Individual rights are moral or legal rights given to a individual.
The rights are assigned and protected by the constitution itself, to honor their liberty and freedom. These rights are protected by the judiciary and whenever a person violates such rights of another person the constitution gives the individual the right to seek help from judiciary. Individual rights are personal rights given to a person to protect his sovereignty but these don't exist in vaccum they are followed by numerous liberties as well which the person is liable perform. Individual rights enabled citizens to live freely and own property, and work according to their own interest without violating the rights of others.
Know more about "Individual rights" visit
brainly.com/question/619133
#SPJ4
Jessie did not meet the minimum income requirement to file a tax return. What is one reason for why she should file a tax return anyway?answer choicesA. She could potentially get a refund for the taxes that were withheld from her paycheck.B. She still needs to report her income to the Federal government.C. She can qualify for a higher tax refund next year.D. She is still legally required to file a tax return even if she does not meet the minimum income requirement to owe taxes.
One reason why Jessie should file a tax return even if she did not meet the minimum income requirement to file is that she could potentially get a refund for the taxes that were withheld from her paycheck. option A is correct.
Even if she did not earn enough income to owe taxes, if taxes were withheld from her paychecks, she may be eligible for a refund of those taxes. Filing a tax return is the only way to claim that refund from the government. A paycheck is a check written out to you for your salary or compensation. Both a checking and a savings account are acceptable for deposits. Your paycheck is often cashed without charge at a bank or credit union where you have an account.
For such more question on tax return
https://brainly.com/question/30655098
#SPJ4
the fallacy that occurs when the author makes a general statement without qualifying it, so that the generalization appears to include all members of a group, is known as a(n)
The fallacy that occurs when the author makes a generalized statement without even qualifying it, so that it appears to include all the members within a group is known as a hasty generalization.
Hasty generalization may be taken into general understanding as the concept wherein the occurrence of informal fallacy is being made by the jury or the judge, owing to the incomplete and insufficient evidences being presented at the time of hearing being made thereunder. These generalizations are usually made without taking all the variables or evidences into consideration.
Learn more about hasty generalizations here:
https://brainly.com/question/2222515
Complete question
the fallacy that occurs when the author makes a general statement without qualifying it, so that the generalization appears to include all members of a group, is known as a ___________.
what amendment provides the rationale for domestic violence reforms?
Fourteenth Amendment provides the rationale for domestic violence reforms.
Domestic violence refers to acts of aggression or other forms of abuse that take place in a marriage or other intimate relationship. Intimate partner violence, which can occur in relationships or between ex-spouses or partners, is frequently referred to as "domestic violence."
This type of violence is done against the other person in an intimate connection. Violence against children, parents, or the elderly is included in domestic violence in its fullest sense. Physical, verbal, emotional, financial, religious, reproductive, or sexual abuse are just a few of the many forms it can take.
To know more about Domestic violence, click here :
https://brainly.com/question/10279566
#SPJ4
Shawn files for bankruptcy. However, he does not mention his farmhouse in Farmington in the bankruptcy proceedings. The farmhouse is later discovered by the mortgage firm and included in the proceedings. Which of the following is true in this case?
A) Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
B) Shawn can use the discovery of the estate as a defense to his concealment.
C) Shawn is guilty of larceny as he did not reveal his estate during bankruptcy proceedings.
D) Shawn can be found guilty of counterfeiting.
E) Shawn is likely to be found not guilty since the estate was recovered and included in the proceedings.
Based on the available options and the situation described, the truth of the case is that Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
What is the Offense of Concealment?The offense of Concealment is a term that is used to describe the offense committed with direct or indirect intent.
Generally, the concealer must know at the moment of committing the deed, in any of the normative ways, that the good comes from committing a deed provided by criminal law.
Therefore, in this case, since it is revealed that Shawn did not mention his farmhouse in Farmington in the bankruptcy proceedings and was later discovered by the mortgage firm and included in the proceedings, or will be concluded that Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A.
Learn more about the Offense of Concealment here: https://brainly.com/question/30033867
#SPJ1
As you assess the upside of expanding into Argentina, you research its existing trade agreements with other countries. Of which economic community is Argentina a part?
