It usually refers to people who are under the jurisdiction of the city and is meant to address matters of local concern.
What is jurisdiction?Jurisdiction refers to the authority or power that a court or legal system has over a particular territory, person, or subject matter. This includes the power to make legal decisions and enforce laws within a specific geographic area or over individuals or entities. Jurisdiction may be based on different factors such as where the crime or incident occurred, the nationality of the parties involved, or the subject matter of the case. It is important because it ensures that cases are heard in the appropriate court and that legal decisions are enforceable. Jurisdiction can be challenged by parties involved in a case, and disputes over jurisdiction may lead to legal challenges and appeals. The concept of jurisdiction is an important aspect of the legal system, as it helps to establish boundaries and ensure fairness in legal proceedings.
To learn more about jurisdiction, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15110253
#SPJ1
which system only allows members of a ruling elite to govern? A. Oligarchy B. Monarchy C. Patriarchy
The system that only allows members of a ruling elite to govern is called an oligarchy.
Hence, the correct option is A.
In an oligarchy, a small group of people hold power and make decisions for the society or organization. This group may be based on wealth, military power, social status, or other factors, but the key characteristic is that it is a select group of individuals who have control over the governing process.
Monarchy refers to a system in which a single person, usually a king or queen, holds power.
Patriarchy refers to a system in which men hold more power and authority than women.
To know more about members here:
https://brainly.com/question/2407649
#SPJ4
For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a corporation is considered to be a citizen of:
A.Every state in which it is incorporated and the one state in which it has its principal place of business
B.The first state in which it was incorporated and every state in which it does substantial business
C.The first state in which it was incorporated and the one state in which it has its principal place of business
D.Every state in which it is incorporated and every state in which it does substantial business
A corporation is regarded as a citizen of each state in which it was incorporated as well as the state that serves as its primary place of business for the purposes of diverse jurisdiction. As a result, a business is allowed to have citizenship in two or more states for diversity-related reasons.
What is Citizenship?A citizen and a country have a legal tie when they are citizens. Typically, the nation is the one where a person was born, resides, supports, and receives protection. Normally, a person is a citizen of the nation in which they were born, but occasionally, a person will seek for naturalisation in order to become citizen of another nation. There are nations that permit dual citizenship and nations that do not. Jus soli, or right of soil, entitles people who are born in the nation to citizenship. Individuals with foreign parents may be citizens by naturalisation. Jus sanguinis, the right of citizenship for members of the national diaspora, is also recognised by some nations. Jus sanguinis, which translates to "right of blood," is a Latin term.
To know more about Citizenship visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11052165
#SPJ1
if a restriction imposed on speech by the government is content neutral, then a court will not allow it. true/false
False. The Supreme Court has supported restrictions on speech that are not based on content in a number of situations, including noise ordinances.
An imposition of a limitation or prohibition on something or someone is known as a restriction. A restriction on speech refers to a judicially imposed constraint on a person's capacity to communicate through spoken or written words. Governments or private organisations may impose speech restrictions, and these restrictions may take many various forms. For instance, laws that penalise specific forms of communication, like defamation or hate speech, or regulations that restrict the way, when, and where speech can be expressed are examples of speech limitations. While the right to free speech is a fundamental human right protected by many countries' laws and constitutions, restrictions on speech are frequently the subject of legal disputes.
Learn more about restriction here:
https://brainly.com/question/8062739
#SPJ4
During the pre-trial phase, witnesses are summoned to the courtroom in which they will testify to facts of a case. During the trial, both fact witnesses and expert witnesses give testimony. Write a response comparing and contrasting what happens with an expert witness versus a fact witness.
Although both fact witnesses and expert witnesses can offer crucial testimony during a trial, there are some significant distinctions between the two.
