For each cartoon, answer the following questions:
• Describe what is happening in the cartoon.
• Explain what opinion is being expressed and what tactics are being used. Provide an explanation to defend your selection.
• Explain why you agree or disagree with the opinion of the cartoonist.

The Wilson-Gorman Tariff of 1894, often known as the Revenue Act, placed a 2% tax on income above $4,000 and marginally reduced United States tariff rates from those determined by the 1890 McKinley Tariff.

It bears the names of two Democrats, Senator Arthur P. Gorman of Maryland and Representative William L. Wilson of West Virginia, who serves as chair of the House Ways and Means Committee. This attempt at tariff reform, which was backed by Democratic Party members who support free trade, imposed the first income tax in peacetime (2% on income over $4,000, or $88,100 in 2010 USD, meaning less than 1% of households would pay any). To replace the revenue that would be lost due to tariff reductions, the income tax was implemented.

While Grover Cleveland was still in power, the Democrats wanted to move away from the protectionism that the McKinley tariff proposed. By coincidence, the exemption for married couples would be $4,000 when President Woodrow Wilson signed the Revenue Act of 1913 into law as a result of the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution being ratified in February 1913.

To know more about Revenue Act visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9086749

#SPJ4

Al Qaeda was organized to promote its extremist ideology and to carry out violent attacks against those it perceived as enemies of Islam. The group has been designated as a terrorist organization by many countries and continues to pose a significant threat to global security.

i dont what answer

Explanation:

because of you

American firms became less competitive compared to foreign firms during the 1980s primarily because C) the U.S. dollar became worth more in terms of foreign currencies.

This made American products more expensive and less attractive to foreign buyers, giving an advantage to foreign firms with lower-priced goods. The answer to your question is D) the U.S. dollar became worth less in terms of foreign currencies. This made American goods more expensive compared to foreign goods, reducing their competitiveness in the global market. Additionally, some foreign firms had more modern facilities and utilized the latest technology, which also gave them a competitive advantage over some American firms. However, it is important to note that the decline in competitiveness was not solely due to these factors and may have had other underlying causes as well.

Learn more about foreign currencies here: brainly.com/question/15874744

#SPJ11

American firms became less competitive compared to foreign firms during the 1980s because the U.S. dollar became worth more in terms of foreign currencies. The correct answer is option C.

During the 1980s, American firms became less competitive compared to foreign firms mainly due to the appreciation of the U.S. dollar in terms of foreign currencies. This made American goods and services more expensive for foreign buyers, which in turn led to a decline in demand for American products. Consequently, foreign firms with lower costs and competitive prices gained an advantage in the global market.

While it is true that some foreign firms had more modern facilities and advanced technology, the primary reason for the reduced competitiveness of American firms was the strong U.S. dollar. It is important to note that other factors, such as the quality and productivity of American workers, did not significantly contribute to this decline in competitiveness.

Instead, the changing value of the U.S. dollar played a more prominent role in shaping the global market dynamics during the 1980s.

Therefore, option C is correct.

For more such questions on American firms, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/17106599

#SPJ11

The territory in the Pacific that rose up in violent protest to the US takeover in the aftermath of the Spanish-American War: is the Philippines.

The Spanish-American War, which took place in 1898, was a conflict between the United States and Spain that resulted in the US acquiring several territories, including the Philippines. The Philippine-American War, also known as the Philippine Insurrection, was a direct result of this takeover. This war began in 1899 and lasted until 1902.

The Filipinos, led by Emilio Aguinaldo, were initially supportive of the US during the Spanish-American War, believing that they would gain independence from Spain. However, when it became clear that the US intended to maintain control over the Philippines, the sentiment quickly changed.

The Filipino forces engaged in a violent and prolonged struggle against the American forces, leading to a bloody conflict with significant casualties on both sides.

Despite the resistance, the US eventually established control over the Philippines and implemented a series of political and social reforms. The Philippines would not gain full independence from the United States until July 4, 1946.

In summary, the Philippines rose up in violent protest to the US takeover in the aftermath of the Spanish-American War due to the desire for independence and resentment towards the United States for not honoring their initial expectations.

To know more about Spanish-American War, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/2827989#

#SPJ11

The accomplished by the 1947 Mendez v. Westminster case Segregation ended in schools.

U.S. Region Court Judge Paul J. McCormick concurred with the offended parties and requested that the school areas stop their "biased rehearses against the understudies of Mexican drop in the government-funded schools."

