The federal genuine id act of 2005, a law that created universal requirements for state-issued identification cards and provided regulation of a state function, is constitutionally supported under the necessary and appropriate clause.
What is the proper and essential clause?The "Necessary and Proper Clause," sometimes known as the "Elastic Clause," is a provision of the Constitution that grants Congress the power to enact laws about matters that aren't necessarily covered by the document.
The main focus of Article I is the legislative authority (Article II is about the Executive powers and Article III is about Judicial powers). The Constitution specifically grants Congress authority over a wide range of matters, including the following.
Collect taxesClear your debtsLoan moneyControl international trade (see the Commerce Clause)Coin currencyCreate post officesPunish marine piracy and other maritime crimesEstablish a militaryLearn more about the necessary and proper clause with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/17857054
#SPJ1
the writer whose work encouraged the passage of the meat inspection act was
The writer whose work encouraged the passage of the Meat Inspection Act was Upton Sinclair.
The Jungle, a book by American author Sinclair, revealed the unfavourable working conditions in the meatpacking industry in the early 20th century. In 1906, Sinclair published The Jungle, which sparked a backlash from the public. He uncovered both the mistreatment of industry workers and the unhygienic circumstances under which meat was processed and marketed.
President Theodore Roosevelt was inspired by the novel's swift rise to national prominence to enact the Meat Inspection Act in 1906.
The Act mandated that meatpackers adhere to specified standards of hygiene and that all meat be examined for wholesomeness and sanitation.
Sinclair achieved a significant win with the Act's adoption since it addressed the problems with public health and safety that he had exposed in The Jungle.
Complete Question:
The writer whose work encouraged the passage of the meat inspection act was ______
To learn more about public visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4618450
#SPJ4
Who is the United States Administrator of the Small Business Administration?
On March 17, 2021, Isabella Casillas Guzman took the oath of office to become the 27th Administrator of the United States Small Business Administration.
Administrator Guzman has dedicated her life to assisting small businesses. She developed a strong appreciation for small business owners who define Main Streets in neighborhoods across America, provide our products and services, and innovate to solve global problems while working alongside her father at a young age in his chain of veterinary hospitals in Southern California.
Early in her career, Administrator Guzman worked as an entrepreneur, advisor, and consultant in the private sector. She discovered there the critical part that small enterprises play in paving the way for the American Dream. She continued to dedicate herself to public service, working as the Small Business Administration's senior advisor and deputy chief of staff as well as the state of California's small business advocate to promote equity and opportunity for all business owners.
To learn more about Small Business Administration, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/28535975
#SPJ4
who is the least informed member of the courtroom work group?
The judge is the least informed member of the courtroom work group.
The judges are the most prestigious members of the courtroom yet are least informed member of the courtroom work group the facts of the cases as the prosecutor and defendant talk about limited information in the court and the judges act upon such an information only. Judges couldn't read the whole case rather they frame a summary from the information gathered from the proceedings and therefore take a informed decision on the basis of their virtue and sense. Judges are the voice of sentencing, but their freedom of choice is limited by the statutes and sentencing structures existing in a particular state, they act in accordance with information provided to them which may sometime be wrongly interpreted.
Know more about "judge" visit
brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ4
When Mary believes that it is ethical to use a hiring method that is illegal in the U.S. in another country in which it is legal to use, she is probably applying which ethical approach?
a. tereotyping
b. like-me bias
c. cultural relativism
d. fairness
When Mary thinks it is moral to employ a hiring technique that is unlawful in the United States in a nation where it is acceptable, she is probably mistaken.
What word best describes employ?
Use and use are frequent synonyms for employ. Employ implies the employment of a person or thing that is available but idle, inactive, or disengaged, even though all three words have the same meaning—"to put into service especially to gain an end”—to achieve. The business has 18 employees. In the tourism sector, there are around 3,000 local employees. Her first spouse had worked for a chemical manufacturer.
Know more about nation Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9015813
#SPJ1
the economic downturn led to in a significant increase in which type of crime?
It is largely believed that the property-related criminal activities increases significantly due to the downturn led to the American economy.
The phase of economic downturn within the American society was largely evident during the times of different social crises that the society went through. In fact, the economic downturn led to a downfall in the prices of properties, and thus, many people turned into criminals for undertaking activities related to property-related crimes. Thus, it may be said that economic downturn had a significant impact on the property-related crime.
Learn more about economic downturn here:
https://brainly.com/question/3762037?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
the lex mercatoria was an unbiased system of rules for deciding commercial disputes across borders and political boundaries. (true or false)
True. The Lex Mercatoria, commonly referred to as the "law merchant," was a body of laws and regulations that oversaw business dealings in Europe in the Middle Ages.
An impartial set of laws known as the Lex Mercatoria was used to arbitrate economic disputes that crossed national and political boundaries. Instead of official rules passed by governments, it was based on norms and practises that developed among traders and merchants. The concepts of the Lex Mercatoria were widely used in international commerce, and they still have an impact on contemporary international commercial law. The Lex Mercatoria, commonly referred to as the "law merchant," was a body of laws and regulations that oversaw business dealings in Europe in the Middle Ages. An impartial set of laws known as the Lex Mercatoria was used to arbitrate economic disputes that crossed national and political boundaries. Instead of official rules passed by governments, it was based on norms and practises that developed among traders and merchants.
