The senate can refuse to confirm judicial appointments. It is the upper chamber of the United States Congress.
Being the upper chamber of Congress the Senate has many powers of advice and consent which are unique. The power includes the approval of treaties and the confirmation of Cabinet secretaries, federal judges including Federal Supreme Court justices, flag officers, regulatory officials, ambassadors and other federal executive officials and federal uniformed officers. If anyone not receives a majority of electors for vice president then the duty falls to the Senate to elect one of the top two recipients of electors for that office. The Senate has been considered as both deliberative and prestigious body than the House of representatives due to the longer terms it has and smaller size and statewide constituencies which historically led to a more collegial and less partisan atmosphere.
To learn more about Senate
https://brainly.com/question/29790817
#SPJ4
what are the three types of authority exercised in a construction contract
The three types of authority exercised in a construction contract are apparent, expressed(written) and limited.
A construction contract is a legally binding agreement between two parties for construction of any building or monuments in exchange of certain money based on a tender. This contract mentions every detail of the construction work which gives right to the parties to exercise their rights and claim answers to that. Three types of authority are conferred by contract in a construction work apparent, expressed(written) and limited authority. where apparent authority refers to the power of an agent to act on behalf of a principal, even though not expressly or impliedly granted. Expressed authority is a form of written authority to a agent to work on behalf of principal, and limited authority where certain decisions cannot be solely made by the principal or agent it has to be discussed. These are the three types of authorities exercised in a construction contract.
Know more about "contract" visit
brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ4
Which term refers to the person conveying title, often called the "party of the first part," in a deed?
A. Notary public
B. Witness
C. Grantor
D. Grantee
Grantor refers to the person conveying title, often called the "party of the first part," in a deed. The correct option is C.
To convey is to give a property interest to another person, either through a gift or a sale. A conveyance is the legal term for this transaction. A deed is the common method for transferring a property interest.
A conveyance deed is a type of real estate document that effectively demonstrates that a piece of property has no outstanding debts. The document that serves as the official record of the transfer of title from one person to another at a mutually agreed-upon price is sometimes referred to as a real estate conveyance instrument.
A conveyance deed serves as ownership documentation. The ownership of property is mentioned. Legally transferring property rights: You can swiftly give someone else ownership of your property by using a conveyance document.
To know more about estate, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29408476
#SPJ4
What to do during a traffic break?
During a traffic break, also known as a traffic pause or traffic hold, you should slow down and maintain a safe following distance from the vehicle in front of you.
You should not change lanes or try to pass other vehicles during a traffic break. It's important to stay alert and focused on the road during a traffic break, as sudden changes in traffic flow can occur. You should be prepared to stop quickly if necessary, so keep your foot close to the brake pedal.
You can use the time during a traffic break to check your surroundings, make sure your seat belt is securely fastened, and adjust your mirrors or climate control.
Remember to remain patient and avoid road rage during a traffic break. It's a common occurrence on busy roads and highways, and getting frustrated or angry will not make the traffic move any faster.
To know more about traffic break here
https://brainly.com/question/10629809
#SPJ4
Shawn files for bankruptcy. However, he does not mention his farmhouse in Farmington in the bankruptcy proceedings. The farmhouse is later discovered by the mortgage firm and included in the proceedings. Which of the following is true in this case?
A) Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
B) Shawn can use the discovery of the estate as a defense to his concealment.
C) Shawn is guilty of larceny as he did not reveal his estate during bankruptcy proceedings.
D) Shawn can be found guilty of counterfeiting.
E) Shawn is likely to be found not guilty since the estate was recovered and included in the proceedings.
Based on the available options and the situation described, the truth of the case is that Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
What is the Offense of Concealment?The offense of Concealment is a term that is used to describe the offense committed with direct or indirect intent.
Generally, the concealer must know at the moment of committing the deed, in any of the normative ways, that the good comes from committing a deed provided by criminal law.
Therefore, in this case, since it is revealed that Shawn did not mention his farmhouse in Farmington in the bankruptcy proceedings and was later discovered by the mortgage firm and included in the proceedings, or will be concluded that Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A.
Learn more about the Offense of Concealment here: https://brainly.com/question/30033867
#SPJ1
what is the least severe form of denying liberty
Restriction is the least severe form of denying liberty.
