One example of an unwritten custom that became part of the constitution is the practice of the president having a cabinet of advisors.
Although the Constitution does not explicitly state that the president should have a cabinet, the establishment of the cabinet as a key component of the executive branch has become an accepted norm and an important part of American government. Another example is the use of political parties as a means of organizing and competing for political power, which is not mentioned in the Constitution but has become an integral part of the American political system.
For such more question on Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
a halal food bill was passed by seven states including?
A halal food bill was passed by seven states including Minnesota, Michigan, New Jersey, Maryland, Texas, California, Illinois, and Texas.
Nine US states have established legislation governing the labelling and/or sale of halal food.
Foods that are halal are compliant with Islamic dietary laws and are safe to eat. Beef, lamb, goat, deer, bison, chicken, turkey, fish, and shellfish can all be halal foods if they are killed or harvested in accordance with Islamic law. Both alcohol and pork are banned in Islam (forbidden).
Alcohol consumption is prohibited in Islam and is referred to as haram. Fruit juice, sparkling water, coffee, tea, soymilk, almond milk, and milk from cows, goats, or camels are just a few of the beverages that are safe for Halal-conscious customers.
Consumer goods containing alcohol-containing components in addition to the main ingredient must have a total alcohol content of less than 0.1% to be considered halal.
To learn about more on Halal food https://brainly.com/question/30708142
#SPJ4
what specific argument does cato make against the structure of the executive branch which are valid
The specific argument that Cato makes against the structure of the executive branch is that the executive branch is given too much power over the legislative and judicial branches.
This argument is valid because the executive branch can use its powers to veto bills passed by the legislative branch and to appoint judges to the judiciary. This gives the executive branch the ability to significantly influence both the legislative and judicial branches, and therefore gives it an excessive amount of power in the overall balance of power between the three branches of government.
This is due in part to a failure of the legislative branch to check the power of the executive branch, which has resulted in the creation of an "imperial presidency" that wields tremendous power of both policy and governance.
To know more about executive branch go to
https://brainly.com/question/18052177
#SPJ4
the regulation of the production and sale of drugs and medical devices in the united states is an example of how resources are allocated in a
The regulation of the production and sale of drugs and medical devices in the United States is an example of how resources are allocated in a market economy.
The food and drug administration in United States is a federal part of the department of health and human services, Among its other functions, the FDA evaluates the safety and effectiveness of drugs and medical devices United States for public safety. An approval from FDA is required before marketing any of such medical products in the market for open public such as Orasure was allowed to market its home HIV test after proper evaluation and testing of devices to make it user friendly and check its suitability. The regulation of the production and sale of drugs and medical devices in the United States is an example of how resources are allocated in a centrally planned economy and the regulation of the production and sale of drugs and medical devices in the United States is an example of how resources are allocated in a market economy.
Know more about "food and drug administration" visit
brainly.com/question/9281125
#SPJ4
drivers become subject to the liability insurance law when crash damages amount to:
The driver becomes subject to the liability insurance law when the crash damages amount to more than $1,000 in property damage or $5,000 in personal injury.
This means that the driver will be responsible for paying any damages that exceed these limits, and must obtain liability insurance in order to avoid facing significant financial penalties if they are in an accident that causes property damage or personal injury in excess of the limits specified by the law.
Drivers who do not carry liability insurance and are involved in a car accident may face legal consequences, such as fines, license suspension, or even criminal charges. It is important for all drivers to understand the liability insurance requirements in their state, and to carry adequate insurance coverage to protect themselves and others in the event of an accident.
To know more about liability insurance go to
https://brainly.com/question/1530286
#SPJ4
how did the constitution reflect specific concerns of southern states?
The US Constitution reflected specific concerns of southern states by including provisions that protected their interests.
Such as the Three-Fifths Compromise, which allowed southern states to count enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of determining representation in Congress, and the Fugitive Slave Clause, which required northern states to return escaped slaves to their southern owners.
Southern states were concerned about losing power in the federal government due to their smaller populations compared to northern states. The Three-Fifths Compromise addressed this concern by giving southern states a greater number of representatives in Congress, as enslaved individuals were counted towards the population even though they were not able to vote or participate in government.
