in 1689, british parliament signs into law a list of guarantees to its citizens. what is the document called?

Answer:

It is necessary for the victim to wait until he or she has been physically assaulted before acting in self-defense

Explanation:

That is definately an inaccurate statement.

You didn't provide options, so I hope this helps

The filibuster is the procedure where end we shall speak for the extended. In the hope of a delaying and preventing out on a bill.

They are commonly used in the procedures of the parliament of the United States Senate, they can be used to control legislative procedures are there confirmation of the nominees nominated by the president closed it can be used controversially, where they can prevent the majority from passing the important appointments.

Others thought that filibusters promote the rights of the minority and the protection of the rights of the minority and some other argue that they can undermine the democratic process or deteriorate the laws.

To know more about the filibuster

brainly.com/question/24047431

#SPJ4

A scenario that would violate a person's 5th Amendment rights would involve the government compelling a person to incriminate themselves.

Here are some examples of scenarios that would violate a person's 5th Amendment rights:
A police officer arrests a person and asks them to confess to a crime without informing them of their right to remain silent or their right to an attorney.
A court forces a defendant to testify against themselves in a criminal trial.
A prosecutor threatens to file additional charges against a defendant if they do not testify against themselves or plead guilty.
A government agency forces a person to turn over documents that could be used to incriminate themselves in a criminal investigation without a warrant or probable cause.
In general, any scenario where the government forces a person to incriminate themselves without due process of law or in violation of their constitutional rights would violate their 5th Amendment rights.

To read more about the 5th Amendment, click on https://brainly.com/question/30391361

#SPJ4

Governments have the authority to place some restrictions on speech to protect public safety, maintain public order, and safeguard national security.

However, the extent to which speech can be restricted varies depending on the country and its legal system. Here are some types of speech that can be restricted by the government. Incitement to violence: Speech that directly incites violence or lawless action can be restricted, as it poses a clear and present danger to public safety. Hate speech: Some governments restrict speech that promotes or incites hatred, discrimination, or violence against individuals or groups based on their race, ethnicity, religion, nationality, or other characteristics. Obscenity: Speech that is considered obscene or sexually explicit can be restricted under certain circumstances.

To learn more about government, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/8561829

#SPJ4

Answer:

Containerized cargo can include a wide variety of goods, ranging from harmless consumer goods to potentially dangerous materials. Some examples of cargo that could be placed in containers include:

In order to anticipate and mitigate the inherent danger of each type of cargo, a security manager should be aware of the risks associated with each type of cargo, and take steps to ensure that the cargo is properly contained and secured during transit. This may involve implementing specific security protocols, such as inspections, surveillance, and tracking, to monitor the cargo and ensure that it is not tampered with or stolen. Additionally, the security manager may need to develop contingency plans in case of emergency situations, such as a spill or leakage of hazardous materials, to ensure that the risk is minimized and the appropriate response is taken.

Explanation:

The review of a new drug application may take from 2 months to 7 years after the trade name is finalized, and the NDA (New Drug Application) review is completed.

Preclinical (animal) testing comes first in the evaluation of new drug applications. A new medicine's sponsor's plans for clinical trial human testing are outlined in an investigational novel drug application. The studies of Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 are conducted after it. The time frame immediately preceding the submission of an NDA or new drug application. A regular time for meetings between the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) and drug sponsors. The official procedure to request that the FDA consider approving a medicine for commercialization is to submit an NDA. The FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) has 60 days from the time it receives an NDA to decide whether to file it for review. An FDA review panel is tasked with assessing the sponsor's analysis of the drug's safety and efficacy if the FDA submits the NDA (new drug application). The FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) examines the information on a drug's official labeling. As part of the approval procedure, the FDA inspects the factories where the medicine will be made. FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) reviewers will either accept the application or send a letter with a detailed response. This whole procedure may take from 2 months to 7 years.

To learn more about U.S. Food and Drug Administration, click below:

https://brainly.com/question/30302103

#SPJ4

Both the European nations of class in the colonies and the Indian caste system shares share some similarities they also have differences but in some ways are similar.

Hierarchical social order can be seen in both systems which shows the clear social order based on the birth time ancestry according to the Indian class system the people who are born in a particular caste could not change it during their lifetime and the same way in the colonial societies people are often assigned a social status based on their values ancestry and ethnicity and which cannot be changed.

Limited mobility within the social hierarchy is limited in two systems when it comes to the Indian gas system people are expected to marry within their cast and then come to the colonial societies the people are occupied are told to Marry with in themselves.

Both the discrimination and prejudice of the system can be seen against the lowers status groups in the Indian caste system people from lower castes are excluded from certain social economic and religious activities unfazed discrimination similarly in colonial societies uh people from other areas are often subjected to discrimination.