It is more of a moral restrain than a physical restrain, the least severe deprivation from liberty. Nonjudicial punishment or NJP is a disciplinary measure more serious than the administrative corrective measure but less serious than trial by court. Refusal of bail is one such type of denying liberty, when the court refuse the acceptance of bail plea of the convicted or accused, it limits the access of certain places or goods by stopping them to do so in the form of punishment or to protect from another bad happening. These denials doesn't violate the right to liberty of a person as such rights are limited by the law when ever needed.
Know more about "liberty" visit
brainly.com/question/13207672
#SPJ4
what is the reason for traffic laws?
Traffic laws are put in place to promote safe and orderly movement of people and vehicles on public roadways.
The following are the primary reasons for traffic laws:
Safety: Traffic regulations are intended to keep all road users safe, including drivers, passengers, pedestrians, and cyclists.
Order: By setting rules and recommendations for how drivers should act in various scenarios, traffic regulations serve to create order and predictability on the roadways.
Efficiency: By controlling traffic flow, decreasing congestion, and eliminating delays, traffic rules can also serve to promote efficient use of roadways.
Equal Access: Traffic regulations also assist in ensuring that all road users have equal access to the roadway and that no one group is improperly disadvantaged or favoured.
For such more question on Traffic laws:
https://brainly.com/question/1071840
#SPJ4
What was one of the original goals of the First Amendment?
The First Amendment declared that the government could not establish a state religion or impose excessive limitations on religious practice, but rather that it must respect people's freedom to exercise their faith as they see fit.
In 1789, the United States' first amendment came into existence. Even today, it protects citizens' rights to freedom of expression, of the press, of religion, of peaceful assembly, and of petitioning the government to make their complaints heard.
Religion, speech, the press, the right to petition, and the freedom to assemble are five important social values that are protected by the First Amendment of our Constitution. Our steadfast dedication to these ideals has endured challenging conflicts throughout our history and has remained a cornerstone.
To know more about the first amendment, refer to the:
https://brainly.com/question/6501700
#SPJ4
The event challenged the foreign policy of President Adams is Attacks on U.S. ships. True/False?
The event challenged the foreign policy of President Adams is Attacks on U.S. ships. This statement is true.
The United States and France were in an unofficial state of war as soon as John Adams took office in 1797. His presidency was dominated by the Quasi-War, which controlled both home and foreign policy.
By bolstering the American Navy to defend American ships at sea, Adams prevented war. John Adams established the Department of Navy during his administration, and the U.S.S. Constitution as well as other ships were launched.
It was encircled in 1789 by hostile British, Spanish, and Indian forces. Full-scale war with Britain and a "quasi-war" with France were the results of conflicts on the continent and on the high seas. Indians on the border, Brits on the Great Lakes, and North African pirates in the Mediterranean Sea were all engaged by American troops.
To know more about Attacks on U.S. ships, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/4388878
#SPJ4
Room invasions are a significant security issue for hotels located in CONUS. (Antiterrorism Scenario Training, Page 1)
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
CONUS is "Continental United States." which is anywhere in the united states
Police and military are taught to handle room invasions in the instance one happens; rules are set in place to minimize the chances of invasion.
Room invasions can pose a significant security issue for hotels located in the Continental United States (CONUS), requiring appropriate measures to ensure the safety and security of guests and staff. Therefore, the given statement is true.
Room invasions refer to unauthorized entry or intrusion into hotel rooms, posing a significant security concern for hotels. Such incidents can jeopardize the safety and privacy of guests, leading to potential theft, assault, or other criminal activities.
Hotels must implement robust security measures to prevent room invasions, including strict access controls, surveillance systems, trained staff, and effective emergency response protocols.
Additionally, proper communication and collaboration with law enforcement agencies can help address and mitigate the risk of room invasions, ensuring a secure environment for guests and maintaining the reputation of the hotel.
Learn more about Room invasions here:
https://brainly.com/question/31861303
#SPJ6
What does fiscal policy involve increases or decreases in?
Fiscal policy is the political conclusion to increase or decrease taxation and giving. Fiscal tactics and monetary policy are frequently secondhand together to influence the economy. The fiscal procedure can influence an association's development, renting skills, and taxes.
