Theodore Roosevelt, who served as the 26th President of the United States from 1901 to 1909, had complex beliefs about big business. He believed that big businesses, particularly monopolies, had too much power and needed to be regulated in order to protect the public's interest. He also believed that big businesses had a responsibility to be good corporate citizens and to act in the best interest of the community.
During his presidency, Roosevelt acted on these beliefs by using the power of the federal government to break up monopolies and trusts, which were large corporations that controlled a significant portion of a particular industry. He also pushed for the passage of the Hepburn Act in 1906, which gave the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) more power to regulate railroad rates and to prevent monopolies from forming.
Additionally, he supported the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, which strengthened existing antitrust laws and helped to further break up monopolies. He also used the power of the presidency to mediate labor disputes, and to push for workplace safety and labor protections.
In summary, Theodore Roosevelt believed that big business had too much power and needed to be regulated in order to protect the public's interest, he acted on this belief by using the power of the federal government to break up monopolies, increase regulation and promote fair competition, as well as pushing for workplace safety and labor protections.
A student created this organizer for a document-based essay on the expansion of totalitarian states. Which fact could be added to Column B? Japan’s invasion of northeastern China the role of Japan’s emperor in government the names of Japan’s past military leaders an example of nationalist propaganda from Japan.
The fact that could be added to Column B is the role of Japan's emperor in government. In the context of the expansion of totalitarian states, Japan's emperor played a significant role in the government and the militaristic policies pursued by the country during that time.
The emperor held a revered and symbolic position in Japanese society, and his authority was exploited by the military leaders and nationalist factions to rally support for their expansionist agenda. The inclusion of the role of Japan's emperor in government in Column B would provide important information about the power dynamics and ideological underpinnings of Japan's totalitarian regime.
By acknowledging the role of Japan's emperor in government, students would be able to analyze how the emperor's position was utilized to promote militarism, nationalism, and the expansionist policies pursued by Japan.
This fact would highlight the centralization of power and the manipulation of traditional cultural and political institutions in the establishment and maintenance of the totalitarian regime in Japan.
It would also provide a basis for examining the cult of personality that surrounded the emperor and the impact of this propaganda on the Japanese population's perception and support for the state's aggressive actions.
Learn more about expansionist policies here :
https://brainly.com/question/806169
#SPJ11
how did the tet offensive affect civilian perceptions of the u.s. war effort in vietnam?
The Tet Offensive had a significant impact on civilian perceptions of the U.S. war effort in Vietnam.
The Tet Offensive was a series of coordinated attacks launched by the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces against South Vietnam and U.S. positions during the Lunar New Year holiday in 1968. While the offensive ultimately resulted in a military defeat for the North Vietnamese, it had a profound psychological impact on the American public.
The Tet Offensive shattered the perception that the U.S. was winning the war and exposed the gap between the official government statements and the reality on the ground. The extensive media coverage of the offensive, including images of violence and destruction in cities like Saigon, shocked the American public and raised doubts about the effectiveness and justification of the U.S. involvement in Vietnam.
It undermined the credibility of the Johnson administration's optimistic claims about progress in the war and fueled growing opposition to the conflict. The Tet Offensive marked a turning point in public opinion, as more Americans began to question the rationale and viability of the U.S. war effort in Vietnam.
Learn more about Vietnam here: brainly.com/question/32055975
#SPJ11
some of the money from the american arms deal with iran during the reagan presidency was secretly funneled to
The Reagan presidency, there were allegations and investigations regarding the secret funneling of money from the American arms deal with Iran This complex and controversial affair, known as the Iran-Contra affair, unfolded in the mid-1980s.
The Reagan administration sought to secure the release of American hostages held in Lebanon by Iranian-backed Hezbollah militants.
To achieve this, they engaged in a clandestine operation involving arms sales to Iran, despite an arms embargo in place due to Iran's role as a state sponsor of terrorism.
