Answer:
14th amendment basically means anybody born or naturalized in the United States is guaranteed equal by law
Explanation:
14th amendment
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
what is the least severe form of denying liberty
Restriction is the least severe form of denying liberty.
It is more of a moral restrain than a physical restrain, the least severe deprivation from liberty. Nonjudicial punishment or NJP is a disciplinary measure more serious than the administrative corrective measure but less serious than trial by court. Refusal of bail is one such type of denying liberty, when the court refuse the acceptance of bail plea of the convicted or accused, it limits the access of certain places or goods by stopping them to do so in the form of punishment or to protect from another bad happening. These denials doesn't violate the right to liberty of a person as such rights are limited by the law when ever needed.
Know more about "liberty" visit
brainly.com/question/13207672
#SPJ4
The event challenged the foreign policy of President Adams is Attacks on U.S. ships. True/False?
The event challenged the foreign policy of President Adams is Attacks on U.S. ships. This statement is true.
The United States and France were in an unofficial state of war as soon as John Adams took office in 1797. His presidency was dominated by the Quasi-War, which controlled both home and foreign policy.
By bolstering the American Navy to defend American ships at sea, Adams prevented war. John Adams established the Department of Navy during his administration, and the U.S.S. Constitution as well as other ships were launched.
It was encircled in 1789 by hostile British, Spanish, and Indian forces. Full-scale war with Britain and a "quasi-war" with France were the results of conflicts on the continent and on the high seas. Indians on the border, Brits on the Great Lakes, and North African pirates in the Mediterranean Sea were all engaged by American troops.
To know more about Attacks on U.S. ships, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/4388878
#SPJ4
What happened in Lemon v Kurtzman?
In Lemon v. Kurtzman, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that laws in Pennsylvania and Rhode Island that gave Catholic school instructors a taxpayer-funded wage supplement were unconstitutional for violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
The Lemon v. Kurtzman decision is significant because it created the Lemon Rule, a three-part analysis to assess whether a law violates the First Amendment's ban on the establishment of religion. A significant Supreme Court ruling called Lemon v. Kurtzman forbade state governments from giving taxpayer money to schools with a religious affiliation. State financing may now be used in religiously connected schools in Pennsylvania and Rhode Island to pay teachers' salaries and purchase instructional supplies. The Establishment Clause and the separation of church and state were both broken, according to the Supreme Court's ruling.
Learn more about Lemon v Kurtzman here:
https://brainly.com/question/9031401
#SPJ4
What is American Eagles return policy online?
The return policy of the American Eagles company states that there is no limit related to time as such for returning the product and getting a refund for the same if the consumer is not satisfied with the products that they have purchased from the company.
The return policy can be taken into interpretation as the policy offered by a company to accept its products being returned to it by the consumers, wherein the company is under an obligation to provide a refund for the same to their customers. This policy is usually provided by the company to protect its consumers against any manufacturing defects, or malfunctioning of the products.
Learn more about return policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/14337606
#SPJ4
The locality rule is sometimes invoked when
a. a physician practices in a remote location.
b. a real estate contract is breached.
c. res ipsa loquitur applies.
d. jury members are from the same city
Out of the given choices of alternatives, it may be concluded that the locality rule is sometimes invoked when the physician practices in a remote location. Therefore, the option A holds true.
There are a number of rules in the different fields of operations. These rules are mostly given under the authorities of the government, and the citizens are bound to obey them for a longer course of time. One such rule is that of locality rule. However, when a professional provides his or her services in a remote location away from their localities, the rule is invoked.
Learn more about rules here:
https://brainly.com/question/28188534?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
The Constitution has comparatively little to say about the structure and composition of the Supreme Court. Identify two aspects of the Court's structure and composition that the Constitution does not specify. (The Constitution does specify these two basic aspects of structure and composition for the other two branches).