A fact witness is a person who has firsthand knowledge of the events leading up to a legal dispute. In a trial or hearing, they are asked to testify to give their personal account of incidents or actions that are important to the case. Everyone who has seen the events in question or took part in them qualifies as a fact witness, including victims, spectators, and law enforcement personnel. Both the prosecution and the defence often cross-examine fact witnesses, whose testimony can be used to establish the chronology of events, demonstrate or refute elements of a crime, or support or refute other pieces of evidence in the case. They are not allowed to provide their own opinions during their testimony, which is restricted to the case's facts.
Learn more about Fact witnesses here:
https://brainly.com/question/16268618
#SPJ4
the law of diminishing marginal utility explains why
The law of diminishing marginal utility is an economic concept that explains why the satisfaction or usefulness that a person derives from consuming additional units of a good or service tends to decrease as they consume more of it.
The law states that as a person consumes more and more of a good or service, the marginal utility, or the additional satisfaction or benefit they receive from consuming each additional unit, decreases. This means that while the first unit of a good or service consumed may provide a lot of satisfaction or utility, each additional unit consumed provides progressively less satisfaction.
This concept is important because it helps to explain consumer behavior and how people make choices about how to allocate their resources. For example, a person may be willing to pay a high price for the first unit of a good or service, but as they consume more of it, they may become less willing to pay the same high price, because the marginal utility they receive from each additional unit is decreasing.
The law of diminishing marginal utility is a fundamental concept in economics and helps to explain a wide range of phenomena, from consumer behavior to the pricing of goods and services in the marketplace.
For such more question on law of diminishing
https://brainly.com/question/19070161
#SPJ4
What does civil liability mean for sellers or servers of alcohol?
In the context of injuries caused by them, licensees and their sellers may be held civilly liable.
In civil cases, bars, restaurants, and other establishments with a license to sell and/or serve alcohol may be held accountable for doing so unlawfully. The relevant legislation, also referred to as "dram shop laws," differ from state to state, sometimes dramatically.
Anybody who violates any of the terms of Sections 4 and 6 or any Central Government order made thereunder is subject to a sentence of up to six months in jail, a fine of up to $1,000, both, or both. If the violation is persisted, a further fine may also be imposed.
To know more about civil liability mean refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/16679204
URGENT! PLEASE!
Discuss what aviation security existed prior to 9/11 and what changes occurred after the events to improve the safety of all air passengers?
Prior to 9/11, aviation security consisted of metal detectors, X-ray machines, and limited searches of passengers and their luggage. Passengers would be randomly selected for additional screening, as well as questioning.
What is the metal detectors?Metal detectors are electronic devices used to detect the presence of metal objects. They are used in a wide variety of applications, including security screening, archaeological prospecting, and industrial production. Metal detectors are usually composed of a search coil, transmitter, and receiver, with the search coil generating a magnetic field and the receiver detecting metal objects passing through the field. They can detect various kinds of metal objects, including coins, jewelry, weapons, and other valuable items.
After 9/11, aviation security underwent a drastic overhaul to ensure the safety of all air passengers. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was created to implement and manage a more comprehensive security system. This included additional screening measures, such as enhanced pat-downs, full body scans, and the use of explosive trace detection systems.
To learn more about metal detectors
https://brainly.com/question/28894363
#SPJ1
When the host country's national anthem is played when you are visiting a foreign port, you should take what action?
When the host country's national anthem is played while visiting a foreign port, it is customary and respectful to stand at attention and be silent during the playing of the anthem.
If you are in a group, it is also appropriate to face the direction of the flag or the location of the music source, and to stand with your feet together and your hands by your sides. Men should remove their hats as a sign of respect.
It is important to note that customs and etiquette may vary across different countries, so it is always a good idea to research and familiarize yourself with the cultural norms of the country you are visiting to ensure that you are behaving respectfully and appropriately.
To know more about cultural norms here
https://brainly.com/question/12425056
#SPJ4
A major goal of the allied statesmen at the Congress of Vienna was to -
answer choices
establish democratic governments throughout Europe.
maintain a balance of power in Europe.
return Napoleon Bonaparte to power
support nationalist movements in Poland, Italy, and Germany.