There are also significant differences between the systems the Indian caste system was religious and cultural whereas the Europeans have colonies where they were well the product of colonialism and imperialism European nations are based on simplistic thesis assumptions how about this periodicity of the civilization and culture.

To know more about European notions of class in the colonies

brainly.com/question/30856294

#SPJ4

Answer: executed

Explanation:

Soldiers, police, and militia quickly executed key Tutsi and moderate Hutu military and political leaders who could have assumed control in the ensuing power vacuum.

With the development of gene-edited crop technologies, the need for international regulation of genetically modified crops has grown.

Genetically modified crops (GMCs) are plants that have had their genetic makeup altered utilising biotechnology methods in order to improve traits including yield, pest resistance, and herbicide tolerance. This procedure involves adding or removing particular genes from a plant's Genome, enabling the development of crops with desired characteristics. Concerns about the potential effects of GMCs on human health, the environment, and conventional farming methods have generated discussion about them. Supporters contend that GMCs could aid in addressing issues related to global food security by boosting agricultural yields, decreasing the use of pesticides, and enhancing tolerance to environmental stressors. Despite these potential advantages, the use of GMCs is still a contentious topic with variable levels of acceptance and regulation in various nations.

Learn more about genetically modified crops here:

https://brainly.com/question/4010693

#SPJ4

A correct statement about a rent control law is that it is a price ceiling law that sets a maximum amount that landlords can charge tenants for rent.

Rent control laws, in particular, limit the amount of rent that landlords can charge tenants, usually in specified types of housing such as apartments, in an effort to make housing more affordable for low-income households and to avoid rent price hikes.

Rent control rules do not, in fact, deter property owners from renting out apartments. In truth, the goal of rent control regulations is to help ensure that landlords continue to rent out apartments at accessible costs for renters. Some critics of rent control legislation, however, believe that they may discourage new investment in rental properties or reduce the quality or quantity of existing rental units.

For such more question on law:

brainly.com/question/28171613

#SPJ4

The following question may be like this:

Which is a correct statement about a rent control law?

A rent control law is a price floor law that makes apartments cheaper to rent but discourages property owners from renting out apartments.

A rent control law encourages property owners to convert offices and condos into apartments.

A rent control law reduces housing shortages

A rent control law encourages landlords to rent out apartments.

A rent control law is a price ceiling law that makes apartments cheaper to rent but discourages property owners from renting out apartments

In order for a public figure to obtain a damage award under libel laws, they must prove that the defendant made a false and defamatory statement about them.

That the statement was made with actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth, and that the statement caused them harm or damage.

The actual malice standard means that the defendant made the statement with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard for whether it was true or false. This standard applies to public figures, such as politicians, celebrities, and other individuals who have become well-known in the public eye. It is higher than the standard applied to private individuals, who only need to show that the defendant was negligent in making the false statement.

The harm or damage that a public figure must prove in order to obtain a damage award can take many forms, including damage to their reputation, emotional distress, or financial harm. Public figures may also be required to prove that the false statement caused them to suffer specific, quantifiable losses, such as lost business opportunities or damage to their career prospects.

Overall, the actual malice standard makes it more difficult for public figures to win libel cases, as they must prove that the defendant made the false statement with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth. However, if a public figure is able to meet this standard and prove that they suffered harm as a result of the false statement, they may be able to obtain a damage award under libel laws.

For such more question on defendant

https://brainly.com/question/14661448

#SPJ4

The legislative branch is the branch that has the power to check, create and pass a legislation.

The legislative branch may be referred to or taken into consideration as the branch that deals with the legal structuring and lawful observation in the society that falls under its jurisdiction. In order to maintain the legal formalities, the legislative branch also has the powers to make, amend, change, or discard the laws for creating and passing legislations within the constitution. Thus, the powers of legislative branch are given.

Learn more about the legislative branch here:

https://brainly.com/question/11883152

#SPJ4

complete question

Which branch's power is being checked to create and pass a legislation?

The government agency that is responsible for assuring compliance with ethical conduct of research in humans is the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

The IRB is a committee made up of scientists, non-scientists, and community members. The IRB is in charge of reviewing human subjects research proposals to ensure that they are ethical and scientifically sound. The IRB evaluates the possible hazards and benefits of the research and ensures that the participants' rights and welfare are maintained.

By law, the IRB must follow the regulations and recommendations established by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP).

For such more question on agency:

https://brainly.com/question/26253714

#SPJ4

No one creates the substantive or statutory law applied by the International Court of Justice in cases before it.