The appointed authorities concluded the Mendez case on grounds that California regulation, while as yet allowing the isolation of specific racial gatherings, "does exclude the isolation of younger students due to their Mexican blood. It was the primary government case to hold that school isolation is unlawful and abuses the Equivalent Assurance Statement of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Learn more about Mendez v. Westminster:

https://brainly.com/question/30647637

#SPJ4

The 1947 Mendez v. Westminster case was a landmark decision in the United States that ended segregation in California schools and paved the way for the desegregation of schools across the country.

The 1947 Mendez v. Westminster case was a landmark court decision that helped desegregate schools in California. The case challenged the practice of segregating Mexican-American students into separate "Mexican schools," which were often overcrowded and underfunded compared to white schools. The ruling by the federal court found that the segregation of Mexican-American students violated their equal protection rights under the 14th Amendment. This case paved the way for other civil rights cases and was an important step in the fight for educational equality and desegregation in the United States.The Mendez v. Westminster case was also significant because it predated the more well-known Brown v. Board of Education case, which ended segregation in schools nationwide. The Mendez case helped to lay the groundwork for the Brown decision and demonstrated the importance of grassroots organizing and activism in the fight for civil rights.

Learn more about desegregation here:

https://brainly.com/question/18321409

#SPJ11

Answer:

Freedom: We have the freedom to do what we want, believe in what we want, and say what we want and to do so without persecution. ...

Diversity: We are a melting pot. ...

Opportunity: This is the land of opportunity. ...

Volunteerism: People in the United States love to help.

Explanation:

The Treaty of Versailles was signed between The Allied powers and Germany and codified the terms of peace between the Allied and the Germans on June 28, 1919.

It is widely accepted all over the world that the Treaty of Versailles was not followed. As it was filled with harsh punishments which were imposed on Germany. Fundamentally, the Treaty of Versailles was not a peace treaty but was signed for revenge.

As Germany was required to pay for financial reparations, it also lost its territory and also give up all of its overseas colonies to the Allied powers.

For more information:

brainly.com/question/18255693

The Crusades were intended to regain not Rome but the Holy Land for Christians.

The expansion of trade and the economy was one of the Crusades' most significant effects. When the Crusades ended, many Crusaders were captivated by the luxury goods they found in the Middle East and brought them home.

Both the militarization of the medieval western Church and the persistence of criticism of that militarization were aided by the Crusades' movement to change Christianity. It made certain financial innovations central to Church operations and arguably strengthened the pope's control over the Church. Additionally, devotional trends were reflected and influenced by it.

European exploration was impacted by the Crusades because of the significant desire to continue expanding markets east. The Crusades opened Europe to goods from the east and provided new markets for European goods.

Learn more about Crusades :

brainly.com/question/29364663

#SPJ4

Incomplete question :

The Crusades were intended to regain_______ Rome _____for Christians.

Compared to World War I, the literary outpouring from World War II can be best described as significantly greater in terms of volume, diversity, and global impact.

From memoirs and personal stories to fiction, poetry, and theatre, World War II created a huge and diverse body of literature.

This literary outpouring reflected the war's global scope, huge human cost, and impact on varied communities worldwide.

Many writers from occupied or directly affected countries wrote strong works that captured the horrors and complexities of the war, such as Primo Levi's "Survival in Auschwitz," Anne Frank's "The Diary of a Young Girl," and Art Spiegelman's graphic novel "Maus."

For such more question on World War II:

https://brainly.com/question/651584

#SPJ11

The average annual economic growth rate in China over the 20 years from 1959 to 1978 was approximately 3.5%. Deng Xiao Ping then started market reforms in 1978 to further boost China's economic development.

From 1959 to 1978, China experienced a growth in real per capita GDP from $350 to $700. To calculate the average annual economic growth rate over these 20 years, we can use the formula:
Growth Rate = [(Ending Value / Starting Value)^(1 / Number of Years)] - 1
Growth Rate = [($700 / $350)^(1 / 20)] - 1
Growth Rate = (2^(1 / 20)) - 1
Growth Rate ≈ 0.035 or 3.5%
Therefore, the average annual economic growth rate in China over the 20 years from 1959 to 1978 was approximately 3.5%. Deng Xiao Ping then started market reforms in 1978 to further boost China's economic development.

The average annual economic growth rate in China over the 20 years from 1959 to 1978 was approximately 3.5%. Despite this relatively modest growth rate, the doubling of real per capita GDP during this period was still a significant achievement for China. However, it was only after Deng Xiao Ping initiated market reforms in 1978 that China experienced sustained and rapid economic growth, with average annual growth rates of around 10% over the following decades.

Learn more about Deng Xiao Ping here: brainly.com/question/20298602

#SPJ11

In Africa in the early 1980s, many of the political parties that had led the movements for independence from colonial rule were struggling.