A major goal of the allied statesmen at the Congress of Vienna was to option B: maintain a balance of power in Europe.
The "balance of power" was the congress' guiding philosophy, which sought to ensure that no nation had sufficient influence to destabilize international relations. Klemens von Metternich, an Austrian diplomat, was concerned that Tsar Alexander may incite revolution as a means of establishing Russian dominion in Europe.
Von Metternich had serious concerns about Russian expansionism and political/social upheaval. The Confederation of the Rhine, which increased German unity and prevented revolution, was supported by European nations in order to deter potential Russian aggression. Bavaria, Wurttemberg, and Saxony were also kept as autonomous kingdoms.
To know more about Congress of Vienna, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/14225676
#SPJ4
what was the berlin blockade, and what did stalin hope to gain from it?
The Berlin Blockade was implemented by Soviet leader Joseph Stalin starting on June 24 1948 to 12 May 1949, cutting off all land and river transit between West Berlin and West Germany.
The Soviet Union (USSR) blocked access to the western sector of Berlin, which was governed by the US, UK, and France.
Joseph Stalin, the leader of the Soviet Union, desired to increase its area and create a barrier separating it from Europe after a lengthy history of hostile incursions. He also desired power over the nations of Central and Eastern Europe that the Soviets had assisted in liberating.
The USSR blocked the highways to prevent the NATO countries from delivering supplies to the war-torn Berlin because they intended to have the entire city to themselves.
The Berlin Blockade was an effort by the Soviet Union in 1948 to restrict access for travellers from the United States, Great Britain, and France to their respective parts of Berlin, which were wholly located inside Russian-occupied East Germany.
Nonetheless, the Americans launched the Berlin Airlift, which over a period of time transported thousands, if not millions, of supplies to West Berlin.
To known more about Berline blockade https://brainly.com/question/3798821
#SPJ4
Do what is right and let the law catch up?
Ultimately, whether to "do what is right and let the law catch up" is a personal decision that each individual must make for themselves, taking into account their own moral principles, the specific situation at hand, and the potential consequences of their actions.
What is a phrase?Generally, The phrase "do what is right and let the law catch up" suggests that there may be situations where the law has not yet caught up to what is morally or ethically right, and that in such cases, individuals should act based on their conscience and sense of morality rather than solely following the law.
While it is important to respect and abide by the law, it is also important to recognize that the law is not always perfect or infallible. There may be times when the law is unjust or does not adequately address certain issues, and in such cases, individuals may have a moral obligation to act in a way that aligns with their own ethical principles, even if it means breaking the law.
However, it is also important to recognize that breaking the law can have serious consequences, both legally and personally. It is important to carefully consider the potential consequences of one's actions and to be prepared to accept the legal and personal repercussions that may result.
Read more about phrase
https://brainly.com/question/15806900
#SPJ1
when the result of a lawsuit at the trial court level is appealed, the successful party in the trial court is called the ________.
The successful party in the trial court is known as the appellee when the outcome of a litigation at the trial court level is appealed.
Is trial court and district court same?District courts settle disputes by gathering the relevant information and using legal standards to determine who is correct. Trial courts have a district judge who conducts the trial and a jury who renders the verdict.
What does an Indian trial court do?A court with original jurisdiction where trials are conducted is known as a trial court or court of first instance. Higher courts having the ability of appellate review typically hear appeals from the judgements of trial courts (appellate courts).
To know more about Trial court visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14839358
#SPJ1
If a restriction imposed by the government is content neutral, then a court will not allow it.True False
It is false that if a restriction imposed by the government is content-neutral, then a court will not allow it.
Content-neutral regulations are those that apply to all expressions without taking into account their message or substance.