The profits generated from these arms sales were allegedly diverted to support the Nicaraguan Contras, who were fighting against the leftist Sandinista government.
The Contras had been barred from receiving direct funding by the U.S. Congress.
The diversion of funds was conducted through complex channels involving the use of third-party countries and intermediaries.
It is believed that Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North, a National Security Council staff member, played a central role in orchestrating these covert activities.
The secret funneling of money was a violation of U.S. law and caused a major political scandal when it was publicly revealed in 1986. Congressional investigations were launched, and several individuals were indicted and convicted, although some convictions were later overturned.
The Iran-Contra affair had significant political and legal ramifications, raising questions about executive power, government transparency, and adherence to the rule of law.
It remains a controversial chapter in American history, highlighting the complexities and ethical dilemmas associated with covert operations and foreign policy decision-making.
For similar questions onAmerican arms
https://brainly.com/question/29351844
#SPJ11
Which areas of the territory do you think were likely to be settled first? Explain your answer.
Answer:
Based on historical patterns of settlement, areas with access to waterways and fertile land were likely to be settled first.
Explanation:
Waterways provided transportation for goods and people , as well a agriculture and production of crops.
Additionally, minerals, and Wildlife were also attractive to settlers.
who was the European colonial power in East Africa until World War ll
The European colonial power in East Africa until World War II was primarily Britain.
Until World War II, the European colonial power in East Africa was predominantly Britain. Through a series of colonial conquests, treaties, and negotiations, Britain established its dominance over various territories in East Africa, including present-day Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania.
The British East Africa Company played a significant role in the colonization process, particularly in Kenya. Britain's primary interests in East Africa were economic, centered around the exploitation of natural resources, such as ivory and later on, agriculture, including the cultivation of cash crops like coffee and tea.
The region was also strategically important for Britain due to its proximity to the Indian Ocean and its role as a trade route to India. The British colonial administration imposed its political and legal systems, established infrastructure, and implemented policies that often favored British settlers and commercial interests.
However, the effects of colonial rule varied among different ethnic groups and regions in East Africa, leading to complex dynamics that would shape the post-colonial era.
For more such question on World War II
https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ11
einstein's general theory of relativity, as originally formulated without the cosmological constant, predicts
Einstein's general theory of relativity, as originally formulated without the cosmological constant, predicts several key phenomena and concepts:Gravitational bending of light.
The theory predicts that light passing through a gravitational field will be bent as it follows the curvature of spacetime caused by massive objects. This prediction was famously confirmed during a solar eclipse in 1919. Gravitational time dilation: According to the theory, clocks in stronger gravitational fields run slower than clocks in weaker fields. This phenomenon has been observed and measured through experiments and is an essential component of satellite-based navigation systems like GPS.Gravitational redshift: The theory predicts that light emitted from a source in a strong gravitational field will be shifted to longer wavelengths (redshifted) as it escapes the gravitational pull. This prediction has been confirmed through various observations and experiments.
The equivalence principle: The theory states that the effects of gravity are indistinguishable from the effects of acceleration. This principle forms the basis for understanding the relationship between gravity and the curvature of spacetime.The description of gravity as the curvature of spacetime: Einstein's theory describes gravity not as a force but as the result of the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. Massive objects, like planets or stars, curve the fabric of spacetime, and other objects move along the curved paths dictated by this curvature.
These predictions and concepts form the foundation of Einstein's general theory of relativity and have been extensively confirmed through observations and experiments.
To learn more about theory of relativity click here:
brainly.com/question/22816553
#SPJ11
Help me please all question
The Great Depression referred to the economic downturn that caused the stock market to crash in 1929, resulting in poor economic stability in the United States and a massive disaster indicating postwar disillusionment.
As it imposed large reparations and severe penalties on Germany, the Treaty of Versailles mirrored postwar disillusionment, fostering animosity and a sense of unfairness that contributed to World War II.
The phrase conveys bitterness towards the Treaty of Versailles and postwar disillusionment in the United States by implying that if the US had remained neutral, it could have averted the development of leaders such as Mussolini and Hitler.