A uniform legal framework that could be used in business dealings between many nations and areas led to the creation of the Lex Mercatoria. It placed a strong emphasis on the value of arbitrating issues rather than going to court, and it was mostly founded on the values of justice, equity, and good faith. The concepts of the Lex Mercatoria were widely used in international commerce, and they still have an impact on contemporary international commercial law.
To learn more about Lex Mercatoria, click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/30408604
#SPJ4
Police officers had probable cause to believe that drug dealing was routinely taking place in a particular room at a local motel. The motel manager authorized the officers to enter the room and provided them with a passkey. Without obtaining a warrant, the officers knocked on the room's door, announced their presence, and told the occupants that they would like to speak with them. The officers then heard yelling and repeated flushing of the toilet. They then used the passkey and entered the room, where they saw the occupants dumping drugs into the toilet. The occupants of the room were charged with drug dealing and have moved to suppress the drugs.
Should the court grant the motion to suppress?
In such a situation, no because the officers discovered the cocaine during a lawful protective sweep of the house looking for the mans accomplice hence, the court cannot grant the motion of suppress.
A motion to suppress is a motion that talks about the exclusion of evidence from trial. In the United States, a motion to suppress is a request made by a criminal defendant in advance of a criminal trial asking the court to exclude certain evidence from the trial. But in the above scenario the police officials while conducting a lawful sweep checked in a probable cause to believe that drug dealing was routinely taking place in a particular room at a local motel. Hence, the evidences collected cannot be removed on the virtue of motion of suppress.
Know more about "motion of suppress" visit
brainly.com/question/6583224
#SPJ4
An unconscious adult victim is gasping for breath and having difficulty breathing. The scene is safe and help has been called. Next you should Use the head tilt chin lift procedure (true or false)
True, An unconscious adult victim is gasping for breath and having difficulty breathing. The scene is safe and help has been called. Next, you should use the head tilt chin lift procedure.
A patient who is unconscious runs the danger of obstructing their airway and suffocating. The tongue is primarily to blame for this happening. The tongue also loses its muscle tone when a patient is unconscious. The tongue may recoil and obstruct the airway. A lack of oxygen will cause the sufferer to suffocate in a matter of minutes, making this scenario urgent.
To open the airway during CPR, we adopt the head-tilt, chin-lift technique. The modified jaw thrust would be performed in place of "head-tilt, chin-lift" if a cervical spine injury was suspected. The jaw push is a method applied to supine patients who have a suspected spinal injury.
To learn more about the head tilt chin lift procedure, click at:
https://brainly.com/question/6849463
#SPJ4
ban on marijuana users owning guns is unconstitutional (true or false)
True. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution, which protects the right to carry weapons, has been used as justification to challenge the federal law that prohibits marijuana users from owning firearms.
Although marijuana usage for medical or recreational purposes has been authorised in certain states, it remains a Schedule 1 substance under federal law, indicating it has no recognised medical benefit and a high potential for misuse. The federal restriction on medicinal marijuana users owning guns, according to a 2016 decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, is a violation of the Second Amendment. The court determined that the restriction was unlawful because it interfered with law-abiding persons' Second Amendment rights to possess weapons and use marijuana for medicinal purposes.
It's crucial to remember that this ruling only affects the states covered by the Ninth Circuit's authority. Different federal circuits may interpret the Second Amendment and the permissibility of gun ownership by marijuana users differently.
To learn more about marijuana, click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/30624927
#SPJ4
implied powers are granted to congress by which constitutional provision?
The constitutional provision granting Congress the authority to exercise implied powers is known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, also called the Elastic Clause. This clause is found in Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 of the Constitution.
This clause states that Congress has the power to "make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the preceding Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or any Department or Officer thereof."
The Necessary and Proper Clause gives Congress a broad range of authority to pass laws that are necessary and appropriate to carry out its enumerated powers, such as the power to regulate commerce, the power to establish post offices, and the power to declare war.
To know more about Elastic Clause, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3279904
#SPJ4
what is the relationship between campaign contributions and special interest groups?
According to "The Relationship Between Campaign Contributions and Voting in Congress," politicians would never want the public to know that their actions are influenced by financial contributions.
This section discusses the laws, rules, and standards of conduct governing three aspects of campaign or political contributions: solicitation of contributions, receipt and acceptance of contributions, and the general prohibition against acting in one's official capacity for political reasons. A special interest group (SIG) is a community within a larger organisation that has a shared interest in advancing a specific area of knowledge, learning, or technology, and where members collaborate to affect or produce solutions within their specific field, and may communicate, meet, and organise conferences. The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), an academic and professional computer society, coined the term in 1961.
To learn more about contributions:
https://brainly.com/question/15317541
#SPJ4
which constitutional amendment guarantees the right to a speedy trial?
According to the human right to a speedy trial, which is recognised in criminal law, a government prosecutor is not permitted to unilaterally or indefinitely postpone a criminal suspect's trial.
If not, the ability to impose such delays basically would give prosecutors the right to imprison anyone for a predetermined period of time without a trial.
Although having a court where a defendant can complain about an undue delay in the trial is necessary for the protection of speedy trial rights, it is equally crucial that countries put in place procedures to prevent delays.
The requirement of a "speedy trial" encourages prosecutors to rigorously develop cases within a reasonable length of time in jurisdictions with strong rule of law.
To know more about speedy trial
https://brainly.com/question/9479564
#SPJ4