-BRIC
-Mercosur
-USMCA
-EU
You investigate Argentina's trade agreements with other nations as you weigh the benefits of expanding there. Argentina is a member of the Mercosur economic bloc. The correct answer is option(b).
For the United States, the main aim of trade understanding search out defeat obstructions to U.S. exports, cover U.S. interests playing overseas and reinforce the rule of regulation in the FTA husband country or nations. Currently, the United States has 14 FTAs accompanying 20 nations.
Argentina, properly the Argentine Republic, is a country the in the southern half of South America. Argentina covers an extent of 2,780,400 km², making it the second-best country in South America following in position or time Brazil, one of four equal parts-best countries in the Americas, and the eighth-best country in the globe.
To know more about trade refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29103946
#SPJ4
Is composed of institutions and processes that rulers establish to strengthen and perpetuate their power and control over a land and its inhabitants. More complex gov't sometimes called the state.
The statement is partially correct.
The term "government" typically refers to the institutions and processes through which a society or political entity makes decisions and exercises authority over its citizens. This can include a variety of actors, such as elected officials, bureaucrats, and courts, who are responsible for enacting laws and policies, enforcing them, and resolving disputes.
While some governments may be established to strengthen and perpetuate the power of a particular ruler or ruling elite, not all governments are designed in this way. Many governments are created with the goal of serving the broader interests of the population, such as protecting their security, promoting economic development, and upholding human rights.
The term "state" is often used to refer to a more complex form of government that has a defined territory, a permanent population, and a centralized authority that exercises control over that territory.
To learn more about rights click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30349401
#SPJ4
What was the stated purpose of the Constitution?
The purpose of the U.S. Constitution was to create a government that could effectively govern the country and protect the individual rights of citizens, while also ensuring that no one branch of government became too powerful.
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States and outlines the framework of the country's government. The stated purpose of the Constitution is to establish a more perfect union, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. The Constitution was created in response to weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation, which governed the country after the American Revolution. The framers of the Constitution sought to create a stronger national government that could effectively govern the country while also protecting the individual rights of citizens. To achieve these goals, the Constitution established a system of checks and balances among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. It also outlines the powers and responsibilities of each branch, as well as the relationship between the federal government and the individual states.
To know more about the U.S. Constitution, click here: https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
The main goal(s) of ethics for government acquisition professionals is to1.Maintain the confidence and support of the American people.
2.Avoid even the appearance of impropriety
3.Both answers are correct.
4.None are correct.
Option 3 is correct. Both answers are correct. The main goals of ethics for government acquisition professionals is to maintain the confidence and support of the American people.
Government acquisition means the acquiring by contract with appropriated funds of supplies or services including construction by and for the use of the Federal Government through purchase or lease whether the supplies or services are already in existence or must be created, developed, demonstrated and evaluated. This is said to be a process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the agency it needs in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. Government acquisition is developing the overall strategy for managing the acquisition.
To learn more about Government acquisition
https://brainly.com/question/13348618
#SPJ4
when is the miranda warning required? **
The Miranda Warning is read by the police when a person who is in custody as well as the officer is questioning a particular individual about their crime or criminal activity.
In the country of United States, the Miranda warning is basically a type of notification or warning which is customarily given by the police to the criminal suspects who are in a police custody, or they are in a custodial interrogation, in order to advise them of their right to remain silent and protection from the self-incrimination.
This means that it is their right to refuse to answer any of the questions or provide any information to the law enforcement or the other officials. These rights are known as the to as the Miranda rights.
To know more about Miranda Warning
https://brainly.com/question/29619409
#SPJ4
What branch can refuse to confirm judicial appointments?
The senate can refuse to confirm judicial appointments. It is the upper chamber of the United States Congress.
Being the upper chamber of Congress the Senate has many powers of advice and consent which are unique. The power includes the approval of treaties and the confirmation of Cabinet secretaries, federal judges including Federal Supreme Court justices, flag officers, regulatory officials, ambassadors and other federal executive officials and federal uniformed officers. If anyone not receives a majority of electors for vice president then the duty falls to the Senate to elect one of the top two recipients of electors for that office. The Senate has been considered as both deliberative and prestigious body than the House of representatives due to the longer terms it has and smaller size and statewide constituencies which historically led to a more collegial and less partisan atmosphere.