Learn more about Great Depression, here:
https://brainly.com/question/7998129
#SPJ1
Hitler's first invasion with a newly rearmed germany in 1938, after the take-over of austria, was in which nation
After the takeover of Austria in 1938, Hitler's first invasion with a newly rearmed Germany was in the nation of Czechoslovakia.
Following the Anschluss (annexation) of Austria in March 1938, Adolf Hitler turned his attention to Czechoslovakia, specifically the Sudetenland region. The Sudetenland was home to a significant German-speaking population, and Hitler used their grievances as a pretext to pursue territorial expansion. In September 1938, the Munich Agreement was signed, which allowed Germany to annex the Sudetenland. Subsequently, in March 1939, Hitler violated the Munich Agreement and seized the remainder of Czechoslovakia, effectively dismembering the country and establishing a German protectorate over Bohemia and Moravia.
Learn more about Hitler's first invasion here:
https://brainly.com/question/5338087
#SPJ11
In which two Midwestern states are there cattle ranches? Minnesota, lowa, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Texas
Cattle ranches are commonly found in the states of Oklahoma and Nebraska in the Midwestern region of the United States.
Cattle ranching is prevalent in the states of Oklahoma and Nebraska in the Midwest. These states have a long history of agricultural traditions and favorable environmental conditions for raising cattle.
Oklahoma, located in the southern part of the Midwest, is known for its extensive cattle ranching industry. The state's warm climate and ample grazing lands make it an ideal location for raising cattle. Oklahoma's cattle ranches contribute significantly to the state's economy and play a vital role in supplying beef to both domestic and international markets.
Nebraska, located in the central part of the Midwest, is also a prominent state for cattle ranching. It is often referred to as the "Beef State" due to its large number of cattle and its leading role in beef production. Nebraska's vast grasslands and favorable climatic conditions support the growth and sustenance of cattle.
While Minnesota and Iowa are agricultural states in the Midwest, they are more commonly associated with crop farming, such as corn and soybeans, rather than cattle ranching. Texas, on the other hand, is renowned for its extensive cattle industry but is not considered part of the Midwest region.
Learn more about cattle industry here:
https://brainly.com/question/28916302
#SPJ11
What are the two preconditions to be the leader of one province during the reign of Emperor Yohannes IV.
The two preconditions to be the leader of one province during the reign of Emperor Yohannes IV were loyalty to the emperor and the ability to govern effectively.
During the reign of Emperor Yohannes IV in Ethiopia, loyalty to the emperor was paramount in order to maintain political stability and unity within the empire. Leaders of provinces were expected to demonstrate unwavering loyalty and support to the emperor's rule. Additionally, the ability to govern effectively was crucial for maintaining order, resolving conflicts, and ensuring the well-being of the province and its inhabitants. This included skills such as administrative competence, justice, diplomacy, and the ability to manage resources and provide for the needs of the people. Leaders who fulfilled these preconditions were more likely to gain the emperor's trust and support, securing their position as provincial leaders.
Learn more about Ethiopia here:
https://brainly.com/question/25244992
#SPJ11
Your essay will be about the establishment of Native American Boarding Schools and its effects on Native American children. Your essay should Be 4-5 paragraphs in length. Briefly describe the reasons given by the U.S. government for the establishment of Native American Boarding Schools. Briefly describe details of the environment in Native American Boarding Schools Describe the impact that the Native American Boarding schools had on Native American children and their culture. Feel free to use the work you did in your History Journal to help with your essay. Review the lesson content. In your essay you should support your points using evidence from the lesson and the material you just read.
until the early 1950s, the country the united states assisted in trying to control vietnam was:
Until the early 1950s, the country the United States assisted in trying to control Vietnam was French Indochina. The United States provided economic and military aid to France in its efforts to maintain its colonial rule over Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia.