Some had become entrenched in power and were facing challenges from opposition parties, while others had fractured or disappeared altogether. Additionally, many of these parties had failed to deliver on the promises they had made to their constituents, leading to widespread disillusionment and frustration among the population. This created opportunities for new political movements and parties to emerge, as well as for existing parties to adapt and evolve in response to changing political and social conditions. Overall, the early 1980s marked a period of significant political upheaval and transformation in Africa, as the continent continued to grapple with the legacies of colonialism and the challenges of building stable and democratic societies.

To know more about entrenched refer :

brainly.com/question/12055756

#SPJ11

The United States played a significant role in World War 1, although it entered the conflict relatively late, in 1917.

Prior to its entry, the US had maintained a policy of neutrality, but several factors, including German submarine warfare, the Zimmerman telegram, and economic ties with Britain and France, ultimately led to its involvement in the war.Once it entered the war, the US provided substantial military, economic, and logistical support to the Allied powers, including the deployment of over two million soldiers to Europe. The US also played a key role in shaping the post-war order, including the creation of the League of Nations, which sought to prevent future conflicts through collective security and international cooperation.Whether or not US entry into the war was justified is a matter of debate. Supporters of US involvement argue that it was necessary to defend American interests and values, and to uphold international law and order. They also point to the atrocities committed by Germany, such as the sinking of the Lusitania and the use of chemical weapons, as evidence of the need for intervention.

Learn more about including here:https://brainly.com/question/28266360

#SPJ11

Answer:

1. The Napoleonic Code, also known as the French Civil Code, was a comprehensive set of laws that consolidated and simplified the legal system in France. It had several similarities with the principles of the Enlightenment, including the emphasis on rationality and equality. The code abolished feudalism, established legal equality among citizens, and protected individual property rights. It also recognized the importance of merit over birthright, which aligned with the Enlightenment idea of social mobility. The code emphasized individual rights, such as freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and the right to a fair trial, all of which were also central principles of the Enlightenment.

2. The American and French revolutions resulted in significant changes in government, but there were key differences between the two. The American Revolution aimed to establish a government based on the principles of democracy and individual liberty. After the war, the US Constitution was created, which established a federal system of government with checks and balances, and protected individual rights through the Bill of Rights. The Constitution created a system of government with three branches - legislative, executive, and judicial - and limited the power of the federal government to prevent tyranny.

In contrast, the French Revolution aimed to abolish the old order and establish a republic based on the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity. The French government underwent several changes during this period, including the establishment of a constitutional monarchy and the reign of terror under Robespierre. However, after Napoleon came to power, he established an authoritarian regime with himself as emperor. He centralized power and limited individual rights, although he did implement several legal reforms, including the Napoleonic Code.

Overall, while both revolutions resulted in significant changes to their respective governments, the American Revolution established a more democratic system of government, while the French Revolution resulted in a more authoritarian one.

Explanation:

The Allied peace settlement after World War I was flawed in several ways. One of the major flaws was the Treaty of Versailles, which imposed harsh reparations on Germany, leading to economic hardship and resentment.

The treaty also created new nation-states, disregarding the cultural and ethnic differences within them, leading to conflicts in the future.

Additionally, the treaty failed to address the issue of imperialism, which led to the rise of anti-colonial movements and further conflicts. The League of Nations, which was created to prevent future wars, lacked sufficient power to enforce its decisions and was eventually dissolved.

Overall, the Allied peace settlement failed to address the root causes of the war and created conditions for future conflicts.

Read more about Allied peace settlement at https://brainly.com/question/9678151

#SPJ11

The statement "the first great awakening lasted about two decades." is True because The first Great Awakening was a period of religious revival that occurred in the American colonies during the 1730s and 1740s.

It was characterized by a renewed interest in religion, particularly among Protestants, and a shift towards more emotional and personal forms of worship.

The movement was sparked by a number of influential preachers, including Jonathan Edwards, George Whitefield, and Gilbert Tennent, who traveled throughout the colonies delivering powerful sermons and encouraging people to renew their commitment to God.
The first Great Awakening had a significant impact on American society, both religiously and politically. It helped to fuel the growth of new religious denominations, such as the Baptists and Methodists, and played a role in the development of a uniquely American sense of identity. It also had political implications, as many of the preachers involved in the movement encouraged their followers to resist British authority and support the cause of American independence.
Overall, the first Great Awakening was a transformative period in American history that helped to shape the country in a number of important ways. Its impact can still be felt today in the diverse and dynamic religious landscape of the United States.