To learn more about Senate
https://brainly.com/question/29790817
#SPJ4
according to thoreau what should be respected more than the law
Laws are the formal expression of governmental decisions. Men and women should esteem the right more highly than the law, in Thoreau's opinion, because the latter may not represent the former given that it is determined by numerical criteria rather than moral standards.
Resistance to Civil Government, an article by Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862), introduced the concept of civil disobedience, which holds that people should not allow any government to intrude upon their consciences.
Thoreau argues that it is the responsibility of conscientious individuals to act in order to avoid being instruments of the government's injustice, for as by refusing to pay taxes in the face of an unjust law.
Thoreau's question, "Unjust laws exist; shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once?," is an example of this kind of thinking. It has negative effects on people's attitudes towards their governments and has legal repercussions.
To know more about Laws
https://brainly.com/question/14661439
#SPJ4
What is the free exercise clause prohibits the government from passing laws that have any impact on religion?
Answer: The Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion as they please, so long as the practice does not run afoul of a "public morals" or a "compelling" governmental interest
The free exercise clause prohibits the government from passing laws that interfere with the free exercise of religion.
Explanation:The free exercise clause is part of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and prohibits the government from making laws that interfere with the free exercise of religion.
This means that the government cannot pass laws that target or burden religious practices or beliefs.
For example, if a law is specifically designed to restrict the practice of a particular religion, it would likely violate the free exercise clause.
Learn more about free exercise clause here:https://brainly.com/question/5245894
#SPJ2
Document A: Chamberlain
(Sourcing) When and where did this speech take place? What was Chamberlain's goal for the Munich Agreement?
In October 1938, the Document A: Chamberlain took place in the House of Commons. The main goal of the Munich Agreement was to prevent the breaking out of the World War II.
The Munich Agreement was a significant event in the United States' history. However, the entire goal or the primary intention of holding the event of Chamberlain as a forming part of this agreement was to find ways to prevent the Second World War from breaking out, but unfortunately, everything went in vain as it eventually happened.
Learn more about the Munich Agreement here:
https://brainly.com/question/29770761
#SPJ4
must one state honor the ruling of a state court in another state?
Yes, under article 4 section 1 of the constitution one state must honor the ruling of a state court in another state.
The article states that "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State." Hence, one state is liable to honor and accept the ruling of a another state court whether it interprets the statute differently. The state courts are formed to act in their own jurisdiction on the basis of geographical area as addressed and issues and other state court cannot interfere in the jurisdiction of each other, only the Supreme Court was given the power to intervene in certain issues regarding some statutes and interpretation of laws by the constitution to keep a check on working of the state and regional judicial authorities.
Know more about "constitution" visit
brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
a defendant is found guilty of a misdemeanor. on what grounds must a court grant a new trial?
A defendant is found guilty of a misdemeanor. On Defendant's Motion grounds, a court must grant a new trial. If the defendant moves, the court may vacate any decision and order a fresh trial if the interests of justice demand it.
A trial is defined as a formalized hearing in a law court when a judge and jury insights obtained and deliberate whether a person is convicted of a crime.
A prosecution's trial is the most important step of the process. This stage assists judges in administering justice in a way that is fair to both the defendant and the complainant. It guarantees that the topic is properly considered before concluding whether the accused is responsible or harmless.
A defendant commits a misdemeanor. A new trial must be granted on the basis of the Defendant's Motion. Therefore, if the defendant makes a motion, the court may overrule any judgment and order a new trial if the interests of justice necessitate it.
Learn more about the trial, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/4570749
#SPJ4
Room invasions are a significant security issue for hotels located in CONUS. (Antiterrorism Scenario Training, Page 1)
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
CONUS is "Continental United States." which is anywhere in the united states
Police and military are taught to handle room invasions in the instance one happens; rules are set in place to minimize the chances of invasion.
Room invasions can pose a significant security issue for hotels located in the Continental United States (CONUS), requiring appropriate measures to ensure the safety and security of guests and staff. Therefore, the given statement is true.