In the early 1950s, the French were facing growing resistance from Vietnamese nationalists, who sought independence from colonial rule. In response, the United States increased its involvement in the conflict, providing financial and military assistance to the French colonial government.
This American involvement in Vietnam would continue to grow over the years, ultimately leading to the Vietnam War, which lasted from 1955 to 1975. The United States would become increasingly embroiled in the conflict, ultimately committing over half a million troops to the war effort. The war would have a profound impact on American society and foreign policy, and would ultimately end with the fall of Saigon in 1975 and the withdrawal of American troops.
Learn more about Vietnam Visit: brainly.com/question/24845081
#SPJ4
How were voters disenfranchised in Texas and how did activists like Willie Velasquez help change this?
Disenfranchisement can be defined as "the state of being deprived of a right or privilege, especially the right
to vote"
Willie Velasquez played a key role in changing the disenfranchisement of voters in Texas by advocating for voting rights, organizing voter registration drives, and challenging discriminatory practices.
In Texas, voters were disenfranchised through various discriminatory practices aimed at suppressing the voting rights of certain groups. One such practice was the imposition of poll taxes, which required voters to pay a fee in order to vote. This disproportionately affected low-income individuals who could not afford the tax, effectively preventing them from exercising their right to vote. Additionally, literacy tests were implemented, targeting minority communities and intentionally designed to be difficult to pass, further disenfranchising potential voters.
Gerrymandering, the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor a particular political party, was another tactic used to suppress voter participation. Districts were redrawn in a way that diluted the voting power of minority communities, ensuring that their voices were not adequately represented in the political process.
Activists like Willie Velasquez played a significant role in changing this disenfranchisement. Velasquez, the founder of the Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, dedicated his efforts to advocating for voting rights and increasing political participation among marginalized communities, particularly Latinos. He organized voter registration drives, providing education and resources to help people navigate the registration process. Additionally, he used legal means to challenge discriminatory practices such as poll taxes and gerrymandering, seeking to dismantle barriers that hindered equal access to the voting booth. Through his activism and the work of organizations like the Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, progress was made in expanding voting rights and combating voter disenfranchisement in Texas.
Learn more about disenfranchisement here:
https://brainly.com/question/15130699
#SPJ11
The Black Codes passed in a number of southern states after the Civil War were intended to A close public schools to the children of former slaves 00 promote the return of former slaves to Africa с enable Black citizens to vote in federal elections D place limits on the socioeconomic opportunities open to Black people E further the integration of southern society
The Black Codes passed in southern states after the Civil War were intended to place limits on the socioeconomic opportunities open to Black people.
The Black Codes were a series of laws enacted by southern states in the aftermath of the Civil War. The primary objective of these codes was to maintain white supremacy and restrict the rights and freedoms of newly freed African Americans.
One of the key purposes of the Black Codes was to limit the socioeconomic opportunities available to Black people. These laws imposed restrictions on employment, property ownership, and economic activities, aiming to maintain a system of labor that closely resembled slavery.
The Black Codes also sought to control and regulate the movements and behavior of Black individuals, often subjecting them to harsh penalties for perceived violations. These laws essentially aimed to maintain racial hierarchy and prevent Black people from attaining social and economic equality with white citizens.
Overall, the Black Codes were a deliberate attempt to suppress the rights and freedoms of African Americans and reinforce racial discrimination and segregation in the post-Civil War South.
Learn more about Black Codes here :
https://brainly.com/question/30380931
#SPJ11
t/f robert kennedy asserted that our national purpose and personal satisfaction are served by continuation of economic progress and amassing of worldly goods.
The statement 'Robert Kennedy asserted that our national purpose and personal satisfaction are served by continuation of economic progress and amassing of worldly goods' is false as he believed that material wealth is not sufficient to measure a society's well-being.
Robert Kennedy did not assert that our national purpose and personal satisfaction are served by continuation of economic progress and amassing of worldly goods. In fact, he argued for a more holistic approach to progress and happiness, one that includes social and environmental factors. He believed that GDP and material wealth were not enough to measure a society's well-being and that we should focus on improving the quality of life for everyone.