Fiscal policy is a main finish for directing frugality by way of allure ability to influence the total amount of product produced—that is, gross household fruit. The first impact of monetary growth is to raise the demand for merchandise and aid. This better demand leads to increases in two together productivity and prices.
The management can use contractionary fiscal policy to slow business-related endeavors by depreciating management giving, increasing income tax, or an alliance of two together. Decreasing management giving tends to slow business-related projects as the management purchases less merchandise and aids from the private sector.
To know more about fiscal policy refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29992592
#SPJ4
Jessie did not meet the minimum income requirement to file a tax return. What is one reason for why she should file a tax return anyway?answer choicesA. She could potentially get a refund for the taxes that were withheld from her paycheck.B. She still needs to report her income to the Federal government.C. She can qualify for a higher tax refund next year.D. She is still legally required to file a tax return even if she does not meet the minimum income requirement to owe taxes.
One reason why Jessie should file a tax return even if she did not meet the minimum income requirement to file is that she could potentially get a refund for the taxes that were withheld from her paycheck. option A is correct.
Even if she did not earn enough income to owe taxes, if taxes were withheld from her paychecks, she may be eligible for a refund of those taxes. Filing a tax return is the only way to claim that refund from the government. A paycheck is a check written out to you for your salary or compensation. Both a checking and a savings account are acceptable for deposits. Your paycheck is often cashed without charge at a bank or credit union where you have an account.
For such more question on tax return
https://brainly.com/question/30655098
#SPJ4
The locality rule is sometimes invoked when
a. a physician practices in a remote location.
b. a real estate contract is breached.
c. res ipsa loquitur applies.
d. jury members are from the same city
Out of the given choices of alternatives, it may be concluded that the locality rule is sometimes invoked when the physician practices in a remote location. Therefore, the option A holds true.
There are a number of rules in the different fields of operations. These rules are mostly given under the authorities of the government, and the citizens are bound to obey them for a longer course of time. One such rule is that of locality rule. However, when a professional provides his or her services in a remote location away from their localities, the rule is invoked.
Learn more about rules here:
https://brainly.com/question/28188534?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
_______ supported by the larger states who wanted strong state governments
_______ stated that Congress couldn't act on the slave trade for 20 years
_______ based congressional representation on population size and taxes paid
________ presented by William Paterson
________ a unicameral Congress, like that under the Articles
________ a plural executive
________ equal representation in Congress
The Virginia Plan supported by the larger states who wanted strong state governments, while Commerce and Slave Trade states that Congress couldn't act on the slave trade for 20 years.
Virginia Plan based congressional representation on population size and taxes paid. New Jersey Plan was presented by William Paterson, New Jersey Plan was a unicameral Congress, like that under the Articles and New Jersey Plan was a plural executive and New Jersey Plan demarcated equal representation in Congress.
New Jersey Plan was formulated to provide one vote to each smaller state under the Article of Confederation, while in Virginia plan, the vote was given on the basis of population. The New Jersey plan was favored by small states and Virginia plan was favored by large states.
Learn more about New Jersey plan at:
brainly.com/question/19836218
#SPJ4
The main goal(s) of ethics for government acquisition professionals is to1.Maintain the confidence and support of the American people.
2.Avoid even the appearance of impropriety
3.Both answers are correct.
4.None are correct.
Option 3 is correct. Both answers are correct. The main goals of ethics for government acquisition professionals is to maintain the confidence and support of the American people.
Government acquisition means the acquiring by contract with appropriated funds of supplies or services including construction by and for the use of the Federal Government through purchase or lease whether the supplies or services are already in existence or must be created, developed, demonstrated and evaluated. This is said to be a process by which the efforts of all personnel responsible for an acquisition are coordinated and integrated through a comprehensive plan for fulfilling the agency it needs in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost. Government acquisition is developing the overall strategy for managing the acquisition.
To learn more about Government acquisition
https://brainly.com/question/13348618
#SPJ4
What happened in Lemon v Kurtzman?