The Constitution has comparatively little to say about the structure and composition of the Supreme Court, the two aspects that the constitution doesn't comment upon is the number of justices in the court and the difference between chief justice and other judges.
The constitution is the supreme law of land, it is the framework within which the government and all the three aspects of government the legislature, the executive and the judiciary function. Within judiciary the constitution confers certain powers to all the levels of courts to perform their functions to confer legal rights to the common people. It also bounds the courts in certain situations but the structure and composition of the courts is not widely discussed under the constitution. It doesn't mention the maximum number of judges to be appointed in a court nor it differentiates between a chief justice and other judges of the court.
Know more about "Constitution" visit
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
What to do during a traffic break?
During a traffic break, also known as a traffic pause or traffic hold, you should slow down and maintain a safe following distance from the vehicle in front of you.
You should not change lanes or try to pass other vehicles during a traffic break. It's important to stay alert and focused on the road during a traffic break, as sudden changes in traffic flow can occur. You should be prepared to stop quickly if necessary, so keep your foot close to the brake pedal.
You can use the time during a traffic break to check your surroundings, make sure your seat belt is securely fastened, and adjust your mirrors or climate control.
Remember to remain patient and avoid road rage during a traffic break. It's a common occurrence on busy roads and highways, and getting frustrated or angry will not make the traffic move any faster.
To know more about traffic break here
https://brainly.com/question/10629809
#SPJ4
Which term refers to the person conveying title, often called the "party of the first part," in a deed?
A. Notary public
B. Witness
C. Grantor
D. Grantee
Grantor refers to the person conveying title, often called the "party of the first part," in a deed. The correct option is C.
To convey is to give a property interest to another person, either through a gift or a sale. A conveyance is the legal term for this transaction. A deed is the common method for transferring a property interest.
A conveyance deed is a type of real estate document that effectively demonstrates that a piece of property has no outstanding debts. The document that serves as the official record of the transfer of title from one person to another at a mutually agreed-upon price is sometimes referred to as a real estate conveyance instrument.
A conveyance deed serves as ownership documentation. The ownership of property is mentioned. Legally transferring property rights: You can swiftly give someone else ownership of your property by using a conveyance document.
To know more about estate, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29408476
#SPJ4
how does a member of congress vote if they’re acting as a trustee?
As a trustee, a member of Congress is expected to vote in accordance with the interests of their constituents, rather than their own personal beliefs or interests.
This means that they should take into consideration the views and preferences of their constituents when casting their vote.
In practice, a member of Congress acting as a trustee might gather input from their constituents through town hall meetings, surveys, or other means of public engagement. They might also consult with experts and stakeholders to inform their decision-making.
When it comes time to vote, the member of Congress would weigh the various factors and make a decision that they believe best serves the interests of their constituents.
They might also communicate their reasoning and decision to their constituents to ensure transparency and accountability.
To know more about member of Congress here:
https://brainly.com/question/28583709
#SPJ4
What is universe law?
In the fields of law and ethics, the terms "universal law" or "universal principle" refer to ideas of legal legitimacy, whereby the principles and regulations governing human behaviour.
They are most universal in their acceptance, their applicability, their translation, and their philosophical foundation are therefore regarded as the most legitimate. There is a significant universal law that, if followed carefully, can help in resolving problems involving human actions. However, even though this universal law has remained constant over time, partial application without full comprehension has resulted in many failures in dealing with problems involving humanity. The Universal Law of Human Functioning is this law. "HUMAN FUNCTIONALITY IS EQUAL TO ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE AND THE APPLICATION OF THE ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE, IF OTHER CONDITIONS REMAIN CONSTANT" states the universal law of human functionality.
Learn more about functionality here:
https://brainly.com/question/30553767
#SPJ4
what amendment grants states the ability to make laws?
Document A: Chamberlain
(Sourcing) When and where did this speech take place? What was Chamberlain's goal for the Munich Agreement?
In October 1938, the Document A: Chamberlain took place in the House of Commons. The main goal of the Munich Agreement was to prevent the breaking out of the World War II.