Kennedy's famous quote captures his philosophy: "Gross National Product measures neither our wit nor our courage, neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our compassion nor our devotion to our country. It measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile." Hence, the statement is false.
Learn more about Robert Kennedy:
https://brainly.com/question/30658230
#SPJ11
why the confederate avoid the slavery issue during the restoration of the unio
The Confederate states avoided the slavery issue during the restoration of the Union due to various factors, including political strategy, attempts to gain sympathy from Northern states, and the desire to maintain social and economic structures built on slavery.
After the Civil War, during the process of restoring the Union, the Confederate states sought to downplay or ignore the issue of slavery. This strategic approach was aimed at avoiding further conflict and resistance from Northern states that had fought against the Confederacy. By avoiding the slavery issue, Confederate leaders hoped to garner sympathy and support for their cause, particularly among those who were not fully aligned with the abolitionist movement.
Additionally, the Confederate states wanted to protect their economic and social systems that were deeply entrenched in slavery. Slavery had been the foundation of the Southern economy, and many Southern elites believed that the preservation of their agrarian way of life depended on maintaining the institution. By avoiding discussions about slavery, they aimed to safeguard their social hierarchy and economic interests.
It is important to note that the issue of slavery remained a significant factor during the Reconstruction era, as it was central to discussions on civil rights, political representation, and racial equality. However, the Confederate states, in their attempts to rebuild and reintegrate into the Union, strategically avoided direct confrontations on the slavery issue and instead focused on other aspects of the restoration process.
to learn more about slavery issue click here; brainly.com/question/813486
#SPJ11
In the 20th Century, the behavioralists and the post-behavioralists became the two dominant strains of Political Science. Which of these two strains of the discipline do you find more interesting and/or important? Why?
Answer: In the 20th century, there were two main groups of political scientists: the behavioralists and the post-behavioralists.
The behavioralists believed in using scientific methods, like observing and experimenting, to study politics. They wanted to treat politics like a science and use data to understand how people behave and make political decisions. They focused on gathering information, analyzing patterns, and making predictions based on evidence.
On the other hand, the post-behavioralists thought that politics couldn't be fully understood using just scientific methods. They believed that politics is influenced by things like culture, values, and individual perspectives. They wanted to study not just the facts and numbers but also the ideas, history, and social structures that shape politics.
Both groups have contributed important ideas to political science. The behavioralists helped us learn more about how people act in politics by using scientific methods and data. The post-behavioralists reminded us that politics is more than just numbers and facts, and that we need to consider things like culture and history.
Which group is more interesting or important can depend on personal interests and the specific questions being studied. It's good to appreciate both perspectives because they give us different ways to understand and study politics.
Explanation:
How did the Olympics play a part in permanent immigration?
The Olympics have played a significant role in permanent immigration through various ways. First, hosting the Olympic Games often leads to urban development and infrastructure improvements, making host cities more attractive for migrants seeking better opportunities. This, in turn, results in increased permanent immigration to these cities.
Second, the Olympics serve as a platform for cultural exchange, fostering an environment that celebrates diversity and encourages mutual understanding between different nations. This exposure to various cultures and traditions may encourage some individuals to consider immigrating to countries they otherwise might not have.
Third, the Games provide job opportunities not only during the event itself but also in the preparation and post-event stages. This includes construction, hospitality, and various support services. These jobs often attract foreign workers, who may decide to settle permanently in the host country after their work is completed.
Lastly, the Olympics inspire athletes to pursue their dreams, leading to the migration of talented individuals to countries with better sports facilities, training, and support. This phenomenon contributes to the global exchange of talent and encourages permanent immigration of athletes and their families.
The Olympics contribute to permanent immigration through urban development, cultural exchange, job opportunities, and the migration of talented athletes, enriching the host countries and fostering global connections.