Such prohibitions frequently only regulate the place, time, and manner of speech, as opposed to laws that restrict speech based on its content. This distinction is critical in First Amendment challenges because content-based legislation is subject to intense scrutiny, the highest level of judicial review, but content-neutral legislation is only subject to intermediate, or mid-level, assessment.
Because many content-based laws are overturned and many content-neutral laws are upheld by the courts, the distinction frequently has an impact on how a case turns out.
Reviewing courts usually look at whether the government meant to repress expression when it established the law to assess whether the statute is content-based or content-neutral.
To learn more about content-neutral, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/30691182
#SPJ4
Which of the following powers is NOT explicitly given to Congress by the Constitution? a. the power to impeach the President b. the power to regulate commerce among the states c. the power to extradite a person accused of a crime from one state to another d. the power
The power to impeach the President is not explicitly given to Congress under the Constitution.
The correct option is A.
According to the Constitution, Congress has the power to oust the President, Vice President, and all federal civil servants for treason, bribery, or other serious offences.
This technique was brought over from English practice, where Parliament impeached and found guilty ministers and Crown favorites in an effort to check the Monarch's power.
The Framers of the Constitution understood the impeachment power of Congress as a critical instrument for holding government officials accountable for legal infractions and abuses of power.
It serves as a significant check on the Executive and Judicial Branches.
All federal are liable to removal via impeachment, but the President and federal judges have been the targets of most notable use of the instrument by Congress.
To know more about the impeachment process, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11542266
#SPJ4
The question is incomplete. The complete question is:
Which of the following powers is NOT explicitly given to Congress by the Constitution?
a. the power to impeach the president
b. the power to regulate commerce among the states
c. the power to extradite a person accused of a crime from one state to another
d. the power to confirm the president's nominee to fill a vacancy in the vice-presidency
benefits of the rule of law as a democratic policy which supports democracy
The rule of law is a fundamental democratic policy that provides a framework for governance that is essential for the functioning of a democratic society.
What are the advantages of the rule of law as a democratic policy that aids democracy?Protects individual rights: The rule of law ensures that the rights of individuals are protected by providing a framework for fair and impartial legal procedures. It ensures that everyone is equal before the law and that no one is above the law.Promotes transparency and accountability: The rule of law ensures that the government is transparent and accountable to its citizens by setting clear rules and procedures for governance. This helps to prevent corruption, abuse of power, and arbitrary decision-making.Fosters economic growth and development: The rule of law provides a stable and predictable legal framework for businesses to operate in, which encourages investment, innovation, and economic growth. It helps to ensure that contracts are enforced, property rights are protected, and disputes are resolved fairly and efficiently.Enhances social stability: The rule of law provides a framework for resolving disputes and conflicts in a peaceful and orderly manner. It helps to prevent violence and unrest and promotes social stability by providing a mechanism for resolving conflicts and grievances peacefully.Facilitates democratic participation: The rule of law provides a framework for citizens to participate in the democratic process by providing a fair and impartial legal system. It ensures that elections are conducted fairly, that the rights of citizens are protected, and that government officials are held accountable to the people they serve.To learn more about investment, click
https://brainly.com/question/15105766
#SPJ1
The rediscovery process is in its final stage when activists make headway toward their goals. True or false?
The statement "The rediscovery process is in its final stage when activists make headway toward their goals" is false.
The rediscovery process of the victims of crime, Americans became more active and informed of the increasing crime so in order to support the victims this social movement to rediscover the victims started. During 1980s politicians engaged in social struggles and enacting laws that can help rediscover the plight of innocent victims. Various social groups and activists joined the movement to help these victims and pressurize the government to make strict provisions for various crimes. Many bills were presented in front of the senate which were ratified to uplift these survivors of crimes. The rediscovery process can analyze the effectiveness of certain measures taken to help survivors of crime but not in protecting others from the same fate.
Know more about "rediscovery process" visit
brainly.com/question/30301067
#SPJ4
The lex mercatoria was an unbiased system of rules for deciding _______ disputes across borders and political boundaries.
commercial
capacity
bussiness
product
The lex mercatoria was an unbiased system of rules for deciding commercial disputes across borders and political boundaries.