For more such questions on Great Awakening

https://brainly.com/question/9365435

#SPJ11

The statement "the first great awakening lasted about two decades." is True because The first Great Awakening was a period of religious revival that occurred in the American colonies during the 1730s and 1740s.

It was characterized by a renewed interest in religion, particularly among Protestants, and a shift towards more emotional and personal forms of worship.The movement was sparked by a number of influential preachers, including Jonathan Edwards, George Whitefield, and Gilbert Tennent, who traveled throughout the colonies delivering powerful sermons and encouraging people to renew their commitment to God.The first Great Awakening had a significant impact on American society, both religiously and politically. It helped to fuel the growth of new religious denominations, such as the Baptists and Methodists, and played a role in the development of a uniquely American sense of identity. It also had political implications, as many of the preachers involved in the movement encouraged their followers to resist British authority and support the cause of American independence.

Learn more about religionhere:https://brainly.com/question/30228180

#SPJ11

Answer:

the assassination of Australian Archduke franz Ferdinand

Planted Chapter 10 does not list how we can further criticize the church and its teachings as a question against members of the LDS Church. Here option D is the correct answer.

In Planted Chapter 10, the author, Patrick Q. Mason, discusses the challenges faced by members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) who experience a faith crisis or struggle with doubts. He lists several questions that members may ask themselves or others during this difficult time. These questions include:

A) How can we reconcile our doubts with our faith?

B) How can we maintain our relationships with family and friends who have left the Church?

C) How can we better support those who experience a faith crisis?

However, the question of "How can we be more critical of the Church and its teachings?" was not listed as one of the questions facing LDS Church members. Instead, Mason emphasizes the importance of understanding and engaging with difficult issues in a faithful and thoughtful manner, while also recognizing that there may not always be easy answers or resolutions.

To learn more about Church

https://brainly.com/question/9046468

#SPJ4

Complete question:

Which of the following was not listed as a question facing LDS Church members in Planted Chapter 10?

A) How can we reconcile our doubts with our faith?

B) How can we maintain our relationships with family and friends who have left the Church?

C) How can we better support those who experience a faith crisis?

D) How can we be more critical of the Church and its teachings?

The term that BEST describes the kind of people Oglethorpe and his associates wanted to bring to Georgia is "worthy poor." They were seeking individuals who were deserving of a second chance and willing to work hard to establish a successful colony.

These individuals would have been chosen based on their moral character, work ethic, and ability to contribute to the growth and development of the colony.
The term that best describes the kind of people Oglethorpe and his associates wanted to bring to Georgia is "worthy poor." They aimed to provide an opportunity for impoverished individuals to start a new life and contribute to the development of the colony.

Visit here to learn more about Oglethorpe brainly.com/question/697015

#SPJ11

While John Adams was anxious to continue his relationship with Abigail Smith, he was also aware of the obligations that came with marriage. Adams therefore began organizing and improving the cottage and farmland he inherited after his father passed away in May 1761.

A cottage was a modest house owned by a cottager with a garden large enough to feed a family during the feudal era in England. For the cottage, the occupant was required to do some kind of service to the manorial lord. However, the term "cottage" only changed over time to refer to a simple house in general.

In common usage today, a cottage is often a small, oftentimes charming home located in a rural or semi-rural area, however it is not always in England. The cottage orné has its roots in a Romantic-era architectural movement of "rustic"-themed structures in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. These structures were typically fairly enormous and opulent mansions constructed by the nobility.

Learn more about cottage here:

brainly.com/question/29794262

#SPJ4

One way in which the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) was an example of other trends in international relations in the 20th century was its emphasis on independence and sovereignty of nations

What is brief history?

In the aftermath of World War II, many nations in Asia, Africa, and Latin America gained independence and sought to assert their independence in international affairs.

The NAM, which emerged in the 1950s as a coalition of newly independent nations, sought to promote the interests of these countries and advocated for a more equitable global order.

This emphasis on independence and sovereignty of nations was also reflected in other international movements such as the decolonization movement and the rise of nationalism in many parts of the world.

To know more about NAM related question visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28571640

#SPJ1

Answer:

a shot from a gun announced the ponnys arrival

Explanation:

the celebration

Answer:

Mobile homes have been in general production since ____.

Choose one answer.

A. 1943

C. 1965

D. 1970

Explanation:

You're welcome.

The Lilliputians learn "leaping and creeping" for practical purposes such as hunting and warfare, as well as for cultural and social events.

In "Gulliver's Travels," by Jonathan Swift, the Lilliputians discover "leaping and creeping" for a variety of uses. Practically speaking, these abilities let the Lilliputians better understand their surroundings, which is helpful for both hunting and combat.