For more questions on immigration
https://brainly.com/question/4269640
#SPJ11
All of the following were credited to Carnegie's success in the steel business EXCEPT ______.
Andrew Carnegie achieved great success in the steel business through various factors, except for his family's immense wealth.
Andrew Carnegie's success in the steel industry can be attributed to several key factors. First, he possessed exceptional business acumen and strategic vision. Carnegie was known for his ability to identify market trends, make shrewd investments, and leverage technological advancements to his advantage. Additionally, he implemented efficient production methods and cost-saving techniques, such as vertical integration, which allowed him to control the entire production process and reduce expenses. Furthermore, Carnegie was a skilled manager who assembled a talented team and fostered a culture of innovation and productivity. While Carnegie did come from a relatively modest background, his family's wealth was not a significant contributing factor to his success in the steel business. Instead, it was his entrepreneurial spirit, industry knowledge, and business strategies that propelled him to the top of the steel industry.
To learn more about Andrew Carnegie, refer:
brainly.com/question/27903913
#SPJ11
If you don't uphold your caste responsibility what happens
If a person does not uphold their caste responsibility in the caste system, they may face various social and cultural consequences within their community.
These consequences can range from social ostracism and exclusion to limited opportunities and discrimination. In the caste system, individuals are expected to fulfill their prescribed duties and responsibilities based on their caste or social position.
Failure to fulfill these responsibilities can lead to social stigma and loss of social standing. The exact consequences may vary depending on the specific caste system and cultural context.For instance, in some cases, individuals who do not uphold their caste responsibilities may be shunned or socially isolated by their community members. They may be excluded from social gatherings, religious ceremonies, or other communal activities. They may also face restricted access to resources, education, employment opportunities, and marriage prospects.In summary, not upholding one's caste responsibilities in the caste system can result in social ostracism, limited opportunities, and discrimination within the community. The consequences can vary depending on the specific caste system and cultural practices.
For more questions on Caste
https://brainly.com/question/25078974
#SPJ8
Who runs the day-to-day operations of a corporation? during the industrial age
1. employees
2. stockholders
3. labor unions
4.board of directors
During the industrial age, the day-to-day operations of a corporation were primarily run by the employees, specifically the workers and managers who were responsible for carrying out the company's activities and tasks.
Employees played a vital role in the production process, working in various departments such as manufacturing, sales, marketing, and administration. They were responsible for executing the company's operations, ensuring the smooth functioning of the business, and achieving its objectives. While stockholders, labor unions, and the board of directors had significant roles in the overall management and decision-making of the corporation, the day-to-day operations were primarily handled by the employees on the ground. They were the ones directly involved in the production and delivery of goods and services, overseeing the routine tasks and processes necessary for the company's functioning.
Learn more about the industrial age here:
https://brainly.com/question/30819583
#SPJ11
Nomadic herding was prevalent in which type of climate? A. Mountainous regions B. Tropical and subtropical forests C. Drier climates with grasslands D. Remote islands with limited supplies of freshwater Please select the best answer from the choices provided. A B C D.
Nomadic herding was prevalent in drier climates with grasslands. This practice is commonly associated with regions that have dry climates and vast grasslands, providing suitable conditions for livestock grazing.
Drier climates with grasslands. Nomadic herding refers to a traditional way of life where people move from one place to another in search of grazing lands for their livestock. This practice is commonly associated with regions that have dry climates and vast grasslands, providing suitable conditions for livestock grazing. In these areas, the availability of natural grasses and vegetation is crucial for sustaining the herds. Drier climates with grasslands are often characterized by limited agricultural opportunities due to aridity, making nomadic herding a more viable and sustainable livelihood option. These regions include arid or semi-arid areas, steppes, savannas, and prairies, where nomadic herding communities have historically thrived. The mobility of herders allows them to follow seasonal patterns of rainfall and vegetation growth, ensuring the well-being and survival of their livestock.