The substantive or statutory law applied by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in cases before it is created by a variety of sources. The primary source of international law is treaties or conventions, which are agreements between states that set out their rights and obligations. The ICJ also draws on customary international law, which refers to longstanding practices and beliefs among states that are considered to have legal force. Other sources of international law include general principles of law recognized by civilized nations, judicial decisions, and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists.

The ICJ, like other international courts, applies international law to resolve disputes between states, as well as to provide advisory opinions on legal questions. The court does not create new law, but rather applies existing legal norms to the facts of the case before it. The decisions of the ICJ are considered authoritative interpretations of international law and can influence the development of the law in the future.

To learn more about court click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13750271

#SPJ4

Claire lives in Alabama and holds a sales associate license there. She also wants to be able to work in Florida. Claire must Submit an application and pass the state portion of the licensing exam.

Hence, the option is D.

If Claire wants to practice real estate in Florida she needs to Submit an application and pass the state portion of the licensing exam as a non-resident of Florida. Through the licensing examination the government evaluates the ability of the examinee, on the basis of such results people are hired at various job posts. The person who is graduate is eligible to give the licensing exam.

Know more about "licensing exam" visit

brainly.com/question/4036449

#SPJ4

Answer:

The Sixth Amendment

Jump to essay-4Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213, 223 (1967) ( We hold here that the right to a speedy trial is as fundamental as any of the rights secured by the Sixth Amendment. ).

In my state, anyone who is a legal resident of the state, is 18 years of age or older, and is a US citizen is eligible to become a jury member.

A person must meet the requirements of their state's jury selection statutes and complete a jury questionnaire that asks about their work, education, and crime background in order to serve on a jury.

A person must also be able to read and comprehend English, adhere to directions, and concentrate for extended periods of time in a courtroom.

Judges, lawyers, and members of the legal profession are prohibited from serving on juries because it could lead to a conflict of interest.

However, some states have statutes that permit people to be excused from jury duty due to illness, inability to serve, or other circumstances.

Complete Question:

Who is eligible to become a jury member in your state?

To learn more about crime visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13143195

#SPJ4

The PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) has the authority to enforce SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) Title III, Section 303 in disciplinary proceedings against registered public accounting firms and their associated persons.

Section 303 of Title III of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that the registered public accounting firm of an issuer who is found to have engaged in fraudulent activity must "promptly" report that activity to the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors. In case the accounting firm fails to do so, the PCAOB has the authority to bring disciplinary proceedings against the firm and its associated persons.

The PCAOB can conduct investigations and enforcement proceedings against registered public accounting firms and their associated persons for violations of SOX and PCAOB rules and standards, including those related to Section 303. The PCAOB has the power to impose sanctions, such as fines, censures, and suspensions, on firms and individuals found to have violated SOX and PCAOB rules.

To know more about section 303 here

https://brainly.com/question/30552429

#SPJ4

Multi-factor Authentication: Multi-factor authentication is an important tool for protecting user accounts. It should be configured to require users to provide multiple credentials to gain access.

Authentication is the process of verifying the identity of a user or device with the aim of ensuring that only authorized users or devices can access certain systems or resources. This is generally done by requiring users to supply a set of credentials such as username and password or biometric data.

1. Firewall: A firewall is a powerful tool for protecting your network from malicious traffic, such as viruses, hackers, and malicious software.

2. Intrusion Detection System (IDS): An IDS is designed to detect malicious activity, such as port scans, Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, and other malicious activities.

3. Encryption: Encryption is an important tool for protecting sensitive data, such as customer information and financial records.

4. Access Control: Access control is an important measure for ensuring that only authorized users have access to sensitive information.

To learn more about authentication

https://brainly.com/question/17377257

#SPJ1

Six women have been confirmed and seated as the United States Supreme Court justice. Out of 6, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson are the four that are currently in office.

The judiciary branch's highest court is the United States Supreme Court. Only six of the 115 justices who have served on the court have been female.

Sandra Day O'Connor was proposed by President Reagan in 1981 to succeed Potter Stewart as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. She was a conservative jurist who frequently agreed with conservative justices in cases, yet many of her rulings were commended for being both limited and moderate.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated to the United States Supreme Court by President Bill Clinton in 1993, and she was subsequently confirmed by the Senate by a 96-3 majority.

In 2009, the U.S. Senate approved Sonia Sotomayor to succeed retiring Justice David Souter on the United States Supreme Court. Sotomayor previously held positions on the Second Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals and as a district court judge in New York.

John Paul Stevens was replaced by Elena Kagan as a United States Supreme Court justice in 2010. Kagan was the first female U.S. Solicitor General before being confirmed.

2020 saw the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett to the United States Supreme Court, taking Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's place. Barrett presided over the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals from 2017 to 2020 prior to her confirmation.