The corpus of commercial law utilised by merchants across mediaeval Europe was called lex mercatoria, or "merchant law," often known as "the Law Merchant" in English.
It developed as a body of custom and accepted practises, much like English common law, and was upheld by a network of merchant courts situated along the major trade routes. It evolved into a comprehensive body of law that was created, decided, and upheld freely, reducing conflict resulting from the members' varied backgrounds and regional customs.
Local state law was not always relevant due to the international context, and merchant law gave a standardised framework to conduct transactions, minimising the need for a third party to be trusted.
It highlighted contractual flexibility and the non-transferability of property, while eschewing legal minutiae and making decisions ex aequo et bono. Professional traders resurrected Europe's nearly nonexistent economic operations, which had collapsed with the fall of the Roman Empire, with the lex mercatoria.
To learn more about Lex mercatoria follow link; https://brainly.com/question/30755370
#SPJ4
when the government is unified it passes a significantly higher number of laws compared to the times when the government is under a divided control.
False. The number of laws passed when the government is unified is not much higher compared to the times when the government is under divided control.
The process for passing a law typically involves several steps, which may vary depending on the specific country or jurisdiction. Generally, a member of the legislature introduces a bill, which then goes through a series of committees and debates for review and possible revision. If the bill is approved by the legislature, it may be sent to the executive branch for approval or veto. If approved, the bill becomes law and may be implemented or enforced by the appropriate agencies. The law may also be subject to judicial review or challenges, which may impact its ultimate interpretation and application.
To learn more about law click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30037866
#SPJ4
The correct question is given as:
When the government is unified, it passes a significantly higher number of laws compared to times when the government is under divided control. True or false?
Give an example of current policy where we see marble cake federalism in which state and federal authorities are intertwined in an inseparable mix!
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a prominent example of marble cake federalism in which state and federal authorities are intertwined in an inseparable mix.
While providing federal cash to support private health insurance exchanges and provide other healthcare-related protections, the ACA compels states to extend Medicaid eligibility.
States can choose to implement the ACA on their own, but if they do not, the federal government will take over and do so. But, states are given significant latitude in how they carry out specific provisions of the legislation, such as how they run their Medicaid programmes and establish their insurance exchanges.
Under this form of federalism, states have some flexibility over how they carry out the law while federal authorities make sure that it is adhered to, creating the ideal balance between state and federal authority.
To learn more about legislation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ4
The framers of the Constitution intended the Supreme Court to be politically insulated. Despite this intent, the Supreme Court is not completely insulated from political influences.(a) Describe one constitutional provision that seeks to insulate the Supreme Court from public opinion.One point is earned for a description of a constitutional provision that seeks to insulate the Supreme Court from public opinion.• Justices serve for life.• Justices are appointed/not elected.• Justices' salaries cannot be reduced
The Supreme Court was supposed to be politically insulated, according to the Constitution's authors.
This indicates that they desired the Court's decision-making to be free from political pressure or interference.
The Constitution's framers incorporated a number of clauses to safeguard the Court's independence in order to accomplish this purpose.
They include lifetime appointments for justices, allowing them to make decisions without worrying about losing their positions as a result of their convictions.
Also, justices' salaries cannot be decreased, shielding them from outside influences like money.
Finally, justices are appointed and not elected, meaning that they are not subject to the popular opinion of the moment when making decisions.
Ultimately, the Constitution was designed to create an independent and impartial Supreme Court, free from political influence.
To know more about Constitution,
https://brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ4
what three countries follow religious law?
Iran, Israel, and India are the three countries that follow religious law.
The countries that follow religious law, follow religious cultures. Religious cultures are to teach ethical and moral principles as part of their law. These religious cultures are often believed to put different levels of significance on sacred law. These counties include India, Iran, Israel, and Pakistan.