Southern states were also concerned about the possibility of enslaved individuals escaping to the North. The Fugitive Slave Clause addressed this concern by requiring northern states to cooperate in the capture and return of escaped slaves to their southern owners. This provision was particularly important to southern states as the institution of slavery was a key component of their economy and way of life.
In addition to these specific provisions, the US Constitution also protected the institution of slavery more broadly by including language that prevented Congress from banning the international slave trade for 20 years after the Constitution's ratification and by including a provision that prevented states from interfering with the "migration" of enslaved individuals between states.
Overall, the US Constitution reflected the concerns of southern states by including provisions that protected their interests in terms of representation in Congress and the protection of the institution of slavery. These provisions ultimately played a role in the tensions between northern and southern states that led to the Civil War.
learn more about constitution at :
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
what part of the constitution includes the equal protection clause and was used to decide the case brown v. board of education?
The fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution includes the equal protection clause and was used to decide the case brown v. board of education.
Despite emphasising several legal justifications, the most common defence the used in his appeal was that the segregated school systems for blacks and whites were fundamentally unfair and thus infringed upon the "equal protection provision" of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
In the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state laws requiring racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, regardless of whether the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. The decision largely reversed the Court's Plessy v. Ferguson decision from 1896, which had stated that the racial sega doctrine known as "separate but equal" was false.
Integration became possible after the Brown decision by the Court, was a major victory for the civil rights movement, and it served as a model for many more impact litigation cases in the future. It was determined that the U.S. Constitution was not violated by the regulation legislation as long as the facilities for each race were of equivalent quality.
To know more about brown v. board of education
https://brainly.com/question/12241722
#SPJ4
what kinds of decisions did the cherokee nation face when european nations—and later the united states—encroached on its homelands?
One of the primary decisions the Cherokee Nation faced was how to resist or adapt to the pressures of colonization and territorial expansion.
When European nations and later the United States encroached on Cherokee homelands, the Cherokee Nation faced a range of decisions that fundamentally altered the course of their history. One of the primary decisions they faced was how to resist or adapt to the pressures of colonization and territorial expansion. Some Cherokee leaders advocated for alliances with European powers, while others sought to resist colonization through military means or diplomatic negotiations. In the early 19th century, the Cherokee Nation attempted to adapt to the changing political landscape by adopting a written constitution, establishing a national capital, and building schools and businesses. However, these efforts were largely unsuccessful, and the Cherokee were forcibly removed from their ancestral lands through the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This led to the infamous Trail of Tears, in which thousands of Cherokee were forced to relocate to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma) and endured significant hardship and loss of life. Overall, the Cherokee Nation faced a range of difficult decisions as they navigated the complex and often violent process of European colonization and territorial expansion. Their experiences highlight the enduring impact of colonialism and the ongoing struggles for Indigenous sovereignty and self-determination.
To know more about the Cherokee Nation, click here: https://brainly.com/question/23601626
#SPJ4
Who was the naacp lawyer for Brown v. Board of Education?
Jack Greenberg was the lawyer, also the first white attorney, for Brown v. Board of Education.
The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in the favor of Brown v. Board of Education was basically the product of the hard work as well as the diligence of the best attorneys from the nation which included Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Robert Carter, Oliver Hill, Spottswood Robinson, Louis Redding, Charles and John Scott, Harold R. Boulware, James Nabrit, as well as George E.C. Hayes.
These LDF lawyers were further assisted by a number of brain trust of legal scholars. These legal minds were the ones who conceived, developed as well as executed the plan to dismantle the notion of “separate but equal” in the American life.
To know more about Brown v. Board of Education
https://brainly.com/question/14637388
#SPJ4
After a defendant was indicted on federal bank fraud charges and released on bail, his attorney filed notice of the defendant's intent to offer an insanity defense. The prosecutor then enlisted the help of a forensic psychologist who was willing to participate in an "undercover" mental examination of the defendant.Psychologist contacted defendant and pretended to represent an agency and told defendant about an attractive employment opportunity and invited him to a "preliminary screening interview" to determine qualification for the job. Psychologist gave defendant psychological tests that enabled her to form a reliable opinion about his mental state at the time of the alleged offense.
What's the strongest basis for a defense objection to the psychologist's testimony regarding the defendant's mental state?
The 6th Amendment's right to the assistance of counsel provides the defense with the most compelling justification for objecting to the psychologist's testimony regarding the defendant's mental state.