In Lemon v. Kurtzman, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that laws in Pennsylvania and Rhode Island that gave Catholic school instructors a taxpayer-funded wage supplement were unconstitutional for violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
The Lemon v. Kurtzman decision is significant because it created the Lemon Rule, a three-part analysis to assess whether a law violates the First Amendment's ban on the establishment of religion. A significant Supreme Court ruling called Lemon v. Kurtzman forbade state governments from giving taxpayer money to schools with a religious affiliation. State financing may now be used in religiously connected schools in Pennsylvania and Rhode Island to pay teachers' salaries and purchase instructional supplies. The Establishment Clause and the separation of church and state were both broken, according to the Supreme Court's ruling.
Learn more about Lemon v Kurtzman here:
https://brainly.com/question/9031401
#SPJ4
Document A: Chamberlain
(Sourcing) When and where did this speech take place? What was Chamberlain's goal for the Munich Agreement?
In October 1938, the Document A: Chamberlain took place in the House of Commons. The main goal of the Munich Agreement was to prevent the breaking out of the World War II.
The Munich Agreement was a significant event in the United States' history. However, the entire goal or the primary intention of holding the event of Chamberlain as a forming part of this agreement was to find ways to prevent the Second World War from breaking out, but unfortunately, everything went in vain as it eventually happened.
Learn more about the Munich Agreement here:
https://brainly.com/question/29770761
#SPJ4
what could elizabeth have done right before she turned in the paper to avoid plagiarism?
Elizabeth could have done several things right before she turned in the paper to avoid plagiarism:
Properly cite all sources: It is important to properly cite all sources used in the paper. This includes direct quotes, paraphrased information, and any ideas or concepts taken from other sources. Proper citation includes both in-text citations and a bibliography or works cited page.Paraphrase correctly: When paraphrasing, it is important to put the information into your own words and not simply change a few words or rearrange the sentence structure. Paraphrasing also requires proper citation.Check for accidental plagiarism: Before turning in the paper, it is important to double check for any accidental plagiarism. This can be done by using a plagiarism checker tool or by carefully reviewing the paper and comparing it to the original sources.By following these steps, Elizabeth can ensure that her paper is free of plagiarism and that she is giving proper credit to the original sources.
To know more, check out: https://brainly.com/question/1654147
#SPJ1
The Constitution has comparatively little to say about the structure and composition of the Supreme Court. Identify two aspects of the Court's structure and composition that the Constitution does not specify. (The Constitution does specify these two basic aspects of structure and composition for the other two branches).
The Constitution has comparatively little to say about the structure and composition of the Supreme Court, the two aspects that the constitution doesn't comment upon is the number of justices in the court and the difference between chief justice and other judges.
The constitution is the supreme law of land, it is the framework within which the government and all the three aspects of government the legislature, the executive and the judiciary function. Within judiciary the constitution confers certain powers to all the levels of courts to perform their functions to confer legal rights to the common people. It also bounds the courts in certain situations but the structure and composition of the courts is not widely discussed under the constitution. It doesn't mention the maximum number of judges to be appointed in a court nor it differentiates between a chief justice and other judges of the court.
Know more about "Constitution" visit
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
What is the free exercise clause prohibits the government from passing laws that have any impact on religion?
Answer: The Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion as they please, so long as the practice does not run afoul of a "public morals" or a "compelling" governmental interest
The free exercise clause prohibits the government from passing laws that interfere with the free exercise of religion.
Explanation:The free exercise clause is part of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and prohibits the government from making laws that interfere with the free exercise of religion.
This means that the government cannot pass laws that target or burden religious practices or beliefs.
For example, if a law is specifically designed to restrict the practice of a particular religion, it would likely violate the free exercise clause.
Learn more about free exercise clause here:https://brainly.com/question/5245894
#SPJ2
What is universe law?
In the fields of law and ethics, the terms "universal law" or "universal principle" refer to ideas of legal legitimacy, whereby the principles and regulations governing human behaviour.
They are most universal in their acceptance, their applicability, their translation, and their philosophical foundation are therefore regarded as the most legitimate. There is a significant universal law that, if followed carefully, can help in resolving problems involving human actions. However, even though this universal law has remained constant over time, partial application without full comprehension has resulted in many failures in dealing with problems involving humanity. The Universal Law of Human Functioning is this law. "HUMAN FUNCTIONALITY IS EQUAL TO ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE AND THE APPLICATION OF THE ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE, IF OTHER CONDITIONS REMAIN CONSTANT" states the universal law of human functionality.