Religious law comes from the deity, who searched it through prophets, whereas secular law is human created. The logical conclusion is that whereas secular laws can be altered by their authors, religious laws are seen as timeless and unchanging.
Furthermore, while secular law deals with our activities' effects on others, religious law instructs people on both what to believe and how to conduct.
To know more about religious law, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/11558625
#SPJ4
The soil from the tools in the truck and a set of footprints was orange-red. One of the forensic scientists in your lab concludes that Brittany Evans is being held in the northwestern tip of Missouri. What is a correct evaluation of his conclusion?
The forensic scientist's conclusion that Brittany Evans is being held in the north-western tip of Missouri based solely on the orange-red soil from the tools and footprints is likely premature and may be unreliable.
While soil samples can provide important clues about a suspect's location, it is important to consider other factors before drawing definitive conclusions. For example, it is possible that the soil samples could have been transported to a different location before the crime occurred or that the suspect deliberately left misleading evidence to throw investigators off their trail. In addition, footprints alone may not provide enough information to accurately pinpoint a suspect's location. To further evaluate the forensic scientist's conclusion, it would be important to conduct additional analysis of the soil samples and footprints, as well as gather other forms of evidence and intelligence to corroborate the findings. It would also be important to consider other potential locations and suspects before making any definitive conclusions about Brittany Evans' whereabouts.
To know more about forensic soil analysis, click here: https://brainly.com/question/30589606
#SPJ4
what the one issue you are addressing as the od practitioner recall?
The organization's staff training programme is one of the main challenges at hand. Employee productivity and efficiency increase with training.
By implementing innovative training techniques, the OD practitioner aids the organisation by assisting in the improvement of employees' skill sets, which is advantageous to the business. The effects of a recent change in the company's procedures or organisational structure are another problem that an OD petitioner must address. The new strategy will be examined by OD professionals, who will also gather data about it, compile a report, and then submit it.
Those tasked with implementing the firm's preplanned changes are organisational development practitioners. By implementing appropriate adjustments to the current system that will be highly effective, they play a significant part in the development of an organisation. About the problems the company is facing, they engage with other specialists there and come up with a workable plan for change.
To know more about OD practitioner, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30265271
#SPJ4
he first thing that you should do after entering your vehicle is _____
The first thing that you should do after entering your vehicle is to make sure that all of your vehicle's safety features are working properly.
This includes making sure that your seat belt is properly buckled, that your mirrors are properly adjusted, and that all of your lights are in working order.
While you are buckling your seatbelt and adjusting your mirrors, you should also check to ensure that there are no obstructions to your vision, such as a dirty or cracked windshield. Once you have taken these preliminary steps, you can then proceed to start your vehicle.
To know more about vehicle go to
https://brainly.com/question/24745369
#SPJ4
Who were the 3 Supreme Court justices?
In 2020, the United States Supreme Court was composed of nine justices. The three justices who garnered significant attention that year were Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, and Associate Justice Samuel Alito.
John Roberts, who was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2005, is the current Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Roberts is often seen as a swing vote on the court, meaning he has the ability to decide cases that are closely divided among the other justices.
Clarence Thomas was appointed by President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and is the longest-serving member of the current court. Thomas is known for his conservative views and originalist interpretation of the Constitution.
Samuel Alito was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2006 and is also considered a conservative justice. Alito is known for his strong views on individual rights, free speech, and the Second Amendment.
Complete question:
Who were the 3 Supreme Court justices in 2020 in the united states?
To learn more about Supreme Court
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
the retributive era is a return to the positive school of criminality, in which offenders have free choice to commit their crimes. (T/F)
It is false that the retributive era is a return to the positive school of criminality, in which offenders have free choice to commit their crimes.
The retributive era is a type of legal punishment that mandates the perpetrator be given a sentence for a crime that is both proportionate to and parallel to the offense.