The required details for 6th Amendment's right to the assistance of counsel in given paragraph
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense," the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution states. Five separate rights are included in the assistance of counsel provision: the right to counsel of one's choice, the right to appointed counsel, the right to conflict-free counsel, the right to effective assistance of counsel, and the right to represent oneself pro se.
The right to counsel "means, at the very least, that a person has the right to the assistance of a lawyer during or beyond the time that court procedures have been whether it be a formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment, something has been started against him.
To know about 6th Amendment's right to the assistance of counsel click here
https://brainly.com/question/539935
#SPJ1
Which of the following organizations is NOT a US agency?
A. PEPFAR
B. USAID
C.WHO
D.CDC
Founded in 1948, the World Health Organization (WHO) is not part of the US agency. It is a specialised agency of the UN with a broad mandate to serve as a coordinating authority on global health concerns.
The United States government has been actively involved with WHO for a long time, contributing financial and technical support as well as taking part in its governance structure. Future challenges for the WHO include a wide-ranging mandate, constrained, rigid budget, and a convoluted bureaucratic structure. Although the agency has made adjustments to address some of these problems, many governments, including the United States, are pressing for additional reforms to enable WHO to more effectively respond to upcoming epidemics.
Learn more about bureaucratic here:
https://brainly.com/question/28661392
#SPJ4
which civil rights act banned discrimination against any person based on race or color?
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the act that outlawed prejudice based on race or color.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as improved, protects representatives and task applicants from hiring bias established by race, color, cult, sexuality, and nationwide origin. In 1964, Congress gave Public Law 88-352 (78 Stat. 241). The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits bias on the footing of race, color, doctrine, sexuality, or national inception.
Provisions concerning this civil liberties act outlawed bias on the base of sex, in addition to, race in engaging, advancing, and discharging. The 1968 Act extended previous acts and forbidden bias having to do with the auction, rent, and financing of the place of accommodation established race, morality, social inception, sexuality, (and as amended) handicap, and offspring rank.
To know more about Civil Rights Act refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29768407
#SPJ4
which two elements are required to find a defendant guilty of an intent-based crime?
a. Criminal act and criminal intent are required to find a defendant guilty of an intent-based crime
The physical or exterior component of a crime, such as the act of stealing, assault, or murder, is referred to as the criminal act. The accused must have done something that is regarded as unlawful. Contrarily, criminal intent refers to the psychological component of a crime. When committing a crime, a person must be in this frame of mind or have this mental attitude. Depending on the exact crime, criminal intent may be explicit or inferred and vary.
Crimes with a definite intent or state of mind are known as intent crimes. Crimes with intent include homicide, theft, and fraud. A defendant must have committed unlawful conduct as well as the necessary criminal intent in order to be found guilty of an intent offence. But, criminal intent is not necessary for all crimes. A person may be found guilty of certain crimes even if they did not intend to do them since they are deemed strict liability crimes.
Complete Question:
Which two elements are required to find a defendant guilty of an intent crime?
A) criminal act and criminal intent
B) victim and criminal intent
C) criminal act and proof of gain
D) motive and criminal intent
Read more about Criminal act on:
https://brainly.com/question/3788903
#SPJ4
what must be proved for a public figure to obtain a damage award under libel laws?
Since the unanimous ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), the Supreme Court has maintained that public officials cannot get restitution for libel without demonstrating genuine malice in their statements.
What was the ruling in New York?
Bruen. The Heller decision expanded the right to possess a firearm for self-defense beyond the home by finding New York's concealed carry legislation unconstitutional. The existing law requires that applicants for Federal firearms dealer licenses certify that secure gun storage or safety devices will be available at any location where firearms are sold under the license to non-licensed individuals. This rule amends ATF regulations to take into account this requirement.
Know more about Supreme Court Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ1
how did balkan nationalism contribute to the decline of the ottoman empire?
Balkan nationalism contributed to the decline of the Ottoman Empire by fomenting ethnic and political tensions within the empire's multi-ethnic and multi-religious population. This led to various nationalist uprisings and movements seeking greater autonomy or independence, weakening the central government's control and authority.