The Munich Agreement was a significant event in the United States' history. However, the entire goal or the primary intention of holding the event of Chamberlain as a forming part of this agreement was to find ways to prevent the Second World War from breaking out, but unfortunately, everything went in vain as it eventually happened.
Learn more about the Munich Agreement here:
https://brainly.com/question/29770761
#SPJ4
Identify the aims and accomplishments of the Virginia Plan proposed by the Constitutional Convention.-It stressed the establishment of a two-house legislature.-Its proposed size and structure for Congress would bolster the power of the larger states.-argued that the country's large size and diversity of interests would be its strength-found support from cosmopolitan areas
Ultimately, the Virgi/nia Plan was one of the proposals that led to the creation of the United States Constitution. Its aim was to establish a strong central government that could effectively govern the diverse interests of the states. It accomplished this by proposing a bicameral legislature based on proportional representation, which would give more power to the larger states, and by establishing the executive and judicial branches of the government.
What is Constitutional Convention?Generally, The Vi/rginia Plan was proposed by James Madison at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. Its main aims were to establish a strong central government and to provide for the representation of the people based on population. The plan proposed the following:
A bicameral legislature: The Vir/ginia Plan called for a two-house legislature, with a lower house elected by the people and an upper house elected by the lower house.
Proportional representation: The number of representatives in both houses would be based on each state's population. This proposal was supported by the larger states, as they would have a greater say in the government.
Executive and Judicial branches: The Virgi/nia Plan called for a single executive who would be elected by Congress and a judiciary appointed by the executive.
The Vir/ginia Plan's proposed size and structure for Congress would bolster the power of the larger states. It argued that the country's large size and diversity of interests would be its strength. The Virgi/nia Plan found support from cosmopolitan areas and was seen as a way to balance the interests of different regions.
Read more about Constitutional Convention
https://brainly.com/question/11662939
#SPJ1
Jessie did not meet the minimum income requirement to file a tax return. What is one reason for why she should file a tax return anyway?answer choicesA. She could potentially get a refund for the taxes that were withheld from her paycheck.B. She still needs to report her income to the Federal government.C. She can qualify for a higher tax refund next year.D. She is still legally required to file a tax return even if she does not meet the minimum income requirement to owe taxes.
One reason why Jessie should file a tax return even if she did not meet the minimum income requirement to file is that she could potentially get a refund for the taxes that were withheld from her paycheck. option A is correct.
Even if she did not earn enough income to owe taxes, if taxes were withheld from her paychecks, she may be eligible for a refund of those taxes. Filing a tax return is the only way to claim that refund from the government. A paycheck is a check written out to you for your salary or compensation. Both a checking and a savings account are acceptable for deposits. Your paycheck is often cashed without charge at a bank or credit union where you have an account.
For such more question on tax return
https://brainly.com/question/30655098
#SPJ4
The actions of the House Un-American Activities Committee and Senator Joseph McCarthy demonstrated what idea?A. forming the Warsaw PactB. The government ignored citizens' rights under the guise of protecting national security.C. The Marshal PlanD. Warsw Pact & NATO
b. The activities of the House Un-American Activities Committee and Senator Joseph McCarthy proved that the government disregarded the rights of the people while ostensibly defending national security.
The acts of Senator Joseph McCarthy and the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) proved that the government violated people' rights while ostensibly defending national security. HUAC and McCarthy led a campaign to find accused communists and Soviet spies in the US during the Cold War, frequently utilising intimidation and terror to accuse innocent individuals of being traitors. This created an atmosphere of mistrust and anxiety that violated people's rights and threatened democratic principles. A more general dread of Soviet influence and the imagined threat of communist infiltration in American culture was mirrored in the acts of the HUAC and McCarthy, which constituted an extreme kind of anti-communist hysteria.
learn more about government here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
according to the video the juvenile court documentary even though a separate juvenile justice system was created for white youth, african american youth were initially still treated as adults.