Retributive justice, as contrasted to vengeance, is non-personal, only intended to punish injustice, has built-in boundaries, doesn't take pleasure in the pain of others, and adheres to procedural rules. The retributive era contrasts with other criminal justice goals, including deterrence (preventing future crimes) and offender rehabilitation.
Retributive justice serves as a conduit for public sentiments of vengeance in the political and judicial spheres. Lynchings, blood feuds, and other kinds of vigilante self-help are intended to be discouraged. On the premise that "the society that slays together, stays together", it is done in an effort to strengthen social cohesion by engaging in acts of punishment. To avoid a circumstance where a person who would have chosen to follow the law as part of his civic responsibilities thinks that it would be foolish for him to not break it when so many others are going to get away with it that the purpose of his obedience is largely lost.
To learn more about Retributive, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/30506033
#SPJ4
REALTOR Marguerite's listings portfolio is chock full of rehab properties, so on her website, she alters photos to show what they could look like if the right investor fixes them up. According to the Code of Ethics, is this acceptable?
If REALTOR Marguerite alters photos in a way that misrepresents the property's current condition, it would be a violation of the Code of Ethics.
What exactly is Code ethics?Code ethics, also known as computer ethics or digital ethics, refers to the ethical principles and values that govern the behavior of individuals and organizations in the use and development of technology and computer systems. It involves considering the impact of technology on society and the environment, as well as the responsibilities and rights of those who create, design, develop, and use technology.
Code ethics covers a wide range of topics, such as privacy, security, intellectual property, access, freedom of expression, and responsible use of technology. It aims to ensure that technology is developed and used in a way that is ethical, equitable, and beneficial to society as a whole.
To learn more about the Code of Ethics, click
https://brainly.com/question/28268879
#SPJ1
which part of the united states constitution protects the general right to privacy? choose the best answer.
The Fourth Amendment
Second amendment
Third amendment
The United States Constitution Fourth Amendment safeguards everyone's right to privacy. The correct answer is option(a).
The Fourth Amendment protects the right of solitude against extravagant searches and seizures for one management. The Fifth Amendment supports the right against self-accusation, which justifies the care of private news.
The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects crowds from senseless searches and seizures for one management. The Fourth Amendment, still, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are regarded extravagant under the regulation.
To know more about Fourth Amendment refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29791299
#SPJ4
what does batch prep mean?
Batch prep means the process of preparing a larger volume of a legal document in order to reduce turnaround times and improve efficiency.
The use of batch prep techniques can help to reduce the time and cost associated with preparing and filing legal documents, and can also help to improve the overall quality of legal work produced.
Batch prep can include pre-drafting standard documents that may be used repeatedly and then just editing the pre-drafted documents to fit a specific case. This can also include using software that will automatically generate certain parts of a legal document such as standard sections like the table of contents, headings and page numbers. This can save a lot of time when preparing legal documents, which can lead to lower costs for the client.
To know more about legal documents go to
https://brainly.com/question/3239989
#SPJ4
in 1689, british parliament signs into law a list of guarantees to its citizens. what is the document called?
The "Bill of Rights 1689" is a legal document that the British Parliament ratified in 1689 that promises a number of rights to its inhabitants.
Following the Glorious Revolution, which resulted in the toppling of King James II and the inauguration of William III and Mary II as joint monarchs, the English Parliament approved the Bill of Rights 1689.
The right to petition the queen, the prohibition against harsh and unusual punishment, and the right to a fair trial are just a few of the rights and liberties that were created by the Bill of Rights in 1689 and were expected to be protected by both the monarch and the government.
The Bill of Rights of 1689 also placed limitations on the power of the monarch and the government, requiring parliamentary authorization for some measures like taxation and army mobilisation. A foundational piece in the evolution of England's constitutional monarchy and the larger Western heritage of democratic administration is the Bill of Rights of 1689. There were still limitations on who may vote and hold office, and these rights were not made available to all residents.
For such more question on British Parliament
https://brainly.com/question/30811959
#SPJ4