The Ottoman Empire was a multi-ethnic and multi-religious state, which encompassed a vast territory across Europe, Asia, and Africa. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, nationalist movements emerged among various ethnic groups in the Balkans, including the Serbs, Bulgarians, Greeks, and Albanians. These movements sought to promote their respective national identities and cultures and to assert their political independence from the Ottoman Empire.
These nationalist movements often resorted to violence, rebellion, and terrorism to achieve their goals, further destabilizing the empire. The Ottoman government responded with harsh measures, such as repression, forced assimilation, and mass deportations, which further fueled nationalist sentiments and grievances.
learn more about balkan at :
https://brainly.com/question/13567358
#SPJ4
in one sentence, explain why the separation of power between the federal and state governments now resembles a marbled cake as opposed to a layered cake.
The expressions "layer cake federalism" and "marble cake federalism" were first used in this paper by Grodzins.
He compared the dual federalism system to a layer cake, with the separated layers signifying the various domains of power that the state and federal governments had not yet occupied.
Federalism is a form of government in which a central authority and numerous national constituent parts share power.
A pragmatic blending of power and initiatives among the federal, state, and local governments is the foundation of marble-cake federalism. The foundation of layer cake federalism is a distinct division of responsibilities and initiatives among the various levels of government.
To know more about federal and state governments, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/13734473
#SPJ4
Which event best explains what the Federalist papers were intended to support?A) the regulation of slavery in western territories.B) the ratification of the U.S. ConstitutionC) the drafting of the Declaration of IndependenceD) the annexation of the Louisiana Territory.
B) the ratification of the U.S. Constitution event best explains what the Federalist papers were intended to support.
The proposed United States Constitution was drafted in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 and was the subject of The Federalist Papers, which were written and distributed to convince New Yorkers to ratify it.
The Federalist Papers were produced in an effort to persuade the American people of the need for a more powerful federal government and to support the ratification of the Constitution after the Constitutional Convention.
Federalists maintained the Constitution's strengthened national government, which included a more powerful executive, independent judiciary, and increased legislative and executive authority. They contended that the federalist, checks-and-balances, and separation of powers ideologies were upheld by the new administration.
To know more about U.S. Constitution, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/17817208
#SPJ4
If one of the two nations at war defines justice as ‘might’ and the other defines justice as ‘defending sovereignty’, what kind of disagreement are they engaged in and why? As a member of the mediating team seeking to bring peace, do you think a stipulative definition is helpful?
One country views justice as a matter of might, or the skill to exert control and power the other views justice as a matter of protecting its autonomy, or the right to be left alone and unaffected by other forces.
Justice and precedent, what are they?For many individuals, justice is synonymous with fairness. Justice matters to almost everyone, but it has distinct connotations for various organisations. For instance, gender equality is the idea that, regardless of ethnicity, gender, or faith, everyone gets equitable access to economic, political, as well as social possibilities.
What does justice really mean?The concept or standard of righteous behaviour or transaction. Adherence to this tenet or goal righteousness. The trait of adhering to the law; the righteousness of their cause.
To know more about Justice visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30695448
#SPJ1
why do third parties not succeed?
The third parties not succeed because Nationwide, ballot access regulations pose the most significant obstacle to third-party candidatures. While Democrats and Republicans enjoy simple access to voting in all 50 states in each election.
Roosevelt conducted one of the most successful third-party campaigns in the past periods, but he was beat out by the Democrat and the Progressive party swiftly molten away, while the Republicans recovered their main party position.
Third parties seldom win political elections because they are outmatched by the two major political parties, the Republican and Democratic parties.
Third-party candidates do not succeed because ballot access restrictions constitute the greatest major barrier to third-party candidatures across the country.
Learn more about the third parties, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/26754296
#SPJ4
What's the meaning of Plessy v. Ferguson ?
of the following, the most compelling reason for the united states to enter the war wasa. a moral obligation to halt the refugee crisis in Belgium.
b. concern over the repayment of Allied debts to American banks.
c. a desire to become more involved in the affairs of Europe.
d. the outrage of American citizens over German submarine warfare.
The most compelling reason for the United States to enter the war was d. the outrage of American citizens over German submarine warfare.