Leran more about vegetation growth here:
https://brainly.com/question/32253186
#SPJ11
briefly explain one historical event or development from 1865 to 1900 that could support hofstadter’s interpretation of the populists
One historical event or development from 1865 to 1900 that supports Hofstadter's interpretation of the Populists is the rise of agrarian discontent and the subsequent formation of the Populist Party.
In the late 19th century, farmers faced significant challenges that led to widespread discontent. One crucial development during this period was the expansion of railroads and the emergence of a national market economy. While the railroads brought increased connectivity and opportunities for trade, farmers often found themselves at a disadvantage due to discriminatory pricing and monopolistic practices by railroad companies. Farmers also faced financial difficulties resulting from high levels of debt, falling agricultural prices, and limited access to credit.
In response to these challenges, the Populist movement gained traction. The Populists aimed to address the concerns of farmers and rural communities by advocating for policies such as the regulation of railroads, the establishment of government-owned banks, the implementation of a graduated income tax, and the free coinage of silver. They saw these measures as ways to combat the concentration of wealth and political power in the hands of a few wealthy elites and promote a more equitable society.
Hofstadter's interpretation of the Populists portrays them as a reactionary and irrational movement that resisted modernization and technological advancements. He argues that they held a nostalgic view of the agrarian past and were resistant to change.
However, the rise of agrarian discontent during this period, marked by economic challenges and the formation of the Populist Party, demonstrates that the Populists were responding to genuine grievances and advocating for reforms that they believed would address the economic and political inequalities of the time.
Learn more about hofstadter’s interpretation here: brainly.com/question/9571955
#SPJ11
most important african state to emerge from islamic revival of the eighteenth and nineteenth centureies?
The most important African state to emerge from the Islamic revival of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries was the Sokoto Caliphate.
The Sokoto Caliphate, founded in 1804 by Usman dan Fodio in what is now northern Nigeria, became a prominent political and religious entity in West Africa. It emerged as a result of Usman dan Fodio's call for a religious reform movement, seeking to establish an Islamic state based on the principles of Sharia law.
The Sokoto Caliphate expanded its influence through jihad, conquering and incorporating neighboring states into its domain. Under the leadership of successive caliphs, the Sokoto Caliphate promoted Islamic education, law, and administration, leaving a lasting impact on the political and cultural landscape of the region.
It became a center of Islamic learning and attracted scholars from across Africa. The Sokoto Caliphate's significance lies in its role as a successful Islamic revivalist movement and its enduring influence on the development of Islamic societies in West Africa.
To learn more about Sokoto Caliphate click here; brainly.com/question/32067907
#SPJ11
10. how do you think Orozco feels about Father Hidalgo?
11. Explain your answer based on what you see in the mural.
Orozco's portrayal of Father Hidalgo in the mural suggests a level of admiration and reverence for his historical significance and role in advocating for independence, but definitive conclusions about Orozco's personal feelings are challenging without additional context or explicit statements.
10. Based on Orozco's portrayal of Father Hidalgo in the mural titled "Father Hidalgo," one could interpret that Orozco holds a level of admiration and respect for him. The heroic and powerful depiction of Hidalgo in the artwork suggests a positive sentiment towards his historical significance and role as a leader in the Mexican War of Independence.
Nonetheless, it's essential to remember that interpretations of artworks can vary, and an artist's perspective may be influenced by various factors. To gain deeper insights into Orozco's feelings towards Father Hidalgo, it would be beneficial to explore additional sources such as Orozco's writings, interviews, or statements from art critics and historians who have analyzed his work in-depth.
11. In the mural, Orozco portrays Father Hidalgo in a heroic and powerful manner, suggesting a certain reverence for his role as a leader and advocate for independence. The mural emphasizes Hidalgo's significance in Mexican history and his contribution to the fight against oppression.
However, without further context or Orozco's explicit statements, it is challenging to make definitive conclusions about his personal feelings towards Father Hidalgo solely based on the mural.