The juvenile court system was established in the US a little more than a century ago, with the first court opening in Illinois in 1899. Prior to it, children were judged, tried, and punished like "miniature adults."
Where does the need for a separate juvenile justice system come from?In an effort to keep juvenile offenders out of the criminal justice system and to promote rehabilitation that is specific to each youngster's needs, the United States established a separate juvenile justice system about a century ago.
Why is the creation of a distinct juvenile justice system so important?The core goals of the juvenile justice system are to successfully reintegrate youth into society, improve their abilities, provide habilitation, and provide rehabilitation, in addition to maintaining public safety.
Learn more about juvenile court system: https://brainly.com/question/2342468
#SPJ1
What branch can refuse to confirm judicial appointments?
The senate can refuse to confirm judicial appointments. It is the upper chamber of the United States Congress.
Being the upper chamber of Congress the Senate has many powers of advice and consent which are unique. The power includes the approval of treaties and the confirmation of Cabinet secretaries, federal judges including Federal Supreme Court justices, flag officers, regulatory officials, ambassadors and other federal executive officials and federal uniformed officers. If anyone not receives a majority of electors for vice president then the duty falls to the Senate to elect one of the top two recipients of electors for that office. The Senate has been considered as both deliberative and prestigious body than the House of representatives due to the longer terms it has and smaller size and statewide constituencies which historically led to a more collegial and less partisan atmosphere.
To learn more about Senate
https://brainly.com/question/29790817
#SPJ4
marlene is a law school professor speaking about the philosophy of law under the british system. which of the following legal categories is she addressing? multiple choice statutory construction historical jurisdiction jurisprudence ordinances
Marlene is law school professor speaking about philosophy of law under the British system. Jurisprudence of the following legal categories she is addressing.
What is Jurisprudence?Jurisprudence is the study of law, its philosophy, history, and the theoretical foundations that shape its practice. It seeks to understand the nature of law, how it is created, and how it operates in society. Jurisprudence examines the various theories of law, including natural law, legal positivism, and critical legal studies, and analyzes how these theories impact legal decision-making. It also considers the role of judges, the relationship between law and morality, and the ways in which law interacts with other social institutions. Jurisprudence is an interdisciplinary field that draws on philosophy, political science, sociology, and other disciplines to provide a comprehensive understanding of the law and its effects on society.
To learn more about jurisprudence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26279888
#SPJ1
What is one important difference between a sublease and a lease assignment?A. In an assignment, responsibility for the original lease is transferred completely to the assignee.B. In a sublease, the original tenant retains primary responsibility for performance of the original lease contract.C. A sublease does not convey any of the leasehold interest.D. A sublease conveys the entire leasehold interest.
The first important difference between a sublease and an assignment is that in an assignment, responsibility for the original lease is completely transferred to the assignee.
This means that the assignee takes on all rights and obligations under the original lease contract and the original tenant has no further responsibility for fulfillment of the lease. In a sublease, on the other hand, the original tenant retains primary responsibility for performance of the original lease contract.
This means that the original tenant still has some responsibility for fulfillment of the lease, even after subleasing the right to occupy the property to another tenant.
To know more about lease contract go to
https://brainly.com/question/29380983
#SPJ4
_______ supported by the larger states who wanted strong state governments
_______ stated that Congress couldn't act on the slave trade for 20 years
_______ based congressional representation on population size and taxes paid
________ presented by William Paterson
________ a unicameral Congress, like that under the Articles
________ a plural executive
________ equal representation in Congress
The Virginia Plan supported by the larger states who wanted strong state governments, while Commerce and Slave Trade states that Congress couldn't act on the slave trade for 20 years.
Virginia Plan based congressional representation on population size and taxes paid. New Jersey Plan was presented by William Paterson, New Jersey Plan was a unicameral Congress, like that under the Articles and New Jersey Plan was a plural executive and New Jersey Plan demarcated equal representation in Congress.