In 1915, the passenger liner Lusitania, carrying American passengers, was sunk by a German submarine, resulting in the loss of 1,198 lives, including 128 Americans. This event, along with continued unrestricted submarine warfare by Germany, outraged the American public and led to increased calls for the U.S. to enter the war on the side of the Allies. President Woodrow Wilson initially resisted these calls, but in 1917, after German attempts to form an alliance with Mexico were uncovered, Wilson asked Congress to declare war on Germany. The sinking of the Lusitania and other incidents of German aggression against American interests provided the most compelling reasons for the U.S. to enter the war.
To learn more about war, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1113074
#SPJ4
political apathy among americans hurts which core political value the most?
The political apathy among the Americans hurts a core political value known as democracy, the most.
How does political apathy hurt democracy?Political apathy refers to a lack of interest, engagement, or participation in political activities or issues. When a significant portion of the population is politically apathetic, it can have a negative impact on democracy in several ways:
Reduced voter turnout: Political apathy can lead to low voter turnout in elections, which can make it easier for a small group of individuals or special interest groups to dominate the political process. When fewer people participate in elections, the legitimacy of the democratic process is undermined.Lack of representation: When people are politically apathetic, they may be less likely to engage with their elected officials or express their views on important issues. This can lead to a lack of representation for certain groups or viewpoints, which can ultimately harm democracy.In conclusion, political apathy can be detrimental to democracy because it undermines citizen engagement, representation, accountability, and the diversity of ideas necessary for a healthy and functioning democratic system.
Read more about political apathy
brainly.com/question/13305824
#SPJ1
which of the following best characterizes the policy of the national government toward indigenous americans during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries?
US efforts to isolate Native Americans on reservations were stepped up due to political, economic, and even humanitarian considerations.
Which of the following best encapsulates American attitudes toward equality?Few Americans support the concept of equality of results, while the majority support it in terms of political equality and equality of opportunity.
What impact did the construction of new railroads have on the West's native population?Ecosystems were significantly impacted by the Transcontinental Railroad. For instance, it attracted a large number of hunters who killed the bison on which Native Americans depended. The situation in Cheyenne was unique. Intertribal trading on the Plains was hampered by the railroad, which also destroyed a crucial component of Cheyenne economic life.
To know more about Americans visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2600449
#SPJ1
URGENT PLEASE!!
Maritime attacks by modern day pirates are still ongoing. Discuss what measures can be or are being taken to combat this maritime terrorism?
Increased security aboard ships: Many countries employ armed personnel aboard ships to increase security and deter pirates. In some cases, private security companies are employed to help protect ships.
What is the protect ?The word "protect" is often used to describe the action of guarding or shielding something from danger, harm, or damage. Protecting can be done in a variety of ways, ranging from physical barriers to emotional support. For example, a fence may be used to protect a home from intruders, or a parent may protect a child from emotional harm by providing comfort and support.
Increased surveillance: Governments are using satellite imagery and other technologies to monitor ships and identify suspicious activity.
Strengthened regional cooperation: Regional cooperation among countries is essential to combat piracy.
Use of naval forces: Naval forces from multiple countries are often deployed to patrol waters and respond to attacks.
Use of legal measures: In some cases, criminal charges have been brought against pirates for their activities.
Use of deterrents: Certain deterrents have been employed to discourage potential pirates, such as creating economic zones and establishing naval embargoes.
Education and awareness: Governments and organizations are working to educate seafarers and coastal communities about the dangers of piracy and how to respond to attacks.
To learn more about protect
https://brainly.com/question/22089522
#SPJ1
The Constitution states that all legislation regarding the passing of treaties or the approval of presidential appointments must _____.a. mark the bill as unread
b. remain within the Senate
c. legislate and produce Laws
d. people don't like the implications
According to the Constitution, only the Senate may pass legislation pertaining to signing treaties or approving presidential nominations. The correct answer is option(b).
The United States Constitution specifies that the CEO "be going to have Power, by and accompanying the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to create Treaties, given two-three of something of the Senators present approve" (Article II, portion 2). The Constitution gives to the Senate the singular capacity to authorize, by a two-thirds base vote, contracts crossed for one residence of the president of the united states.
The Senate has the singular capacity to validate those of the President's assignments that demand consent and to affirm contracts. There are, nevertheless, two irregularities to this rule: delegation of representatives must still authorize jobs to the Vice Presidency and some contract that includes overseas profession.
To know more about Senate refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29618633
#SPJ4
creates the judicial branch whose main job is to interpret the laws is called ?