Learn more about functionality here:
https://brainly.com/question/30553767
#SPJ4
As you assess the upside of expanding into Argentina, you research its existing trade agreements with other countries. Of which economic community is Argentina a part?
-BRIC
-Mercosur
-USMCA
-EU
You investigate Argentina's trade agreements with other nations as you weigh the benefits of expanding there. Argentina is a member of the Mercosur economic bloc. The correct answer is option(b).
For the United States, the main aim of trade understanding search out defeat obstructions to U.S. exports, cover U.S. interests playing overseas and reinforce the rule of regulation in the FTA husband country or nations. Currently, the United States has 14 FTAs accompanying 20 nations.
Argentina, properly the Argentine Republic, is a country the in the southern half of South America. Argentina covers an extent of 2,780,400 km², making it the second-best country in South America following in position or time Brazil, one of four equal parts-best countries in the Americas, and the eighth-best country in the globe.
To know more about trade refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29103946
#SPJ4
when is the miranda warning required? **
The Miranda Warning is read by the police when a person who is in custody as well as the officer is questioning a particular individual about their crime or criminal activity.
In the country of United States, the Miranda warning is basically a type of notification or warning which is customarily given by the police to the criminal suspects who are in a police custody, or they are in a custodial interrogation, in order to advise them of their right to remain silent and protection from the self-incrimination.
This means that it is their right to refuse to answer any of the questions or provide any information to the law enforcement or the other officials. These rights are known as the to as the Miranda rights.
To know more about Miranda Warning
https://brainly.com/question/29619409
#SPJ4
Identify the aims and accomplishments of the Virginia Plan proposed by the Constitutional Convention.-It stressed the establishment of a two-house legislature.-Its proposed size and structure for Congress would bolster the power of the larger states.-argued that the country's large size and diversity of interests would be its strength-found support from cosmopolitan areas
Ultimately, the Virgi/nia Plan was one of the proposals that led to the creation of the United States Constitution. Its aim was to establish a strong central government that could effectively govern the diverse interests of the states. It accomplished this by proposing a bicameral legislature based on proportional representation, which would give more power to the larger states, and by establishing the executive and judicial branches of the government.
What is Constitutional Convention?Generally, The Vi/rginia Plan was proposed by James Madison at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. Its main aims were to establish a strong central government and to provide for the representation of the people based on population. The plan proposed the following:
A bicameral legislature: The Vir/ginia Plan called for a two-house legislature, with a lower house elected by the people and an upper house elected by the lower house.
Proportional representation: The number of representatives in both houses would be based on each state's population. This proposal was supported by the larger states, as they would have a greater say in the government.
Executive and Judicial branches: The Virgi/nia Plan called for a single executive who would be elected by Congress and a judiciary appointed by the executive.
The Vir/ginia Plan's proposed size and structure for Congress would bolster the power of the larger states. It argued that the country's large size and diversity of interests would be its strength. The Virgi/nia Plan found support from cosmopolitan areas and was seen as a way to balance the interests of different regions.
Read more about Constitutional Convention
https://brainly.com/question/11662939
#SPJ1
when a party wishes to excuse a potential juror without giving a reason, the party may exercise a:
When a party wishes to excuse a potential juror without giving a reason, the party may exercise a peremptory challenge. This is a special type of challenge that allows a party to excuse a potential juror without giving a reason and without the approval of the other party or the court.
This type of challenge allows a party to remove a potential juror from the pool without any reason or explanation; it is a "challenger for cause" that does not require the party to meet a burden of proof or demonstrate cause for the challenge.
In a civil case, each side may exercise a limited number of peremptory challenges; in criminal cases, the state gets a limited number of peremptory challenges and the defendant gets an unlimited number of peremptory challenges.
To know more about peremptory challenge go to
https://brainly.com/question/30655221
#SPJ4
The 1950 case involving the District of Columbia's Washington Board of REALTORS® and the National Association of REALTORS® determined that "trade" involves which transactions?
a. Both interstate and intrastate
b. Interstate only
c. Intrastate only
d. Only transactions outside Washington, D.C.
The 1950 case involving the District of Columbia's Washington Board of REALTORS® and the National Association of REALTORS® determined that "trade" involves both interstate and intrastate. Therefore the correct option is A.