Ketanji Brown Jackson, who replaced Justice Stephen Breyer in the United States Supreme Court, was confirmed as the first African-American woman to hold the position on April 7, 2022. Judge Jackson previously presided over cases before the U.S.

To learn more about the United States Supreme Court, click below:

https://brainly.com/question/28100996

#SPJ4

No person may serve as a senator unless they are at least thirty years old, have been citizens of the United States for nine years, and are residents of the state for which they are being elected at the time of their election, according to Article I, Section 3, Clause 3.

The three requirements outlined in the Constitution for membership in the U.S. Senate are age, U.S. citizenship, and residency in the state a senator is elected to represent.

The upper house of the United States Congress, a tiny body of elected persons who make the nation's laws, is known as the United States Senate. Two representatives for each state in the US are chosen to serve in the US Senate. Senators are those people.

To know more about United States Senate, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/29789233

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

what is one of the senate qualification clauses?

The 18th Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1919, prohibited the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating liquors within the United States.

The amendment was a result of the temperance movement, which sought to eliminate alcohol consumption as a means of promoting morality and public health. The 18th Amendment was important because it ushered in the era of Prohibition in the United States. Prohibition had a significant impact on American society and culture, as it led to the rise of organized crime and the illegal production and sale of alcohol. It also had unintended consequences, such as the spread of dangerous, homemade alcohol, and the loss of tax revenue for the government. Ultimately, the 18th Amendment was repealed by the 21st Amendment in 1933, marking the end of Prohibition. The legacy of Prohibition and the 18th Amendment continues to be debated today, with some viewing it as a failed experiment in social engineering, while others see it as an important example of the power of the Constitution to address pressing social issues.

Learn more about 18th Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/694491

#SPJ4

Answer: When commited a crime

Explanation:

If a federal official commits a crime or otherwise acts improperly, the House of Representatives may impeach—formally charge—that official. If the official subsequently is convicted in a Senate impeachment trial, he is removed from office.

A defendant was on trial for the mur-der of a police officer, which was allegedly order-ed by the kingpin of a drug cartel kno-wn to be ope-rating in the city. The prosecution asked for a closed trial to pro-tect the identity of witness-es, some of whom were children.

A defendant is a per-son who has been accused of break-ing the law and is being tried in court. A defendant is a person or object who is the party either acc-used of committing a crime in criminal prose-cution or against whom some type of civil relief is being sought in a civil case.

There are less restricti-ve means of protecting the test-ifying victim witnesses and govern-ment interests in secrecy than a closed trial and gag order.

Complete question- a defendant was on trial for the murder of a police officer, which was allegedly ordered by the kingpin of a drug cartel known to be operating in the city.

- There are less restrictive means of protecting the testifying victim witnesses and government interests in secrecy than a closed trial and gag order.

- The First Amendment protects the public's right to attend criminal trials.

To know more about a defendant click below:

brainly.com/question/30736002

#SPJ4

The case of Father Bernard Pagano, who was identified by seven eyewitnesses as a criminal, was an instance of a false positive.

Many witnesses to the holdups testified Father Pagano, a lanky man of 53, committed them at his trial in Delaware in 1979. Then, in a stunning turn of events, Ronald W. Clouser of Brookhaven, Pa., a Philadelphia suburb, appeared with a lawyer and acknowledged to being the Gentleman Bandit.

It is the procedure that masks the disruption caused by micro saccades. You can block out all the other discussions around you while sitting in a noisy restaurant so you can listen to the buddy with whom you are chatting.

For such more question on criminal:

brainly.com/question/6203610

#SPJ4

When term limits have been overturned, the most common method was a decision by the state supreme court.

The term limits of the state legislature can be turned by the means of the Supreme Court of the state, the legislature has certain clauses that can be altered at the time of need the Supreme Courts intervenes to overturn the common law by increasing the term limit. Term limits date back to the American Revolution and prior to that, to the democracies and republics of antiquity. A movement in favor of term limits started in the early 1990s, and reached its apex in 1992-1994, a period when seventeen states enacted term limits through state legislation or state constitutional amendments.

Know more about "term limits" visit

brainly.com/question/6817746

#SPJ4

Answer:

In Southern California, escrow functions are usually performed by an independent escrow company. In Northern California, however, the title company frequently also acts as the escrow agent for the transaction.

A court that follows stare decisis may make a decision to not use a rule of common law from an earlier case in the situations when the court distinguishes the decisions given in the earlier case. Therefore, the option B holds true.

The doctrine of stare decisis can be taken into interpretation as the provision under law wherein the earlier judgments of the court in similar cases are given priority when making a decision. However, this doctrine does not apply when there are differences in the decisions made by the earlier courts.

Learn more about stare decisis here:

https://brainly.com/question/21085371

#SPJ4