The United States Constitution is the legal document that establishes the judicial branch and designates law interpretation as its primary function.
Together with the legislative and executive branches, the judicial branch is one of the three divisions of the federal government of the United States. Its main responsibility is to interpret the legislation and make sure it complies with the Constitution. The Supreme Court, the nation's highest court, as well as other federal courts are included in the judicial arm of the government. The President appoints federal judges, including justices of the Supreme Court, who are then confirmed by the Senate. The decisions made by the judicial branch can influence how laws are interpreted and applied for many years to come and have a profound impact on American culture.
Learn more about "judicial branch." here:
https://brainly.com/question/10481921
#SPJ4
which of the following statements concerning power is correct?
Power can be found in all human relationships, it can be exercised obviously or subtly and involves a person to act according to the wishes of another person.
The correct option is option e.
Power can basically be defined as the ability of a particular person to get another person to act according to the first person's wishes as well as intentions. Authority can be defined as the rights which allow a person to use their power.
Power can be exercised in an obvious manner and also it can exercised in a subtle manner. Power can be found in all types of human relationships.
To know more about power
https://brainly.com/question/11481567
#SPJ4
--The given question is incomplete, the complete question is
"Which of the following statements concerning power is correct?
a. Its exercise can sometimes be obvious.
b. It can be exercised in subtle ways.
c. It involves a person getting another person to act in accordance with the first person's wishes.
d. It is found in all human relationships.
e. All of the above."
what does a state need to be successful? A. permanent population B. Government C. Territory D. All of the above
To be successful, a state generally needs permanent population, government and territory.
Hence, the correct option is D.
A. Permanent population: A state needs a permanent population to establish and maintain social, economic, and political institutions.
It provides a basis for the establishment of social norms, economic exchange, and political representation.
B. Government: A state needs a government to establish and enforce laws, protect the rights and interests of its citizens, and provide essential services such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure.
A stable and effective government is essential for the development and success of a state.
C. Territory: A state needs a defined territory to establish its jurisdiction, control its borders, and access resources.
The physical boundaries of a state provide a sense of identity and sovereignty and help to establish the authority of the state over its population and institutions.
To know more about state here:
https://brainly.com/question/24035616
#SPJ4
what is a system of government in which the power to rule is in the hands of a single individual
A system of government in which the power to rule is in the hands of a single individual is known as an autocracy or a dictatorship.
In an autocracy, the ruler typically holds absolute power, meaning that they have complete control over the government and are not accountable to the people. Autocracies can take many different forms, including monarchies, military juntas, and personal dictatorships. In some cases, autocracies may be established through a coup or other form of unconstitutional seizure of power, while in others they may be inherited through a dynasty or other form of succession. In an autocratic system of government, the ruler typically has the ability to make decisions without input or oversight from other branches of government or from the public. This can lead to a lack of accountability and transparency, as well as the potential for abuse of power and human rights violations. Overall, autocracies are generally considered to be less democratic and less responsive to the needs and desires of the population than other forms of government, such as democracies or republics.
To know more about autocracy, click here: https://brainly.com/question/3710016
#SPJ4
what are regulations? and how do they relate to the bureaucracy?
The regulations are rules under which the programs of the federal and state governments operate. These regulations are related to bureaucracy in a way that they are formed through an administrative process under law.
The regulations are put forth by the government through the process of rule-making. These regulations determine the underlying methods of operations for the federal and state governments. As already discussed in the introductory part of the answer, the regulations may be stated to have a direct relationship to that of the federal bureaucracy.
Learn more about regulations here:
https://brainly.com/question/30695404?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
What are examples of insuring domestic tranquility?
Examples of insuring domestic tranquility include ensuring that individuals have access to the courts of law, protecting the rights of individuals to voice their opinions, and maintaining an adequate level of public safety.
There are many other examples of insuring domestic tranquility, including ensuring that individuals are treated equally before the law, protecting the rights of workers to organize unions and engage in collective bargaining, and ensuring that individuals have the right to due process in criminal and civil proceedings.
In general, the government should take steps to ensure that the lives of its citizens are safe and secure from threats both internal and external. This includes taking steps to address the needs of communities and individuals who might be at risk of becoming involved in criminal activity.
To know more about right to due process go to
https://brainly.com/question/11591373
#SPJ4