf of his despised poor, I have done no wrong, but RIGHT. Now, if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life, for the furtherance of the ends
of justice, and MINGLE MY BLOOD FURTHER WITH THE BLOOD OF MY CHILDREN,
and with the blood of millions in this Slave country, whose rights are disregarded by wicked,
cruel, and unjust enactments, – I say; LET IT BE DONE.
Let me say one word further: I feel entirely satisfied with the treatment I have received on
my trial. Considering all the circumstances, it has been more generous than I expected; but I feel
no consciousness of guilt. I have stated from the first what was my intention, and what was not.
I never had any design against the liberty of any person, nor any disposition to commit treason,
or excite Slaves to rebel, or make any general insurrection. I never encouraged any man to do
so, but always discouraged any idea of that kind.
Let me say something, also, in regard to the statements made by some of those who were
connected with me. I hear that it has been stated by some of them, that I have induced them to
join me; but the contrary is true. I do not say this to injure them, but as regarding their weakness.
Not one but joined me of his own accord, and the greater part at their own expense. A number of
them I never saw and never had a word of conversation with, till the day they came to me, and
that was for the purpose I have stated. Now I have done.
– John Brown
Before it was declared the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire, the place that became known as Constantinople was ?
A. an ancient Roman colony that had few inhabitants.
B. a small Greek farming village on the banks of a major river.
C. an ancient Greek city with an ideal location for trade.
D. a city built by Roman generals to train Roman soldiers.
Before it was declared the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire, the place that became known as Constantinople was an ancient Greek city with an ideal location for trade.
The Eastern Roman Empire, often known as the Byzantine Empire, existed between the years of 330 and 1453. Later, the Latin Empire (1204–1261), the Ottoman Empire, and the Latin Empire all had their capitals in Constantinople (1453–1922). The Turkish capital then shifted to Ankara after the Turkish War of Independence. The Republic of Turkey's greatest city and financial hub, Istanbul, was renamed officially in 1930. Moreover, it is the biggest city in Europe. Emperor Constantine the Great designated the ancient city of Byzantium as the new capital of the Roman Empire in 324 and changed its name to "New Rome." On 11 May 330, it was renamed to Constantinople, and dedicated to Constantine.
Learn more about Constantinopole here:
https://brainly.com/question/14235394
#SPJ4
What was the Romans' attitude toward Christianity before A.D. 313?
Romans' attitude toward Christianity before A.D. 313 was generally negative as Christianity was a very new religion and people saw Christianity as strange religion.
The rulers of roman during that time saw Christianity as a threat to their rule and power in the longer term. Christians were generally treated very harshly and they were subjected to torture and execution.
Nero who was emperor of Rome during the 1st century was infamous for his execution of Christians for their beliefs. Even after many executions of Christians, it spread like wildfire, especially among lower classes and particularly among slaves. It was the Edict of Milan in A.D. 313 that recognized Christianity.
To know more about the origin of Christianity -
brainly.com/question/11578816
#SPJ4
which was the chief reason the anti-federalists wanted a bill of rights?
The chief reason the anti-federalists wanted a bill of rights was it provided protections of individual liberties missing from the constitution, the correct option is C.
Anti-federalism was a political movement that opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution and opposed the development of a more strong federal government in the United States in the late 18th century. In the previous constitution, known as the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, states were given more authority.
State ratification of the Constitution was hampered by the absence of a "bill of rights." The Federalists disregarded a bill of rights because they thought it was superfluous. Without one, the Anti-Federalists refused to support the Constitution out of concern about a strong central authority.
To learn more about the anti-federalists follow the link: https://brainly.com/question/29496480
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Which was the chief reason the Anti-Federalists wanted a bill of rights?
A- It introduced a unanimous vote requirement for amendments.
B- It mandated the creation of currency, which made business transactions easier.
C- It provided protections of individual liberties missing from the Constitution.
As if having no shelter or no food wasn't enough, the Loyalists also faced the challenge of discrimination from the settlers who lived in The Bahamas as they tried to settle here. Develop and explain this point. Give couple reasons and state source
Answer:
Also try to check if my answer is correct. Source given at the bottom page
Explanation:
FIRST REASON for this discrimination was the economic competition between the Loyalists and the settlers. The Loyalists were often skilled and educated individuals who brought with them valuable resources and knowledge. This made them a threat to the local settlers, who felt that their own economic prospects were threatened by the Loyalists' arrival. As a result, the settlers sought to limit the Loyalists' access to land, resources, and opportunities, which further perpetuated the cycle of poverty and discrimination.
SECOND REASON for this discrimination was cultural differences between the Loyalists and the settlers. The Loyalists were often of British origin and brought with them a different set of customs and values. This made them stand out in The Bahamas, and many settlers viewed them with suspicion and hostility. The Loyalists were also often associated with the British government, which was seen as an oppressor by many of the settlers who had fought for their own independence.
Source: "Loyalists in The Bahamas" by Dr. Gail Saunders, published in The Bahamas Historical Society Journal, Volume 21 (October 1999).