Aside from that, "leaping and creeping" are often used in cultural and social occasions like dances and competitions. The Lilliputians' overall command of their physical prowess is a reflection of their ingenuity and flexibility in their little surroundings.

Learn more about Gulliver:

https://brainly.com/question/27880055

#SPJ4

In contrast to China, the collectivization of agriculture in the Soviet Union was largely imposed by the government rather than being initiated by the peasants themselves.

While the Chinese government encouraged peasants to form agricultural cooperatives, in the Soviet Union, collectivization was enforced through violent means such as confiscation of land and equipment, deportation, and imprisonment. This led to widespread resistance and even violence among the Soviet peasantry, resulting in a significant loss of life and disruption to the agricultural sector. Despite these challenges, collectivization in the Soviet Union ultimately led to greater state control over agricultural production, which was seen as essential to building a socialist economy.

In contrast to China, the collectivization of agriculture in the Soviet Union was a process that took place during the late 1920s and early 1930s under the leadership of Joseph Stalin. This policy aimed at consolidating individual farms into large state-owned collective farms, known as kolkhozes, in order to increase agricultural production and efficiency. While both countries experienced significant social and economic disruption, the Soviet Union's collectivization was marked by more extreme measures, including forced relocation and widespread famines, particularly in Ukraine.

Visit here to learn more about Soviet Union brainly.com/question/10173240

#SPJ11

Answer:

In 1707, the Kingdom of Scotland and the Kingdom of England joined together to become one country under a new name, the Kingdom of Great Britain. This was achieved through the Treaty of Union, which was a legal agreement signed by both countries to combine their parliaments, military, and economy into one unified entity.

The union between Scotland and England was a significant event in British history, and it marked the beginning of a new era of political and social integration. The union allowed for greater economic and military power, which helped to make Great Britain one of the world's most powerful nations at that time. The Treaty of Union remains an important document in British history, and it continues to shape the political and social landscape of the United Kingdom today.

While the politics of elitism aim to promote social mobility and equal opportunities, critics argue that it can create a new form of elitism and raise concerns about fairness in the selection process.

The politics of elitism aim to replace the privileged with a new elite that is based on merit and competence rather than wealth, social status, or other arbitrary factors. This approach to governance seeks to promote social mobility and equal opportunities for all individuals by providing them with access to education, training, and other resources that can help them develop the skills and competencies needed to succeed in their chosen fields.

The idea behind this political philosophy is that individuals should be judged based on their abilities and potential rather than their background or social status. This can help to break down the barriers that prevent individuals from achieving their full potential and create a more just and equitable society.

However, critics of this approach argue that it can lead to a new form of elitism where those who are deemed to be the most talented or competent are granted disproportionate power and influence over society. Additionally, there may be concerns about the fairness of the selection process and whether it truly provides equal opportunities for all individuals.

To learn more about political philosophy

https://brainly.com/question/11640194

#SPJ4

Oglethorpe's plan for the establishment of Savannah could BEST be described as a well-organized and carefully thought-out plan for a new settlement.

His vision was to create a utopian community that would serve as a haven for debtors and the poor, and his plan included a grid-like street system, public squares, and regulations governing the size and placement of houses. Oglethorpe also placed great emphasis on agriculture, encouraging settlers to cultivate mulberry trees and produce silk. Overall, Oglethorpe's plan for Savannah was a success, and the city became a thriving center of trade and commerce in the region.

For more information on Oglethorpe's plan see:

https://brainly.com/question/28735764

#SPJ11

My topic for "most influence today" is Roman art, in which I would make an argument on relevance of Roman art today.

Given below is and Essay on Roman Art, the topic selected by me for argumentative essay.

From the ancient times to the present, Roman art has had a significant influence. There are several applications of art that are still important today, whether they be in architecture, painting, film, etc.

In the modern times the relevance of Roman art has just gone a notch higher. The art of gem cutting and metals were both established by the Romans, who also manufactured cameos and ornate glass bottles.

Murals in eateries, banks, and other structures, realistic sculptures, cut jewels, and cameos are some modern examples of Roman-influenced art.

Other Roman contributions included the fact that criminals could not be permitted to pass away before being found guilty since the state would not be able to collect their property. Additionally, the owner frequently qualified for a complete reimbursement if a slave committed Self- execution. They even had a formalized system in place where anyone could ask to commit executing himself.

These were some laws that did not make sense even in the ancient times and do not and should not effect the society today.

Sculptors and painters have continued to be influenced by Roman art. Early on in the history of the United States, Roman architectural styles were particularly prominent. To add dignity and majesty to their work, Americans copied these techniques.

To know more on Roman Art visit:

https://brainly.com/question/972104

#SPJ1