New Jersey Plan was formulated to provide one vote to each smaller state under the Article of Confederation, while in Virginia plan, the vote was given on the basis of population. The New Jersey plan was favored by small states and Virginia plan was favored by large states.
Learn more about New Jersey plan at:
brainly.com/question/19836218
#SPJ4
The public's right to know via the media does not conflict with the victim's right to privacy. True or false?
The statement "The public's right to know via the media does not conflict with the victim's right to privacy" is false.
Whenever a person suffers a crime, its identity is safeguarded from media so as to protect their rights, but the facts of cases can't be concealed until personal or private in order spread awareness among the masses. The UN Declaration recognized the major components of the rights of victims of crime: 1. access to justice and fair treatment; 2. restitution 3. compensation in the form of money or job that can secure the future of the victims from society; 4. rehabilitation or assistance throughout the legal process and right to protection of privacy and safety.
Know more about "right to privacy" visit
brainly.com/question/1145825
#SPJ4
What is the free exercise clause prohibits the government from passing laws that have any impact on religion?
Answer: The Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion as they please, so long as the practice does not run afoul of a "public morals" or a "compelling" governmental interest
The free exercise clause prohibits the government from passing laws that interfere with the free exercise of religion.
Explanation:The free exercise clause is part of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and prohibits the government from making laws that interfere with the free exercise of religion.
This means that the government cannot pass laws that target or burden religious practices or beliefs.
For example, if a law is specifically designed to restrict the practice of a particular religion, it would likely violate the free exercise clause.
Learn more about free exercise clause here:https://brainly.com/question/5245894
#SPJ2
duplicate registration attempts per market will be disqualified. is this statement true or false?
The claim seems to be accurate. That implies that any attempts to register duplicates (more than once) for a given market would be rejected.
Depending on the situation, the word "market" might indicate many things. A market is typically used to describe a certain business or sector where products or services are bought and sold. It may also refer to the region or demographic segment where a good or service is marketed or offered for sale. In business and economics, the idea of a market is crucial because it influences supply and demand, pricing, and competition. In some situations, the word "market" can also refer to a system or platform where transactions are carried out, such a stock exchange or an online marketplace. Creating a winning company plan and achieving commercial success require an understanding of the market.
Learn more about market here:
https://brainly.com/question/13627328
#SPJ4
the primary legal responsibility of business is to obey the law. true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The primary legal responsibility of a business is to obey the law. This means that businesses must operate within the legal framework established by the government, including complying with relevant laws, regulations, and rules. Businesses must also fulfill their legal obligations, such as paying taxes, obtaining necessary licenses and permits, and complying with labor laws and environmental regulations. While businesses have many other responsibilities, such as fulfilling their obligations to customers and stakeholders, obeying the law is the foundation of any ethical and responsible business practice.
a defendant on trial for burglary planned to raise in his defense that his arrest was a result of racial profiling. during voir dire, the prosecutor exercised h
As interrogation without counsel throughout a crucial stage of the case violates the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel, the court should exclude the defendant's admission of the theft.
It is likely that the court will determine that the defendant's rights under the Sixth Amendment were violated. Every "critical stage" of a criminal prosecution, including any police questioning after the defendant has been accused of a crime, is covered by the Sixth Amendment's assurance that the defendant has the right to legal representation. The police questioned the defendant in this case while he was already on trial for arson for a similar theft. Due to the denial of the defendant's right to legal representation, the confession acquired during that questioning may be deemed inadmissible.
learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
A defendant was on trial for arson of an office building. During the trial, the police officers who initially arrested him began to suspect that the defendant was also responsible for a theft of several computers that took place in the office building on the same night as the arson. One evening during the arson trial, the police visited the defendant in jail, read him his Miranda rights, and began to question him about the theft. The defendant eventually confessed, and the police informed the prosecutor of his confession. The prosecutor later wants to charge the defendant with theft, using the statement that was obtained by the police in the jail. The defendant's attorney objects on the grounds that the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights were violated. The court should:
a driver with recent traffic convictions pays more for insurance because?