Room invasions refer to unauthorized entry or intrusion into hotel rooms, posing a significant security concern for hotels. Such incidents can jeopardize the safety and privacy of guests, leading to potential theft, assault, or other criminal activities.
Hotels must implement robust security measures to prevent room invasions, including strict access controls, surveillance systems, trained staff, and effective emergency response protocols.
Additionally, proper communication and collaboration with law enforcement agencies can help address and mitigate the risk of room invasions, ensuring a secure environment for guests and maintaining the reputation of the hotel.
Learn more about Room invasions here:
https://brainly.com/question/31861303
#SPJ6
which is not a case for rule utilitarianism?
Rule Utilitarianism - Case against Utilitarianism in General
1. Utilitarianism forces us to use a single scale or measure to evaluate completely different
kinds of consequences.
2. Utilitarianism ignores the problem of an unjust distribution of good consequences
Neither of the statements you provided is a case against rule utilitarianism specifically.
Rule utilitarianism seeks to address the problem of using a single scale to evaluate consequences by focusing on general rules that, if followed, would maximize overall well-being.
Additionally, rule utilitarianism may address the problem of an unjust distribution of good consequences by formulating rules that promote justice and fairness.
The case against utilitarianism in general is not a case for rule utilitarianism, but rather a critique of utilitarianism as a whole.
That being said, there are still criticisms of rule utilitarianism, such as the difficulty in formulating universal rules that can account for all possible scenarios, and the potential conflict between following rules and promoting individual well-being.
To know more about rule utilitarianism here:
https://brainly.com/question/28148663
#SPJ4
which amendment(s) address and protect the rights of women?part 3 ap gov
The 14th Amendment address and protect the rights of women. In 1937, the argument that restricting the freedom of contract by establishing minimum pay for women and children violates due process was finally abandoned.
The 14th Amendment states that all people who are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and who were born or naturalized there are citizens of both the nation and the state in which they currently reside. No State shall enact or carry out any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens; no State shall rob anyone of their life, liberty, or property without due process of law; and no State shall refuse to any person within its borders the equal protection under the law.
The 14th Amendment disregarded such supporting evidence, declared it was unable to see any rational connection between the statute and the legitimate goals of health or safety, and condemned the statute as an arbitrary restriction on the right to contract in order to invalidate comparable legislation, such as laws establishing minimum wages for women and children.
Even in the Lochner era, the due process clause was interpreted to allow the States to establish maximum hours regulations that applied to female employees and those in particular professions deemed to be physically demanding or otherwise deserving of special protection.
To learn more about the 14th Amendment, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/29793577
#SPJ4
what does reverend sykes tell scout to do after the verdict comes in? why does he do this?
Reverend Sykes tells Scout to stand up after the verdict comes in, and he does this to show a sense of respect towards his father.
Reverend Sykes is a character from a fictional story, which includes a legal battle being fought between the central characters of Scout and his father. When the court grants the verdict in favor of the father, and against the interest of Scout, Reverend Sykes advices Scout to stand up for showing a sense of respect for his father, as a matter of facts related thereto.
Learn more about Reverend Sykes here:
https://brainly.com/question/8002302?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
in this type of plea, a defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a lesser included charge.
In the reduced sentence plea, the defendant basically pleads guilty or nolo contendere to get a included charge.
The correct option is option b.
The purpose of reduced sentences is to get the offenders plead guilty of their crimes as early as possible because when they do this, it particularly saves victims as well as the witnesses from the stress of basically going through a trial, such as having to relive their ordeal as well as being repeatedly cross examined about it.
This is very important when there are young and the vulnerable victims which should not be put through further traumatic experiences. It also reduced the number of cases which are going in a trial and thus helps in improving the efficiency of the criminal justice system.
Hence, the correct option is b.
To know more about reduced sentences
https://brainly.com/question/17238327
#SPJ4
--The given question is incomplete, the complete question is
"In this type of plea, a defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a lesser included charge. a. Vertical plea. b. Reduced-sentence plea c. Horizontal plea. d. Avoidance-of-stigma plea."
what is the least severe form of denying liberty
Restriction is the least severe form of denying liberty.