The case was a challenge to the National Association of Real Estate Boards' set of regulations that prohibited real estate brokers from working with minority buyers and sellers. The Supreme Court ruled in the case that the real estate business impacts interstate commerce and is subject to federal control under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.
As a result, the proper answer to the question is: a. Both interstate and intrastate. The Supreme Court ruled that because the real estate sector impacts both interstate and intrastate commerce, the National Association of Real Estate Boards could not govern it in a way that violated federal anti-discrimination legislation.
For such more question on trade:
brainly.com/question/14926566
#SPJ4
What was the stated purpose of the Constitution?
The purpose of the U.S. Constitution was to create a government that could effectively govern the country and protect the individual rights of citizens, while also ensuring that no one branch of government became too powerful.
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States and outlines the framework of the country's government. The stated purpose of the Constitution is to establish a more perfect union, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. The Constitution was created in response to weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation, which governed the country after the American Revolution. The framers of the Constitution sought to create a stronger national government that could effectively govern the country while also protecting the individual rights of citizens. To achieve these goals, the Constitution established a system of checks and balances among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. It also outlines the powers and responsibilities of each branch, as well as the relationship between the federal government and the individual states.
To know more about the U.S. Constitution, click here: https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
the primary legal responsibility of business is to obey the law. true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The primary legal responsibility of a business is to obey the law. This means that businesses must operate within the legal framework established by the government, including complying with relevant laws, regulations, and rules. Businesses must also fulfill their legal obligations, such as paying taxes, obtaining necessary licenses and permits, and complying with labor laws and environmental regulations. While businesses have many other responsibilities, such as fulfilling their obligations to customers and stakeholders, obeying the law is the foundation of any ethical and responsible business practice.
according to the video the juvenile court documentary even though a separate juvenile justice system was created for white youth, african american youth were initially still treated as adults.
The juvenile court system was established in the US a little more than a century ago, with the first court opening in Illinois in 1899. Prior to it, children were judged, tried, and punished like "miniature adults."
Where does the need for a separate juvenile justice system come from?In an effort to keep juvenile offenders out of the criminal justice system and to promote rehabilitation that is specific to each youngster's needs, the United States established a separate juvenile justice system about a century ago.
Why is the creation of a distinct juvenile justice system so important?The core goals of the juvenile justice system are to successfully reintegrate youth into society, improve their abilities, provide habilitation, and provide rehabilitation, in addition to maintaining public safety.
Learn more about juvenile court system: https://brainly.com/question/2342468
#SPJ1
a defendant is found guilty of a misdemeanor. on what grounds must a court grant a new trial?
A defendant is found guilty of a misdemeanor. On Defendant's Motion grounds, a court must grant a new trial. If the defendant moves, the court may vacate any decision and order a fresh trial if the interests of justice demand it.
A trial is defined as a formalized hearing in a law court when a judge and jury insights obtained and deliberate whether a person is convicted of a crime.
A prosecution's trial is the most important step of the process. This stage assists judges in administering justice in a way that is fair to both the defendant and the complainant. It guarantees that the topic is properly considered before concluding whether the accused is responsible or harmless.
A defendant commits a misdemeanor. A new trial must be granted on the basis of the Defendant's Motion. Therefore, if the defendant makes a motion, the court may overrule any judgment and order a new trial if the interests of justice necessitate it.
Learn more about the trial, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/4570749
#SPJ4
marlene is a law school professor speaking about the philosophy of law under the british system. which of the following legal categories is she addressing? multiple choice statutory construction historical jurisdiction jurisprudence ordinances
Marlene is law school professor speaking about philosophy of law under the British system. Jurisprudence of the following legal categories she is addressing.
What is Jurisprudence?Jurisprudence is the study of law, its philosophy, history, and the theoretical foundations that shape its practice. It seeks to understand the nature of law, how it is created, and how it operates in society. Jurisprudence examines the various theories of law, including natural law, legal positivism, and critical legal studies, and analyzes how these theories impact legal decision-making. It also considers the role of judges, the relationship between law and morality, and the ways in which law interacts with other social institutions. Jurisprudence is an interdisciplinary field that draws on philosophy, political science, sociology, and other disciplines to provide a comprehensive understanding of the law and its effects on society.
To learn more about jurisprudence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26279888
#SPJ1