A driver with recent traffic convictions may pay more for insurance because they are considered to be at a higher risk of being involved in an accident.
Insurance companies determine premiums based on the likelihood of the insured filing a claim, and drivers with recent traffic convictions are considered to be a higher risk because they have demonstrated a history of unsafe driving behaviors.
Traffic convictions such as speeding, reckless driving, driving under the influence, or at-fault accidents may result in an increase in insurance premiums. Insurance companies may also check a driver's driving record periodically, and any recent traffic convictions may lead to an increase in premiums.
For such more question on traffic convictions
https://brainly.com/question/15388145
#SPJ4
when a party wishes to excuse a potential juror without giving a reason, the party may exercise a:
When a party wishes to excuse a potential juror without giving a reason, the party may exercise a peremptory challenge. This is a special type of challenge that allows a party to excuse a potential juror without giving a reason and without the approval of the other party or the court.
This type of challenge allows a party to remove a potential juror from the pool without any reason or explanation; it is a "challenger for cause" that does not require the party to meet a burden of proof or demonstrate cause for the challenge.
In a civil case, each side may exercise a limited number of peremptory challenges; in criminal cases, the state gets a limited number of peremptory challenges and the defendant gets an unlimited number of peremptory challenges.
To know more about peremptory challenge go to
https://brainly.com/question/30655221
#SPJ4
what are the three types of authority exercised in a construction contract
The three types of authority exercised in a construction contract are apparent, expressed(written) and limited.
A construction contract is a legally binding agreement between two parties for construction of any building or monuments in exchange of certain money based on a tender. This contract mentions every detail of the construction work which gives right to the parties to exercise their rights and claim answers to that. Three types of authority are conferred by contract in a construction work apparent, expressed(written) and limited authority. where apparent authority refers to the power of an agent to act on behalf of a principal, even though not expressly or impliedly granted. Expressed authority is a form of written authority to a agent to work on behalf of principal, and limited authority where certain decisions cannot be solely made by the principal or agent it has to be discussed. These are the three types of authorities exercised in a construction contract.
Know more about "contract" visit
brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ4
one result of muller v. oregon was that women were still considered weak, dependent, and incapable of enjoying the same economic rights as men. (T/F)
One result of Muller v. Oregon was that women were still considered weak, dependent, and incapable of enjoying the same economic rights as men. - True
Despite the fact that Muller v. Oregon was an important Supreme Court case that contributed to the establishment of some rights for women in the workplace, the ruling for the case was founded in part on the idea that women were weaker and less competent than men. Because people thought that women were more prone to health problems and other negative effects of long working hours, the state once created a rule that limited the number of hours that they might work in certain professions.
Curt Muller, the proprietor of a laundry who had been penalised for breaking the law, contested the law, and the matter ultimately reached the Supreme Court. The Court had then upheld the statute in its ruling, citing worries for the health and well-being of female workers. But, the Court's decision also included some of the then-dominant viewpoints on the capabilities and restrictions of women.
Read more about Muller v. Oregon on:
https://brainly.com/question/2899136
#SPJ4
What belief is the defining characteristics of pluralism?
The belief that is the defining characteristic of pluralism is that it encourages a diversity of political opinion.
In political science, pluralism is the idea that power in modern democracies should not be held by a single elite or group of elites, but rather should be distributed among a range of economic and ideological pressure groups.
According to pluralism, diverse functional or cultural groups within a community, such as religious organisations, labour unions, professional associations, and racial minorities, should be allowed to exercise their autonomy.
A political concept known as pluralism asserts that people of various backgrounds, ideologies, and lifestyles can live in harmony and equally participate in politics.
To know more about pluralism, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/20712075
#SPJ4