It is more of a moral restrain than a physical restrain, the least severe deprivation from liberty. Nonjudicial punishment or NJP is a disciplinary measure more serious than the administrative corrective measure but less serious than trial by court. Refusal of bail is one such type of denying liberty, when the court refuse the acceptance of bail plea of the convicted or accused, it limits the access of certain places or goods by stopping them to do so in the form of punishment or to protect from another bad happening. These denials doesn't violate the right to liberty of a person as such rights are limited by the law when ever needed.
Know more about "liberty" visit
brainly.com/question/13207672
#SPJ4
Which of the following is a state and federally funded healthcare program for low income people living in the US?
Medicaid is the country's public health insurance programme for residents of the US who have low incomes.
The nation's public health insurance programme for those with low incomes is called Medicaid. One in five Americans are covered by the Medicaid programme, including those who have complicated and expensive medical requirements. The programme is where most Americans get their long-term care insurance. Most Medicaid beneficiaries do not have access to alternative cheap health insurance. Medicaid restricts enrollee out-of-pocket expenses while providing coverage for a variety of healthcare services. Medicaid provides considerable funding for hospitals, community health centres, doctors, nursing homes, and employment in the healthcare industry, accounting for close to 5% of all personal health care spending in the U.S. The programme is governed by Section XIX of the Social Security Act and a substantial set of federal rules, which specify federal Medicaid criteria as well as state alternatives and authority. Medicaid is implemented through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), a division of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
To learn more about Medicaid, click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/30468247
#SPJ4
what is the reason for traffic laws?
Traffic laws are put in place to promote safe and orderly movement of people and vehicles on public roadways.
The following are the primary reasons for traffic laws:
Safety: Traffic regulations are intended to keep all road users safe, including drivers, passengers, pedestrians, and cyclists.
Order: By setting rules and recommendations for how drivers should act in various scenarios, traffic regulations serve to create order and predictability on the roadways.
Efficiency: By controlling traffic flow, decreasing congestion, and eliminating delays, traffic rules can also serve to promote efficient use of roadways.
Equal Access: Traffic regulations also assist in ensuring that all road users have equal access to the roadway and that no one group is improperly disadvantaged or favoured.
For such more question on Traffic laws:
https://brainly.com/question/1071840
#SPJ4
united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is one of the thirteen federal appellate courts in the United States.
It has jurisdiction over cases from the District of Columbia and federal agencies. The court hears cases in three-judge panels and has the power to review decisions of federal agencies and lower courts.
The court also has a special role in reviewing certain types of cases, such as those involving constitutional issues, and has frequently been referred to as the second-highest court in the United States, after the Supreme Court.
The court is composed of eleven active judges and four senior judges who continue to hear cases on a part-time basis. The judges are appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. The court is headquartered in Washington, D.C., and hears cases throughout the year.
To learn more about United States Court
https://brainly.com/question/16760725
#SPJ4
What does fiscal policy involve increases or decreases in?
Fiscal policy is the political conclusion to increase or decrease taxation and giving. Fiscal tactics and monetary policy are frequently secondhand together to influence the economy. The fiscal procedure can influence an association's development, renting skills, and taxes.
Fiscal policy is a main finish for directing frugality by way of allure ability to influence the total amount of product produced—that is, gross household fruit. The first impact of monetary growth is to raise the demand for merchandise and aid. This better demand leads to increases in two together productivity and prices.
The management can use contractionary fiscal policy to slow business-related endeavors by depreciating management giving, increasing income tax, or an alliance of two together. Decreasing management giving tends to slow business-related projects as the management purchases less merchandise and aids from the private sector.
To know more about fiscal policy refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29992592
#SPJ4
_______ supported by the larger states who wanted strong state governments
_______ stated that Congress couldn't act on the slave trade for 20 years
_______ based congressional representation on population size and taxes paid
________ presented by William Paterson
________ a unicameral Congress, like that under the Articles
________ a plural executive
________ equal representation in Congress
The Virginia Plan supported by the larger states who wanted strong state governments, while Commerce and Slave Trade states that Congress couldn't act on the slave trade for 20 years.