For more such questions on Father Hidalgo: https://brainly.com/question/2400246
#SPJ11
A) How might the owner of the Lafayette view the manifest? b) How might the people whose names appear on the manifest view it?(Slave Ship Manifest from Schooner Lafayette)
The slave ship manifest was seen as a record of valuable human cargo and a financial asset, while the people whose names appeared on it were dehumanized and objectified.
a) From the perspective of the owner of the Lafayette, the slave ship manifest would be seen as a business document. It would provide information on the number of enslaved individuals, their ages, genders, and physical condition. The owner would view the manifest as an essential record for financial purposes, enabling them to account for and track the enslaved individuals as valuable assets. The manifest would assist in documenting the purchase, sale, and transportation of the enslaved individuals, helping to ensure the profitability of the slave trade.
b) On the other hand, the people whose names appear on the manifest would likely view it with immense sorrow and indignation. The manifest would serve as a dehumanizing record that reduces them to mere commodities. It would represent the brutal separation from their families, homes, and communities. Seeing their names listed on the manifest would serve as a painful reminder of their forced displacement and the atrocities they would endure during the transatlantic slave trade. It would symbolize the loss of freedom, dignity, and humanity, reflecting the harsh reality of their lives as enslaved individuals.
Learn more about financial here:
https://brainly.com/question/29763313
#SPJ11
Select the true statements
Answer:
What are the statments?
Explanation:
We cant help with just a title and nothing to choose from :(
in comparing the rulers of ancient egypt and the kings of benin both are considered ______.
In comparing the rulers of Ancient Egypt and the kings of Benin, both are considered monarchies or forms of monarchical systems.
Monarchy refers to a system of government where a single individual, often called a monarch, holds supreme authority and power over the state. In Ancient Egypt, the rulers were known as pharaohs and held absolute power as the political and religious leaders of the civilization.
Similarly, in the Kingdom of Benin, the kings held significant authority and were considered the highest-ranking rulers, overseeing the governance and administration of their kingdom. Both systems featured hereditary succession, where leadership was passed down within a specific lineage or family.
To learn more about monarchies click here:
brainly.com/question/3458331
#SPJ11
why did the troops burn the smal south carlonia town is this allowed in war
The burning of a small South Carolina town by troops can be attributed to military tactics and strategies employed during war. However, whether such actions are allowed in war depends on various factors, including international laws and conventions governing armed conflict.
During times of war, military forces may engage in the destruction of infrastructure, including towns and villages, as a strategic measure. This destruction aims to weaken the enemy's capabilities, disrupt supply lines, and undermine their morale. The decision to burn a town is often based on military objectives and considerations.
However, the legality of such actions is determined by international humanitarian law, which includes the Geneva Conventions and customary laws of war. These laws aim to protect civilians and civilian objects during armed conflict. Deliberate targeting of civilians or wanton destruction of property without military necessity is generally considered a violation of these laws.
It is essential to investigate the specific circumstances surrounding the burning of the small South Carolina town to determine whether it aligns with military objectives or constitutes a violation of international humanitarian law. Factors such as the presence of military targets, the proportionality of the destruction, and adherence to principles of distinction between combatants and non-combatants would be crucial in evaluating the legality of such actions in a specific war context.
to learn more about South Carolina click here; brainly.com/question/16277885
#SPJ11
true or false: emulating western models to the letter, the meiji regime left the development of infrastructure projects up to entrepreneurs.
The statement is true because during the Meiji period in Japan, the government emphasized private enterprise and encouraged entrepreneurship as a way to modernize the country.
This approach, known as "Datsu-A Ron" or "Rejecting Asia" was a deliberate decision to adopt Western practices in order to catch up with the more advanced economies of the West. Therefore, the Meiji regime did not directly invest in infrastructure projects but instead created an environment that encouraged private investment and development.
As a result, many of Japan's modern infrastructure projects were led by entrepreneurs who were eager to take advantage of the government's pro-business policies.
Learn more about Meiji regime https://brainly.com/question/380379
#SPJ11