Virginia Plan based congressional representation on population size and taxes paid. New Jersey Plan was presented by William Paterson, New Jersey Plan was a unicameral Congress, like that under the Articles and New Jersey Plan was a plural executive and New Jersey Plan demarcated equal representation in Congress.
New Jersey Plan was formulated to provide one vote to each smaller state under the Article of Confederation, while in Virginia plan, the vote was given on the basis of population. The New Jersey plan was favored by small states and Virginia plan was favored by large states.
Learn more about New Jersey plan at:
brainly.com/question/19836218
#SPJ4
what could elizabeth have done right before she turned in the paper to avoid plagiarism?
Elizabeth could have done several things right before she turned in the paper to avoid plagiarism:
Properly cite all sources: It is important to properly cite all sources used in the paper. This includes direct quotes, paraphrased information, and any ideas or concepts taken from other sources. Proper citation includes both in-text citations and a bibliography or works cited page.Paraphrase correctly: When paraphrasing, it is important to put the information into your own words and not simply change a few words or rearrange the sentence structure. Paraphrasing also requires proper citation.Check for accidental plagiarism: Before turning in the paper, it is important to double check for any accidental plagiarism. This can be done by using a plagiarism checker tool or by carefully reviewing the paper and comparing it to the original sources.By following these steps, Elizabeth can ensure that her paper is free of plagiarism and that she is giving proper credit to the original sources.
To know more, check out: https://brainly.com/question/1654147
#SPJ1
when a nation puts government-backed insurance programs in place to cover major types of foreign investment risk, it has the effect ofa. restricitng outward FDI by a host countryb. restricitng outward FDI by ahome countryc. restricitng inward FDI by a host countryd. encouraging inward FDI by a host countrye. encouraging outward FDI by a home country
The correct answer is d. encouraging outward FDI by a home country.
What is an outward FDI?
A business strategy known as an outward direct investment (ODI) is one in which a local company expands its activities to a foreign nation.
ODI may come in a variety of shapes and sizes depending on the organisation. As an illustration, some businesses will invest in "green fields," which is when a parent firm establishes a subsidiary abroad. Moreover, a merger or purchase may take place abroad (and so may be considered an outward direct investment). As a last option, a business may choose to implement an ODI strategy by expanding an existing foreign site. As home markets become saturated and greater commercial prospects are available abroad, using ODI is a logical next step for businesses.
Outward foreign direct investment, or ODI, is another name for foreign direct investment.
to learn more about FDI click:
https://brainly.com/question/28139114
#SPJ1
What was one of the original goals of the First Amendment?
The First Amendment declared that the government could not establish a state religion or impose excessive limitations on religious practice, but rather that it must respect people's freedom to exercise their faith as they see fit.
In 1789, the United States' first amendment came into existence. Even today, it protects citizens' rights to freedom of expression, of the press, of religion, of peaceful assembly, and of petitioning the government to make their complaints heard.
Religion, speech, the press, the right to petition, and the freedom to assemble are five important social values that are protected by the First Amendment of our Constitution. Our steadfast dedication to these ideals has endured challenging conflicts throughout our history and has remained a cornerstone.
To know more about the first amendment, refer to the:
https://brainly.com/question/6501700
#SPJ4
The 1950 case involving the District of Columbia's Washington Board of REALTORS® and the National Association of REALTORS® determined that "trade" involves which transactions?
a. Both interstate and intrastate
b. Interstate only
c. Intrastate only
d. Only transactions outside Washington, D.C.
The 1950 case involving the District of Columbia's Washington Board of REALTORS® and the National Association of REALTORS® determined that "trade" involves both interstate and intrastate. Therefore the correct option is A.
The case was a challenge to the National Association of Real Estate Boards' set of regulations that prohibited real estate brokers from working with minority buyers and sellers. The Supreme Court ruled in the case that the real estate business impacts interstate commerce and is subject to federal control under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.
As a result, the proper answer to the question is: a. Both interstate and intrastate. The Supreme Court ruled that because the real estate sector impacts both interstate and intrastate commerce, the National Association of Real Estate Boards could not govern it in a way that violated federal anti-discrimination legislation.
For such more question on trade:
brainly.com/question/14926566
#SPJ4